nach oben

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Erschienen in:

20.10.2017 | Original Research

Flexible System Approach for Understanding Requisites of Product Innovation Management

verfasst von: Abid Haleem, Sanjay Kumar, Sunil Luthra

Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Innovation may be a key towards business success and winning over competition prevailing in the market. Effective management of innovations may be recognized as a requirement to sustain the existing position of an organization and also to attract new customers for gaining a competitive advantage over other players in the market. Product innovativeness, regarding ‘new’/‘significantly improved’: features; functions, aesthetics etc., may be valued as an increasingly important research area in Indian context for domestic and international business sustainability. It has been attempted to identify and understand important requisites for product innovation management in Indian organizations. Literature review approach has been used for identifying requisites and benefits of product innovation management. AHP methodology has been used to understand the importance of requisites of product innovation management. ‘Total interpretive structural modelling’ has been utilized to develop and appropriately construe interpretive structural model of requisites and benefits of product innovation management. This paper may also help to practicing innovation managers of various Indian organizations to identify, understand and analyse ‘strengths and weaknesses’ of their organization in managing resources and activities involved in ‘product innovation management processes’.

Vorheriger Artikel Does Workplace Flexibility Usher Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model on the Enablers of Innovative Workplace Behavior

Nächster Artikel Analysis and Prioritization of Green Health Suppliers Using Fuzzy ELECTRE Method with a Case Study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26.CrossRef

Afuah, A. (2002). Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 171–179.CrossRef

Aralica, Z., Račić, D., & Radić, D. (2008). Innovation propensity in Croatian enterprises: Results of a community innovation survey. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1), 77–88.CrossRef

Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., & Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644–657.CrossRef

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRef

Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 411–428.CrossRef

Botswana, L. G. (2013). Public sector innovation drivers: A process model. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2), 165–176.CrossRef

Calantone, R. J., Chan, K., & Cui, A. S. (2006). Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 408–421.CrossRef

Carayannis, E. G., & Provance, M. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 90–107.CrossRef

Chaminade, C., & De Fuentes, C. (2012). Competences as drivers and enablers of globalization of innovation: The Swedish ICT industry and emerging economies. Innovation and Development, 2(2), 209–229.CrossRef

Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1–17.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching anew paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 128–152.

Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2008). Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Research-Technology Management, 51(2), 47–58.CrossRef

Cormican, K., & O’Sullivan, D. (2004). Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management. Technovation, 24(10), 819–829.CrossRef

Davila, T., Epstein, M., & Shelton, R. (2012). Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. FT Press.

Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2010). A framework for the assessment of an organization’s innovation excellence. Total Quality Management, 21(9), 903–918.CrossRef

Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20–29.CrossRef

Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, dtr060.

Elenkov, D. S., Judge, W., & Wright, P. (2005). Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: An international multi-cluster comparative study. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 665–682.CrossRef

Evangelista, R. (2000). Sectoral patterns of technological change in services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(3), 183–222.CrossRef

Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 21–37.CrossRef

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford Handbooks Online.

Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163–176.CrossRef

Fritsch, M., & Meschede, M. (2001). Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3), 335–350.CrossRef

Gumusluoğlu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The roles of internal and external support for innovation*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 264–277.CrossRef

Hadjimanolis, A. (1999). Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus). Technovation, 19(9), 561–570.CrossRef

Haleem, A., Sushil, Q., Asim, M., & Kumar, S. (2012). Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning and Control, 23(10–11), 722–734.CrossRef

Husain, Z., Sushil, & Pathak, R. D. (2002). A technology management perspective on collaborations in Indian automobile industry: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 167–201.CrossRef

Kumar, S. (2014). Some application of analytic hierarchy process. Data Mining and Knowledge Engineering, 6(9), 382–384.

Kumar, N., Kumar, S., Haleem, A., & Gahlot, P. (2013a). Implementing lean manufacturing system: ISM approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 996–1012.CrossRef

Kumar, S., Luthra, S., & Haleem, A. (2013b). Customer involvement in greening the supply chain: An interpretive structural modelling methodology. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Kumar, S., Luthra, S., & Haleem, A. (2014). Critical success factors of customer involvement in greening the supply chain: An empirical study. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 19(3), 283–310.CrossRef

Kumar, S., Parashar, N., & Haleem, A. (2009). Analytical hierarchy process applied to vendor selection problem: Small scale, medium scale and large scale industries. Business Intelligence Journal, 2(2), 355–362.

Lee, S. M., Olson, D. L., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation: Convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817–831.CrossRef

Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.CrossRef

Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2013). Identifying and ranking of strategies to implement green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industry using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 930–962.CrossRef

Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 762–776.CrossRef

Luthra, S., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., & Haleem, A. (2011). Barriers to implementing green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 231–257.CrossRef

Madaan, J., & Mangla, S. (2015). Decision modeling approach for eco-driven flexible green supply chain. In Sushil and G. Chroust (Eds.), Systemic flexibility and business agility (pp. 343–364). India: Springer.

Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014). Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 113–130.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Madaan, J., & Chan, F. T. (2012). Analysis of performance focused variables for multi-objective flexible decision modeling approach of product recovery Systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 77–86.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Madaan, J., & Chan, F. T. (2013). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3428–3442.CrossRef

Mannan, B., Khurana, S., & Haleem, A. (2015).Technological innovation challenges and opportunities in India and the developing countries. In 2015 annual IEEE India conference (INDICON), pp. 1–6. Doi:10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443854

Mannan, B., Khurana, S., & Haleem, A. (2016). Modeling of critical factors for integrating sustainability with innovation for Indian small- and medium-scale manufacturing enterprises: An ISM and MICMAC approach. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/23311975.2016.1140318.CrossRef

Manoochehri, G. (2010). Measuring innovation: Challanges and best practices. California Journal of Operations Management, 8, 67–73.

Martensen, A., & Mouritsen, J. (2014). Prioritising investments in marketing activities to improve business performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(5–6), 582–601.CrossRef

McMahon, D., & Thorsteinsdóttir, H. (2013). Pursuing endogenous high-tech innovation in developing countries: A look at regenerative medicine innovation in Brazil, China and India. Research Policy, 42(4), 965–974.CrossRef

Mu, J., Peng, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2009). Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation, 29(3), 170–180.CrossRef

Nasim, S. (2011). Total Interpretive Structural Modeling of continuity and change forces in e-government. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1(2), 147–168.CrossRef

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 44–69.CrossRef

Online available at http://www.ficci.com/spdocument/20144/FICCI-MSME-Summit-2012-knowledge-paper-new.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2014.

Online available at: http://www.ibef.org/download/ Innovation-in-Indian-Manufacturing-310512.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2014.

Online available at: http://www.knowledgecommission.gov.in/ downloads/documents/NKC_Innovation.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2014.

Online available at: http://www.scidev.net/global/innovation/news/china-and-india-catching-up-in-the-innovation-stakes.html. Accessed 8 June 2014.

Orcutt, L. H., & AlKadri, M. (2009). Barriers and enablers of innovation: A pilot survey of transportation professionals. California PATH Program.

Patri, R., & Suresh, M. (2017). Modelling the enablers of agile performance in healthcare organization: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 251–272.

Peris-Ortiz, M., & Hervás-Oliver, J. L. (2014). Management innovation and technological innovation: Friends or foes?. In Management innovation (pp. 1–17). Springer International Publishing.

Romano, C. A. (1990). Identifying factors which influence product innovation: A case study approach. Journal of Management Studies, 27(1), 75–95.CrossRef

Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchichal structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.CrossRef

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (p. 54). New York: McGraw Hill Inc.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRef

Sandeep, K., Sanjay, K., Pardeep, G., & Abid, H. (2013). Analysis of interdependence among the enablers of green concept implementation in Indian automobile supply chain. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 4(2), 5–11.

Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158.CrossRef

Singh, N., & Sushil, (2004). Flexibility in product development for success in dynamic market environment. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 5(1), 23–34.

Soosay, C. A., Hyland, P. W., & Ferrer, M. (2008). Supply chain collaboration: Capabilitiesfor continuous innovation. Supply Chain Management: An international Journal, 13(2), 160–169.CrossRef

Steward, F., Wang, Y., & Tsoi, J. (2008). Direct measurement of innovation output using documentary and digital sources. In Report for measuring eco-innovation project. European Commission and European Environment Agency, Bruselas.

Sund, K. J. (2008). Innovation in the postal sector: Strategies, barriers and enablers. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/5224/. Accessed 16 June 2014.

Sushil. (1994). Flexible systems methodology. Systems Practice, 7(6), 633–652.

Sushil. (2009). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), 1–10.

Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.

Sushil. (2016). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3.

Sushil. (2017). Modified ISM/TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reducing direct pair comparisons. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 331–351.CrossRef

Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423–437.CrossRef

Van der Panne, G., Van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(03), 309–338.CrossRef

Vaona, A., & Pianta, M. (2008). Firmsize and innovation in Europeanmanufacturing. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 283–299.CrossRef

Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy. Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313.CrossRef

Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing subsystem matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1, 74–80.CrossRef

Wasuja, S., & Sagar, M. (2012). Cognitive bias in salespersons in specialty drug selling of pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 6(4), 310–335.CrossRef

Xie, Y. H. (2012). Foreign firms’ brand extensions in a host market: Strategic factors in international branding strategy. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(1), 105–118.CrossRef

Yadav, N., & Sushil (2014). Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM) of strategic performance management for Indian telecom service providers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(4), 421–445.CrossRef

Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561.

Titel: Flexible System Approach for Understanding Requisites of Product Innovation Management
verfasst von: Abid Haleem
Sanjay Kumar
Sunil Luthra
Publikationsdatum: 20.10.2017
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0171-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Is Management Science Applicable at the Top Level?

Simulated Annealing-Based Embedded Meta-Heuristic Approach to Solve Bi-objective Robust Stochastic Sustainable Cellular Layout

Alignment of IT Authority and Citizens of Proposed Smart Cities in India: System Security and Privacy Perspective

Finding and Ranking High-Quality Answers in Community Question Answering Sites

Does Workplace Flexibility Usher Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model on the Enablers of Innovative Workplace Behavior

Analysis and Prioritization of Green Health Suppliers Using Fuzzy ELECTRE Method with a Case Study

Premium Partner