nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

17.10.2022 | Original Article

Improving the nutritional value and rumen fermentation characteristics of sesame seed coats through bioconversion approach using exogenous fibrolytic enzymes produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum

verfasst von: Khalil Abid, Jihene Jabri, Hela Yaich, Atef Malek, Jamel Rekhis, Mohamed Kamoun

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 16/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Sesame seed coat (SSC), agro-industrial waste of Halava, is characterized by high fiber content, moderate energy, low digestibility, and sugar. The aim of this study was to improve their nutritional value and rumen fermentation characteristics through a bioconversion approach using liquid exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFE) produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum. SSC was pre-treated for 12 h with EFE (xylanases, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase) at concentrations of 0, 1, 2, and 4 µl g⁻¹ dry matter (DM). The in vitro gas production technique with cow inoculum was used to determine rumen fermentation. At the end of fermentation, dry matter digestibility (DMD) as well as protozoa, ruminal fibrolytic enzyme activity, ruminal pH, and ammonia–nitrogen (NH₃-N) were determined, and net energy-lactation (NEL), total short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), and microbial crude protein synthesis (MCP) were estimated. Our results showed that the highest dose of EFE improved the amount and rate of rumen fermentation (p < 0.05) and decreased lag time in onset of fermentation (p < 0.05). In addition, it increased (p < 0.05) DMD, NEL, SCFA, and MCP, while NH₃-N decreased (p < 0.05) and ruminal pH was unaffected (p > 0.05). This result was due to hydrolysis (p < 0.05) of fiber content and release (p < 0.05) of total and reducing sugars, as well as the increase (p < 0.05) of ruminal fibrolytic enzyme activity and protozoa. The low and medium had no effect on the nutritional value of SSC. This eco-friendly bioprocess with the high dose of EFE can be a good strategy for bioconversion of these agro-industrial wastes into high-energy feeds.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Methylene blue removal by agricultural wastes from Annona muricata and Treculia africana seeds

Nächster Artikel Lactic acid production from sugarcane field residue as renewable and economical bioresource by newly isolated Pediococcus pentosaceus HLV1

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Narimani Gharajeh S, Seifdavati J, Abdi-Benemar H, Salem AZM, Elghandour MM, Seyed Sharifi R (2021) Effects of nitrogen supplementation on bioconversion of potato waste by rumen fluid from slaughterhouses to produce eco-friendly products. Biomass Convers Biorefin., 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02037-0

Correddu F, Lunesu MF, Buffa G, Atzori AS, Nudda A, Battacone G, Pulina G (2020) Can agro-industrial by-products rich in polyphenols be advantageously used in the feeding and nutrition of dairy small ruminants? Animals 10:131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010131CrossRef

Lucio VD, Susana B, Hernández-Domínguez EM, Villa-García M, Díaz-Godínez G, Mandujano-Gonzalez V, Mendoza-Mendoza B, Álvarez-Cervantes J (2021) Exogenous enzymes as zootechnical additives in animal feed: a review. Catalysts 11:851. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11070851CrossRef

Elleuch M, Besbes S, Roiseux O, Blecker C, Attia H (2007) Quality characteristics of sesame seeds and by-products. Food Chem 103:641–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.008CrossRef

Elleuch M, Bedigian D, Besbes S, Blecker C, Attia H (2012) Dietary fibre characteristics and antioxidant activity of sesame seed coats (testae). Int J Food Prop 15:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942911003687231CrossRef

Morsy MK, Sami R, Algarni E, Al-Mushhin AA, Benajiba N, Almasoudi AG, Mekawi E (2022) phytochemical profile and antioxidant activity of sesame seed (Sesamum indicum) by-products for stability and shelf life improvement of refined olive oil. Antioxidants 11:338. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020338CrossRef

Kaya I, Bölükbaş B, Aykut U, Uğurlu M, Muruz H, Salman M (2022) The effects of adding waste sesame seeds to diets on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat fatty acid composition of Karayaka lambs. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 69:183–189. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.843049CrossRef

Awawdeh MS, Hananeh WM, Abdullah AY (2018) Histopathological effects of alternative feedstuffs (sesame hulls and Prosopis juliflora) on ruminal walls in black goat kids in Jordan. J Appl Anim Res 46(1):130–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1276020CrossRef

Varga GA, Kolver ES (1997) Microbial and animal limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. J Nutr 127:819S-823S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.5.819SCrossRef

10.

Abid K, Jabri J, Beckers Y, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2019) Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on the ruminal fermentation of agro-industrial by-products. S Afr J Anim Sci 49(4):612–618. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i4.2CrossRef

11.

Abid K, Jabri J, Ammar H, Ben Said S, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Lopez S, Kamoun M (2020) Effect of treating olive cake with fibrolytic enzymes on feed intake, digestibility and performance in growing lambs. Anim Feed Sci Tech 261:114405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114405CrossRef

12.

Abid K, Jabri J, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2022) Study of the influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme additive on chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, and nutritional value of brewer’s spent grain. Food Sci Nutr 10(6):1707–1713. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2743CrossRef

13.

Abid K, Jabri J, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2022) In vitro study on the effects of exogenic fibrolytic enzymes produced from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on ruminal degradation of olive mill waste. Arch Anim Breed 65:79–88. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-79-2022CrossRef

14.

Kholif AE, Gouda GA, Morsy TA, Matloup OH, Fahmy M, Gomaa AS, Patra AK (2022) Dietary date palm leaves ensiled with fibrolytic enzymes decreased methane production, and improved feed degradability and fermentation kinetics in a ruminal in vitro system. Waste Biomass Valor 13:3475–3488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01752-7CrossRef

15.

Zhang J, Wang C, Liu Q, Guo G, Huo W, Pei C, Jiang Q (2022) Influence of fibrolytic enzymes mixture on performance, nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation and microbiota in Holstein bulls. J Anim Feed Sci 31(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/147188/2022CrossRef

16.

Beauchemin KA, Colombatto D, Morgavi DP, Yang WZ (2003) Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. J Anim Sci 81(14_suppl_2):E37–E47. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2E37xCrossRef

17.

Wood TM, Bhat KM (1988) Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enzymol 160(87):112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(88)60109-1CrossRef

18.

Baiely P, Poutanen K (1992) Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol 23:257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(92)90074-JCrossRef

19.

Association of Official Chemists Analytical Chemists (2016) Official methodes of analysis of AOAC international, 20^th Edn., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, ISBN 0–935584–87–0

20.

Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2CrossRef

21.

Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Borowy NK, Becker K (1993) Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. J Sci Food Agr 61:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740610205CrossRef

22.

Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030CrossRef

23.

Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017CrossRef

24.

Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France JA (1994) Simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRef

25.

Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 28:7–55

26.

SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT^® 9.3, User's Guide, Cary, NC, USA. ISBN 978–1–60764–896–3

27.

France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, Lopez S, Bannink A (2000) Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br J Nutr 83:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000180CrossRef

28.

Getachew G, Blummel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K (1998) In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Tech 72:261–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2CrossRef

29.

Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K (1997) In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. J Anim Physiol An N 77:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00734.xCrossRef

30.

Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N (2006) Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Anim Feed Sci Technol 128(3–4):276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.11.001CrossRef

31.

Dehority BA (1993) Laboratory manual for classification and morphology of rumen ciliate protozoa. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351073912CrossRef

32.

Broderick GA, Kang JH (1980) Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 63:64–75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8CrossRef

33.

Abaş I, Özpinar H, Kutay HC, Kahraman R, Eseceli H (2005) Determination of the metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy lactation (NEL) contents of some feeds in the Marmara region by in vitro gas technique. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29:751–757

34.

Datsomor O, Gou-Qi Z, Miao L (2022) Effect of ligninolytic axenic and coculture white-rot fungi on rice straw chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics. Sci Rep 12:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05107-zCrossRef

35.

Lashkari S, Taghizadeh A (2013) Nutrient digestibility and evaluation of protein and carbohydrate fractionation of citrus by-products. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 97(4):701–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01312.xCrossRef

36.

Bionaz M, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Busato S (2020) Advances in fatty acids nutrition in dairy cows: from gut to cells and effects on performance. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 11:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00512-8CrossRef

37.

Joy F, Johnson JA, Górka P, McKinnon JJ, Hendrick S, Penner GB (2021) Effect of dietary lipid inclusion from by-product-based pellets on dry matter intake, ruminal fermentation, and nutrient digestion in finishing beef heifers. Can J Anim Sci 101:481–492. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0133CrossRef

38.

Makkar HPS (2003) Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rumin Res 49(3):241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1CrossRef

39.

Min BR, Barry TN, Attwood GT, McNabb WC (2003) The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperature forages. A review Anim Feed Sci Technol 106:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00041-5CrossRef

40.

Mueller-Harvey I (2006) Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J Sci Food Agric 86:2010–2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577CrossRef

41.

Waghorn G (2008) Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production-Progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147:116–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.013CrossRef

42.

Hristov AN, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Firkins J, Rotz A, Dell C, Adesogan A, Yang W, Tricarico J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Dijkstra, J Oosting S (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production - a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions, In: Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Makkar HPS (eds). FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 177. FAO, Rome, Italy. ISBN 978–92–5–107658–3

43.

Lesschaeve I, Noble AC (2005) Polyphenols: factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences. Am J Clin Nutr 81:330S-335S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/81.1.330SCrossRef

44.

Rosser C, Terry SA, Badhan A, McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA (2022) Current knowledge and future opportunities for Ruminant Enzymes. In: Bedford MR, Partridge GC, Hruby M, Walk CL (ed) Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. CABI Publishing, CAB International, London, UK, pp 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789241563.0000.

45.

Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd Edn., Comstock: Ithaca, NY, USA. ISBN-13: 978-0801427725

46.

Lopez S (2005) In vitro and in situ techniques for estimating digestibility. In: Dijkstra J, Forbes JM, France J (ed) Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998145.0000

47.

Takenaka A, Tajima K, Mitsumori M, Kajikawa H (2004) Fiber digestion by rumen ciliate protozoa. Microbes Environ 19:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.19.203CrossRef

48.

Abid K, Jabri J, Beckers Y, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2019) Influence of adding fibrolytic enzymes on the ruminal fermentation of date palm by-products. Arch Anim Breed 62:1–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-1-2019CrossRef

49.

Togtokhbayar N, Cerrillo MA, Rodriguez GB, Elghadour MMY, Salem AZM, Urankhaich C, Jigjidpurev S, Odongo NE, Kholif AD (2015) Effect of exogenous xylanase on rumen in vitro gas production and degradability of wheat straw. Anim Sci J 86:765–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12364CrossRef

50.

Chenost M, Kayouli C (1997) Utilisation des fourrages grossiers en regions chaudes. FAO production et santé animales. Paper No. 135. Rome, Italy. ISBN 9252039813–9789252039815

51.

Dijkstra J, Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Strathe AB, López S, France J, Bannink A (2012) Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH. Anim Feed Sci Tech 172(1–2):22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.005CrossRef

52.

Souza JM, Souza JCSM, Sousa DO, Del Valle TA, Ghizzi LG, Alcântara AHD, Mesquita LG, Sousa RLM, Bueno ICS, Balieiro JCDC (2021) The effects of compound treatment of Aspergillus oryzae and fibrolytic enzyme on in vitro degradation, gas production and fermentative profile of maize silage and sugarcane silage. J Agric Sci 159(1–2):147–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185962100037XCrossRef

53.

Refat B, Christensen DA, Ismael A, Feng X, Rodríguez-Espinosa ME, Guevara-Oquendo VH, Yang J, AlZahal O, Yu P (2021) Evaluating the effects of fibrolytic enzymes on rumen fermentation, omasal nutrient flow, and production performance in dairy cows during early lactation. Can J Anim Sci 102:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0062CrossRef

54.

Newbold CJ, De la Fuente G, Belanche A, Ramos-Morales E, McEwan NR (2015) The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front Microbiol 6:1313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313CrossRef

Titel: Improving the nutritional value and rumen fermentation characteristics of sesame seed coats through bioconversion approach using exogenous fibrolytic enzymes produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum
verfasst von: Khalil Abid
Jihene Jabri
Hela Yaich
Atef Malek
Jamel Rekhis
Mohamed Kamoun
Publikationsdatum: 17.10.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 16/2023
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03402-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 16/2023

Functional characterization of high-yield plant protein powder valorized from de-oiled sour cherry seed using microwave-assisted enzymatic extraction followed by spray- and freeze-drying

Characterizing quality of frass produced by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae after treating water hyacinth and fruit wastes in various proportions

Methylene blue removal by agricultural wastes from Annona muricata and Treculia africana seeds

A new Enzolv process for simultaneous delignification and lignin-derived chemical production from the woody biomass of Melia dubia

Production of bacterial cellulose from enzymatic hydrolysate of kitchen waste by fermentation with kombucha

Retraction Note: Machine learning prediction of higher heating value of biomass