nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

23.12.2022 | Original Article

Nutritional value assessments of peanut hulls and valorization with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes extracted from a mixture culture of Aspergillus strains and Neurospora intermedia

verfasst von: Khalil Abid, Jihene Jabri, Hela Yaich, Atef Malek, Jamel Rekhis, Mohamed Kamoun

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Peanut hulls are abundant waste with high bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and cell wall polysaccharides but low nutritional value. The aim of this study was to valorize this agricultural waste into alternative ruminant feed with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFE) produced by fermentation of mixture culture of Aspergillus strains (A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. oryzae, and A. sojae) and Neurospora intermedia. Peanut hulls were pretreated for 24 h with increasing EFE levels 0, 1, 2, and 4 mg/g dry matter. The results showed that the effectiveness of this additive depended on EFE level. The low EFE level did not affect their nutritional value. The moderate and high EFE levels converted part of their cell wall polysaccharide compound into non-fiber carbohydrates and solubilize their organic matter without altering their bioactive compounds and their antioxidant activity. Consequently, these two levels of EFE accelerate rumen fermentation process, reduce the time of onset of rumen fermentation, and improve cell wall polysaccharide digestibility, net energy lactation, and short-chain fatty acid production. However, only the high EFE level promoted the proliferation of rumen protozoa and the amount of fermentation and dry matter digestibility and reduced rumen ammonia nitrogen by conversion into microbial crude protein. In conclusion, this practical bioprocess with the highest EFE level can be used as an effective tool for bioconversion of these wastes into energy feeds with high bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity to substitute expensive ruminant feeds. This strategy can provide a new source of revenue for the peanut shelling and peanut oil industries and protect the environment from the pollution.

Graphical Abstract

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

García-Rodríguez J, Ranilla MJ, France J, Alaiz-Moretón H, Carro MD, López S (2019) Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and rumen fermentation kinetics of agro-industrial by-products. Animals 9(11):861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110861CrossRef

Correddu F, Lunesu MF, Buffa G, Atzori AS, Nudda A, Battacone G, Pulina G (2020) Can agro-industrial by-products rich in polyphenols be advantageously used in the feeding and nutrition of dairy small ruminants? Animals 10:131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010131CrossRef

Oosting S, van der Lee J, Verdegem M, de Vries M, Vernooij A, Bonilla-Cedrez C, Kabir K (2022) Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems. Food Secur 14:273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01205-4CrossRef

Perea-Moreno MA, Manzano-Agugliaro F, Hernandez-Escobedo Q, Perea-Moreno AJ (2018) Peanut shell for energy: properties and its potential to respect the environment. Sustainability 10(9):3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093254CrossRef

Adhikari B, Dhungana SK, Ali MW, Adhikari A, Kim ID, Shin DH (2019) Antioxidant activities, polyphenol, flavonoid, and amino acid contents in peanut shell. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18(4):437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.02.004CrossRef

Feng MM, Wang YF, Cai X, Zhang HC, Xu JX (2022) Changes in the physicochemical properties and in vitro protein digestibility of peanut hulls treated via mechanical activation. Food Sci Biotechnol 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-022-01084-1

Millam JJ, Bello SS, Abbaya HY, John PA (2020) Growth performance and serum biochemical profile in Yankasa rams fed alkali -treated groundnut shells. Fudma J Sci 3(4):55–59. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0403-251CrossRef

Hill GM (2002) Peanut by-products fed to cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 18(2):295–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00019-1CrossRef

Yuan J, Wan X (2019) Multiple-factor associative effects of peanut shell combined with alfalfa and concentrate determined by in vitro gas production method. Czech J Anim Sci 64(8):352–360. https://doi.org/10.17221/94/2019-CJASCrossRef

10.

Abo-Donia FM, Abdel-Azim SN, Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Buendía G, Soliman NAM (2014) Feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation activities in sheep-fed peanut hulls treated with Trichoderma viride or urea. Trop Anim Health Prod 46(1):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0479-zCrossRef

11.

Farooq S, Shah MA, Ganaie TA, Mir SA (2021) Exogenous enzymes. In: Gani A, Ashwar BA (eds) Food Biopolymers: Structural, Functional and Nutraceutical Properties. Springer Cham, Switzerland, pp 319–338CrossRef

12.

Abid K, Jabri J, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2022) In vitro study on the effects of exogenic fibrolytic enzymes produced from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on ruminal degradation of olive mill waste. Arch Anim Breed 65:79–88. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-79-2022CrossRef

13.

