Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Review of Managerial Science
Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science 2/2017

22.12.2015 | Original Paper

Prior education and entrepreneurial intentions: the differential impact of a wide range of fields of study

verfasst von: Aurora A. C. Teixeira, Rosa Portela Forte

Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Studies on entrepreneurial intentions often neglect the heterogeneity of individuals’ education background. This paper develops an integrated intention-based framework and analyzes the impact of fields of study on entrepreneurial intentions. Based on a sample of 2423 final-year students, enrolled in 32 fields of study, and resorting to logistic estimations, we find that, beside the attitude towards starting a business, fields of study, considered at a highly detailed level, are relevant (direct and indirect) predictors of entrepreneurial intention. We unambiguously show that there is a huge hidden potential for new venture creation in fields of study related to creative and leisure activities (e.g., Arts and humanities, or, more specifically, Literature and linguistics, History and archaeology, Audio-visual techniques and media production, Sports, and Architecture and town planning), Law, and Health (most notably, Pharmacy and Veterinary). Significant differences in the level of intention between students of different fields of study indicate that universities should more extensively focus entrepreneurship education on students in other subject area than business or engineering/technology sciences.
Vorheriger Artikel The interaction between stock prices and corporate investment: is Europe different?
Nächster Artikel Applying firm attention theory to assess the antecedents of firm participation in regulatory processes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
A table with the list of these studies which explicitly identifies the educational background (i.e., course/major/field of study) of the students surveyed can be available on request from the authors.
 
2
To categorize the different education programs, we use the detailed educational field classification, ISCED 2013 (UNESCO 2014).
 
3
Personality factors, namely age, gender and academic performance, are included in the model as control variables in line with the extant literature in the area (see Walter and Heinrichs 2015).
 
4
Although the data are rather old, they are still a valid basis for deriving current conclusions, seeing as entrepreneurial values and intentions have not changed much since 2007, neither in the education system nor in the start-up behavior. Even though the Bologna Process was formally implemented in Portugal in 2006 (by Decree-Law no 74/2006), according to Leite and Ramos (2014: 81), “…the implementation of the new teaching/learning framework represents a challenge not fully overcome within HEI”. Moreover, a recent study by Barros (2015) shows that the financial crises did not have a major impact on students’ values and attitudes towards entrepreneurship: no significant statistical differences were found between the students of the 2012 cohort and students of the 2006 cohort in terms of achievement, risk, authority or autonomy.
 
5
Nonresponse bias might occur when (Yu and Cooper 1983: 36) “a researcher (1) fails to obtain information from a sizable portion of the sample members and (2) the missing members' responses affect conclusions about the variables of interest. Sample members may become nonrespondents because they refuse to respond, lack the ability to respond, or are inaccessible to the researcher.”
 
6
From the total responses gathered (2430), 7 responses were discarded as no valid information on the field of study was provided by the respondents.
 
7
The school of Economics, namely the economics and management courses (representing 20 % in the sample versus 13 % in the population), was overrepresented in the sample, whereas the two schools of medicine, and the corresponding medicine courses, were underrepresented (4 % in the sample versus 10 % in the population). All the remaining schools and courses presented similar weights in the sample and in the population.
 
8
Data analysis is available from the authors upon request.
 
9
Internal reliability or consistency refers to the overall degree to which the items that make up a scale are intercorrelated, whereas homogeneity and unidimensionality indicate whether the scale items assess a single underlying factor or construct (Clark and Watson 1995). Internal consistency is a necessary but not sufficient condition for homogeneity or unidimensionality. In other words, a scale cannot be homogeneous unless all of its items are interrelated, but a scale can contain many interrelated items and still not be unidimensional. Because theory-driven assessment seeks to measure a single construct systematically, the ultimate goal to pursue is that of homogeneity or unidimensionality rather than internal consistency per se.
 
10
All models included the control variables (age, gender and academic performance) as well as the variables prior entrepreneurial exposure (PEE) and learning orientation (LO) which proxied the construct ‘Other entrepreneurial knowledge/human capital’. We also estimated specifications that include the mediating effects of these latter variables via perceived individual control and perceived power but the estimates fail to be statistical significant and the signal and significance levels did not changed for the other estimates.
 
11
This evidence is presented in Table 2, in the Appendix and corresponds to Model I considering broad FS (estimated model in Table 3, in the Appendix). For the remaining baseline models, correlation matrixes are available upon request from the authors.
 
12
Conventional estimation techniques (e.g., multiple regression analysis), in the context of a discrete dependent variable, are not a valid option. First, the assumptions needed for hypothesis testing in conventional regression analysis are necessarily violated—it is unreasonable to assume, for instance, that the distribution of errors is normal. Second, in multiple regression analysis, predicted values cannot be interpreted as probabilities—they are not constrained to fall in the interval between 0 and 1.
 
13
If we considered broad FS (Table 3 in the Appendix), only ‘Arts and humanities’ emerges as significantly (p value <0.001) and directly related to entrepreneurial intentions. ‘Business, administration and law’, ‘Services (Sports)’ and ‘Education’ are positively and significantly associated with entrepreneurial intentions at the 0.05 significance level.
 
14
We also estimated the indirect impact of PEE and LO via PiC and PP (results not shown but available upon request from the authors) but again results failed to emerge as statistically significant.
 
15
Between 2003 and 2007, Portugal presented one of the highest firm mortality rates (13 %) among the European countries—only the rate for Lithuania (17.1 %) was higher (Source: Eurostat).
 
16
See Table 5 in Appendix for the concrete figures.
 
17
We are indebted to one of the referees for this important insight.
 
Literatur
Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Open University Press, Milton-Keynes, England and Dorsey Press, Chicago, IL
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRef
Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitude, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:453–474CrossRef
Aldrich HE, Rosen B, Woodward W (1987) The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: a longitudinal study. In: Churchill NC, Hornaday JA, Krasner OJ, Vesper KH (eds) Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, Babson College
Allison PD (1999) Multiple regression: a primer. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
Añaña ES, Nique W (2010) Personal values in relation to graduate career choices. Int J Public Sect Manag 23(2):158–168CrossRef
Anderson DR, Sweeney DJ, Williams TA (2002) Statistics for business and economics. Mason, South-Western
Astebro T, Bazzazian N, Braguinsky S (2012) Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Res Policy 41(4):663–677CrossRef
Autio E, Keeley RH, Klofsten M, Parker GC, Hay M (2001) Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterp Innov Manag Stud 2(2):145–160CrossRef
Bae TJ, Qian S, Miao C, Fiet JO (2014) The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a meta-analytic review. Entrep Theory Pract 38(2):217–254CrossRef
Bagheri A, Pihie ZAL (2011) On becoming an entrepreneurial leader: a focus on the impacts of university entrepreneurship programs. Am J Appl Sci 8(9):884–892CrossRef
Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H, Yi Y (1992) Appraisal processes in the enactment of intentions to use coupons. Psychol Mark 9(6):469–486CrossRef
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215CrossRef
Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37:122–147CrossRef
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Barros AF (2015) Crisis, what crisis? The life goals of university-aged students during an ongoing economic and financial crisis. Curr Psychol 34:434–446CrossRef
Bird B (1988) Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Acad Manag Rev 13(3):442–453
Boyd NG, Vozikis GS (1994) The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep Theory Pract 18:63
Brancu L, Guðmundsdóttir S, Gligor D, Munteanu V (2015) Is culture a moderator of entrepreneurship motivation? A comparative study of Romania and Iceland. Amfiteatru Econ 17(38):133–147
Buttar HM (2015) Formation of entrepreneurial career intentions: the role of sociocognitive factors. J Employ Couns 52(1):2–17 CrossRef
Byabashaija W, Katono I (2011) The impact of college entrepreneurial education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention to start a business in Uganda. J Dev Entrep 16:127–144CrossRef
Carr JC, Sequeira JM (2007) Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: a theory if planned behavior approach. J Bus Res 60:1090–1098CrossRef
Carsrud A, Brännback M (2011) Entrepreneurial motivations: what do we still need to know? J Small Bus Manag 49(1):9–26CrossRef
Clark LA, Watson D (1995) Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess 7(3):309–319CrossRef
Cruz S, Teixeira AAC (2015) The neglected heterogeneity of spatial agglomeration and co-location patterns of creative employment: evidence from Portugal. Ann Reg Sci 54(1):143–177CrossRef
Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18(3):301–331CrossRef
De Clercq D, Honig B, Martin B (2013) The roles of learning orientation and passion for work in the formation of entrepreneurial intention. Int Small Bus J 31(6):652–676CrossRef
Díaz-Casero J, Ferreira J, Mogollón R, Raposo M (2012) Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: a comparative study of two countries university students. Int Entrep Manag J 8(1):55–74CrossRef
Dohse D, Walter SG (2012) Knowledge context and entrepreneurial intentions among students. Small Bus Econ 39(4):877–895CrossRef
Douglas EJ (2013) Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. J Bus Ventur 28(5):633–651CrossRef
Douglas EJ, Shepherd DA (2000) Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. J Bus Ventur 15(3):231–251CrossRef
Engle RL, Schlaegel C, Dimitriadi N (2010) Institutions and entrepreneurial intent: a cross-country study. J Dev Entrep 16(2):227–250CrossRef
Ewert A, Baker D (2001) Standing for where you sit: an exploratory analysis of the relationship between academic major and environment beliefs. Environ Behav 33(5):687–707CrossRef
Farrington S, Venter D, Schrage C, van der Meer P (2012) Entrepreneurial attributes of undergraduate business students: a three country comparison revisited. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci 15(4):333–351
Fayolle A, Gailly B (2015) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: hysteresis and persistence. J Small Bus Manag 53(1):75–93CrossRef
Fayolle A, Liñán F (2014) The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Res 67(5):663–666CrossRef
Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, UK
Hassan RA, Wafa SA (2012) Predictors towards entrepreneurial intention: a Malaysian case study. Asian J Bus Manag Sci 1(11):1–10
