nach oben

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

Erschienen in:

17.06.2020

Behavioral portfolio insurance strategies

verfasst von: Marcos Escobar-Anel, Andreas Lichtenstern, Rudi Zagst

Erschienen in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Portfolio insurance strategies that ensure a certain minimum portfolio value or floor such as the Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) and the Option-based Portfolio Insurance are economically important and widely spread among the banking and insurance industries. In distress and volatile market environments, investors such as pension funds have a need to insure their portfolios against downside risk in order to meet certain future payments or liabilities. Non-anticipated shocks or negative interest rates, jumps, crashes, or overnight trading restrictions in stock prices could drop pension fund portfolios below desired levels (present value of pension obligations) making them underfunded with pension assets to pension liabilities ratio below 100%. In particular, within the current low interest rate environment, a high number of pension funds happen to be underfunded which is a severe practical problem. Because of such scenarios, there is a need for an investment strategy which covers both the case of funded and underfunded portfolios. This article introduces a novel strategy which generalizes the CPPI approach. It has the overall target of guaranteeing the investment goal or floor while participating in the performance of the assets and limiting the downside risk of the portfolio at the same time. We show that the strategy accounts for behavioral aspects of the investor such as distorted probabilities, a risk-averse behavior for gains, and a risk-seeking behavior for losses. The proposed strategy turns out to be optimal within the Cumulative Prospect Theory framework by Tversky and Kahneman (J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323, 1992).

Nächster Artikel Time-consistent mean–variance asset-liability management in a regime-switching jump-diffusion market

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The market consists of one risky and one risk-free asset with parameters \(\mu = 5\%\), \({\sigma = 20\%}\), \(r = 1\%\) and planning horizon \(T = 1\) year. Moreover, \(V_\mathrm{CPPI}(0) = 10\) and \({\alpha _{T} = 90\%}\) which lead to \(F = 9\); the multiplier is set to \(m = 4\). In particular this implies the starting exposure \(E(0) = 4.36\) to the active risky asset and thus \({{\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}(0) = \frac{E(0)}{V_\mathrm{CPPI}(0)} = 43.6\%}\).

Note that a change in the interest rate is not covered by the model assumptions and thus considered as an external shock of the model parameters.

\(\lambda _{DI}^{(u)}(t)\) is selected optimally based on a given portfolio optimization problem that is introduced later. More information is provided in Definition (GBPI).

In Sect. 4.2 we show the formula for \(\lambda _{\mathrm{Put}(V_{u},B,T)}^{(u)}(t)\) and explain how the put option can be hedged.

The optimal final payoff for any nonzero reference wealth B can simply be obtained by adding B to the optimal terminal wealth when B is forced to zero, while replacing v by \(v - {\mathbb {E}}[{\tilde{Z}} B]\).

Our analytical derivations work out only when applying the same \(\alpha \) above and below the reference point, nonetheless the theory holds and can be solved numerically for different \(\alpha \) values.

\(\liminf \nolimits _{v \rightarrow \infty }{\left( \frac{-vU''_{+}(v)}{U'_{+}(v)}\right) } = 1-\alpha > 0\).

Moreover, the phenomenon which describes that ‘losses loom larger than gains’ (Kahneman and Tversky 1979), widely known as loss aversion, is satisfied for any \(\beta _{-} > 1\).

It holds \({\mathbb {E}}\left[ U_{+}\left( (U'_{+})^{-1}\left( \frac{{\tilde{Z}}}{w'_{+}(F_{{\tilde{Z}}}({\tilde{Z}}))}\right) \right) w'_{+}(F_{{\tilde{Z}}}({\tilde{Z}}))\right] = \alpha ^{\frac{\alpha }{1-\alpha }} \cdot {\mathbb {E}}\left[ {\tilde{Z}}^{-\frac{\alpha }{1-\alpha }} \cdot w'_{+}(F_{{\tilde{Z}}}({\tilde{Z}}))^{\frac{1}{1-\alpha }}\right] < \infty \) iff \({{\mathbb {E}}\left[ {\tilde{Z}}^{-\frac{\alpha }{1-\alpha }} \cdot w'_{+}(F_{{\tilde{Z}}}({\tilde{Z}}))^{\frac{1}{1-\alpha }}\right] < \infty }\).

One can show theoretically that \(\inf _{c>0} k(c) = 0\) when the distortion by Jin and Zhou (2008) is additionally applied on the negative part under power utility; hence an alternative distortion is inevitable.

Unfortunately, \(w_{-} \equiv \text {id}\) is impossible as the problem turns ill-posed automatically. Further notice that a Prelec distortion with parameter \(\gamma _{-}=0.6\) is indirectly applied within the BPI numerical case study; \(w_{-}\) does not affect the form of the solution, but determines \(c^{*}\) and \(v_{+}^{*}\).

This CPPI strategy coincides with the GBPI strategy in Definition (GBPI) when the probability distortion is selected as identity function (\({a_{+} = b_{+} = 0}\)). The risky relative portfolio \({\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}(t)\) for a portfolio value \(V_{f}(t)\) is given by \({{\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}(t) V_{f}(t) = \frac{1}{1 - \alpha } \left[ V_{f}(t) - e^{-r (T-t)} B\right] \cdot {\hat{\pi }}^{G}}\).

For comparison of the underfunded GBPI strategy, a CPPI strategy on \({\hat{V}}_{u}(t)\) is chosen with multiplier \(\frac{1}{1-\alpha }\), i.e., the relative portfolio \({\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}^{(u)}(t)\) for the value \({\hat{V}}_{u}(t)\) is given by \({{\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}^{(u)}(t) {\hat{V}}_{u}(t) = \frac{1}{1-\alpha } \left[ {\hat{V}}_{u}(t) - e^{-r(T-t)}B\right] \cdot {\hat{\pi }}^{G}}\).

The total strategy for comparison consists of a CPPI strategy to the initial value \({v + \mathrm{Put}(V_{u},B,0,T)}\) and a short put option on \(V_{u}\) with exercise price B and maturity T which finances the CPPI. For the allocation only the CPPI part is visualized (denoted by \({\hat{\pi }}_\mathrm{CPPI}^{(u)}(t)\)), for the wealth process the value of the CPPI minus the value of the put option (denoted by \(V_{CPPI-Put}(t)\)) is plotted.

Allais, M.F.C.: Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21(4), 503–546 (1953)

Ameur, H.B., Prigent, J.L.: Portfolio insurance: gap risk under conditional multiples. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236(1), 238–253 (2014)

Balder, S., Brandl, M., Mahayni, A.: Effectiveness of CPPI strategies under discrete-time trading. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 33(1), 204–220 (2009)

Bernard, C., Ghossoub, M.: Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Financ. Econ. 2(4), 277–306 (2010)

Bernard, C., Kwak, M.: Dynamic preferences corresponding to popular investment strategies in pension funds. Scand. Actuar. J. 5, 398–419 (2016)

Bernard, C., He, X., Yan, J.-A., Zhou, X.Y.: Optimal insurance design under rank-dependent expected utility. Math. Finance 25(1), 154–186 (2015)

Björk, T.: Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

Björk, T., Khapko, M., Murgoci, A.: On time-inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time. Finance Stoch. 21(2), 331–360 (2017)

Black, F., Jones, R.: Simplifying portfolio insurance. J. Portf. Manag. 14(1), 48–51 (1987)

Black, F., Perold, A.: Theory of constant proportion portfolio insurance. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 16, 402–426 (1992)

Black, F., Rouhani, R.: Constant proportion portfolio insurance and the synthetic put option: a comparison. In: Fabozzi, F.J. (ed.) Institutional Investor Focus on Investment Management, pp. 695–708. Ballinger, Cambridge (1989)

Branger, N., Mahayni, A., Schneider, J.C.: On the optimal design of insurance contracts with guarantees. Insur. Math. Econ. 46(3), 485–492 (2010)CrossRef

Chateauneuf, A., Wakker, P.P.: An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory for decision under risk. J. Risk Uncertain. 18(2), 137–145 (1999)CrossRef

Chen, A., Hentschel, F., Klein, J.K.: A utility- and CPT-based comparison of life insurance contracts with guarantees. J. Bank. Finance 61, 327–339 (2015)CrossRef

Coleman, T.F., Li, Y., Patron, M.-C.: Hedging guarantees in variable annuities under both equity and interest rate risks. Insur. Math. Econ. 38(2), 215–228 (2006)CrossRef

Cont, R., Tankov, P.: Constant proportion portfolio insurance in the presence of jumps in asset prices. Math. Finance 19(3), 379–401 (2009)CrossRef

Døskeland, T.M., Nordahl, H.A.: Optimal pension insurance design. J. Bank. Finance 32(3), 382–392 (2008)CrossRef

Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75(4), 643–669 (1961)CrossRef

Fennema, H., Wakker, P.: Original and cumulative prospect theory: a discussion of empirical differences. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 10, 53–64 (1997)CrossRef

Friedman, M., Savage, L.J.: The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Polit. Econ. 56(4), 279–304 (1948)

He, X.D., Zhou, X.Y.: Portfolio choice via quantiles. Math. Finance 21(2), 203–231 (2011)

Jin, H., Zhou, X.Y.: Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3), 385–426 (2008)

Jin, H., Zhou, X.Y.: Greed, leverage, and potential losses: a prospect theory perspective. Math. Finance 23(1), 122–142 (2013)

Jin, H., Xu, Z.Q., Zhou, X.Y.: A convex stochastic optimization problem arising from portfolio selection. Math. Finance 18(1), 171–183 (2008)

Jin, H., Zhang, S., Zhou, X.Y.: Behavioral portfolio selection with loss control. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 27(2), 255–274 (2011)

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–292 (1979)CrossRef

Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E.: Methods of Mathematical Finance. Springer, New York (1998)

Mehra, R., Prescott, E.C.: The equity premium: a puzzle. J. Monet. Econ. 15, 145–161 (1985)

Merton, R.C.: Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. Rev. Econ. Stat. 51(3), 247–257 (1969)

Perold, A.: A Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance. Harvard Business School (1986). Unpublished manuscript

Perold, A., Sharpe, W.: Dynamic strategies for asset allocation. Financ. Anal. J. 16–27 (1988)

Prelec, D.: The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3), 497–527 (1998)CrossRef

Rásonyi, M., Rodrigues, A.M.: Optimal portfolio choice for a behavioral investor in continuous-time markets. Ann. Finance 9(2), 291–318 (2012)

Rásonyi, M., Rodrigues, A.M.: Continuous-time portfolio optimisation for a behavioural investor with bounded utility on gains. Electron. Commun. Probab. 19(38), 1–13 (2014)

Sung, K.C.J., Yam, S.C.P., Yung, S.P., Zhou, J.H.: Behavioral optimal insurance. Insur. Math. Econ. 49(3), 418–428 (2011)CrossRef

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)CrossRef

Tversky, A., Wakker, P.P.: An Axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertain. 7(7), 147–176 (1993)

von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

Wakker, P.P., Zank, H.: A simple preference foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 1253–1271 (2002)CrossRef

Xu, Z.Q.: A note on the quantile formulation. Math. Finance 26(3), 589–601 (2014)

Xu, Z.Q., Zhou, X.Y., Zhuang, S.C.: Optimal insurance under rank-dependent utility and incentive compatibility. Math. Finance 29(2), 659–692 (2019)

Zhou, X.Y.: Mathematicalising behavioral finance. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Hyderabad, India (2010)

Zieling, D., Mahayni, A., Balder, S.: Performance evaluation of optimized portfolio insurance strategies. J. Bank. Finance 43, 212–225 (2014)

Titel: Behavioral portfolio insurance strategies
verfasst von: Marcos Escobar-Anel
Andreas Lichtenstern
Rudi Zagst
Publikationsdatum: 17.06.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Financial Markets and Portfolio Management / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1934-4554
Elektronische ISSN: 2373-8529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-020-00353-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Time-consistent mean–variance asset-liability management in a regime-switching jump-diffusion market

Dominance of hybrid contratum strategies over momentum and contrarian strategies: half a century of evidence

Marcos M. López de Prado: Machine learning for asset managers

Flight-to-quality in the stock–bond return relation: a regime-switching copula approach