nach oben

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Erschienen in:

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Fuzzy-TISM: A Fuzzy Extension of TISM for Group Decision Making

verfasst von: Gaurav Khatwani, Surya Prakash Singh, Ashish Trivedi, Ankur Chauhan

Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper proposes Fuzzy-TISM, approach for group decision making process. The proposed approach is a fuzzy extension of TISM, which is a multi-criteria decision making technique. TISM is an effective technique and is applied widely to identify relationships among different criteria by creating a comprehensive systematic model of directly and indirectly related criteria. The proposed Fuzzy-TISM approach consolidates the process of group preference aggregation in the fuzzy environment, which can be easily applied to any real world group decision making problem. The proposed approach is a novel attempt to integrate TISM approach with the fuzzy sets. The integration of TISM with fuzzy sets provides flexibility to decision makers to further understand the level of influences of one criteria over another, which was earlier present only in the form of binary (0,1) numbers. 0 represents no influence and 1 represents influence. Due to this, the decision maker is left with only the option of saying 0 or 1 irrespective of the level of influence whether it is low, high, or very high. The proposed Fuzzy-TISM approach take care of this issue and gives a wider flexibility to express the level of influence using fuzzy numbers. The working methodology of proposed Fuzzy-TISM is demonstrated through an illustrative example based on vendor selection.

Vorheriger Artikel Development of Enhanced Marketing Flexibility by Optimally Allocating Sales Campaign Days for Maximizing Total Expected Sales

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443–457.CrossRef

Bellman, R., & Zadeh, L. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), B-141.CrossRef

Boender, C., De Graan, J., & Lootsma, F. (1989). Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29(2), 133–143.CrossRef

Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2007). A multi-attribute comparison of Turkish quality consultants by fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 6(01), 191–207.CrossRef

Chang, Y., & Yeh, C. (2002). A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(1), 166–177.CrossRef

Chen, S., Hwang, C., Beckmann, M., & Krelle, W. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Ching-Lai, H., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer.

Dubey, R., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 131–143.CrossRef

Fan, Z., & Liu, Y. (2010). A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 4000–4008.CrossRef

Farris, D., & Sage, A. (1975). On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2(2), 149–174.CrossRef

Feng, C., & Wang, R. (2000). Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 133–142.CrossRef

Haleem, A., & Sushil., (2012). Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning & Control, 23(10–11), 722–734.CrossRef

Harary, F., Norman, R., & Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York: Wiley.

Hawthorne, R., & Sage, A. (1975). On applications of interpretive structural modeling to higher education program planning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 9(1), 31–43.CrossRef

Hess, P., & Siciliano, J. (1996). Management responsibility for performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hsu, H., & Chen, C. (1996). Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(3), 279–285.CrossRef

Hsu, H., & Chen, C. (1997). Fuzzy credibility relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Information Sciences, 96(1), 79–91.

Jain, R. (1977). A procedure for multiple-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets. International Journal of Systems Science, 8(1), 1–7.CrossRef

Jedlicka, A., & Meyer, R. (1980). Interpretive structural modeling-cross-cultural uses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 10(1), 49–51.CrossRef

Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2005). IT-enablement of supply chains: Understanding the barriers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(1), 11–27.CrossRef

Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., & Nurmi, H. (1992). Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49(1), 21–31.CrossRef

Kauffman, A., & Gupta, M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and application. New York: VanNostrand Reinhold.

Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: Wiley.

Laarhoven, P. Van, & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1), 199–227.CrossRef

Lee, H. (2002). Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 132(3), 303–315.CrossRef

Lee, D. (2007). Structured decision making with interpretive structural modeling (ISM): Implementing the core of interactive management: An analysis and desision. New York: Sorach Incorporated, McGraw-Hill.

Li, R. (1999). Fuzzy method in group decision making. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 38(1), 91–101.CrossRef

Malone, D. (1975). An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(3), 397–404.CrossRef

Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52–59.CrossRef

Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014). Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 113–130.CrossRef

Mohammed, I. (2008). Creating flex-lean-agile value chain by outsourcing: An ISM-based interventional roadmap. Business Process Management Journal, 14(3), 338–389.CrossRef

Nasim, S. (2011). Total interpretive structural modeling of continuity and change forces in e-government. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1(2), 147–168.CrossRef

Nurmi, H. (1981). Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6(3), 249–259.CrossRef

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. (2003). Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(05), 635–652.CrossRef

Prasad, U., & Suri, R. (2011). Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3–4), 31–40.

Sagar, M., Bora, S., Gangwal, A., Gupta, P., Kumar, A., & Agarwal, A. (2013). Factors affecting customer loyalty in cloud computing: A customer defection-centric view to develop a void-in-customer loyalty amplification model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 143–156.CrossRef

Saxena, J., Sushil, & Vrat, P. (2006). Policy and strategy formulation: An application of flexible systems methodology.. New Delhi: GIFT Pub.

Sharma, H. D., Gupta, A. D., & Sushil, (1995). The objectives of waste management in India: A futures inquiry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(3), 285–309.CrossRef

Srivastava, A. K. (2013). Modeling strategic performance factors for effective strategy execution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 554–582.CrossRef

Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil, (2014). Modeling drivers of adapt for effective strategy execution. The learning Organization, 21(6), 369–391.CrossRef

Sushil, (1994). Flexible System Methodology. Systems Practice, 7(6), 633–652.CrossRef

Sushil, (1997). Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4), 259–275.CrossRef

Sushil, (2012a). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.CrossRef

Sushil, (2012b). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.

Tanino, T. (1984). Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2), 117–131.CrossRef

Tsaur, S., Chang, T., & Yen, C. (2002). The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23(2), 107–115.CrossRef

Waller, R. (1980). Contextual relations and mathematical relations in interpretive structural modeling. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, 10(3), 143–145.

Warfield, J. (1973). On arranging elements of a hierarchy in graphic form. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, 2, 121–132.

Warfield, J. (1974). Toward interpretation of complex structural models. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, 5, 405–417.

Warfield, J. (1976). Societal systems: Planning, policy, and complexity. New York: Wiley.

Warfield, J. (1994). Science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Lowa: Iowa State Press.

Warfield, J. (1999). Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(1), 3–40.CrossRef

Warfield, J. (2003). The mathematics of structure. Palm Harbor: AJAR Publishing Company.

Warfield, J., & Hill, J. (1973). An assault on complexity. Columbus: Battelle Memorial Institute.

Wei, G. (2009). Uncertain linguistic hybrid geometric mean operator and its application to group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 17(02), 251–267.CrossRef

Xu, Z. (2004). Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, Information Sciences, 168(1), 171–184.CrossRef

Xu, Z. (2006). Approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decision Support Systems, 41(2), 488–499.CrossRef

Xu, Y., & Da, Q. (2008). A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information under uncertain linguistic environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8), 837–841.CrossRef

Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.CrossRef

Zimmerman, H. (1991). Fuzzy Set Theory—and its applications. Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef

Zimmermann, H. (1987). Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems (pp. 193–233). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef

Titel: Fuzzy-TISM: A Fuzzy Extension of TISM for Group Decision Making
verfasst von: Gaurav Khatwani
Surya Prakash Singh
Ashish Trivedi
Ankur Chauhan
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2015
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0087-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Flexible Decision Modeling for Evaluating the Risks in Green Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and IRP Methodologies

Managing Wastivity for Sustainability

Development of Enhanced Marketing Flexibility by Optimally Allocating Sales Campaign Days for Maximizing Total Expected Sales

Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Competitive Priorities of the Manufacturing Performance in Karachi

Performance Measurement in Banking & Software Firm: An Empirical Research

Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM) of the Enablers of a Flexible Control System for Industry

Premium Partner