Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 4/2013

01.10.2013 | Original Paper

Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis

verfasst von: Jorge Alcalde-Unzu, Marc Vorsatz

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we axiomatically study how to measure the similarity of preferences in a group of individuals. For simplicity, we refer to this as the cohesiveness. First, we provide axioms that characterize a family of linear and additive measures whose intersection is a partial ordinal criterion similar to first order stochastic dominance. The introduction of some additional properties isolates a one-parameter subfamily. This parameter evaluates the effect on the cohesiveness if one individual changes his ranking on a single pair of objects, as a function of how many of the remaining individuals in the group rank the first object over the second and vice versa. Finally, we characterize the focal measures of this subfamily separately showing that they coincide with measures constructed using two, at first sight, totally different approaches suggested in the literature.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
He uses the term consensus instead of cohesiveness.
 
2
Lemma 1 of Alcalde-Unzu and Vorsatz (2011) calculates these maximum and minimum values.
 
3
We thank an anonymous referee for drawing our attention to this discussion.
 
4
We thank an anonymous referee for drawing our attention to this discussion.
 
5
To see why, suppose that \(n\) is odd and that \(a_i^n < a_{i-1}^n\) for some \(i \in \{1, \ldots , \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor +1\}\). Then, by Claim 2, \(a_{2i}^{2n} < a_{2i-2}^{2n}\). Hence, the condition is also violated for some even \(n\). For the special case when \(n=2\), we already know that \(a_2^2 = 1 > 0 = a_1^2\).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alcalde-Unzu J, Vorsatz M (2011) Measuring consensus: concepts, comparisons, and properties. In: Herrera-Viedma E, García-Lapresta J, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H, Zadrozny H (eds) Consensual processes STUDFUZZ 267. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–211CrossRef Alcalde-Unzu J, Vorsatz M (2011) Measuring consensus: concepts, comparisons, and properties. In: Herrera-Viedma E, García-Lapresta J, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H, Zadrozny H (eds) Consensual processes STUDFUZZ 267. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–211CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson A (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRef Atkinson A (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D (2005) Population issues in social choice theory, welfare economics, and ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D (2005) Population issues in social choice theory, welfare economics, and ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch R (2006) Characterizations of voting rules and consensus measures. PhD Dissertation, Tilburg University Bosch R (2006) Characterizations of voting rules and consensus measures. PhD Dissertation, Tilburg University
Zurück zum Zitat Cook W, Seiford L (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manag Sci 24:1721–1732CrossRef Cook W, Seiford L (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manag Sci 24:1721–1732CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook W, Seiford L (1982) On the Borda-Kendall consensus method for priority ranking problems. Manag Sci 28:621–637CrossRef Cook W, Seiford L (1982) On the Borda-Kendall consensus method for priority ranking problems. Manag Sci 28:621–637CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowell F (2008) Measuring inequality, LSE perspectives in economic analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford Cowell F (2008) Measuring inequality, LSE perspectives in economic analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Duclos J, Esteban J, Ray D (2006) Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 74: 1737–1772 Duclos J, Esteban J, Ray D (2006) Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 74: 1737–1772
Zurück zum Zitat Echenique F, Fryer R (2007) A measure of segregation based on social interactions. Q J Econ 122:1241–1285CrossRef Echenique F, Fryer R (2007) A measure of segregation based on social interactions. Q J Econ 122:1241–1285CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eckert D, Klamler C, Mitloehner J, Schloetterer C (2006) A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules. Central Eur J Oper Res 14:377–386CrossRef Eckert D, Klamler C, Mitloehner J, Schloetterer C (2006) A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules. Central Eur J Oper Res 14:377–386CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg J (2007) Group cohesiveness. In: Baumeister F, Vohs K (eds) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Sage, Thousands Oaks, pp 386–388 Eisenberg J (2007) Group cohesiveness. In: Baumeister F, Vohs K (eds) Encyclopedia of social psychology. Sage, Thousands Oaks, pp 386–388
Zurück zum Zitat Elkind E, Faliszewski P, Slinko A (2010) On the roles of distances in defining voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems Elkind E, Faliszewski P, Slinko A (2010) On the roles of distances in defining voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Zurück zum Zitat Esteban J, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62:819–852CrossRef Esteban J, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62:819–852CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta J, Pérez-Román D (2011) Measuring consensus in weak order. In: Herrera-Viedma E, García-Lapresta J, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H, Zadrozny H (eds) Consensual processes, STUDFUZZ 267. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–234CrossRef García-Lapresta J, Pérez-Román D (2011) Measuring consensus in weak order. In: Herrera-Viedma E, García-Lapresta J, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H, Zadrozny H (eds) Consensual processes, STUDFUZZ 267. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–234CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gini C (1921) Measurement of inequality and incomes. Econ J 31:124–126CrossRef Gini C (1921) Measurement of inequality and incomes. Econ J 31:124–126CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hays W (1960) A note on average tau as a measure of concordance. J Am Stat Assoc 55:331–341CrossRef Hays W (1960) A note on average tau as a measure of concordance. J Am Stat Assoc 55:331–341CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchens R (2004) One measure of segregation. Int Econ Rev 45:555–578CrossRef Hutchens R (2004) One measure of segregation. Int Econ Rev 45:555–578CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kemeny J (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88:577–591 Kemeny J (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88:577–591
Zurück zum Zitat Kendall M (1962) Rank correlation methods, 3rd edn. Hafner Publishing Company, New York Kendall M (1962) Rank correlation methods, 3rd edn. Hafner Publishing Company, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Klamler C (2008) A distance measure for choice functions. Soc Choice Welf 30:419–425CrossRef Klamler C (2008) A distance measure for choice functions. Soc Choice Welf 30:419–425CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kranich L (1996) Equitable opportunities: an axiomatic approach. J Econ Theory 71:131–147CrossRef Kranich L (1996) Equitable opportunities: an axiomatic approach. J Econ Theory 71:131–147CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meskanen T, Nurmi H (2008) Closeness counts in social choice. In: Braham M, Steffen F (eds) Power, freedom, and voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–306CrossRef Meskanen T, Nurmi H (2008) Closeness counts in social choice. In: Braham M, Steffen F (eds) Power, freedom, and voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–306CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Metadaten
Titel
Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis
verfasst von
Jorge Alcalde-Unzu
Marc Vorsatz
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0716-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Social Choice and Welfare 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner