nach oben

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Erschienen in:

13.09.2021 | Original Research

Big Data-Driven Assessment of Proposals to Improve Enterprise Flexibility Through Control Options Untested in Practice

verfasst von: Mikhail Yurievich Ryabchikov, Elena Sergeevna Ryabchikova

Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The study discusses how the process information reserves can be used for improving production flexibility on the basis of production component variation control. Building upon the assumption that the data in question describe the functions of the production components as those experience perturbations, we submit that it may be possible to predict the productivity and economic efficiency for new, previously unused control options. We elaborate on the production components that ensure production flexibility, approaching them as a highly autonomous holon. We determine the conditions that make it possible to analyze the holon control options in isolation from controlling all other components. We also suggest a solution to the problem of predicting the employees’ impact on production. Our suggestion is based on limiting the types of impact accessible to a human operator. The study looks at the reasons behind the uncertainty of production control simulation modeling results, which stem from the peculiarities of the data collected. We propose a criterion for assessing the impact of uncertainty on the productivity indicators’ variation. This study offers a systemic overview of the aspects of a production simulation aimed at assessing the impact of uncertainty on productivity predictions. As an example, we review how uncertainty affects the variation of coke consumption and productivity of a blast furnace, which is ensured by selecting a suitable option for iron ore sinter quality control.

Vorheriger Artikel The Relationship Between “Job Satisfaction” and “Job Performance”: A Meta-analysis

Nächster Artikel Economic Efficiency of Outsourcing Business Models: A Comparative Assessment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Baykasoǧlu, A., Topaloǧlu, S., & Senyüzlüler, F. (2016). Manufacturing cell formation with flexible processing capabilities and worker assignment: Comparison of constraint programming and integer programming approaches. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part b: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 232(11), 2054–2068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416682281CrossRef

Bello-Pintado, A., Marco, T. G., & Zouaghi, F. (2019). Product/process definition, technology adoption and workforce qualification: Impact on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 57(1), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1468096CrossRef

Budylina, E. A., Garkina, I. A., Danilov, A. M., & Tyukalov, D. E. (2015). Parametric identification of human-machine system with random effects and interferences. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1–1, 74. (in Rus.).

Chencov, A. V., Chesnokov, Y. A., & Shavrin, S. V. (2003). Balance, logical and statistic model of the blast-furnace process. Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Rus.).

Contador, J. C., Satyro, W. C., Contador, J. L., & de Spinola, M. (2020). Flexibility in the Brazilian Industry 4.0: Challenges and opportunities. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00240-yCrossRef

Da Costa, M. B., Dos Santos, L. M. A. L., Schaefer, J. L., Baierle, I. C., & Nara, E. O. B. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies basic network identification. Scientometrics, 121, 977–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03216-7CrossRef

Daneev, A. V., Daneev, R. A., & Sizykh, V. N. (2017). Fuzzy control of the human-machine system based on an entropy approach and an anthropocentric model of the operator. Modern Technologies. System Analysis. Modeling, 56(4), 144–151. (in Rus.).CrossRef

Derigent, W., Cardin, O., & Trentesaux, D. (2020). Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01532-xCrossRef

Dey, S., Sharma, R. R. K., & Pandey, B. K. (2019). Relationship of manufacturing flexibility with organizational strategy. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00212-xCrossRef

Dmitriev, A. N., Vit’kina, G. Y., & Chesnokov, Y. A. (2015). Development of methodological basis for analysis of iron-ore raw material and coke quality influence on technical and economic performance of blast-furnace melting process. In Collection of works: Physical chemistry and technology in metallurgy (pp. 309–314). Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metallurgy (in Rus.).

Doyle-Kent, M., & Kopacek, P. (2020). Industry 5.0: Is the Manufacturing Industry on the Cusp of a New Revolution?. In: N. Durakbasa & M. Gençyılmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. ISPR 2019, ISPR 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_38

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Blome, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance: Integrating institutional theory, resource-based view and big data culture. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 341–361.CrossRef

Eidelwein, F., Piran, F. A. S., Lacerda, D. P., Dresch, A., & Rodrigues, L. H. (2018). Exploratory analysis of modularization strategy based on the theory of constraints thinking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(2), 111–122.CrossRef

Evans, S., & Bahrami, H. (2020). Super-flexibility in practice: Insights from a crisis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00246-6CrossRef

Eyers, D. R., Potter, A. T., Gosling, J., & Naim, M. M. (2018). The flexibility of industrial additive manufacturing systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2313–2343. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2016-0200CrossRef

Ghasemi, M., & Amyot, D. (2020). From event logs to goals: A systematic literature review of goal-oriented process mining. Requirements Engineering, 25, 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-00308-3CrossRef

Gladskih, V. I., Lekin, V. P., Hasanov, N. I., Usherov, A. I., Polushkin, M. E., & Usherova, E. V. (2007). Current procedures for preparation of batch materials for the agglomeration at MISW OJSC. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, 3, 29–30. (in Rus.).

Hussain, M. S., & Ali, M. (2019). A multi-agent based dynamic scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00214-9CrossRef

Jain, V., & Soni, V. K. (2018). Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables byfuzzy TISM. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2018-0036CrossRef

Jimenez, J.-F., Zambrano-Rey, G., Aguirre, S., & Trentesaux, D. (2018). Using process-mining for understating the emergence of self-organizing manufacturing systems. IFAC Papers on Line, 51(11), 1618–1623.CrossRef

Kern, S., & Scholz, J. (2020). Agent-based simulation for indoor manufacturing environments—Evaluating the effects of spatialization. In P. Kyriakidis, D. Hadjimitsis, D. Skarlatos, & A. Mansourian (Eds.), Geospatial technologies for local and regional development. AGILE 2019. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14745-7_17CrossRef

Khodabandelou, G., Hug, C., Deneckère, R., & Salinesi, C., et al. (2013). Process mining Versus intention mining. In S. Nurcan (Ed.), Enterprise, business-process and information systems modelling. BPMDS 2013, EMMSAD 2013. Lecture notes in business information processing, 147. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_33CrossRef

Khodaygan, S. (2019). Meta-model based multi-objective optimisation method for computer-aided tolerance design of compliant assemblies. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 32(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2018.1543953CrossRef

Khorasani, S. T. (2018). A robust optimization model for supply chain in agile and flexible mode based on variables of uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0191-yCrossRef

Kluz, R., & Antosz, K. (2019). Simulation of flexible manufacturing systems as an element of education towards Industry 4.0. In J. Trojanowska, O. Ciszak, J. Machado, & I. Pavlenko (Eds.), Advances in manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18715-6_28CrossRef

Kokkas, A., & Vosniakos, G.-C. (2019). An Augmented Reality approach to factory layout design embedding operation simulation. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13, 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00567-6CrossRef

Králik, M., Jerz, V., & Paštéka, M. (2020). Optimization of the Machine and Device Layout Solution in a Specific Company Production. In: N. Durakbasa & M. Gençyılmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. ISPR 2019, ISPR 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_8.

Kumar, S., Raj, T., & Attri, R. (2019). Mapping structural relationships among the critical factors of FMS flexibility. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 18(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686719500252CrossRef

Lechuga, G. P., & Sánchez, F. M. (2019). Modeling and optimization of flexible manufacturing systems: A stochastic approach. In P. Vasant, I. Zelinka, & G. W. Weber (Eds.), Intelligent Computing & Optimization. ICO 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 866. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00979-3_57CrossRef

Leventsov, V. A., Radaev, A. E., & Nikolaevskiy, N. N. (2017). The aspects of the “industry 4.0” concept within production process design. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal Economics, 10(1), 19–31. (in Rus.).

Markov, D. A., & Markova, N. A. (2016). Quick response manufacturing as a concept of an enterprise competitiveness increase. PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin, 2, 182–192. (in Rus.).

Martynov, V. I., & Zabelin, B. F. (2016). On modern understanding of adaptability of production systems. Economic Vector, 4(1), 32–35. (in Rus.).

Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 260–287.CrossRef

Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), 103169.CrossRef

Nausch M., Schumacher A., & Sihn W. (2020). Assessment of organizational capability for data utilization—A readiness model in the context of Industry 4.0. In: N. Durakbasa & M. Gençyılmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. ISPR 2019, ISPR 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_21

Ottogalli, K., Rosquete, D., Amundarain, A., Aguinaga, I., & Borro, D. (2019). Flexible framework to model Industry 4.0 processes for virtual simulators. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9234983CrossRef

Piran, F. A. S., De Paris, A., Lacerda, D. P., Camargo, L. F. R., Serrano, R., & Cassel, R. A. (2020). Overall equipment effectiveness: Required but not enough—An analysis integrating overall equipment effect and data envelopment analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00238-6CrossRef

Potapova, T. B. (2003). “Axioms” of automated process and enterprise control systems’ integration. Automation in Industry, 9, 31–35. (in Rus.).

Rodionova, V. N., & Turovets, O. G. (2016). The comprehensive assessment and planning of organizational flexibility of the industrial system. Organizer of Production, 70(3), 18–27. (in Rus.).

Ryabchikov, M. Y. (2018). Metallurgical agglomerate quality management with the account of its impact on the blast-furnace process efficiency. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9–12), 3785–3794.CrossRef

Ryabchikov, M. Y., & Grebennikova, V. V. (2013). Simulation of the combined effect of production factors on metallurgical sinter mechanical strength. Metallurgist, 57(3–4), 274–283.CrossRef

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Grebennikova, V. V., & Ryabchikova, E. S. (2013). Modelling of the metallurgical agglomerate strength after the restitution in order to organize its quality continuous control. Metallurgical Production Theory and Technology, 1(13), 10–12. (in Rus.).

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Grebennikova, V. V., & Ryabchikova, E. S. (2014b). Control over metallurgical sinter quality using reducibility model. Steel, 2, 4–8. (in Rus.).

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Grebennikova, V. V., & Ryabchikova, E. S. (2018). Managing iron and steel works ore base formation through integration of the blast-furnace process and agglomerate failure models. Journal of Siberian Federal University Engineering & Technologies, 11(2), 168–180. (in Rus.).CrossRef

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Grebennikova, V. V., Ryabchikova, E. S., & Bogdanov, N. V. (2016b). Problems of quality management of metallurgical agglomerate on the basis of results of operational X-ray fluorescent analyses. Quality and Life, 2(10), 13–20. (in Rus.).

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Grebennikova, V. V., Ryabchikova, E. S., & Bogdanov, N. V. (2016c). Failure of metallurgical sinter. Steel in Translation, 3(46), 173–179.CrossRef

Ryabchikov, M. Y., Parsunkin, B. N., & Ryabchikova, E. S. (2014a). Choice of the technical procedures of the ladle furnace operation using generalized evaluations of quality and process expenditures. Chernye Metally, 996(12), 28–43. (in Rus.).

Ryabchikov M. Y., Ryabchikova E. S., & Grebennikova, V. V. (2016a). Automated support system for administration of steel processing in the ladle furnace with a function of process staff training. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEAM.2016.7910909

Sahnoun, M., Xu, Y., Belgacem, B., Imen, B., David, B., & Louis, A. (2019). Fractal modeling of Cyber physical production system using multi-agent systems. International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics (ICAAID), 2019, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAID.2019.8934976CrossRef

Samiei, E., & Habibi, J. (2020). The mutual relation between enterprise resource planning and knowledge management: A review. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00229-2CrossRef

Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., Damm, W., & Passerone, R. (2012). Taming Dr. Frankenstein: Contract-based design for cyber-physical systems. European Journal of Control, 3, 217–238. https://doi.org/10.3166/EJC.18.217-238CrossRef

Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2019). Assessment of supply chain flexibility using system dynamics modeling. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00224-7CrossRef

Şirin Uyan, R., & Öner, A. (2020). Analysis of a Dedicated Flexible Manufacturing System with Closed Loop Layout: A Case Study in Production of Electro-Mechanical Products. In: N. Durakbasa & M. Gençyılmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2019. ISPR 2019, ISPR 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31343-2_7

Slavin, R. (2000). Bottom-up integration as the only way of improving production efficiency. World of Computer Automation, 1, 17–22. (in Rus.).

Solke, N. S., & Singh, T. P. (2018). Analysis of relationship between manufacturing flexibility and lean manufacturing using structural equation modelling. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0181-5CrossRef

Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2018). An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1849–1867.CrossRef

Sushil. (2017). Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning & Control, 28(11–12), 999–1010.CrossRef

Sushil. (2018). Flexible systems methodology: A mixed-method/multi-method research approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0190-zCrossRef

Volkov, Y. V., Sokolov, I. V., & Smirnov, A. A. (2006). Strategy for Ural feedstock supply exploitation. Mining Industry, 4, 57–62. (in Rus.).

Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008CrossRef

Yakovis, L. M. (2014). Improving the intelligence level of production control systems: issues and prospects. In 12th Russian National Conference on Control Issues. V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4380–4391 (in Rus.).

Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Li, D. (2017). The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1403664CrossRef

Titel: Big Data-Driven Assessment of Proposals to Improve Enterprise Flexibility Through Control Options Untested in Practice
verfasst von: Mikhail Yurievich Ryabchikov
Elena Sergeevna Ryabchikova
Publikationsdatum: 13.09.2021
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00287-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

The Relationship Between “Job Satisfaction” and “Job Performance”: A Meta-analysis

Comparing Competitive Priorities of Slow Fashion and Fast Fashion Operations of Large Retailers in an Emerging Economy

Assessment Framework for Agile HRM Practices

The Mechanisms of Collective Resilience in a Crisis Context: The Case of The ‘COVID-19’ Crisis

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling and Control of Lean Manufacturing in Automotive Parts Manufacturing Industry

Identifying Cloud Computing Risks based on Firm’s Ambidexterity Performance using Fuzzy VIKOR Technique

Premium Partner