Urban Forests Potential Contribution to Meet Air Quality Policy Targets
Urban forests effects on air quality are still a subject of intensive research. While positive effects of air purification delivered by vegetation have been estimated at the city scale in many urban areas (e.g., Nowak et al.
2006), pollution concentration can be increased at the site scale (e.g., street canyons) depending upon vegetation configuration, pollutant emissions, or meteorology, showing apparently divergent results on the effectiveness of using urban vegetation for reducing local air pollution hotspots (Pugh et al.
2012; Vos et al.
2013). Likewise, the ability of urban vegetation to remove air pollutants significantly depends on many factors, such as tree health, soil moisture availability, leaf-period, LAI, meteorology, and pollution concentrations.
Our results show that the overall annual air purification rate by urban forests in Barcelona (9.3 g m
−2 of canopy cover year
−1) is very similar to US cities like Columbus, Kansas City, or Portland (9.2 g m
−2 year
−1), although the PM
10 removal rate (5.1 g m
−2 year
−1) is significantly higher than for these cities (between 3.1 and 3.4 g m
−2) and closer to cities like Salt Lake City (5.2 g m
−2), Philadelphia (5.5 g m
−2), or San Diego (5.6 g m
−2) (Nowak et al.
2006). The higher removal rates for PM
10, NO
2, and O
3 compared to CO and SO
2 should be mainly attributable to the almost linear relationship between pollution removal and ambient pollution concentrations considered in the model (pollutant flux equation as
F =
V
d ×
C). However, very high pollutant concentrations could severely damage vegetation or lead to stomatal closure, reducing air pollution removal ability (Robinson et al.
1998; Escobedo and Nowak
2009). Unfortunately, these environmental thresholds are not yet factored in the i-Tree Eco model.
Our findings also show that the NO
2 removal rate by urban forests in Barcelona has a meager impact relative to actual city-based emissions (less than 1 %). Therefore, the potential of urban forests to contribute to the compliance of the EU limit is expected to be very low. NO
2 concentrations in the city derive largely from road transport activity (65.6 % impact according to PECQ
2011). Hence, actions focused on reduction of road traffic, technological change toward less-polluting fuels and the promotion of public transport or cycling utilities are expected to contribute more efficiently to meet policy targets. These actions can also lead to reduction in O
3 concentrations, as NO
2 is a precursor chemical to O
3 formation. PM
10 removal rate from urban forests is notably higher than NO
2 rate, whereas city-based emissions of PM
10 are notably lower, resulting in a substantial impact at the city scale (22.3 % of total city-based emissions). However, the background pollution effect (accounting for 88.1 % of the average annual PM
10 concentration according to PECQ estimations) drastically reduces the actual impact of the urban forests service (2.7 % of total PM
10 pollution levels). Yet, we claim that there are still important reasons for which this ecosystem service should be accounted for in local policy decision-making. First, air pollution from particulate matter is a major health problem in Barcelona metropolitan area and recent research suggests that even moderate improvements in air quality are expected to report significant health benefits, together with related economic savings (Pérez et al.
2009). Second, the major role of PM
10 background pollution in Barcelona air quality might compromise the effectiveness of municipal policies solely based on city emissions abatement. This fact also suggests that measures focused on air quality regulation should be implemented at broader spatial scales, particularly at the metropolitan level. To this end, strong coordination policies between municipal and regional authorities dealing with environmental quality and urban planning are fundamental. Third, the implementation of green infrastructure-based strategies to foster air purification (and other ecosystem services) is a realistic policy option considering the current urban context of Barcelona. I-Tree Eco results show that approximately 3.6 % of the municipality area (364 ha) can be considered as available land for planting. As a complementary alternative, green roofs and walls, yet to be extensively developed in Barcelona, could be particularly appropriate in high-density neighborhoods where ground for planting is extremely scarce. Several studies have quantified the potential of green roofs for air purification in cities at the street canyon (Baik et al.
2012), neighborhood (Currie and Bass
2008), and municipality (Yang et al.
2008) scales, besides their potential to provide many other services and benefits, such as runoff mitigation, noise reduction, or urban cooling (Oberndorfer et al.
2007; Rowe
2011). However, the technical and economic feasibility of green roofs expansion, together with possible trade-offs concerning their maintenance such as water demand, should previously be assessed in Barcelona, especially for existing buildings.
Proper management of existing green space can also contribute to air quality improvement. Yang et al. (
2005) lists several factors to consider in strategies for air quality improvement based on green infrastructure, including selection of species (e.g., evergreen versus deciduous trees, dimension, growth rate, leaf characteristics, or air pollution tolerance) and management practices (e.g., intensity of pruning). Previous studies in cities with high levels of air pollution (e.g., Nowak et al.
2006; Escobedo and Nowak
2009) suggest that meteorological conditions, mixing-layer height (the atmospheric layer which determines the volume available for the dispersion of pollutants, see Seibert et al.
2000 for a complete definition), and vegetation characteristics (e.g., proportion of evergreen leaf area, in-leaf season, and LAI) are important factors defining urban forest effects on air quality. Further research is needed to advance our understanding of the role of morphology, function, and ecophysiology of vegetation in air purification (Manning
2008).
A further critical issue concerns the understanding of trade-offs with other ecosystem services or disservices. For example, urban parks are considered very relevant ecosystems for the provision of outdoor recreation and other cultural services in cities (Chiesura
2004). However, highly maintained parks might remove less air pollutants and CO
2 (due to emissions from maintenance activities, Nowak et al.
2002b) than natural areas that are not intensively managed, but which can be perceived as unpleasant or even dangerous, hence providing few cultural services (Lyytimäki and Sipilä
2009; Escobedo et al.
2011). Likewise, urban tree species with high potential for air purification can be highly invasive as well in certain cities (Escobedo et al.
2010). More generally, many specific environmental factors (e.g., soil condition, climate, water availability, or longevity of the species) should be considered in urban forest management to avoid conflicts with other municipal sustainability goals (Yang et al.
2005; Escobedo et al.
2011).
The i-Tree Eco model could not provide reliable results on O
3 and CO formation rates associated to the quantified BVOC emissions. However, as mentioned above, CO levels in Barcelona (2.7 mg m
3 for a daily 8-h average was the highest measure in 2011 according to ASPB air quality report
2011) have been historically far below the EU reference value (10 mg m
3 daily 8-h average). Thus, it is unlikely that urban forests may compromise in any significant form the compliance of air quality relative to CO target. In contrast, ground-level O
3 levels have surpassed the EU reference value (120 μg m
−3 daily 8-h average) at some monitoring stations in the last decade, even if the allowed exceedences have never been reached. Although O
3 concentrations have remained steady in the last decade within the municipality of Barcelona, O
3 formation due to BVOC emissions might cause air quality problems in the long term, where BVOC emissions are expected to increase due to global warming (Peñuelas and Llusià
2003). Nevertheless, several studies point out that the selection of low BVOC-emitting tree species can contribute positively in O
3 concentrations in urban areas because BVOC emissions are temperature dependent and trees generally lower air temperatures (Taha
1996; Nowak et al.
2000; Paoletti
2009). Chaparro and Terradas (
2009) identified some of the tree and shrub species in Barcelona emitting less BVOC per leaf biomass. These include genera such as
Pyrus,
Prunus,
Ulmus, and
Celtis.
Urban Forests Potential Contribution to Meet Climate Change Mitigation Policy Targets
Some authors suggest that global climate regulation does not stand amongst the most relevant ecosystem services in the urban context because cities can benefit from carbon offsets performed by ecosystems located elsewhere (Bolund and Hunhammar
1999). However, other authors argue that urban forests can play an important role in mitigating the impacts of climate change if compared to other policies at the city level (McHale et al.
2007; Escobedo et al.
2010; Zhao et al.
2010; Liu and Li
2012).
The estimated net annual carbon sequestration per hectare of Barcelona (536 kg ha
−1 year
−1) is very similar to cities such as Baltimore (520 kg ha
−1 year
−1) or Syracuse (540 kg ha
−1 year
−1) (Nowak and Crane
2002). It should be noted that an analysis of the overall contribution of urban green infrastructure to climate change mitigation should also account for the effects of vegetation on micro-climate regulation, which can indirectly avoid CO
2 emissions through energy saving in buildings for heating and cooling (Nowak and Crane
2002). Hence, our quantification likely underestimates the total contribution of urban forests to climate change mitigation. Analyzing the results by land use, urban green and natural green strata are relevant for the supply of climate regulation service due to the high vegetative cover compared to the other land use classes. High-density residential stratum also showed an important rate in net carbon sequestration, mainly attributable to its large total area (36 % of the municipality) and probably, to a lesser extent, to the high presence of street trees in these neighborhoods. Finally, the high ratio of net carbon sequestration per area observed in the low-density residential stratum could be attributed to the high presence of private gardens in these areas, together with low decomposition emissions due to healthier vegetation.
In line with the results obtained in other urban studies (Pataki et al.
2009; Liu and Li
2012), our findings show that direct net carbon sequestration in Barcelona makes a very modest contribution to climate change mitigation relative to total city-based annual GHG emissions (0.47 %). Nevertheless, if we only account for the GHG emissions from services and activities directly management by the City Council (baseline emissions for the 23 % reduction target from the “Covenant of Mayors”), the contribution of urban forest is notably higher (22.55 %). Similar green infrastructure-based strategies as specified for air quality improvement could also improve the contribution of urban forests to offset GHG emissions and meet the urban policy target of 23 % reduction until 2020.
Limitations and Caveats
The main advantages of the i-Tree Eco model stem from the reliance on locally measured field data and standardized peer-reviewed procedures to measure urban forest regulating ecosystem services in cities (Nowak et al.
2008a). Favored by its status as an open access model, it has been widely applied across the world (e.g., Nowak and Crane
2002; Yang et al.
2005; Nowak et al.
2006; Currie and Bass
2008; Escobedo and Nowak
2009; Dobbs et al.
2011; Liu and Li
2012).
However, i-Tree Eco has some limitations that should be taken into account when analyzing its outcomes. First, the model is especially designed for US case studies and its application in other countries is subject to some restrictions, as stated in the user’s manual. For instance, although the i-Tree Eco database has over 5000 species, it did not include some tree and shrub species sampled in Barcelona, which then needed to be added to the database. Likewise, monetary valuations of air purification and climate regulation services are based on the literature (see “
Materials and Methods” section) which mainly apply to the US context and, hence, should be considered a rough estimation for Barcelona. However, these values are direct multiplier to the biophysical accounts, thus they can be easily adjusted to the case study context when data will be available. Another important limitation applying to i-Tree Eco and most dry deposition models is the level of uncertainty involved in the quantification of the air pollution removal rates due to the complexity of this process (Pataki et al.
2011). For instance, some sources of uncertainty include non-homogeneity in spatial distribution of air pollutants, particle re-suspension rates, transpiration rates, or soil moisture status (Manning
2008). Though the model outputs match well with field measured deposition velocities for urban forests, the model analyzes average effects across a city, not local variations in removal caused by local meteorological and pollution differences. However, these local fine-scale input data are often missing from urban areas and empirical data on the actual uptake of pollutants by urban vegetation are still limited (Pataki et al.
2011; Setälä et al.
2013), which makes a more accurate modeling of this ecosystem service unfeasible at the moment. For a sensitivity analysis of the i-Tree Eco deposition model see Hirabayashi et al. (
2011). Estimation errors in climate regulation service values include the uncertainty from using biomass equations and conversion factors as well as measurement errors (Nowak et al.
2008a). For example, there are limited biomass equations for tropical tree species (e.g., palm trees), some of them present in Barcelona. Estimates of carbon sequestration and storage also include uncertainties from factors such as urban forests maintenance (e.g., intensity of pruning), tree decay, or restricted rooting volumes, which are not accounted for in the model’s estimations (Nowak et al.
2008a; Pataki et al.
2011). BVOC emissions are estimated based on species factors and meteorological conditions (i.e., air temperature and daylight) but the uncertainty of the estimate is unknown. As mentioned in previous sections, O
3 and CO formation rates from BVOC emissions cannot be estimated with an acceptable level of reliability.
Therefore, the results presented in this paper should be considered as an approximate estimation rather than a precise quantification of the ecosystem services and disservices delivered by the urban forests of Barcelona. However, these estimates allow one to evaluate the contribution of urban forests in air quality and climate change mitigation in the city, and also to derive implications and recommendations for urban decision-making.