Helms MM, Rutti RM, Lorenz M, Ramsey J, Armstrong CE (2014) A quest for global entrepreneurs: the importance of cultural intelligence on commitment to entrepreneurial education. IntJ Entrep Small Bus 23(3):385–404CrossRef
Karppinen H, Berghäll S (2015) Forest owners’ stand improvement decisions: applying the theory of planned behavior. For Policy Econ 50:275–284CrossRef
Katz J, Gartner WB (1988) Properties of emerging organizations. Acad Manag Rev 13(3):429–441
Kautonen T, Van Gelderen M, Fink M (2015) Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep Theory Pract 39(3):655–674CrossRef
Kolvereid L (1996) Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 20(3):47–56
Kolvereid L, Isaksen E (2006) New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. J Bus Ventur 21:866–885CrossRef
Kopanidis FZ, Shaw MJ (2014) Courses and careers: measuring how students’ personal values matter. Educ Train 56(5):397–413CrossRef
Krueger NF (1993) The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrep Theory Pract 18:5–21
Krueger NF (2009) Entrepreneurial intentions are dead: long live entrepreneurial intentions. In: Carsrud AL, Brännback M (eds) Understanding the entrepreneurial mind. Springer, New York, pp 51–72CrossRef
Krueger NF, Carsrud AL (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrep Reg Dev 5(4):315–330CrossRef
Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15(5–6):411–432CrossRef
Lahaut VMHCJ, Jansen HAM, Van De Mheen D, Garretsen HFL, Verdurmen JEE, Van Dijk A (2003) Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: comparison of response waves. Alcohol Alcohol 38(2):128–134CrossRef
Landström H, Harirchi G, Åström F (2012) Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Res Policy 41(7):1154–1181CrossRef
Lanero A, Vázquez J-L, Muñoz-Adánez A (2015) Un modelo social cognitivo de intenciones emprendedoras en estudiantes universitários. Anales de Psicologia 31(1):243–259
Ledden L, Kalafatis PS, Samouel P (2007) The relationship between personal values and perceived value of education. J Bus Res 60(9):965–974CrossRef
Lee SH, Wong PK (2004) An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: a career anchor perspective. J Bus Ventur 19(1):7–28CrossRef
Leite C, Ramos K (2014) Políticas do ensino superior em Portugal na fase pós-Bolonha: implicações no desenvolvimento do currículo e das exigências ao exercício docente. Revista Lusófona de Educação 28:73–89
Liñán F, Fayolle A (2015) A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. Int Entrep Manag J. doi:10.​1007/​s11365-015-0356-5
Luthje C, Franke N (2003) The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Manag 33(2):135–148 CrossRef
Martínez D, Mora J-G, Vila L (2007) Entrepreneurs, the self-employed and employees amongst young European higher education graduates. Eur J Educ 42(1):99–117CrossRef
Nab J, Bulte AMW, Pilot A (2013) Fostering the competence of science students in identifying business opportunities: a design research approach. Int J Entrep Ventur 5(1):28–47CrossRef
Nabi G, Holden R, Walmsley A (2010) Entrepreneurial intentions among students: towards a re-focused research agenda. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 17(4):537–551CrossRef
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Pailot P (2003) La socialisation entrepreneuriale du chercheur-créateur, in Verstraete T., Dir., La création d’entreprise par les chercheurs de la fonction publique : exploration des dimensions appelées par la loi sur l’innovation du 12 huillet 1999, Rapport du CLAREE pour le CNRS, Contrat APN
Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method bias in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903CrossRef
Prabhu VP, McGuire SJ, Drost EA, Kwong KK (2012) Proactive personality and entrepreneurial intent: is entrepreneurial self-efficacy a mediator or moderator? Int J Entrep Behav Res 18(5):559–586CrossRef
Richardson WE (1993) Academic major and alumni perception of growth and development, paper presented at the 33rd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago
Rittippant N, Kokchang W, Vanichkitpisan P, Chompoodang S (2011) Measure of entrepreneurial intention of young adults in Thailand. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2011), 20–21 September 2011, Singapore, pp 215–226
Saeed S, Yousafzai SY, Yani-De-Soriano M, Muffatto M (2015) The Role of Perceived University support in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intention. J Small Bus Manag 53(4):1127–1145CrossRef
Sánchez JC (2011) University training for entrepreneurial competencies: its impact on intention of venture creation. Int Entrep Manag J 7(2):239–254CrossRef
Sarasvathy D (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Schlaegel C, Koenig M (2014) Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrep Theory Pract 38(2):291–332CrossRef
Schwarz EJ, Wdowiak MA, Almer-Jarz DA, Breitenecker RJ (2009) The effects of attitudes and perceived environment conditions on students’ entrepreneurial intent: an Austrian perspective. Educ Train 51(4):272–291CrossRef
Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11(4):448–469CrossRef
Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226
Shapero A, Sokol L (1982) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In: Kent C, Sexton DL, Vesper K (eds) The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 72–90
Shepherd DA, Douglas EJ, Fitzsimmons JR (2008) MBA admission criteria and an entrepreneurial mind-set: evidence from western style MBAs in India and Thailand. Acad Manag Learn Educ 7(2):158–172CrossRef
Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR (1988) The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consum Res 15(3):325–343CrossRef
Singh P, Bhandarker A, Rai S, Jain AK (2011) Relationship between values and workplace: an exploratory analysis. Facilities 29(11/12):499–520 CrossRef
Solesvik MZ (2013) Entrepreneurial motivations and intentions: investigating the role of education major. Educ Train 55(3):253–271CrossRef
Thompson ER (2009) Individual entrepreneurial intent: construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):669–694CrossRef
Tolentino LR, Sedoglavich V, Lu VN, Garcia PR, Restubog SL (2014) The role of career adaptability in predicting entrepreneurial intentions: a moderated mediation model. J Vocat Behav 85(3):403–412CrossRef
UNESCO (2014) ISCED fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Canada
van der Sluis J, van Praag M, Vijverberg W (2005) Entrepreneurship selection and performance: a meta-analysis of the impact of education in developing economies. World Bank Econ Rev 19(2):225–261CrossRef
van Gelderen M, Kautonen T, Fink M (2015) From entrepreneurial intentions to actions: self-control and action-related doubt, fear, and aversion. J Bus Ventur 30(5):655–673CrossRef
van Praag M (2011) Who values the status of the entrepreneur? In: Audretsch DB, Falck O, Heblich S (eds) Handbook of research on innovation and entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 24–44
van Praag M, Versloot PH (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? a review of recent research. Small Bus Econ 29(4):351–382CrossRef
van Praag M, van Witteloostuijn A, van der Sluis J (2013) The higher returns to formal education for entrepreneurs versus employees. Small Bus Econ 40(2):375–396CrossRef
Vinson DE, Scott JE, Lamont LM (1997) The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. J Mar 41(2):44–50CrossRef
Walter SG, Heinrichs S (2015) Who becomes an entrepreneur? A 30-years-review of individual-level research. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 22(2):225–248CrossRef
Wang C, Wong P, Lu Q (2002) Entrepreneurial intentions and tertiary education. In: Phan P (ed) Technological entrepreneurship. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 55–82
Webster FA (1977) Entrepreneurs and ventures: an attempt at classification and clarification. Acad Manag Rev 2(1):54–61
Wennekers S, Thurik R, van Stel A, Noorderhaven N (2007) Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976–2004. J Evolut Econ 17(2):133–160CrossRef
West LHT, Hore T (1989) The impact of higher education on adult students in Australia part 2. The person. High Educ 18:473–483CrossRef
Wu S, Wu L (2008) The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in China. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15:752–774CrossRef
Yemini M, Yeheskel O (2011) Not born here-evaluation of the country of origin effect on the entrepreneurial intentions of Israeli engineering students. Int J Learn 17(10):329–342
Yu J, Cooper H (1983) Quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. J Mark Res 20:36–44CrossRef
Zampetakis LA, Lerakis M, Kafetsios K, Moustakis VS (2015) The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Int Entrep Manag J. doi:10.​1007/​s11365-015-0367-2
Zapkau FB, Schwens C, Steinmetz H, Kabst R (2015) Disentangling the effect of prior entrepreneurial exposure on entrepreneurial intention. J Bus Res 68(3):639–653CrossRef
Zellweger T, Sieger P, Halter F (2011) Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. J Bus Ventur 26(5):521–536CrossRef
Zhang Y, Duysters G, Cloodt M (2014) The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. Int Entrep Manag J 10:623–641CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prior education and entrepreneurial intentions: the differential impact of a wide range of fields of study
verfasst von
Aurora A. C. Teixeira
Rosa Portela Forte
Publikationsdatum
22.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Review of Managerial Science / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0188-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Review of Managerial Science 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

The interaction between stock prices and corporate investment: is Europe different?

Original Paper

Multi-category purchase incidences with marketing cross effects

Original Paper

Applying firm attention theory to assess the antecedents of firm participation in regulatory processes

Original Paper

The impact of corporate sustainability performance on information asymmetry: the role of institutional differences

Original Paper

A co-utility approach to the mesh economy: the crowd-based business model

Original Paper

Effect of green innovation on job satisfaction of electronic and electrical manufacturers’ employees through job intensity: personal innovativeness as moderator

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise