Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urban Ecosystems 3/2012

01.09.2012

Common factors influence bee foraging in urban and wildland landscapes

verfasst von: Victoria A. Wojcik, Joe R. McBride

Erschienen in: Urban Ecosystems | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Bees are important flower-visiting insects that display differential occurrences at food resources throughout urban and wildland landscapes. This study examined the visitation rates and foraging patterns of eight taxonomic groups of bees that are common to California poppies, Eschscholzia californica, in both landscape types. Bee occurrence was documented in relation to floral resource characteristics (patch area, poppy coverage, and poppy density), local landscape characteristics (distance to the wildland-urban interface, distance to riparian areas, distance to green space, and land use), and regional landscape context (urban versus wildland). Similar abundance and richness measures were recorded at both urban and wildland poppy patches, but community composition varied in each landscape. Bumble bees were more abundant at poppies in the wildland whereas species in the family Halictidae (sweat bees) were more abundant at poppies within the urban landscape. Resource patch size and density consistently correlated with increased bee presence for all bee types foraging in the wildland. Individual patterns of occurrence in the urban landscape were somewhat divergent; the foraging dynamics of larger bodied-bees (Bombus vosnesenskii and Megachile species) correlated significantly with resource patch size and density, whereas smaller-bodied bees (family Halictidae and Andrena species) were influenced by landscape characteristics such as distance to the wildland-urban interface and distance to riparian areas. In summary, the surrounding landscape had an influence on community composition, but the magnitude of the floral resource present at a site and factors relating to foraging energetics were dominant drivers of local occurrence. These results suggest that management strategies that provide dense and abundant floral resources should be successful in attracting bees, irrespective of their location within the urban matrix.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ahrne K, Bengtsson J, Elmqvist T (2009) Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PLoS 4(5): e5574:1–9 Ahrne K, Bengtsson J, Elmqvist T (2009) Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PLoS 4(5): e5574:1–9
Zurück zum Zitat Antonini Y, Costa RG, Martins RP (2006) Floral preferences of a neotropical stingless bee, melipona quadrifasciata lepeletier (apidad: meliponia) in an urban forest fragment. Braz J Biol 66(2A):463–471PubMedCrossRef Antonini Y, Costa RG, Martins RP (2006) Floral preferences of a neotropical stingless bee, melipona quadrifasciata lepeletier (apidad: meliponia) in an urban forest fragment. Braz J Biol 66(2A):463–471PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo ED, Costa M, Chaud-Netto J, Fowler HG (2004) Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (hymenotpera: meliponini): inference of flight range and possible ecological implications. Braz J Biol 64(3B):563–568PubMedCrossRef Araujo ED, Costa M, Chaud-Netto J, Fowler HG (2004) Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (hymenotpera: meliponini): inference of flight range and possible ecological implications. Braz J Biol 64(3B):563–568PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bierzychudek P (1981) Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. Am Nat 117:838–840CrossRef Bierzychudek P (1981) Pollinator limitation of plant reproductive effort. Am Nat 117:838–840CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buchmann SL, Ascher JS (2005) The plight of pollinating bees. Bee World 86:71–74 Buchmann SL, Ascher JS (2005) The plight of pollinating bees. Bee World 86:71–74
Zurück zum Zitat Cane J, Minckley R, Kervin L, Roulston T, Williams N (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (hymenoptera: apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644PubMedCrossRef Cane J, Minckley R, Kervin L, Roulston T, Williams N (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (hymenoptera: apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carre G, Roch P, Chifflet R, Morison N, Bommarco R, Harrison-Cripps J, Krewenka K, Potts S, Roberts SPM, Rodet G, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Szentgyorgyi H, Tscheulin T, Westphal C, Woyciechowski M, Vaissiere B (2009) Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:40–47CrossRef Carre G, Roch P, Chifflet R, Morison N, Bommarco R, Harrison-Cripps J, Krewenka K, Potts S, Roberts SPM, Rodet G, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Szentgyorgyi H, Tscheulin T, Westphal C, Woyciechowski M, Vaissiere B (2009) Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:40–47CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cartar RV, Real LA (1997) Habitat structure and animal movement: the behaviour of bumble bees in uniform and random spatial resource distributions. Oecologia 112:430–434CrossRef Cartar RV, Real LA (1997) Habitat structure and animal movement: the behaviour of bumble bees in uniform and random spatial resource distributions. Oecologia 112:430–434CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Collevatti RG, Schoereder JH, Campos LAO (2000) Foraging behavior of bee pollinators on the tropical weed Triumfetta semitriloba: flight distance and directionality. Rev Bras Biol 60:29–37PubMedCrossRef Collevatti RG, Schoereder JH, Campos LAO (2000) Foraging behavior of bee pollinators on the tropical weed Triumfetta semitriloba: flight distance and directionality. Rev Bras Biol 60:29–37PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fetridge ED, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (hymneoptera: apoidea). Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:1067–1077CrossRef Fetridge ED, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (hymneoptera: apoidea). Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:1067–1077CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Schindler M, Hernandez JL, Ertter B, Rizzardi M (2005) Ecological patterns of bees and their host ornamental flowers in two northern California cities. J Kans Entomol Soc 78:227–246CrossRef Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Schindler M, Hernandez JL, Ertter B, Rizzardi M (2005) Ecological patterns of bees and their host ornamental flowers in two northern California cities. J Kans Entomol Soc 78:227–246CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez JL, Rizzardi M, Ertter B, Pawelek JC, Witt SL, Schindler M, Coville R, Wojcik VA (2009) Native bees are a rich natural resource in urban California gardens. Calif Agric 63:113–120CrossRef Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez JL, Rizzardi M, Ertter B, Pawelek JC, Witt SL, Schindler M, Coville R, Wojcik VA (2009) Native bees are a rich natural resource in urban California gardens. Calif Agric 63:113–120CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764CrossRef Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ginsberg HS (1983) Foraging ecology of bees in an old field. Ecology 64:165–175CrossRef Ginsberg HS (1983) Foraging ecology of bees in an old field. Ecology 64:165–175CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goulson D (1999) Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2:185–209CrossRef Goulson D (1999) Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2:185–209CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenleaf SS, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596PubMedCrossRef Greenleaf SS, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Heinrich B, Mudge P, Deringis P (1977) A laboratory analysis of flower constancy in foraging bumblebees: Bomus ternarius and B. terricola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:247–266CrossRef Heinrich B, Mudge P, Deringis P (1977) A laboratory analysis of flower constancy in foraging bumblebees: Bomus ternarius and B. terricola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:247–266CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hisamatsu M, Yamane S (2006) Faunal makeup of wild bees and their flower utilization in a semi-urbanized area in central Japan. Entomol Sci 9:137–145CrossRef Hisamatsu M, Yamane S (2006) Faunal makeup of wild bees and their flower utilization in a semi-urbanized area in central Japan. Entomol Sci 9:137–145CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kevan P (2001) Pollination: a plinth, pedestal, and pillar for terrestrial productivity: the why, how, and where of pollination protection, conservation, and promotion. Bees and Crop Pollination-Crisis, Crossroads, and Conservation 7–68 Kevan P (2001) Pollination: a plinth, pedestal, and pillar for terrestrial productivity: the why, how, and where of pollination protection, conservation, and promotion. Bees and Crop Pollination-Crisis, Crossroads, and Conservation 7–68
Zurück zum Zitat Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Appl Ecol 40:837–845CrossRef Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Appl Ecol 40:837–845CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knight TM, Steets JA, Varmosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MO, Johnston RJ, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–497CrossRef Knight TM, Steets JA, Varmosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MO, Johnston RJ, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:467–497CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kremen C, Bugg RL, Nicola N, Smith SA, Thorp RW, Williams NM (2002) Native bees, native plants, and crop pollination in California. Fremontia 30(3–4):41–49 Kremen C, Bugg RL, Nicola N, Smith SA, Thorp RW, Williams NM (2002) Native bees, native plants, and crop pollination in California. Fremontia 30(3–4):41–49
Zurück zum Zitat Kremen C, Williams N, Bugg RL, Fay JP, Thorp RW (2004) The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett 7:1109–1119CrossRef Kremen C, Williams N, Bugg RL, Fay JP, Thorp RW (2004) The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett 7:1109–1119CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linsley EG (1958) The ecology of bees. Hilgardia 27:543–599 Linsley EG (1958) The ecology of bees. Hilgardia 27:543–599
Zurück zum Zitat Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KL (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc Ecol 22:601–615CrossRef Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KL (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc Ecol 22:601–615CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loram A, Thompson K, Warren PH, Gaston KL (2008) Urban domestic gardens (XII): the richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. J Veg Sci 19:321–330CrossRef Loram A, Thompson K, Warren PH, Gaston KL (2008) Urban domestic gardens (XII): the richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. J Veg Sci 19:321–330CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matteson KC, Langellotto GA (2010) Determinates of inner city butterfly and bee species richness. Urban Ecosyst 13:333–347CrossRef Matteson KC, Langellotto GA (2010) Determinates of inner city butterfly and bee species richness. Urban Ecosyst 13:333–347CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150CrossRef Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McFrederick QS, LeBuhn G (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (hymenoptera: apidea)? Biol Conserv 123:372–382CrossRef McFrederick QS, LeBuhn G (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (hymenoptera: apidea)? Biol Conserv 123:372–382CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McIntyre NE, Hostetler ME (2001) Effects of urban land use on pollinator (hymenoptera: apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic Appl Ecol 2:209–218CrossRef McIntyre NE, Hostetler ME (2001) Effects of urban land use on pollinator (hymenoptera: apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic Appl Ecol 2:209–218CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Zurück zum Zitat Murray TE, Kuhlmann M, Potts SG (2009) Conservation ecology of bees: populations, species and communities. Apidologie 40:211–236CrossRef Murray TE, Kuhlmann M, Potts SG (2009) Conservation ecology of bees: populations, species and communities. Apidologie 40:211–236CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nates-Parra G, Parra A, Rodrigues A, Baquero P, Velez D (2006) Wild bees (hymenoptera: apoidea) in urban ecosystems: preliminary survey in the city of Bogota and its surroundings. Rev Colomb Entomol 32:77–84 Nates-Parra G, Parra A, Rodrigues A, Baquero P, Velez D (2006) Wild bees (hymenoptera: apoidea) in urban ecosystems: preliminary survey in the city of Bogota and its surroundings. Rev Colomb Entomol 32:77–84
Zurück zum Zitat Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326CrossRef Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts T, Imhoff M (2003) Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: local priority ecoregions for conservation. Conserv Ecol 8:1 Ricketts T, Imhoff M (2003) Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: local priority ecoregions for conservation. Conserv Ecol 8:1
Zurück zum Zitat Roubik DW, Ackerman JD, Copenhaver C, Smith BH (1982) Stratum, tree, and flower selection by tropical bees: implications for the reproductive biology of outcrossing cochlospermum vitifolium in panama. Ecology 63(3):712–720CrossRef Roubik DW, Ackerman JD, Copenhaver C, Smith BH (1982) Stratum, tree, and flower selection by tropical bees: implications for the reproductive biology of outcrossing cochlospermum vitifolium in panama. Ecology 63(3):712–720CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saure C (1996) Urban habitats for bees: the example of the City of Berlin. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH (eds) The conservation of bees. Academic, New York, pp 47–54 Saure C (1996) Urban habitats for bees: the example of the City of Berlin. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH (eds) The conservation of bees. Academic, New York, pp 47–54
Zurück zum Zitat Steffan-Dewenter I, Kuhn A (2003) Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc Biol Sci 270:569–575PubMedCrossRef Steffan-Dewenter I, Kuhn A (2003) Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc Biol Sci 270:569–575PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432CrossRef Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KL (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Veg Sci 14:71–78CrossRef Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KL (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Veg Sci 14:71–78CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tommasi D, Miro A, Higo HA, Winston ML (2004) Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Can Entomol 136:851–869CrossRef Tommasi D, Miro A, Higo HA, Winston ML (2004) Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Can Entomol 136:851–869CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223PubMedCrossRef Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Witham TG (1977) Coevolution of foraging in Bombus and nectar dispersing in Chilopsis: a last dreg theory. Science 197:593–595CrossRef Witham TG (1977) Coevolution of foraging in Bombus and nectar dispersing in Chilopsis: a last dreg theory. Science 197:593–595CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wojcik VA (2011) Resource abundance and distribution drive bee visitation within developing tropical urban landscapes. J Pollinat Ecol 4:48–56 Wojcik VA (2011) Resource abundance and distribution drive bee visitation within developing tropical urban landscapes. J Pollinat Ecol 4:48–56
Zurück zum Zitat Wojcik VA, Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez JL (2008) Seasonality in bees and their floral resource plants at a constructed urban bee habitat in Berkeley, California. J Kans Entomol Soc 81:15–28CrossRef Wojcik VA, Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez JL (2008) Seasonality in bees and their floral resource plants at a constructed urban bee habitat in Berkeley, California. J Kans Entomol Soc 81:15–28CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zurbuchen A, Chessman S, Klaiber J, Muller A, Hein S, Dorn S (2010) Long foraging distances impose high costs on offspring production in solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 79:674–681PubMedCrossRef Zurbuchen A, Chessman S, Klaiber J, Muller A, Hein S, Dorn S (2010) Long foraging distances impose high costs on offspring production in solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 79:674–681PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Common factors influence bee foraging in urban and wildland landscapes
verfasst von
Victoria A. Wojcik
Joe R. McBride
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Urban Ecosystems / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1083-8155
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1642
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0211-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Urban Ecosystems 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe