Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Peace in Peace Studies: Beyond the ‘Negative/Positive’ Divide

verfasst von : Gijsbert M. van Iterson Scholten

Erschienen in: Visions of Peace of Professional Peace Workers

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the academic debate on peace and peacebuilding. It starts with a discussion of classical concepts of peace, such as the well-known dichotomy between positive and negative peace, stable peace, peace as process and the democratic peace thesis. Along the way, seven dimensions are introduced along which these concepts differ from one another.
The second half of the chapter is devoted to the peacebuilding literature, specifically the liberal peace debates. It argues that these debates are not just about the best way to achieve lasting peace in (post-) conflict societies, but more fundamentally about different visions of what constitutes such a peace. Besides the liberal peace itself, four other visions can be distilled from the literature: hybrid peace, agonistic peace, welfare and everyday peace. Using the dimensions identified earlier in the chapter, these visions are compared to one another in order to disentangle what is at stake for the different sides.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction
Nächstes Kapitel Western Dissensus, Non-Western Consensus: A Q Study Into the Meanings of Peace
Fußnoten
1
These were the two names that came up most frequently in response to the background question whether an interviewee was familiar with the academic literature on peace and could name any authors that had influenced his or her thinking. See the interview guide in Appendix E.
 
2
For a similar approach, but focused on International Relations (IR) theory, see (Richmond 2008a).
 
3
This discussion does not cover even more classical visions of peace, such as those espoused by, e.g., Saint Augustine (Augustine 2010: 212–220), Thomas Hobbes (Hobbes 2003 [1651]: 101–102) or Immanuel Kant (Kant 1976 [1796]). Although present-day peace researchers may cite those visions in support of their own, the primary purpose of this chapter is to establish a conceptual framework for present-day visions of peace, rather than giving a full historical overview of thinking about peace. For that, see, e.g. (Adolf 2009; Dietrich 2012; Hassner 1994).
 
4
It should be noted that this reading depends on a constructivist account of International Relations, as Rasmussen himself acknowledges (Rasmussen 2003: 4).
 
5
Although, to be fair, there are also quite some political scientists who are interested in the economic underpinnings of peace (e.g. Gartzke 2007; Hegre et al. 2010).
 
6
See especially Chap. 3, Sect. 3.2, Chap. 7, Sect. 7.3.3 and Chap. 9, Sect. 9.3.2 in the conclusion.
 
7
In a recent appraisal of the ‘hybrid turn’ in peacebuilding literature, Mac Ginty and Richmond even speak of hybridity as an ‘emergent social construct’ (Mac Ginty and Richmond 2016: 221).
 
8
Clausewitz’s original maxim being that war is the continuation of policy—or (depending on the translation) of politics—with other means (Von Clausewitz 1984 [1832]: 87).
 
9
For a brief overview of the classical arguments, in an interstate context, but equally valid for intrastate conflicts, see, e.g. (Gartzke 2007: 169–170).
 
10
In a seemingly largely forgotten essay, German peace scientist Ivan Illich called this ‘vernacular peace’ or Vride, after the medieval German word for this kind of peace. He contrasted the notion with the Roman word Pax that denoted the peace between rulers (Illich 1992).
 
11
According to Millar, the same is true for authors who want to prescribe a hybrid peace.
 
12
Interestingly, care and empathy also feature heavily in feminist approaches to IR. Feminist authors such as Carol Gilligan and Sara Ruddick contrast a male perspective of domination with a female perspective of care for others, arguing that the latter is inherently more peaceful than the former (Gilligan 2009; Ruddick 1995). Likewise, Christine Sylvester proposes ‘empathetic cooperation’ as a feminist method for IR (Sylvester 1994), raising empathy to a concern at the international level as well.
 
13
A point that will be developed in Chap. 8 on the Mindanaoan visions of peace.
 
14
Or, using Giddens’s terminology, in structures or in agents (Giddens 1979).
 
Literatur
Adolf, A. (2009). Peace. A world history. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Advisory Group of Experts (2015). The challenge of sustaining peace. Report of the Advisory Group of Experts for the 2015 Review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. New York: United Nations.
Aggestam, K., F. Cristiano, et al. (2015). “Towards agonistic peacebuilding? Exploring the antagonism–agonism nexus in the Middle East peace process.” Third World Quarterly 36(9): 1736–1753.CrossRef
Anderson, R. (2004). “A definition of peace.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10(2): 101.CrossRef
Augustine, S. (2010). The city of god, books XVII–XXII (The Fathers of the church, volume 24). CUA Press.
Austin, A., M. Fischer, et al. (2013). Transforming ethnopolitical conflict: The Berghof handbook. Springer Science & Business Media.
Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the Congo: Local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press.
Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Babo-Soares, D. (2004). “Nahe Biti: The philosophy and process of grassroots reconciliation (and justice) in East Timor.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5(1): 15–33.CrossRef
Banks, M. (1987). “Four conceptions of peace.” In Conflict management and problem solving: Interpersonal to international applications. D. J. D. Sandole and I. Sandole-Staroste (Eds.). London: Pinter: 259–274.
Basabe, N. and J. Valencia (2007). “Culture of peace: Sociostructural dimensions, cultural values, and emotional climate.” Journal of Social Issues 63(2): 405–419.CrossRef
Begby, E. and J. P. Burgess (2009). “Human security and liberal peace.” Public Reason 1(1): 91–104.
Bell, C. (2008). On the law of peace: Peace agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford University Press.
Belloni, R. (2012). “Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and significance.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18(1): 21–38.CrossRef
Berents, H. and S. McEvoy-Levy (2015). “Theorising youth and everyday peace (building).” Peacebuilding 3(2): 115–125.CrossRef
Björkdahl, A., K. Höglund, et al. (2016). Peacebuilding and friction: Global and local encounters in post conflict-societies. London and New York: Routledge.
Boege, V. (2011). “Potential and limits of traditional approaches in peacebuilding.” In Berghof handbook II: Advancing conflict transformation. B. Austin, M. Fischer, and H. J. Giessmann (Eds.). Berlin: Barbara Budrich Publishers: 431–457.
Boege, V. (2012). “Hybrid forms of peace and order on a South Sea Island: Experiences from Bougainville (Papua New Guinea).” In Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism. O. Richmond and A. Mitchell (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 88–106.CrossRef
Boulding, K. E. (1977). “Twelve friendly quarrels with Johan Galtung.” Journal of Peace Research 14(1): 75–86.CrossRef
Boulding, K. E. (1978). Stable peace. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: UN.
Brigg, M. and P. O. Walker (2016). “Indigeneity and peace.” In The Palgrave handbook of disciplinary and regional approaches to peace. O. P. Richmond and S. Pogodda (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 259–271.CrossRef
Brusset, E., C. De Coning, et al. (2016). Complexity thinking for peacebuilding practice and evaluation. Springer.
Burton, J. W. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and prevention. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Caedel, M. (1987). Thinking about peace and war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Call, C. T. (2008). “Knowing peace when you see it: Setting standards for peacebuilding success.” Civil Wars 10(2): 173–194.CrossRef
Call, C. T. (2012). Why peace fails: The causes and prevention of civil war recurrence. Georgetown University Press.
Call, C. T. and E. M. Cousens (2008). “Ending wars and building peace: International responses to war-torn societies.” International Studies Perspectives 9(1): 1–21.CrossRef
Carothers, T. (2007). “The “sequencing” fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18(1): 12–27.CrossRef
Chandler, D. (2004). “The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘liberal peace’.” International Peacekeeping 11(1): 59–81.CrossRef
Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial: The politics of state-building. London: Pluto.
Chandler, D. (2010). “The uncritical critique of ‘liberal peace’.” Review of International Studies 36(S1): 137–155.CrossRef
Chandler, D. (2017). Peacebuilding: The twenty years’ crisis, 1997–2017. Springer.
Charbonneau, B. and G. Parent, Eds. (2013). Peacebuilding, memory and reconciliation: Bridging top-down and bottom-up approaches. London and New York: Routledge.
Chigas, D. (2014). “The role and effectiveness of non-governmental third parties in peacebuilding.” In Moving toward a just peace. Springer: 273–315.
Chopra, J. and T. Hohe (2004). “Participatory intervention.” Global Governance 10(3): 289–305.CrossRef
Christie, D. J. (2006). “What is peace psychology the psychology of?” Journal of Social Issues 62(1): 1–17.CrossRef
Cisnero, M. R. L. (2008). “Rediscovering olden pathways and vanishing trails to justice and peace: Indigenous modes of dispute resolution and indigenous justice systems.” In A sourcebook on alternatives to formal dispute resolution mechanisms. A publication of the Justice Reform Initiatives Support Project. C. Ubarra (Ed.). N.P.: National Judicial Institute of Canada.
Coleman, P. T. and M. Deutsch, Eds. (2012). Psychological components of sustainable peace. Peace Psychology Book Series. New York: Springer.
Collier, P. and A. Hoeffler (2004). “Greed and grievance in civil war.” Oxford Economic Papers 56(4): 563–595.CrossRef
Connolly, W. E. (2002). Identity, difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cooper, N., M. Turner, et al. (2011). “The end of history and the last liberal peacebuilder: A reply to Roland Paris.” Review of International Studies 1(1): 1–13.
Dafoe, A. (2011). “Statistical critiques of the democratic peace: Caveat emptor.” American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 247–262.CrossRef
Daxecker, U. E. (2007). “Perilous polities? An assessment of the democratization-conflict linkage.” European Journal of International Relations 13(4): 527–553.CrossRef
De Coning, C. (2018a). “Adaptive peacebuilding.” International Affairs 94(2): 301–317.CrossRef
Dietrich, W. (2012). Interpretations of peace in history and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Dietrich, W. and W. Sützl (1997). A call for many peaces. Peace Center Burg Schlaining.
Donais, T. (2009). “Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes.” Peace & Change 34(1): 3–26.CrossRef
Doyle, M. W. (2005). “Three pillars of the liberal peace.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 463–466.CrossRef
Doyle, M. W. and N. Sambanis (2000). “International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis.” American Political Science Review 94(4): 779–801.CrossRef
Doyle, M. W. and N. Sambanis (2006). Making war and building peace: United Nations peace operations. Princeton University Press.
Duffield, M. R. (2001). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed Books.
Fabbro, D. (1978). “Peaceful societies: An introduction.” Journal of Peace Research 15(1): 67–83.CrossRef
Firchow, P. (2018). Reclaiming everyday peace: Local voices in measurement and evaluation after war. Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, R. and K. Hanke (2009). “Are societal values linked to global peace and conflict?” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 15(3): 227.CrossRef
Fortna, V. P. (2004). “Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war.” International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 269–292.CrossRef
Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Galtung, J. (1964). “An editorial.” Journal of Peace Research 1(1): 1–4.CrossRef
Galtung, J. (1967). “On the future of the international system.” Journal of Peace Research 4(4): 305–333.CrossRef
Galtung, J. (1969). “Violence, peace, and peace research.” Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167–191.CrossRef
Galtung, J. (2000). Conflict transformation by peaceful means: The transcend method. UN.
Galtung, J. (2007). “Introduction: Peace by peaceful conflict transformation—The transcend approach.” In Handbook of peace and conflict studies. C. Webel and J. Galtung (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge: 14–32.CrossRef
Galtung, J. (2010). “Peace studies and conflict resolution: The need for transdisciplinarity.” Transcultural Psychiatry 47(1): 20–32.CrossRef
Gartzke, E. (2007). “The capitalist peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 166–191.CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press.
Gilligan, C. (2009). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Gleditsch, N. P., J. Nordkvelle, et al. (2014). “Peace research—Just the study of war?” Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 145–158.CrossRef
Hassner, P. (1994). “Beyond the three traditions: The philosophy of war and peace in historical perspective.” International Affairs 70(4): 737–756.CrossRef
Heathershaw, J. (2008). “Unpacking the liberal peace: The dividing and merging of peacebuilding discourses.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 36(3): 597–621.CrossRef
Heathershaw, J. (2009). Post-conflict Tajikistan: The politics of peacebuilding and the emergence of legitimate order. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Heathershaw, J. (2013). “Towards better theories of peacebuilding: Beyond the liberal peace debate.” Peacebuilding 1(2): 275–282.CrossRef
Hegre, H. (2014). “Democracy and armed conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 159–172.CrossRef
Hegre, H., T. Ellingsen, et al. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Association, Cambridge University Press.
Hegre, H., J. R. Oneal, et al. (2010). “Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 47(6): 763–774.CrossRef
Hilhorst, D. and M. Van Leeuwen (2005). “Grounding local peace organisations: A case study of Southern Sudan.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 43(4): 537–563.CrossRef
Hobbes, T. (2003 [1651]). Leviathan: or The matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.
Illich, I. (1992). “The de-linking of peace and development. Opening address on the occasion of the first meeting of the Asian Peace Research Association, Yokohama, 1 December 1980.” In In the mirror of the past: Lectures and addresses, 1978–1990. I. Illich and V. Borremans (Eds.). London: Marion Boyars Publishers.
Institute for Economics and Peace (2013). Pillars of peace: Understanding the key attitudes and institutions that underpin peaceful societies. IEP Reports. Sydney: Institute for Economics and Peace, 22.
Jarstad, A. K. and R. Belloni (2012). “Introducing hybrid peace governance: Impact and prospects of liberal peacebuilding.” Global Governance 18(1): 1–6.CrossRef
Jenkins, R. (2013). Peacebuilding: From concept to commission. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Johnson, K. and M. L. Hutchison (2012). “Hybridity, political order and legitimacy: Examples from Nigeria.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(2): 37–52.CrossRef
Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kant, I. (1976 [1796]). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Kelsen, H. (1944). Peace through law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Krijtenburg, F. (2007). Cultural ideologies of peace and conflict: A socio-cognitive study of Giryama discourse (Kenya). Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Krijtenburg, F. and E. de Volder (2015). “How universal is UN ‘peace’?: A comparative linguistic analysis of the United Nations and Giryama (Kenya) concepts of ‘peace’.” International Journal of Language and Culture 2(2): 194–218.CrossRef
Kühn, F. P. (2012). “The peace prefix: Ambiguities of the word ‘peace’.” International Peacekeeping 19(4): 396–409.CrossRef
Kustermans, J. (2012). Democratic peace as practice. PhD thesis, Faculteit Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen, Departement Politieke Wetenschappen, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen.
Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Lederach, J. P. (2015). Little book of conflict transformation: Clear articulation of the guiding principles by a pioneer in the field. Simon and Schuster.
Lee, Y.-C., Y.-C. Lin, et al. (2013). “The construct and measurement of peace of mind.” Journal of Happiness Studies 14(2): 571–590.CrossRef
Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1947]). Critique of everyday life. Volume 1: Introduction. London and New York: Verso Books.
Leonardsson, H. and G. Rudd (2015). “The ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly 36(5): 825–839.CrossRef
Liden, K. (2007). ‘What is the ethics of peacebuilding?’ Lecture prepared for the kick-off meeting of the Liberal Peace and the Ethics of Peacebuilding project. Peace Research Institute Oslo, January 18, 2007.
Lidén, K. (2009). “Building peace between global and local politics: The cosmopolitical ethics of liberal peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 16(5): 616–634.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2006). No war, no peace: The rejuvenation of stalled peace processes and peace accords. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2008). “Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace.” Cooperation and Conflict 43(2): 139–163.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). “Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace.” Security Dialogue 41(4): 391–412.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2012). “Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding.” Cooperation and Conflict 47(3): 287–308.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2013). “Indicators+: A proposal for everyday peace indicators.” Evaluation and Program Planning 36: 56–63.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. (2014). “Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies.” Security Dialogue 45(6): 548–564.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. and G. Sanghera, Eds. (2012b). Special issue: Hybridity in peacebuilding and development. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(2): 3–8.
Mac Ginty, R. and P. Firchow (2016). “Top-down and bottom-up narratives of peace and conflict.” Politics 36(3): 308–323.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. and O. P. Richmond (2013). “The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace.” Third World Quarterly 34(5): 763–783.CrossRef
Mac Ginty, R. and O. Richmond (2016). “The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 23(2): 219–239.CrossRef
Macmillan, J. (2003). “Beyond the separate democratic peace.” Journal of Peace Research 40(2): 233–243.CrossRef
Mansfield, E. D. and J. Snyder (1995). “Democratization and the danger of war.” International Security 20(1): 5–38.CrossRef
Mansfield, E. D. and J. Snyder (2007). Electing to fight: Why emerging democracies go to war. MIT Press.
McKeown Jones, S. and D. J. Christie (2016). “Social psychology and peace.” In The Palgrave handbook of disciplinary and regional approaches to peace. O. P. Richmond, S. Pogodda, and J. Ramovic (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Millar, G. (2014). “Disaggregating hybridity: Why hybrid institutions do not produce predictable experiences of peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51(4): 501–514.CrossRef
Millar, G. (2016). “Local experiences of liberal peace.” Journal of Peace Research 53(4): 569–581.CrossRef
Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London and New York: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (1999). “Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?” Social Research 66(3): 745–758.
Münkler, H. (2005). The new wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nadarajah, S. and D. Rampton (2015). “The limits of hybridity and the crisis of liberal peace.” Review of International Studies 41(1): 49–72.CrossRef
Nagle, J. (2014). “From the politics of antagonistic recognition to agonistic peace building: An exploration of symbols and rituals in divided societies.” Peace & Change 39(4): 468–494.CrossRef
Newman, E. (2009). “‘Liberal’ peacebuilding debates.” In New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding. E. Newman, R. Paris, and O. Richmond (Eds.). Tokyo: United Nations University Press: 26–53.
Nixon, H. and R. Ponzio (2007). “Building democracy in Afghanistan: The statebuilding agenda and international engagement.” International Peacekeeping 14(1): 26–40.CrossRef
Noma, E., D. Aker, et al. (2012). “Heeding women’s voices: Breaking cycles of conflict and deepening the concept of peacebuilding.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(1): 7–32.CrossRef
Oneal, J. R., F. H. Oneal, et al. (1996). “The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy, and international conflict, 1950–85.” Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 11–28.CrossRef
Owen, J. M. (1994). “How liberalism produces democratic peace.” International Security 19(2): 87–125.CrossRef
Paarlberg-Kvam, K. (2018). “What’s to come is more complicated: Feminist visions of peace in Colombia.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 21(2): 1–30.CrossRef
Paffenholz, T., Ed. (2010). Civil society & peacebuilding: A critical assessment. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.
Paffenholz, T. (2014). “International peacebuilding goes local: Analysing Lederach’s conflict transformation theory and its ambivalent encounter with 20 years of practice.” Peacebuilding 2(1): 11–27.CrossRef
Paffenholz, T. (2015). “Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research.” Third World Quarterly 36(5): 857–874.CrossRef
Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Paris, R. (2010). “Saving liberal peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36: 337–365.CrossRef
Park, J. (2013). “Forward to the future? The democratic peace after the Cold War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 30(2): 178–194.CrossRef
Pugh, M. (2005). “The political economy of peacebuilding: A critical theory perspective.” International Journal of Peace Studies 10: 23–42.
Pugh, M. (2010). “Welfare in war-torn societies: Nemesis of the liberal peace?” In Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: Critical developments and approaches. O. Richmond (Ed.). London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 262–273.CrossRef
Pugh, M., N. Cooper, et al., Eds. (2008). Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding. New Security Challenges. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Puljek-Shank, R. (2017). “Dead letters on a page? Civic agency and inclusive governance in neopatrimonialism.” Democratization 24(4): 670–688.CrossRef
Ramsbotham, O. (2010). Transforming violent conflict: Radical disagreement, dialogue and survival. London and New York: Routledge.
Randazzo, E. (2016). “The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: Scrutinising the local turn in peace building.” Third World Quarterly 37(8): 1351–1370.CrossRef
Rapoport, A. (1992). Peace: An idea whose time has come. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rasmussen, M. V. (2003). The west, civil society and the construction of peace. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Rausch, C. (2015). Speaking their peace. Personal stories from the frontlines of war and peace. Berkeley: Roaring Forties Press.
Regan, P. M. (2014). “Bringing peace back in: Presidential address to the Peace Science Society, 2013.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 31(4): 345–356.CrossRef
Reiter, D., A. C. Stam, et al. (2016). “A revised look at interstate wars, 1816–2007.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(5): 956–976.CrossRef
Richmond, O. P. (2005). The transformation of peace. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Richmond, O. P. (2008a). Peace in international relations. London and New York: Routledge.
Richmond, O. P. (2008b). “Welfare and the civil peace: Poverty with rights?” In Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding. M. Pugh, N. Cooper, and M. Turner (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 287–301.CrossRef
Richmond, O. P. (2009a). “A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday.” Review of International Studies 35: 557–580.
Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London and New York: Routledge.
Richmond, O. P. (2013). “Peace formation and local infrastructures for peace.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 38(4): 271–287.CrossRef
Richmond, O. P. and J. Franks (2009). Liberal peace transitions: Between statebuilding and peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Richmond, O. P. and R. Mac Ginty (2015). “Where now for the critique of the liberal peace?” Cooperation and Conflict 50(2): 171–189.CrossRef
Richmond, O. P. and A. Mitchell, Eds. (2012). Hybrid forms of peace. From everyday agency to post-liberalism. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). “Democratic peace—Warlike democracies? A social constructivist interpretation of the liberal argument.” European Journal of International Relations 1(4): 491–517.CrossRef
Röling, B. V. A. (1973). Polemologie. Een inleiding in de wetenschap van oorlog en vrede. Assen: van Gorcum.
Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.
Russett, B. (1994). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton University Press.
Russett, B. and J. Oneal (2001). Triangulating peace. Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York and London: Norton.
Sabaratnam, M. (2011). “The liberal peace? A brief intellectual history of international conflict management, 1990–2010.” In A liberal peace? The problems and practices of peacebuilding. S. Campbell, D. Chandler, and M. Sabaratnam (Eds.). London: Zed Books: 13–30.
Sabaratnam, M. (2013). “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace.” Security Dialogue 44(3): 259–278.CrossRef
Sambanis, N. (2008). “Short- and long-term effects of United Nations peace operations.” The World Bank Economic Review 22(1): 9–32.CrossRef
Schia, N. N. and J. Karlsrud (2013). “‘Where the rubber meets the road’: Friction sites and local-level peacebuilding in Haiti, Liberia and South Sudan.” International Peacekeeping 20(2): 233–248.CrossRef
Schmitt, C. (2008 [1932]). The concept of the political: Expanded edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Selby, J. (2013). “The myth of liberal peace-building.” Conflict, Security & Development 13(1): 57–86.CrossRef
Senghaas, D. (2004). Zum irdischen Frieden: Erkenntnisse und Vermutungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Shinko, R. E. (2008). “Agonistic peace: A postmodern reading.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 36(3): 473–491.CrossRef
Stensrud, E. E. (2009). “New dilemmas in transitional justice: Lessons from the mixed courts in Sierra Leone and Cambodia.” Journal of Peace Research 46(1): 5–15.CrossRef
Suurmond, J. and P. M. Sharma (2012). “Like yeast that leavens the dough? Community mediation as local infrastructure for peace in Nepal.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(3): 81–86.CrossRef
Sylvester, C. (1994). “Empathetic cooperation: A feminist method for IR.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 23(2): 315–334.CrossRef
Tadjbakhsh, S. (2009). “Conflicted outcomes and values:(Neo) liberal peace in central Asia and Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 16(5): 635–651.CrossRef
Tadjbakhsh, S., Ed. (2011). Rethinking the liberal peace: External models and local alternatives. London and New York: Routledge.
Tasew, B. (2009). “Metaphors of peace and violence in the folklore discourses of South-Western Ethiopia: A comparative study.” In Department of social and cultural anthropology. Amsterdam: VU University.
Tomz, M. and J. L. Weeks (2013). “Public opinion and the democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 107(4): 849–865CrossRef
Tongeren, P. v., M. Brenk, et al. (2005). People building peace II, Successful stories of civil society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
van Leeuwen, M., W. Verkoren, et al. (2012). “Thinking beyond the liberal peace: From utopia to heterotopias.” Acta Politica 47(3): 292–316.CrossRef
Van Tongeren, P., M. O. Ojielo, et al. (2012). “The evolving landscape of infrastructures for peace.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(3): 1–7.CrossRef
Von Clausewitz, C. (1984 [1832]). On war. Indexed edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wallensteen, P. (2015a). Quality peace: Peacebuilding, victory and world order. Oxford University Press.
Webel, C. (2007). “Introduction: Toward a philosophy and metapsychology of peace.” In Handbook of peace and conflict studies. C. Webel and J. Galtung (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge: 3–13.CrossRef
Zelizer, C. and R. A. Rubinstein (2009). Building peace: Practical reflections from the field. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
Zizek, S. (2009). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London: Profile Books.
Metadaten
Titel
Peace in Peace Studies: Beyond the ‘Negative/Positive’ Divide
verfasst von
Gijsbert M. van Iterson Scholten
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Visions of Peace of Professional Peace Workers

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27974-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-27975-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27975-2_2

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise