nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

31.08.2020 | Original Article

Impact of iron nanoparticles on biogas production and effluent chemical composition from anaerobic digestion of cattle manure

verfasst von: Taha Abdelfattah Mohammed Abdelwahab, Mahendra Kumar Mohanty, Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo, Debaraj Behera

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 12/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Many nanoparticles (NPs) were reported to enhance biogas production from anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic wastes. However, the influence of iron (Fe) NPs on processes stability of AD of cattle manure and effluent chemical composition has not yet been studied in depth. Therefore, three concentrations (15, 30, and 60 mg/L) of Fe NPs were added to the separate lab-scale batch bio-digester to investigate their impact on biogas production and effluent chemical composition from the AD of cattle manure compared with cattle manure only. The results indicated that the highest specific biogas production (p < 0.05) was attained with 15 mg/L Fe NPs and was 953.41 mL biogas/g VS compared with cattle manure only which produce only 589.2 mL biogas/g VS. The addition of 30 mg/L Fe NPs increased the specific methane (CH₄) production (p < 0.05) by 118.8% compared with cattle manure only. Moreover, the rate of hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) production was also reduced (p < 0.05) by 81%, 93%, and 110% using the 15, 30, and 60 mg/L Fe NPs, respectively, compared with cattle manure only. Further investigations confirmed that the addition of 15 mg/L Fe NPs maintained pH 6.9 and improved total and volatile solids removal efficiencies by 25.6% and 10.9%, respectively; this concentration of Fe NPs produced the highest concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and was 4050 mg/L and increases sulfide content by 12%. FTIR spectrum of effluent presented the addition of Fe NPs change the intensity and shift of peaks compared with cattle manure–only peak.

Vorheriger Artikel Computer modelling of the enrichment process of sunflower and corn oils with olive leaves through ultrasound treatment

Nächster Artikel Box–Behnken experimental design for the optimization of enzymatic saccharification of wheat bran

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kadam R, Panwar NL (2017) Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:892–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167CrossRef

Hussein AK (2015) Applications of nanotechnology in renewable energies-a comprehensive overview and understanding. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:460–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.027CrossRef

Gashaw A (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of biodegradable municipal solid waste with human excreta for biogas production: a review. Am J Appl Chem 2(4):55–62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20140204.12CrossRef

Hassanein A, Lansing S, Tikekar R (2019) Impact of metal nanoparticles on biogas production from poultry litter. Bioresour Technol 275:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.048CrossRef

Jin H, Chang Z (2011) Distribution of heavy metal contents and chemical fractions in anaerobically digested manure slurry. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164(3):268–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9133-7CrossRef

Arsova L (2010) Anaerobic digestion of food waste: current status, problems and an alternative product. Department of earth and Environmental Engineering foundation Engineering and Applied Science. Columbia University.MS thesis. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/273e/9731e89de8971c2b32f64b506d589992a0cf.pdf

Krishnasamy K, Nair J, Bäuml B (2012) Hydroponic system for the treatment of anaerobic liquid. Water Sci Technol 65(7):1164–1171. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.031CrossRef

Livestock Censuses, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, GoI. (2019) https://www.nddb.coop/

Wellinger A, Murphy JD, Baxter D (2013) The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Elsevier 23-24

10.

Tezel U, Tandukar M, Pavlostathis SG (2011) Anaerobic biotreatment of municipal sewage sludge: 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00329-9

11.

Rasi S, Läntelä J, Rintala J (2011) Trace compounds affecting biogas energy utilisation–a review. Energy Convers Manag 52(12):3369–3375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.07.005CrossRef

12.

Wahid R, Romero-Guiza M, Moset V, Møller HB, Fernández B (2020) Improved anaerobic biodegradability of wheat straw, solid cattle manure and solid slaughterhouse by alkali, ultrasonic and alkali-ultrasonic pre-treatment. Environ Technol 41(8):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1516802CrossRef

13.

Şenol H, Açıkel Ü, Oda V (2019) Anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp after acid thermal and alkali thermal pretreatments. Biomass Convers Biorefine 25:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00539-6CrossRef

14.

Ormaechea P, Castrillón L, Marañón E, Fernández-Nava Y, Negral L, Megido L (2017) Influence of the ultrasound pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of cattle manure, food waste and crude glycerine. Environ Technol 38(6):682–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1208278CrossRef

15.

Begum S, Ahuja S, Anupoju GR, Ahuja DK, Arelli V, Juntupally S (2020) Operational strategy of high rate anaerobic digester with mixed organic wastes: effect of co-digestion on biogas yield at full scale. Environ Technol 41(9):1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1523232CrossRef

16.

Elsayed M, Diab A, Soliman M (2020) Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with fruit and vegetable wastes: effect of mixing ratio and inoculum type. Biomass Convers Biorefine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00785-z

17.

Sen K, Mahalingam S, Sen B (2013) Rapid and high yield biogas production from Jatropha seed cake by co-digestion with bagasse and addition of Fe2+. Environ Technol 34(22):2989–2994. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.798000CrossRef

18.

Baniamerian H, Isfahani PG, Tsapekos P, Alvarado-Morales M, Shahrokhi M, Vossoughi M, Angelidaki I (2019) Application of nano-structured materials in anaerobic digestion: current status and perspectives. Chemosphere 299:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.193CrossRef

19.

Sreekrishnan TR, Kohli S, Rana V (2004) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques-a review. Bioresour Technol 95(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010CrossRef

20.

Demirel B, Scherer P (2011) Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenergy 35(3):992–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.022CrossRef

21.

Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Attia YA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Hassan HE, Badr Y (2017a) Effects of Co and Ni nanoparticles on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of slurry. Energy Convers Manag 141:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.051CrossRef

22.

Eljamal O, Mokete R, Matsunaga N, Sugihara Y (2018) Chemical pathways of nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) during its transformation in aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng 6(5):6207–6220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.09.012CrossRef

23.

Eljamal O, Khalil AM, Sugihara Y, Matsunaga N (2016) Phosphorus removal from aqueous solution by nanoscale zero valent iron in the presence of copper chloride. Chem Eng J 293:225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.052CrossRef

24.

Karri S, Sierra-Alvarez R, Field JA (2005) Zero valent iron as an electron-donor for methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in anaerobic sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 92(7):810–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20623CrossRef

25.

Zhang YB, Jing YW, Quan X, Liu YW, Onu P (2011b) A built-in zero valent iron anaerobic reactor to enhance treatment of azo dye wastewater. Water Sci Technol 63:741–746. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.301CrossRef

26.

Liu YW, Zhang YB, Quan X, Chen S, Zhao HM (2011) Applying an electric field in a built-in zero valent iron-anaerobic reactor for enhancement of sludge granulation. Water Res 45:1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.002CrossRef

27.

Zhang YB, Jing YW, Zhang JX, Sun LF, Quan X (2011c) Performance of a ZVIUASB reactor for azo dye wastewater treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2485CrossRef

28.

Zhang J, Zhang Y, Quan X, Liu Y, An X, Chen S, Zhao H (2011a) Bioaugmentation and functional partitioning in a zero valent iron-anaerobic reactor for sulfate-containing wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 174:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.069CrossRef

29.

Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Attia YA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Hassan HE, Badr Y (2017b) Influence of zero valent iron nanoparticles and magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of manure. Energy 120:842–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.137CrossRef

30.

Farghali M, Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Ahmed MM, Kotb S, Yamashiro T, Iwasaki M, Umetsu K (2019) Impacts of iron oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on biogas production: hydrogen sulfide mitigation, process stability, and prospective challenges. J Environ Manag 240:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.089CrossRef

31.

Yu B, Huang X, Zhang D, Lou Z, Yuan H, Zhu N (2016) Response of sludge fermentation liquid and microbial community to nano zero-valent iron exposure in a mesophilic anaerobic digestion system. RSC Adv 6(29):24236–24244. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA02591ACrossRef

32.

Su L, Shi X, Guo G, Zhao A, Zhao Y (2013) Stabilization of sewage sludge in the presence of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): abatement of odor and improvement of biogas production. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15(4):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0150-9CrossRef

33.

Wang T, Zhang D, Dai L, Chen Y, Dai X (2016) Effects of metal nanoparticles on methane production from waste-activated sludge and microorganism community shift in anaerobic granular sludge. Sci Rep 6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25857CrossRef

34.

Nguyen D, Visvanathan C, Jacob P, Jegatheesan V (2015) Effects of nano cerium (IV) oxide and zinc oxide particles on biogas production. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 102:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.02.014CrossRef

35.

Abdallah MS, Hassaneen FY, Faisal Y, Mansour MS, Ibrahim AM, Abo-Elfadl S, Salem HG, Allam NK (2019) Effect of Ni-ferrite and Ni-Co-ferrite nanostructures on biogas production from anaerobic digestion. Fuel 254:115673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115673CrossRef

36.

Ripley LE, Boyle WC, Converse JC (1986) Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes. J Water Pollut Control Fed 58(5):406–411 www.jstor.org/stable/25042933

37.

APHA (ed) (1995) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. APHA, Washington, DC

38.

Amen TW, Eljamal O, Khalil AM, Sugihara Y, Matsunaga N (2018) Methane yield enhancement by the addition of new novel of iron and copper-iron bimetallic nanoparticles. Chem Eng Process-Process Intensif 130:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.06.020CrossRef

39.

Faisal S, Yusuf Hafeez F, Zafar Y, Majeed S, Leng X, Zhao S, Saif I, Malik K, Li X (2019) A review on nanoparticles as boon for biogas producers-nano fuels and biosensing monitoring. Appl Sci 9(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010059CrossRef

40.

Pobeheim H, Munk B, Johansson J, Guebitz GM (2010) Influence of trace elements on methane formation from a synthetic model substrate for maize silage. Bioresour Technol 101(2):836–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.076CrossRef

41.

Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Attia YA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Hassan HE, Badr Y (2016) Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry. Renew Energy 87:592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.053CrossRef

42.

Casals E, Barrena R, García A, González E, Delgado L, Busquets-Fité M, Font X, Arbiol J, Glatzel P, Kvashnina K, Sánchez A (2014) Programmed iron oxide nanoparticles disintegration in anaerobic digesters boosts biogas production. Small 10(14):2801–2808. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201303703CrossRef

43.

Abdelwahab TA, Mohanty MK, Sahoo PK, Behera D (2020) Application of nanoparticles for biogas production: current status and perspectives. Energy Sources A: Recov Util Environ Effects 1:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1767730CrossRef

44.

Yang Y, Guo J, Hu Z (2013) Impact of nano zero valent iron (NZVI) on methanogenic activity and population dynamics in anaerobic digestion. Water Res 47(17):6790–6800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.012CrossRef

45.

Feng Y, Zhang Y, Quan X, Chen S (2014) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge digestion by the addition of zero valent iron. Water Res 52:242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.072CrossRef

46.

He CS, He PP, Yang HY, Li LL, Lin Y, Mu Y, Yu HQ (2017) Impact of zero-valent iron nanoparticles on the activity of anaerobic granular sludge: from macroscopic to microcosmic investigation. Water Res 127:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.061CrossRef

47.

Joo SH, Delicio L, Muniz J, Baek S (2018) Perspective: catalytic increase of biogas production in an anaerobic co-digestion system. Int J Nanoparticles Nanotech 4(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.35840/2631-5084/5516CrossRef

48.

Li XQ, Brown DG, Zhang WX (2007) Stabilization of biosolids with nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI). J Nanopart Res 9:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9187-1CrossRef

49.

Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ, Shirai T, Yamashiro T, Yasui S, Iwasaki M, Ihara I, Nishida T, Tangtaweewipat S, Umetsu K (2018) Valorizing waste iron powder in biogas production: hydrogen sulfide control and process performances. J Environ Manag 208:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.012CrossRef

50.

Ogejo JA, Wen Z, Ignosh J, Bendfeldt E, Collins ER (2009) Biomethane technology.Virginia Cooperative Extension: 442–881

51.

Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99(10):4044–4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057CrossRef

52.

Amen TW, Eljamal O, Khalil AM, Matsunaga N (2017) Biochemical methane potential enhancement of domestic sludge digestion by adding pristine iron nanoparticles and iron nanoparticles coated zeolite compositions. J Environ Chem Eng 5(5):5002–5013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.030CrossRef

53.

Ahn HK, Smith MC, Kondrad SL, White JW (2010) Evaluation of biogas production potential by dry anaerobic digestion of switchgrass–animal manure mixtures. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160(4):965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8624-xCrossRef

54.

Suanon F, Sun Q, Li M, Cai X, Zhang Y, Yan Y, Yu CP (2017) Application of nanoscale zero valent iron and iron powder during sludge anaerobic digestion: impact on methane yield and pharmaceutical and personal care products degradation. JHazard Mater 321:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.076CrossRef

55.

Jia T, Wang Z, Shan H, Liu Y, Gong L (2017) Effect of nanoscale zero-valent iron on sludge anaerobic digestion. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1604811CrossRef

56.

Bayr S, Pakarinen O, Korppoo A, Liuksia S, Väisänen A, Kaparaju P, Rintala J (2012) Effect of additives on process stability of mesophilic anaerobic monodigestion of pig slaughterhouse waste. Bioresour Technol 120:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.009CrossRef

57.

Wei Q, Zhang W, Guo J, Wu S, Tan T, Wang F, Dong R (2014) Performance and kinetic evaluation of a semi-continuously fed anaerobic digester treating food waste: effect of trace elements on the digester recovery and stability. Chemosphere 117:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.060CrossRef

58.

Liu A, Xu S, Lu C (2014) Anaerobic fermentation by aquatic product wastes and other auxiliary materials. Clean Technol Environ 16:415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0640-4CrossRef

59.

Angsana R, Warinthom S, Annop N (2009) Combination effect of pH and acetate on enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. J Environ Sci-China 21:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62369-4CrossRef

60.

Ali A, Mahar RB, Abdelsalam EM, Sherazi ST (2019) Kinetic modeling for bioaugmented anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by using Fe ₃O₄ nanoparticles. Waste Biomass Valor 10(11):3213–3224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0375-xCrossRef

61.

Doran JW (2002) Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88(2):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00246-8CrossRef

62.

Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12(3):242–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100085CrossRef

63.

Abdulla HAN, Minor EC, Dias RF, Hatcher PG (2010) Changes in the compound classes of dissolved organic matter along an estuarine transect: a study using FTIR and 13C NMR. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:3815–3838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.04.006CrossRef

64.

Gamage IH, Jonker A, Zhang X, Yu P (2014) Non-destructive analysis of the conformational differences among feedstock sources and their corresponding co-products from bioethanol production with molecular spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 118:407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.08.095CrossRef

65.

Zhou J, You X, Jia T, Niu B, Gong L, Yang X, Zhou Y (2019) Effect of nanoscale zero-valent iron on the change of sludge anaerobic digestion process. Environ Technol 20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1604811CrossRef

66.

Dai X, Xu Y, Dong B (2017) Effect of the micron-sized silica particles (MSSP) on biogas conversion of sewage sludge. Water Res 115:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.064CrossRef

67.

Dong B, Xia Z, Sun J, Dai X, Chen X, Ni BJ (2019) The inhibitory impacts of nano-graphene oxide on methane production from waste activated sludge in anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ 646:1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.424CrossRef

68.

Firer D, Friedler E, Lahav O (2008) Control of sulfide in sewer systems by dosage of iron salts: comparison between theoretical and experimental results, and practical implications. Sci Total Environ 392(1):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.008CrossRef

Titel: Impact of iron nanoparticles on biogas production and effluent chemical composition from anaerobic digestion of cattle manure
verfasst von: Taha Abdelfattah Mohammed Abdelwahab
Mahendra Kumar Mohanty
Pradeepta Kumar Sahoo
Debaraj Behera
Publikationsdatum: 31.08.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 12/2022
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00985-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2022

Development of consolidated bioprocess for biofuel-ethanol production from ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent pretreated Parthenium hysterophorus biomass

Evaluating biomas-derived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth of maize and black gram

Enhancement of lactic acid production from food waste through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using selective microbial strains

MML-catalyzed direct aldol reaction in green solvents

Ionic liquid assisted the extraction of cellulose from de-oiled Calophyllum inophyllum cake and its characterization

A comparative study on rice husk and rice straw as bioresources for production of carbonaceous adsorbent and silica