nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Knowledge Management in Practice

verfasst von : Stephen C. Clark, Theodora Valvi

Erschienen in: Wireless Mobility in Organizations

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Knowledge management in practice is the overall objective of this chapter. Within this context, the authors provide the readers an overview and guidance on building a knowledge management system, organizational culture, and cultural shifts within the context of knowledge management. This includes the introduction of various models that have been introduced in business and academic literature pertaining to structure, culture, and technology. The chapter will conclude by bringing all the concepts together from Chaps. 1 to 4 through a deep dive into invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship. These three concepts will be inserted into processes of knowledge and strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity (SKARSE) components, processes, and strategies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Learning How to Learn

Nächstes Kapitel SKARSE in Business Management

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31(5), 776–793.CrossRef

Auerswald, P. E., & Branscomb, L. M. (2003). Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: Financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3–4), 227–239.CrossRef

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRef

Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.CrossRef

Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J., & Naef, R. (2008). Impact of office layout on communication in a science driven business. R&D Management, 38(4), 372–391.CrossRef

Bratianu, C. (2011). Changing paradigm for knowledge metaphors from dynamics to thermodynamics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28, 160–169.CrossRef

Carayannis, E. G. (1994). The strategic management of technological learning: Transnational decision making frameworks and their empirical effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.

Carayannis, E. G. (2008). Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Industry & Higher Education, 22(6), 1–11.CrossRef

Carleton, K. (2011). How to motivate and retain knowledge workers in organizations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management, 28(2), 459–468.

Chan, I., & Chao, C. K. (2008). Knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises: A balanced combination of management support, technology, and organizational structural factors is necessary for successful knowledge management program implementation. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 83–88.CrossRef

Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 185–206.CrossRef

Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37). Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37

Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 99(397), 569–596.

Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRef

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, P. R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.CrossRef

Denrell, J., Fang, C., & Winter, S. G. (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 977–990.CrossRef

Dew, N. (2009). Serendipity in entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 30(07), 735–753.CrossRef

Ding, M., & Eliashberg, J. (2002). Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Science, 48(3), 343–363.CrossRef

Dingel, K., & Spiekermann, S. (2007). Third generation knowledge management systems: Towards an augmented technology acceptance model. SSRN. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1346872

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper Collins.

Earl, M. J., & Scott, I. A. (1999). What is a chief knowledge officer? Sloan Management Review, 40(2), 29–38.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321–340.CrossRef

Freear, J., Sohl, J. E., & Wetzel, W. (2002). Angels on angles: Financing technologies-based ventures – A historical perspective. Venture Capital, 4(4), 275–287.CrossRef

Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: Practices and challenges. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(1), 17–21.CrossRef

Hemp, P. (2009). Death by information overload: New research and novel techniques offer a lifetime to you and your organization. Harvard Business Review, 3, 83–89.

Hong, J. F. L., & Nguyen, T. V. (2009). Knowledge embeddedness and the transfer mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 347–356.CrossRef

Huseby, T., & Chou, S. T. (2003). Applying a knowledge-focused management philosophy to immature economies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(2), 126–132.CrossRef

Ito, K., & Lechevalier, S. (2010). Why some firms persistently out-perform others: Investing the interactions between innovation and exporting strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1997–2039.CrossRef

Jaruzelski, B., & Dehoff, K. (2010). The global innovation 1000. How the top innovators keep winning: Booz and Company’s annual study of the world’s biggest R&D spenders show why highly innovative companies are able to consistently outperform. Their secret? They’re good at the right things, not at everything. Strategy + Business, 61, 1–14.

Karnani, F. (2012). The university’s unknown knowledge: Tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spin-offs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 235–250.CrossRef

Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56, 33–52.CrossRef

Key, M., Thompson, H., & McCann, J. (2009). Knowledge management: A glass half full. People & Strategy, 32(4), 43–47.

King, W. R., Marks, P. W., & McCoy, S. (2002). The most important issues in knowledge management: What can KM do for corporate memory, management thinking, and IS responsibility, as well as for overall business performance? Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 93–97.CrossRef

Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., et al. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 46–55.CrossRef

Lichtenstein, S., & Hunter, A. (2006). Toward a receiver-based theory of knowledge sharing. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 24–40.CrossRef

Lim, W. M., & Ting, D. H. (2012). E-shopping: An analysis of the technology acceptance model. Modern Applied Science, 6(4), 49–62.CrossRef

Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 57–93.CrossRef

Plessis, M. D. (2005). Drivers of knowledge management in the corporate environment. International Journal of Information Management, 25(3), 193–202.CrossRef

Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2008). Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Management Science, 54(1), 113–128.CrossRef

Rahmandad, H. (2008). Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Science, 54(7), 1297–1312.CrossRef

Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Web 2.0 and the empowerment of the knowledge worker. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 509–520.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. London: Oxford University Press.

Silver, D. A. (1985). Entrepreneurial megabucks: The 100 greatest entrepreneurs of the last 25 years. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351–365.CrossRef

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.CrossRef

Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. M., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information & Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479.CrossRef

Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.CrossRef

Vohra, M., & Mukul, K. (2009). Relevance of Peter Drucker’s work: Celebrating Drucker’s 100th birthday. Vikalpa, 34(4), 1–7.

Wang, D., Su, Z., & Yang, D. (2011). Organizational culture and knowledge creation capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 363–373.CrossRef

Webster’s Dictionary Online. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com

West, P. G., & Bamford, C. E. (2005). Creating a technology-based entrepreneurial economy: A resource based theory perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 433–451.CrossRef

Titel: Knowledge Management in Practice
verfasst von: Stephen C. Clark
Theodora Valvi
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Wireless Mobility in Organizations
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42248-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-42249-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42249-7_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner