nach oben

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Erschienen in:

06.03.2023 | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support

verfasst von: Bernardo De la Gala-Velásquez, Américo Hurtado-Palomino, Angela Y. Arredondo-Salas

Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The competitive intensity of an environment requires firms to improve their innovation performance to be sustainable in the market. This study analyses the direct effect of organisational flexibility and management support on firms’ innovation performance. In addition, the moderating effect of management support on the relationship between organisational flexibility and innovation performance is assessed. Data were collected using a questionnaire based on Likert-type scales, administered to 306 managers of tourism firms in the Arequipa region (Peru). Partial least squares structural equations were used to test the hypotheses. The empirical results show that organisational flexibility and management support positively and significantly affect innovation performance. Furthermore, management support positively moderates the relationship between organisational flexibility and innovation performance. This research proposes guidelines for managers to help enhance innovation performance through organisational flexibility and management support. Moreover, for the first time, organisational flexibility, management support, and innovation performance have been theoretically linked to tourism firms in emerging economies.

Vorheriger Artikel Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American Firms

Nächster Artikel Prescriptive Analytics-Based SIRM Model for Predicting Covid-19 Outbreak

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2020). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: Evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0016CrossRef

Adams, P., Bodas Freitas, I. M., & Fontana, R. (2019). Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. Journal of Business Research, 97, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.071CrossRef

Aini, N., & Sunarti. (2020). Mediation analysis of supply chain integration on the relationship of quality, flexibility and delivery with innovation performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 447–453. https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/5276/2605

Akpan, I. J., Udoh, E. A. P., & Adebisi, B. (2022). Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 34(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1820185CrossRef

Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003CrossRef

Al-Omoush, K. S. (2020). The role of top management support and organizational capabilities in achieving e-business entrepreneurship. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0851CrossRef

Alolayyan, M. N., & Ibrahem, A. S. (2021). Proposed mathematical model to study and analyze the relationship between operational flexibility dimensions and hospital performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(4), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00275-9CrossRef

Angeles, A., Perez-Encinas, A., & Villanueva, C. E. (2022). Characterizing organizational lifecycle through strategic and structural flexibility: Insights from MSMEs in Mexico. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23, 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00301-4CrossRef

Anning-Dorson, T., & Nyamekye, M. B. (2020). Be flexible: Turning innovativeness into competitive advantage in hospitality firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(2), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-1014CrossRef

Avkiran, N. K. (2018). An in-depth discussion and illustration of partial least squares structural equation modeling in health care. Health Care Management Science, 21(3), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-017-9393-7CrossRef

Barham, H., Dabic, M., Daim, T., & Shifrer, D. (2020). The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms. Technology in Society, 63, 101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101282

Becker, J. M., Proksch, D., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Revisiting Gaussian copulas to handle endogenous regressors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00805-yCrossRef

Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information and Management, 55(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.004

Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2013). Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.032CrossRef

Broekaert, W., Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2016). Innovation processes in family firms: The relevance of organizational flexibility. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9760-7CrossRef

Bueno, S., & Gallego, M. D. (2017). Managing top management support in complex information systems projects: An end-user empirical study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 19(1–2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-06-2017-0043CrossRef

Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Does remote work flexibility enhance organization performance? Moderating role of organization policy and top management support. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.10.069CrossRef

Chen, Y., Gao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The impact of green organizational identity on green competitive advantage: The role of green ambidexterity innovation and organizational flexibility. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 4305900. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4305900CrossRef

Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148CrossRef

Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019). Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(7), 1457–1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365CrossRef

Córcoles Muñoz, M. M., Parra Requena, G., García Villaverde, P. M., & Ruiz Ortega, M. J. (2022). Relational antecedents of sustainability orientation in hospitality and tourism firms: the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.2023166

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.xCrossRef

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2019). Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility: The moderating effect of organizational flexibility. Management Decision, 57(8), 2092–2112. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2018-0119CrossRef

Ebersberger, B., Galia, F., Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2021). Inbound Open Innovation and Innovation Performance: A Robustness Study. Research Policy, 50(7), 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104271

Eckstein, D., Goellner, M., Blome, C., & Henke, M. (2015). The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3028–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.970707CrossRef

Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006CrossRef

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312CrossRef

Gałaś, A., Paulo, A., Gaidzik, K., Zavala, B., Kalicki, T., Churata, D., ... & Mariño, J. (2018). Geosites and geotouristic attractions proposed for the Project Geopark Colca and Volcanoes of Andagua, Peru. Geoheritage, 10(4), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0307-y

García-Sánchez, E., Guerrero-Villegas, J., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2018). How do technological skills improve reverse logistics? The moderating role of top management support in information technology use and innovativeness. Sustainability, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010058CrossRef

García-Villaverde, P. M., Ruiz-Ortega, M. J., Hurtado-Palomino, A., De La Gala-Velásquez, B., & Zirena-Bejarano, P. P. (2021). Social capital and innovativeness in firms in cultural tourism destinations: Divergent contingent factors. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100529

Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159CrossRef

Hair, J. F., M. Hult, G. T., M. Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Castillo Apraiz, J., Cepeda Carrión, G. A., & Roldán, J. L. (2019). Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Segunda Edición). https://doi.org/10.3926/oss.37

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628CrossRef

Hanna, J. B., Skipper, J. B., & Hall, D. (2010). Mitigating supply chain disruption: The importance of top management support to collaboration and flexibility. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 6(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2010.032944CrossRef

Henderson, A. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666997CrossRef

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8CrossRef

Hjalager, A. M. (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.012CrossRef

Hoonsopon, D., Puriwat, W. (2019). The impact of organization agility, organization flexibility, and environmental volatility on radical and incremental innovation performance: An abstract. In: Rossi, P., Krey, N. (eds) Finding New Ways to Engage and Satisfy Global Customers. AMSWMC 2018. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_32

Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8CrossRef

Hsu, H.-Y., Liu, F.-H., Tsou, H.-T., & Chen, L.-J. (2019). Openness of technology adoption, top management support and service innovation: A social innovation perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(3), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2017-0068CrossRef

Hurtado-Palomino, A., De la Gala-Velásquez, B., & Ccorisapra-Quintana, J. (2022). The interactive effect of innovation capability and potential absorptive capacity on innovation performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100259

Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., Cheah, J. H., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). A concept analysis of methodological research on composite-based structural equation modeling: Bridging PLSPM and GSCA. Behaviormetrika, 47(1), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-019-00085-5CrossRef

Iddris, F. (2019). Innovation capability and product innovation performance: The case of low-tech manufacturing firms. European Business Review, 31(5), 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2016-0159CrossRef

Instituto Peruano de Economía (2022). Índice de Competitividad Regional - INCORE 2022. Lima, Perú. https://n9.cl/tqjtx

Jin, C., Liu, A., Liu, H., Gu, J., & Shao, M. (2022). How business model design drives innovation performance: The roles of product innovation capabilities and technological turbulence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121591. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121591

Kamasak, R., Yavuz, M., Karagulle, A. O., & Agca, T. (2016). Importance of strategic flexibility on the knowledge and innovation relationship: An emerging market study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.121CrossRef

Khan, M. N., & Zaman, U. (2021). The effect of knowledge management practices on organizational innovation: Moderating role of management support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2284CrossRef

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Kock, N. (2017). Common Method Bias: A Full Collinearity Assessment Method for PLS-SEM. In: Latan, H., Noonan, R. (eds) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11

Kumar, P. (2022). Internal flexibility in health-care organizations: A value-laden perspective on sustainability. International Journal of Organizational Analysis., 30(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2019-1766CrossRef

Kuratko, D. F., Montagno, R. V, & Hornsby, J. S. (1990). Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 49–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486669

Lai, Y., Sun, H., & Ren, J. (2018). Understanding the determinants of big data analytics (BDA) adoption in logistics and supply chain management: An empirical investigation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0153CrossRef

Lee, C., Hallak, R., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2016). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and restaurant performance: A higher-order structural model. Tourism Management, 53, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.017CrossRef

Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002CrossRef

Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (2013). Conundra and progress: Research on entry order and performance. Long Range Planning, 46(4–5), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.005CrossRef

López-Duarte, C., & Vidal-Suárez, M. M. (2021). Exploring the nexus between business activity and development aid in favor of the development agenda. Business Strategy and Development, 4(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.178CrossRef

Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Alsyouf, A., Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Al-Khasawneh, A. L., Alshira’h, A. F., Alshirah, M. H., Saad, M., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Drivers and impact of big data analytic adoption in the retail industry: A quantitative investigation applying structural equation modeling. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103129

Malaviya, P., & Wadhwa, S. (2005). Innovation management in organizational context: an empirical study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 6(2), 1–14.

Martínez-Sánchez, Á., Vela-Jimenez, M. J., Abella-Garces, S., & Gorgemans, S. (2019). Flexibility and innovation: Moderator effects of cooperation and dynamism. Personnel Review, 48(6), 1548–1564. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2017-0397CrossRef

Martínez-Sánchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2020). The relationship between R&D, the absorptive capacity of knowledge, human resource flexibility and innovation: Mediator effects on industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 118, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.014CrossRef

Moeen, M. (2017). Entry into Nascent Industries: Disentangling a Firm’s Capability Portfolio at the Time of Investment Versus Market Entry. Strategic Management Journal, 38(10), 1986–2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2642CrossRef

Neely, B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P., & Hiller, N. J. (2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons Theory: verdicts and recommendations for future research. International Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640CrossRef

Ni, G., Xu, H., Cui, Q., Qiao, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, H., & Hickey, P. J. (2021). Influence mechanism of organizational flexibility on enterprise competitiveness: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability (switzerland), 13(1), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010176CrossRef

Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003CrossRef

Ortiz, B., Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2021). Intra-Organizational Social Capital and Product Innovation: The Mediating Role of Realized Absorptive Capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 624189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.624189

Pikkemaat, B., Peters, M., & Bichler, B. F. (2019). Innovation research in tourism: Research streams and actions for the future. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 41, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.10.007CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. In Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452CrossRef

Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R and D Management, 36(5), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.xCrossRef

Pryor, C., Li, C., Sergeeva, A. V., & Pryor, I. S. (2022). In loving hands: how founders’ affective commitment strengthens the effect of organizational flexibility on firms’ opportunity exploitation and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 623847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623847

Puriwat, W., & Hoonsopon, D. (2022). Cultivating product innovation performance through creativity: The impact of organizational agility and flexibility under technological turbulence. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0420CrossRef

Raffaelli, R., Glynn, M. A., & Tushman, M. (2019). Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. In Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1013–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3011CrossRef

Rahman, M. H., Rahman, M. A., & Talapatra, S. (2020). The bullwhip effect: Causes, intensity, and mitigation. Production and Manufacturing Research, 8(1), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2020.1862722CrossRef

Robertson, J., Caruana, A., & Ferreira, C. (2021). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866

Ruiz-Ortega, M. J., García-Villaverde, P. M., De La Gala-Velásquez, B., Hurtado-Palomino, A., & Arredondo-Salas, Á. Y. (2021). Innovation capability and pioneering orientation in Peru’s cultural heritage tourism destinations: Conflicting environmental effects. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.012CrossRef

Saeed, M. A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M. M., & Tabassum, H. (2017). Relationship of organisational flexibility and project portfolio performance: Assessing the mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 9(4), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2017.088242CrossRef

Saeed, M. A., Jiao, Y., Zahid, M. M., Tabassum, H., & Nauman, S. (2021a). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: The roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2020-0058CrossRef

Saeed, M. A., Tabassum, H., Zahid, M. M., Jiao, Y., & Nauman, S. (2021b). Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: The roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation capability. Engineering Management Journal, 34(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2021.1884450CrossRef

Saha, P., Talapatra, S., Belal, H. M., & Jackson, V. (2022). Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00316-x

Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Pascual-Fernandez, P. (2018). Co-creation with clients of hotel services: The moderating role of top management support. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(3), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1078781CrossRef

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In: Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (eds) Handbook of Market Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Shahriar, M. M., Parvez, M. S., Islam, M. A., & Talapatra, S. (2022). Implementation of 5S in a plastic bag manufacturing industry: A case study. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 8, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100488

Shepherd, N. G., Mooi, E. A., Elbanna, S., & Rudd, J. M. (2021). Deciding fast: Examining the relationship between strategic decision speed and decision quality across multiple environmental contexts. European Management Review, 18(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12430CrossRef

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189CrossRef

Shukla, S. K., & Sushil, & Sharma, M. K. (2019). Managerial paradox toward flexibility: Emergent views using thematic analysis of literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00220-xCrossRef

Sindhwani, R., & Malhotra, V. (2017). A framework to enhance agile manufacturing system: A total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach. Benchmarking, 24(2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2015-0092CrossRef

Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.006CrossRef

Singh, S., Dhir, S., Evans, S., & Sushil. (2021). The Trajectory of two decades of global journal of flexible systems management and flexibility research: A bibliometric analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(4), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00286-6CrossRef

Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2018). An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1849–1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12746CrossRef

Suryanto, T., Haseeb, M., & Hartani, N. H. (2018). The correlates of developing green supply chain management practices: Firms level analysis in Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 316–324.

Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002CrossRef

Talapatra, S., & Uddin, M. K. (2019). Prioritizing the barriers of TQM implementation from the perspective of garment sector in developing countries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(7), 2205–2224. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2019-0023

Talapatra, S., Uddin, M. K., Antony, J., Gupta, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2020). An empirical study to investigate the effects of critical factors on TQM implementation in the garment industry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 37(9–10), 1209–1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2018-0145CrossRef

Tang, T. W., Zhang, P., Lu, Y., Wang, T. C., & Tsai, C. L. (2020). The effect of tourism core competence on entrepreneurial orientation and service innovation performance in tourism small and medium enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1674346CrossRef

Wadhwa, S., & Rao, K. S. (2004). A unified framework for manufacturing and supply chain flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 5(1), 29–36.

Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2020). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94–95, 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002

Wang, M. Y., Li, Y. Q., Liu, C. H., & Ruan, W. Q. (2022). Conducting an integrated perspective of academic networks and individual elements on tourism scholars’ innovation performance discovery. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.025CrossRef

Wided, R. (2023). IT Capabilities, Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Resilience in SMEs Post-COVID-19: A Mediating and Moderating Role of Big Data Analytics Capabilities. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 123–142

Wong, L. W., Leong, L. Y., Hew, J. J., Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2020). Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005CrossRef

Wu, A. (2020). Improving tourism innovation performance: Linking perspectives of asset specificity, intellectual capital, and absorptive capacity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 44(6), 908–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020927453CrossRef

Yachin, J. M. (2019). The entrepreneur–opportunity nexus: Discovering the forces that promote product innovations in rural micro-tourism firms. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2017.1383936CrossRef

Yadav, A., & Sagar, M. (2021). Modified total interpretive structural modeling of marketing flexibility factors for Indian telecommunications service providers. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(4), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00278-6CrossRef

Yousaf, Z., & Majid, A. (2018). Organizational network and strategic business performance: Does organizational flexibility and entrepreneurial orientation really matter? Journal of Organizational Change Management., 31(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2016-0298CrossRef

Yu, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, S., Chen, Z., & Chen, Z. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and innovation performance in new ventures: Examining the roles of strategic flexibility and environmental turbulence. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 12(4), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2018-0090CrossRef

Zang, S., Wang, H., & Zhou, J. (2022). Impact of eco-embeddedness and strategic flexibility on innovation performance of non-core firms: The perspective of ecological legitimacy. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100266

Zhang, X., Ma, X., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2014). How can emerging market small and medium-sized enterprises maximise internationalisation benefits? The moderating effect of organisational flexibility. International Small Business Journal, 32(6), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613503356CrossRef

Titel: Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support
verfasst von: Bernardo De la Gala-Velásquez
Américo Hurtado-Palomino
Angela Y. Arredondo-Salas
Publikationsdatum: 06.03.2023
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00336-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

The Consequences of COVID-19 Disruption on Sustainable Economy in the Top 30 High-Tech Innovative Countries

Enablers of ‘Creating Shared Value’: A Total Interpretive Structural Modeling–Polarity Approach

Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American Firms

Prescriptive Analytics-Based SIRM Model for Predicting Covid-19 Outbreak

The Influence of the Barriers of Hybrid Strategy on Strategic Competitive Priorities: Evidence from Oil Companies

Novelty Score and Technological Relatedness Measurement Using Patent Information in Mergers and Acquisitions: Case Study in the Japanese Electric Motor Industry

Premium Partner