nach oben

Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications

Erschienen in:

16.03.2021

An Optimized Byzantine Fault Tolerance Algorithm for Consortium Blockchain

verfasst von: Yuxi Li, Liang Qiao, Zhihan Lv

Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

According to different application scenarios of blockchain system, it is generally divided into public chain, private chain and consortium chain. Consortium chain is a typical multi-center blockchain, because it has better landing, it is supported by more and more enterprises and governments. This paper analyzes the advantages and problems of Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) algorithm for the application scenarios of the consortium chain. In order to be more suitable for consortium chains, this paper proposes a new optimized consensus algorithm based on PBFT. Aiming at the shortcomings of PBFT, such as the inability to dynamically join nodes, low multi-node consensus efficiency, and primary master node selection, our optimized algorithm has designed a hierarchical structure to increase scalability and improve consensus efficiency. The simulation results show that compared with PBFT and RAFT, our new consensus algorithm increases the data throughput while supporting more nodes, and effectively reducing the consensus delay and the number of communication times between nodes.

Vorheriger Artikel Privacy-preserving hierarchical deterministic key generation based on a lattice of rings in public blockchain

Nächster Artikel An integrative approach for secure data sharing in vehicular edge computing using Blockchain

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system

Peck ME (2017) Blockchain world-Do you need a blockchain? This chart will tell you if the technology can solve your problem. IEEE Spectrum 54(10):38–60CrossRef

Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Chen X, Wang H (2017) An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In: 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress). IEEE, pp 557–564

Yang S, Deng B, Wang J, Li H, Lu M, Che Y, Wei X, Loparo KA (2019) Scalable digital neuromorphic architecture for large-scale biophysically meaningful neural network with multi-compartment neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Sys 31(1):148–162CrossRef

Yang S, Wang J, Deng B, Liu C, Li H, Fietkiewicz C, Loparo KA (2018) Real-time neuromorphic system for large-scale conductance-based spiking neural networks. IEEE Trans Cybern 49(7):2490–2503CrossRef

Morabito V (2017) Business innovation through blockchain. Springer International Publishing, ChamCrossRef

Buterin V (2014) A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper 3(37)

Crosby M, Pattanayak P, Verma S, Kalyanaraman V (2016) Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation 2(6-10):71

Mohan C (2019) State of public and private blockchains: Myths and reality. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on management of data, pp 404–411

10.

Guo Y, Liang C (2016) Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovation 2(1):24CrossRef

11.

Gramoli V (2020) From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus. Future Gener Comput Syst 107:760–769CrossRef

12.

Xiao Y, Zhang N, Lou W, Hou YT (2020) A survey of distributed consensus protocols for blockchain networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 22(2):1432–1465CrossRef

13.

Pahlajani S, Kshirsagar A, Pachghare V (2019) Survey on private blockchain consensus algorithms. In: 2019 1st International conference on innovations in information and communication technology (ICIICT). IEEE, pp 1–6

14.

Jakobsson M, Juels A (1999) Proofs of work and bread pudding protocols. In: Secure information networks. Springer, Boston, pp 258–272

15.

King S, Nadal S (2012) Ppcoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake. Self-published paper, August, 19, 1

16.

Larimer D (2017) Delegated proof-of-stake consensus. bitshares.org. https://bitshares.org/technology/delegating-proof-of-stake-consensushttps://bitshares.org/technology/delegating-proof-of-stake-consensus. Accessed March 28th, 2017

17.

Sankar LS, Sindhu M, Sethumadhavan M (2017) Survey of consensus protocols on blockchain applications. In: 2017 4th international conference on advanced computing and communication systems (ICACCS). IEEE, pp 1–5

18.

Mingxiao D, Xiaofeng M, Zhe Z, Xiangwei W, Qijun C (2017) A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 2567–2572

19.

Huang D, Ma X, Zhang S (2019) Performance analysis of the raft consensus algorithm for private blockchains. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern Sys 50(1):172–181CrossRef

20.

Castro M, Liskov B (2002) Practical Byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Trans Comput Sys (TOCS) 20(4):398–461CrossRef

21.

Khosravi A, Kavian YS (2016) Broadcast gossip ratio consensus: Asynchronous distributed averaging in strongly connected networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 65(1):119–129MathSciNetCrossRef

22.

Sukhwani H, Martínez JM, Chang X, Trivedi KS, Rindos A (2017) Performance modeling of PBFT consensus process for permissioned blockchain network (hyperledger fabric). In: 2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS). IEEE, pp 253–255

23.

Zhang L, Li Q (2018) Research on consensus efficiency based on practical byzantine fault tolerance. In: 2018 10th International conference on modelling, identification and control (ICMIC). IEEE, pp 1–6

24.

Wang S (2019) Performance evaluation of hyperledger fabric with malicious behavior. In: International conference on blockchain. Springer, Cham, pp 211–219

25.

Wang X, WeiLi J, Chai J (2018) The research on the incentive method of consortium blockchain based on practical byzantine fault tolerant. In: 2018 11th international symposium on computational intelligence and design (ISCID), vol 2. IEEE, pp 154–156

26.

He L, Hou Z (2019) An improvement of consensus fault tolerant algorithm applied to alliance chain. In: 2019 IEEE 9th international conference on electronics information and emergency communication (ICEIEC). IEEE, pp 1–4

27.

Wang H, Guo K (2019) Byzantine fault tolerant algorithm based on vote. In: 2019 international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC). IEEE, pp 190–196

28.

Zhu S, Zhang Z, Chen L, Chen H, Wang Y (2020) A PBFT consensus scheme with reputation value voting based on dynamic clustering. In: International conference on security and privacy in digital economy. Springer, Singapore, pp 336–354

29.

Miller A, Xia Y, Croman K, Shi E, Song D (2016) The honey badger of BFT protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pp 31–42

30.

Gueta GG, Abraham I, Grossman S, Malkhi D, Pinkas B, Reiter M, Seredinschi D, Tamir O, Tomescu A (2018) Sbft: a scalable decentralized trust infrastructure for blockchains (1804)

31.

Li Y, Wang Z, Fan J, Zheng Y, Luo Y, Deng C, Ding J (2019) An extensible consensus algorithm based on PBFT. In: 2019 international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC). IEEE, pp 17–23

32.

Zhang J, Rong Y, Cao J, Rong C, Bian J, Wu W (2019) DBFT: A byzantine fault tolerant protocol with graceful performance degradation. In: 2019 38th symposium on reliable distributed systems (SRDS). IEEE, pp 123–12309

33.

Jalalzai MM, Busch C (2018) Window based BFT blockchain consensus. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData). IEEE, pp 971–979

34.

Gao S, Yu T, Zhu J, Cai W (2019) T-PBFT: An EigenTrust-based practical Byzantine fault tolerance consensus algorithm. China Commun 16(12):111–123CrossRef

35.

Lao L, Dai X, Xiao B, Guo S (2020) G-PBFT: a location-based and scalable consensus protocol for IOT-Blockchain applications. In: 2020 IEEE International parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS). IEEE, pp 664–673

36.

Okusanya O (2019) Consensus in Distributed Systems: RAFT vs CRDTs. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/csitetds/29

Titel: An Optimized Byzantine Fault Tolerance Algorithm for Consortium Blockchain
verfasst von: Yuxi Li
Liang Qiao
Zhihan Lv
Publikationsdatum: 16.03.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1936-6442
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-6450
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01103-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Resource management of GEO relays for real-time remote sensing

A survey for the application of blockchain technology in the media

A decentralized vehicle anti-theft system using Blockchain and smart contracts

A double-layer collaborative apportionment method for personalized and balanced routing

Secure access control for manufacturing sector with application of ethereum blockchain

User authentication using Blockchain based smart contract in role-based access control

Premium Partner