nach oben

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal

Erschienen in:

22.05.2020

The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results

verfasst von: Marina Estrada-Cruz, Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández, Antonio J. Verdú-Jover, Jose Maria Gómez-Gras

Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Although the field of strategic entrepreneurship has received much attention in recent years, the relationship of strategic entrepreneurship to context is fundamental to understanding the conditions under which strategic entrepreneurship is most necessary. This study analyses the impact of strategic entrepreneurship on the organization’s results, in focusing especially on whether this impact is greater in an environment of high competitive intensity. Performed on a sample of 358 Spanish SMEs, the study suggests that carrying out a strategic venture has a positive influence the company’s results and that this positive relationship improves in situations of high competitiveness.

Nächster Artikel Ethical leadership and ambidexterity in young firms: examining the CEO-TMT Interface

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abebe, M. A., & Angriawan, A. (2014). Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 339–345.

Alvarez, S. A. (2003). Resources and hierarchies: Intersections between entrepreneurship and strategy. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Springer.

Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69, 61–83.

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective in new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 1–29.

Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652–1661.

Awang, A., Kassim, A., Noor, A. M., Shukor, N., Shaari, A. Z., Amran, S., & Khalid, S. A. (2015). Strategic entrepreneurship model for economic transformation: Malaysian evidence. Asian Social Science, 11(7), 19.

Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr., D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.

Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(3), 373–400.

Bedford, D. S., Bisbe, J., & Sweeney, B. (2019). Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 21–37.

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploration, exploitation, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

Bierly, P., & Daly, P. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493–516.

Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of the subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221–241.

Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., et al. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.

Boone, C., & de Brabander, B. (1993). Generalized vs. specific locus of control expectancies of chief executive officers. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 619–625.

Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2012). Coopetition: Performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(5), 1250028-1-1250028-28.

Brizek, M. G. (2014). Explaining corporate entrepreneurship: A contemporary literature investigation. Journal of management and marketing research, 14, 1.

Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic flexibility: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31.

Burgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (2007). Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—Repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 965–979.

Busenitz, L. W., Gomex, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Interlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.

Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.

Chang, S. J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184.

Cingöz, A., & Akdoğan, A. A. (2013). Strategic flexibility, environmental dynamism, and innovation performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 582–589.

Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Routledge.

Covin, J. G. Y., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 28, 439–462.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2002). The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 309–327). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81.

Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

Deligianni, I., Voudouris, I., & Lioukas, S. (2017). Do effectuation processes shape the relationship between product diversification and performance in new ventures? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 349–377.

Deming, W. E. (1981). Japanese methods for productivity and quality. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.

Dess, G., & Beard, D. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73.

Dolz, C., Safón, V., Iborra, M., & Dasí, A. (2014). Antecedentes y dinamismo de la ambidestreza organizativa en las Pymes. INNOVAR. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 24(53), 161–175.

Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regression II. Biometrika, 38, 159–178.

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1249–1259.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedent, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

Gómez-Gras, J. M., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2005). TQM, structural and strategic flexibility and performance: An empirical research study. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 16(7), 841–860.

Gruber-Muecke, T., & Hofer, K. M. (2015). Market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and performance in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(3), 560–571.

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2016). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies, 37(2), 213–235.

Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Kim, H. B. (2001). Entry barriers: A dull-, one-, or two-edged sword for incumbents? Unraveling the paradox from a contingency perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65, 1–14.

Hanson, D., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalisation. Cengage AU.

Hanssen-Bauer, J., & Snow, C. C. (1996). Responding to hypercompetition: The structure and processes of a regional learning network organization. Organization Science, 7, 413–427.

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494.

Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1899–1931.

Hitt, M. A., & Reed, T. S. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the new competitive landscape. In G. Meyer & K. Heppard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the Management of Growing Enterprises: Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial edge. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..

Hitt, M., Keats, B., & DeMarie, S. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 22–43.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue. Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 479–491.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2011a). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization (9th Ed.). Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Sirmon, D. G., & Trahms, C. (2011b). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57–75.

Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 77–94.

Homburg, C., Krohmer, H., & Workman, J. P. (1999). Strategic consensus and performance: The role of strategy type and market-relate dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 339–357.

Ireland, R., & Webb, J. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49–59.

Ireland, R., & Webb, J. (2009). Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 52(5), 469–479.

Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship actions and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49–63.

Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.

Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volverda, H. W. (2006). Exploration innovation, exploitation innovation and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.

Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical research memoirs.

Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.

Jurczak, J. (2008). Intellectual capital measurement methods. Economics and organization of enterprise, 1(1), 37–45.

Kantur, D. (2016). Strategic entrepreneurship: Mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link. Management Decision, 54(1), 24–43.

Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.

Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413–427.

Kraus, S., Breier, M., Jones, P., & Hughes, M. (2019). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-22.

Kuratko, D., & Audretsch, D. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17.

Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: The innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245–253.

Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60.

Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). Myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.

Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Caroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization. Science, 10, 535–550.

López, E., Grcía, F. E., & García, S. M. (2012). De la organización que aprende a la organización ambidiestra: evolución teórica del aprendizaje organizativo. Cuadernos de Administración, 25(45), 11–37.

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449–470.

Lumpkin, G. T. Y., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–171.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: A moderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(2), 128–148.

Miller, D. Y., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25.

Mitchell, R. K. (2011). Increasing returns and the domain of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 615–629.

Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1050–1073.

Nason, R. S., & Wiklund, J. (2018). An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of Management, 44(1), 32–60.

Nosella, A., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Strategic Organization, 10(4), 450–465.

Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2012). Power, trust, social exchange and community support. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 997–1023.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, Third Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York:

O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Ambidexterity as dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

O’Reilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., Chatman, J. A., & Doerr, B. (2014). The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 595–625.

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.

Paek, B., & Lee, H. (2018). Strategic entrepreneurship and competitive advantage of established firms: Evidence from the digital TV industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(4), 883–925.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249.

Qiu, L., Lu, J., Yang, S., Qu, W., & Zhu, T. (2015). What does your selfie say about you? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 443–449.

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

Ramírez, R., & Selsky, J. W. (2016). Strategic planning in turbulent environments: A social ecology approach to scenarios. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 90–102.

Rousseau, D. M., & Batt, R. (2007). Global competition’s perfect storm: Why business and labor cannot solve their problems alone. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(2), 6–23.

SABI. (2013) -Bureau Van Dijk. https://sabi.bvdinfo.com.

Sandberg, W. R., & Hofer, C. W. (1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 5–28.

Schindehutte, M., & Morris, M. H. (2009). Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: The role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 241–276.

Schulze, P., Heinemann, F., & Abedin, A. (2008). ‘Balancing exploitation and exploration’. Paper pre-sented at the annual meeting of the academy of management. Anaheim.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: University Press.

Shirokova, G., Vega, G., & Sokolova, L. (2013). Performance of Russian SMEs: Exploration, exploitation and strategic entrepreneurship. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 9(1–2), 173–203.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624.

Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.

Sirén, C. A., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 18–41.

Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524.

Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.

Stettner, U., & Lavie, D. (2014). Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1903–1929.

Sun, Z. (2015). Technology innovation and entrepreneurial state: The development of China's high-speed rail industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(6), 646–659.

Sun, J., Yao, M., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., & Liu, Y. (2016). Entrepreneurial environment, market-oriented strategy, and entrepreneurial performance: A study of Chinese automobile firms. Internet Research, 26(2), 546–562.

Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, pp., 35, 463–486.

Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–30.

Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S.firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–557.

Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231.

Valencia-Arias, A., Flórez, L. G., Restrepo, L. A. M., López, A. M. U., & Restrepo, I. M. (2017). Consideraciones acerca del emprendimiento estratégico como síntesis funcional de la identificación de oportunidades y la creación de ventajas competitivas. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, 52, 143–159.

Van Rensburg, D. J. (2013). Is strategic entrepreneurship a pleonasm? Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(1), 15–27.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujan, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.

Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459–1477.

Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832–847.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

Wiklund, J. Y., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.

Williams, L. J., Gavin, M. B., & Hartman, N. S. (2004). Structural equation modeling methods in strategy research: Applications and issues. In D. Ketchen, J. Jr, & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), research methodology in strategy and management (vol.1). Oxford: Elsevier.

Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.

Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 319–340.

Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.

Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2015). How is ambidexterity initiated? The emergent charter definition process. Organization Science, 26(4), 1119–1139.

Titel: The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results
verfasst von: Marina Estrada-Cruz
Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández
Antonio J. Verdú-Jover
Jose Maria Gómez-Gras
Publikationsdatum: 22.05.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00670-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

The impact of bankruptcy regimes on entrepreneurship and innovation. Is there any relationship?

The interplay of entrepreneurial and non-entrepreneurial internationalization: an illustrative case of an Italian SME

A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model

Disassembling the influences of perceived family relational conflict on business family offspring’s intrapreneurial intentions

Information disclosure ratings and managerial short-termism: An empirical investigation of the Chinese stock market

Ethical leadership and ambidexterity in young firms: examining the CEO-TMT Interface

Premium Partner