nach oben

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Erschienen in:

17.06.2021

The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance

verfasst von: Hyojung Jung, Seung Won Park, Hyun Song Kim, Jongchan Park

Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Flipped classrooms have been growing in popularity in higher education for their potential to promote students’ active engagement in learning. Ironically, the key to the success of flipped classrooms is the agency of students to actively participate in learning. The flipped classroom approach requires students’ responsibility for their learning and a high level of self-regulation in completing individual and collaborative learning tasks. However, many college students tend to be more comfortable with a traditional, passive form of lecture-based course and are not yet prepared for an active form of learning. In this study, we developed a regulated learning-supported flipped classroom framework grounded in self-regulation and social regulation research. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student engagement and performance. Our results showed that the flipped classroom with regulation guidance had a significant influence on students’ use of higher-order cognitive skills. The implications of this study are further discussed based on the findings.

Vorheriger Artikel Adopting a framework to support the process of critical reflection and understanding of online engagement

Nächster Artikel The design and development of an open educational resources intervention in a college course that manifests in open educational practices: a design-based research study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021CrossRef

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1CrossRef

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.

Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers and Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014CrossRef

Braun, I., Rittter, S., & Vasko, M. (2014). Inverted classroom by topic: A study in mathematics for electrical engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3299CrossRef

Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487CrossRef

Chan, C. K. K. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A discussion. Metacognition Learning, 7, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9086-zCrossRef

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004CrossRef

Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3CrossRef

Chiang, Y.-H., & Wang, H.-C. (2015). Effects of the in-flipped classroom on the learning environment of database engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2), 454–460.

Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530CrossRef

Filiz, O., & Kurt, A. (2015). Flipped learning: Misunderstandings and the truth. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5, 215–229.

Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702CrossRef

Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616726CrossRef

Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-181CrossRef

Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge.

Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 83–106). Routledge.

Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.CrossRef

Halili, S. H., Razak, R. A., & Zainuddin, Z. (2014). Enhancing collaborative learning in flipped classroom. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 147–149.

Hao, Y. W. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032CrossRef

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.

Hsu, T.-C. (2018). Behavioural sequential analysis of using an instant response application to enhance peer interactions in a flipped classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1283332CrossRef

Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006CrossRef

Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006CrossRef

Jo, K. J., & Kim, J. D. (2016). Tendencies action of college students in flipped learning instruction. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 10(4), 203–214.CrossRef

Kalman, Y., & Blau, I. (2017, June). The implications of a national high-stakes MOOC on the business models of academic institutions, and on their faculty and students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Distance and E-learning Network (EDEN), Jönköping, Sweden.

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Oigara, J. N. (2014). Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. IGI Global.CrossRef

Kim, H. (2010). Developments and effects of collaboration scripts for argumentation based on activity theory in computer supported collaborative learning [Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University]. dCollection. http://dcollection.hanyang.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000058551

Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003CrossRef

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers and Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006CrossRef

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389CrossRef

Lee, H., Kang, S., & Kim, C. (2016). Analysis of the structural relationship among factors related to the effects of flipped learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 87–100.

Lee, Y.-H. (2017). Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: Implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1372483CrossRef

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002CrossRef

Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8CrossRef

Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066CrossRef

Mazur, A. D., Brown, B., & Jacobsen, M. (2015). Learning designs using flipped classroom instruction. Conception D’apprentissage à L’aide De L’instruction En Classe Inversee, 41, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2PG7PCrossRef

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002CrossRef

Palmer, K. (2015). Flipping a calculus class: One instructor’s experience. Primus, 25(9–10), 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1050618CrossRef

Patanwala, A. E., Erstad, B. L., & Murphy, J. E. (2017). Student use of flipped classroom videos in a therapeutics course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.043CrossRef

Pauli, R., Mohiyeddini, C., Bray, D., Michie, F., & Street, B. (2007). Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701413746CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Educational psychology at the millennium: A look back and a look forward. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_01CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-xCrossRef

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components in classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRef

Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A., & Noroozi, O. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004CrossRef

Ross, J. A. (2008). Explanation giving and receiving in cooperative learning groups. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 227–242). Springer.

Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction-what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199CrossRef

Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Prentice-Hall.

Shibukawa, S., & Taguchi, M. (2019). Exploring the difficulty on students’ preparation and the effective instruction in the flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09220-3CrossRef

Sletten, S. R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9683-8CrossRef

Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12444CrossRef

Sun, Z. (2015). The role of self-regulation on students’ learning in an undergraduate flipped math class [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003CrossRef

Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009a). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001CrossRef

Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009b). Self-and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584CrossRef

Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). Taylor & Francis.

Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., & Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 251–270). Springer.CrossRef

Wong, B. Y. L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510290CrossRef

Yang, I., Lee, H., Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 203–220.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1999). Commentary: Toward a cyclically interactive view of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00021-XCrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Developing a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge.

Titel: The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance
verfasst von: Hyojung Jung
Seung Won Park
Hyun Song Kim
Jongchan Park
Publikationsdatum: 17.06.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09284-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Instructors’ conceptualization and implementation of scaffolding in online higher education courses

The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors

A differentiated learning environment in domain model for learning disabled learners

Improving the portability of predicting students’ performance models by using ontologies

Adopting a framework to support the process of critical reflection and understanding of online engagement

Design of peer assessment rubrics for ICT topics

Premium Partner