Abid K, Jabri J, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2022) Improving the nutritional value and rumen fermentation characteristics of sesame seed coats through bioconversion approach using exogenous fibrolytic enzymes produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Biomass Convers Biorefin 1-9.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03402-3

14.

Yang J, Guevara-Oquendo VH, Refat B, Yu P (2022) Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme derived from Trichoderma reesei on rumen degradation characteristics and degradability of low-tannin whole plant faba bean silage in dairy cows. Dairy 3(2):303–313. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy3020023CrossRef

15.

Zhang J, Wang C, Liu Q, Guo G, Huo W, Pei C, Jiang Q (2022) Influence of fibrolytic enzymes mixture on performance, nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation and microbiota in Holstein bulls. J Anim Feed Sci 31(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/147188/2022CrossRef

16.

Refat B, Christensen DA, McKinnon JJ, Yang W, Beattie AD, McAllister TA, Eun JS, Abdel-Rahman GA, Yu P (2018) Effect of fibrolytic enzymes on lactational performance, feeding behavior, and digestibility in high-producing dairy cows fed a barley silage–based diet. J Dairy Sci 101(9):7971–7979. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14203CrossRef

17.

Abid K, Jabri J, Ammar H, Ben Said S, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Lopez S, Kamoun M (2020) Effect of treating olive cake with fibrolytic enzymes on feed intake, digestibility and performance in growing lambs. Anim Feed Sci Tech 261:114405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114405CrossRef

18.

Sallam SM, Kholif AE, Amin KA, El-Din ANN, Attia MF, Matloup OH, Anele UY (2020) Effects of microbial feed additives on feed utilization and growth performance in growing Barki lambs fed diet based on peanut hay. Anim Biotechno 31(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2019.1616554CrossRef

19.

Kholif AE, Hamdon HA, Gouda GA, Kassab AY, Morsy TA, Patra AK (2022) Feeding date-palm leaves ensiled with fibrolytic enzymes or multi-species probiotics to Farafra ewes: intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, blood chemistry, milk production and milk fatty acid profile. Animals 12(9):1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091107CrossRef

20.

Tirado-González DN, Tirado-Estrada G, Miranda-Romero LA, Ramírez-Valverde R, Medina-Cuéllar SE, Salem AZM (2021) Effects of addition of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on digestibility and milk and meat production—a systematic review. Ann Anim Sci 21(4):1159–1192. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2021-0001CrossRef

21.

Rosser C, Terry SA, Badhan A, McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA (2022) Current knowledge and future opportunities for ruminant enzymes. In: Bedford MR, Partridge GC, Hruby M, Walk CL (eds) Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. CABI Publishing, CAB International, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789241563.0000CrossRef

22.

Wang Y, Ramirez-Bribiesca JE, Yanke LJ, Tsang A, McAllister TA (2012) Effect of exogeous fibrolytic enzyme application on the microbial attachment and digestion of barley straw in vitro. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 25(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11158CrossRef

23.

Yang J, Refat B, Guevara-Oquendo VH, Yu P (2022) Lactational performance, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows fed whole-plant faba bean silage-based diet with fibrolytic enzyme. Animal 16(9):100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100606CrossRef

24.

Jabri J, Abid K, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2019) Effect of combining exogenous fibrolytics enzymes supplementation with alkali and acid pre-treatments on wheat straw hydrolysis and ruminal fermentation. Indian J Anim Sci 89(7):780–785

25.

Baiely P, Poutanen K (1992) Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol 23:257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(92)90074-JCrossRef

26.

Wood TM, Bhat KM (1988) Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enzymol 160(87):112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(88)60109-1CrossRef

27.

Association of Official Chemists Analytical Chemists (2000) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

28.

Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74(10):3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2CrossRef

29.

Abid K, Jabri J, Beckers Y, Yaich H, Malek A, Rekhis J, Kamoun M (2019) Influence of adding fibrolytic enzymes on the ruminal fermentation of date palm by-products. Arch Anim Breed 62:1–8. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-1-2019CrossRef

30.

National Research Council (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th edn. National Academies Press, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825CrossRef

31.

Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM (1999) Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol 299:152–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1CrossRef

32.

Broadhurst RB, Jones WT (1978) Analysis of condensed tannins using acidified vanillin. J Sci Food Agric 29(9):788–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740290908CrossRef

33.

Zhu H, Wang Y, Liu Y, Xia Y, Tang T (2010) Analysis of flavonoids in Portulaca oleracea L. by UV–vis spectrophotometry with comparative study on different extraction technologies. Food Anal Methods 3(2):90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-009-9091-2CrossRef

34.

Xu BJ, Chang SKC (2007) A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J Food Sci 72(2):S159–S166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00260.xCrossRef

35.

Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France JA (1994) Simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48(3–4):185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRef

36.

Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 28:7–55

37.

Mauricio RM, Mould FL, Dhanoa MS, Owen E, Channa KS, Theodorou MK (1999) A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 79(4):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00033-4CrossRef

38.

France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, Lopez S, Bannink A (2000) Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br J Nutr 83:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000180CrossRef

39.

SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3, user's guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

40.

Dehority BA (1993) Laboratory manual for classification and morphology of rumen ciliate protozoa. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351073912CrossRef

41.

Broderick GA, Kang JH (1980) Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 63:64–75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8CrossRef

42.

Getachew G, Blummel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K (1998) In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Tech 72:261–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2CrossRef

43.

Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K (1997) In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. J Anim Physiol An N 77:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00734.xCrossRef

44.

Olagaray KE, Bradford BJ (2019) Plant flavonoids to improve productivity of ruminants–a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 251:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.004CrossRef

45.

Gemeda BS, Hassen A (2015) Effect of tannin and species variation on in vitro digestibility, gas, and methane production of tropical browse plants. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 28(2):188. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0325CrossRef

46.

Yanza YR, Fitri A, Suwignyo B, Hidayatik N, Kumalasari NR, Irawan A, Jayanegara A (2021) The utilisation of tannin extract as a dietary additive in ruminant nutrition: a meta-analysis. Animals 11(11):3317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113317CrossRef

47.

Akinfemi A, Adua MM, Adu OA (2012) Evaluation of nutritive values of tropical feed sources and by-products using in vitro gas production technique in ruminant animals. J Food Agric 24(4):348–353

48.

Du W, Hou F, Tsunekawa A, Kobayashi N, Peng F, Ichinohe T (2020) Substitution of leguminous forage for oat hay improves nitrogen utilization efficiency of crossbred Simmental calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 104(4):998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13288CrossRef

49.

Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYCrossRef

50.

Lynch JP, Jin L, Church JS, Baah J, Beauchemin KA (2013) Fibrolytic enzymes and a ferulic acid esterase-producing bacterial additive applied to alfalfa hay at baling: effects on fibre digestibility, chemical composition and conservation characteristics. Grass Forage Sci 70(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12093CrossRef

51.

Kholif AE, Elghandour MMY, Rodríguez GB, Olafadehan OA, Salem AZM (2017) Anaerobic ensiling of raw agricultural waste with a fibrolytic enzyme cocktail as a cleaner and sustainable biological product. J Clean Prod 142(4):2649–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.012CrossRef

52.

Kholif AE, Gouda GA, Morsy TA, Matloup OH, Fahmy M, Gomaa AS, Patra AK (2022) Dietary date palm leaves ensiled with fibrolytic enzymes decreased methane production, and improved feed degradability and fermentation kinetics in a ruminal in vitro system. Waste Biomass Valorization 13:3475–3488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01752-7CrossRef

53.

Li Z, Deng Q, Liu Y, Yan T, Li F, Cao Y, Yao J (2018) Dynamics of methanogenesis, ruminal fermentation and fiber digestibility in ruminants following elimination of protozoa: a meta-analysis. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0305-6CrossRef

54.

Oba M, Allen MS (1999) Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 82(3):589–596. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9CrossRef

55.

Refat B, Christensen DA, Ismael A, Feng X, Rodríguez-Espinosa ME, Guevara-Oquendo VH, Yang J, AlZahal O, Yu P (2021) Evaluating the effects of fibrolytic enzymes on rumen fermentation, omasal nutrient flow, and production performance in dairy cows during early lactation. Can J Anim Sci 102(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0062CrossRef

56.

Jouany JP (2006) Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Anim Reprod Sci 96(3–4):250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.005CrossRef

Titel: Nutritional value assessments of peanut hulls and valorization with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes extracted from a mixture culture of Aspergillus strains and Neurospora intermedia
verfasst von: Khalil Abid
Jihene Jabri
Hela Yaich
Atef Malek
Jamel Rekhis
Mohamed Kamoun
Publikationsdatum: 23.12.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03681-w