Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Engineering with Computers
Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers 2/2007

01.06.2007 | Original Article

Graphical and text-based design interfaces for parameter design of an I-beam, desk lamp, aircraft wing, and job shop manufacturing system

verfasst von: Timothy W. Simpson, Mary Frecker, Russell R. Barton, Ling Rothrock

Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we describe four design optimization problems and corresponding design interfaces that have been developed to help assess the impact of fast, graphical interfaces for design space visualization and optimization. The design problems involve the design of an I-beam, desk lamp, aircraft wing, and job shop manufacturing system. The problems vary in size from 2 to 6 inputs and 2 to 7 outputs, where the outputs are formulated as either a multiobjective optimization problem or a constrained, single objective optimization problem. Graphical and text-based design interfaces have been developed for the I-beam and desk lamp problems, and two sets of graphical design interfaces have been developed for the aircraft wing and job shop design problems that vary in the number of input variables and analytical complexity, respectively. Response delays ranging from 0.0 to 1.5 s have been imposed in the interfaces to mimic computationally expensive analyses typical of complex engineering design problems, allowing us to study the impact of delay on user performance. In addition to describing each problem, we discuss the experimental methods that we use, including the experimental factors, performance measures, and protocol. The focus in this paper is to publicize and share our design interfaces as well as our insights with other researchers who are developing tools to support design space visualization and exploration.
Vorheriger Artikel Interactive collision detection in three-dimensional visualizations of simulated construction operations
Nächster Artikel Dimensional reduction of 3D building models using graph theory and its application in building energy simulation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Lembersky MR, Chi UH (1984) Decision simulators speed implementation and improve operations. Interfaces 14:1–15
2.
Burgess S, Pasini D, Alemzadeh K (2004) Improved visualization of the design space using nested performance charts. Des Stud 25(1):51–62
3.
Dahl DW, Chattopadhyay A, Gorn GJ (2001) The Importance of visualisation in concept design. Des Stud 22(1):5–26
4.
Eddy J, Lewis K (2002) Visualization of multi-dimensional design and optimization data using cloud visualization. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences - design automation conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, ASME, Paper No. DETC02/DAC-02006
5.
Evans PT, Vance JM, Dark VJ (1999) Assessing the effectiveness of traditional and virtual reality interfaces in spherical mechanism design. ASME J Mech Des 121(4):507–514
6.
Hirschi NW, Frey DD (2002) Cognition and complexity: an experiment on the effect of coupling in parameter design. Res Eng Des 13(3):123–131
7.
Jayaram S, Vance JM, Gadh R, Jayaram U, Srinivasan H (2001) Assessment of VR technology and its applications to engineering problems. ASME J Comput Info Sci Eng 1(1):72–83CrossRef
8.
Kelsick J, Vance JM, Buhr L, Moller C (2004) Discrete event simulation implemented in a virtual environment. ASME J Mech Des 125(3):428–433CrossRef
9.
Kodiyalam S, Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) High performance computing and surrogate modeling for rapid visualization with multidisciplinary optimization. AIAA J 42(11):2347–2354
10.
Messac A, Chen X (2000) Visualizing the optimization process in real-time using physical programming. Eng Optim 32(6):721–747
11.
Stump G, Yukish M, Simpson TW (2004) The advanced trade space visualizer: an engineering decision-making tool. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Albany, NY, AIAA, AIAA-2004–4568
12.
Maxfield J, Juster NP, Dew PM, Taylor S, Fitchie M, Ion WJ, Zhao J, Thompson M (2000) Predicting product cosmetic quality using virtual environments. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences - computers and information in engineering, Baltimore, MD, ASME, Paper No. DETC2000/CIE-14591
13.
Winer EH, Bloebaum CL (2002) Development of visual design steering as an aid in large-scale multidisciplinary design optimization. part i: method development. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(6):412–424CrossRef
14.
Zionts S (1992) The state of multiple criteria decisionmaking: past, present, and future. In: Goicoechea A, Duckstein L, Zionts S (eds) Multiple criteria decision making, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 33–43
15.
Zionts S (1993) Multiple criteria decision making: the challenge that lies ahead. In: Tzeng GH, Wang HF, Wen UP, Yu PL (eds) Multiple criteria decision making. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 17–26
16.
Athan TW, Papalambros PY (1996) A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization. Eng Optim 27(2):155–176
17.
18.
Wilson B, Cappelleri DJ, Frecker MI, Simpson TW (2001) Efficient Pareto frontier exploration using Surrogate approximations. Optim Eng 2(1):31–50MATHCrossRefMathSciNet
19.
Hazelrigg GA (1996) The implications of arrow’s impossibility theorem on approaches to optimal engineering design. ASME J Mech Des 118(2):161–164
20.
Hazelrigg GA (1996) Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
21.
Steuer RE, Choo EU (1983) An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Math Program 26:326–344MATHCrossRefMathSciNet
22.
Thurston DL, Carnahan JV, Liu T (1994) Optimization of design utility. J Mech Des 116(3):801–808
23.
Yang JB, Sen P (1994) Multiple objective design optimization by estimating local utility functions. In: Advances in design automation vol. ASME DE-vol 69–2, pp 135–145
24.
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Bus Rev 66(3):63–73
25.
Locascio A, Thurston DL (1998) Transforming the house of quality to a multiobjective optimization formulation. Struct Optim 16(2–3):136–146
26.
Lewis K, Mistree F (1998) Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design. ASME J Mech Des 120(4):643–652
27.
Lewis K, Mistree F (2001) Modeling subsystem interactions: a game theoretic approach. J Des Manuf Autom 1(1):17–36
28.
Rao SS, Vankayya VB, Khot NS (1988) Game theory approach for the integrated design of structures and controls. AIAA J 26(4):463–469MATHMathSciNet
29.
Otto KN, Antonsson EK (1991) Trade-off strategies in engineering design. Res Eng Des 3(2):87–103CrossRef
30.
Wood KL, Antonsson EK, Beck JL (1990) Representing imprecision in engineering design: comparing fuzzy and probability calculus. Res Eng Des 1(3/4):187–203CrossRef
31.
Messac A (1996) Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J 34(1):149–158MATH
32.
Messac A (2000) From dubious construction of objective functions to the application of physical programming. AIAA J 38(1):155–163
33.
Saaty T (1988) The analytic hierarchy process, revised and extended edition. McGraw-Hill, New York
34.
National Research Council (1998) Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020, Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
35.
Ullman DG (2003) The mechanical design process. 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York
36.
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
37.
Sturman DJ, Zeltzer D, Pieper S (1989) Hands-on interaction with virtual environments, Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology:19–24
38.
Ware C, Balakrishnan R (1994) Reaching for objects in VR displays lag and frame rate. ACM Trans Compr Hum Interact 1:331–356CrossRef
39.
Watson B, Walker N, Hodges LF, Worden A (1997) Managing level of detail through peripheral degradation: effects on search performance in head-mounted display. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 4:323–346CrossRef
40.
Waern Y (1989) Cognitive aspects of computer supported tasks. Wiley, New York
41.
Goodman T, Spence R (1978) The effect of system response time on interactive computer-aided design. Comput Graph 12:100–104CrossRef
42.
Foley JD, Wallace JD (1974) The art of natural graphic man-machine conversation. Proc IEEE 4:462–471CrossRef
43.
Simpson TW, Meckesheimer M (2004) Evaluation of a graphical design interface for design space visualization. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, CA, AIAA, AIAA-2004–1683
44.
Gu L (2001) A comparison of polynomial based regression models in vehicle safety analysis. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences - design automation conference, Pittsburgh, PA, ASME, Paper No. DETC2001/DAC-21063
45.
Kleijnen JPC (1975) A comment on Blanning’s metamodel for sensitivity analysis: the regression metamodel in simulation. Interfaces 5(1):21–23
46.
Barton RR (1998) Simulation metamodels. In: Proceedings of the 1998 winter simulation conference (WSC’98), Washington, DC, IEEE, pp. 167–174
47.
Simpson TW, Peplinski J, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17(2):129–150MATHCrossRef
48.
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka RT (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim 14(1):1–23CrossRef
49.
Haftka R, Scott EP, Cruz JR (1998) Optimization and experiments: a survey. Appl Mech Rev 51(7):435–448CrossRef
50.
Simpson TW, Booker AJ, Ghosh D, Giunta AA, Koch PN, Yang RJ (2004) Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27(5):302–313
51.
Haftka R, Gürdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization. 3rd Revised and Expanded Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonMATH
52.
Frecker M, Simpson TW, Goldberg JH, Barton RR, Holewinski B, Stump G (2001) Integrating design research into the classroom: experiments in two graduate courses. In: 2001 Annual ASEE Conference, Albuquerque, NM, ASEE
53.
Ligetti C, Simpson TW, Frecker M, Barton RR, Stump G (2003) Assessing the impact of graphical design interfaces on design efficiency and effectiveness. ASME J Comput Inform Sci Eng 3(2):144–154CrossRef
54.
Barron K, Simpson TW, Rothrock L, Frecker M, Barton RR, Ligetti C (2004) Graphical user interfaces for engineering design: impact of response delay and training on user performance. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences - design theory & methodology conference, Salt Lake City, UT, ASME, Paper No. DETC2004/DTM-57085
55.
Barton RR, Limayem F, Meckesheimer M, Yannou B (1999) Using metamodels for modeling the propagation of design uncertainties. In: 5th international conference on concurrent engineering (ICE’99), The Hague, Centre for Concurrent Enterprising, The Netherlands, pp 521–528
56.
Simpson TW, Iyer P, Barron K, Rothrock L, Frecker M, Barton RR, Meckesheimer M (2005) Metamodel-driven interfaces for engineering design: impact of delay and problem size on user performance. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference and 1st AIAA multidisciplinary design optimization specialist conference, Austin, TX, AIAA, AIAA-2005–2060
57.
Law AM, Kelton WD (2000) Simulation modeling and analysis. 3rd edn, McGraw Hill, Boston, MA
58.
Ligetti C, Simpson TW (2005) Metamodel-driven design optimization using integrative graphical design interfaces: results from a job shop manufacturing simulation experiment. ASME J Comput Inform Sci Eng 5(1):8–17CrossRef
59.
Hammond KR (1986) Generalization in operational contexts: what does it mean? can it be done?. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 16(3):428–433MathSciNet
60.
Hammond KR, Hamm RM, Grassia J, Pearson T (1987) Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 17(5):753–770
61.
Meckesheimer M, Barton RR, Simpson TW, Limayem F, Yannou B (2001) Metamodeling of combined discrete/continuous responses. AIAA J 39(10):1955–1959CrossRef
62.
Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. 4th edn. WCB/McGraw Hill, Boston, MA
63.
Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 139–183
64.
Wierwille WW, Eggemeier FT (1993) Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum Factors 35(2):262–282
65.
Rothrock L, Barron K, Simpson TW, Frecker M, Barton RR, Ligetti C (2006) Applying the proximity compatibility and the control-display compatibility principles to engineering design interfaces. Hum Factors Ergonom Manuf 16(1):61–81CrossRef
66.
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97CrossRef
67.
Wickens CD, Carswell CM (1995) The proximity compatibility principle: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Hum Factors 37(3):473–494CrossRef
68.
Wickens CD (1992) Engineering psychology and human performance. 2nd edn. Harper Collins Inc., NewYork
69.
Martin JD, Simpson TW (2004) A Monte Carlo simulation of the kriging model. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Albany, NY, AIAA, AIAA-2004–4483
Metadaten
Titel
Graphical and text-based design interfaces for parameter design of an I-beam, desk lamp, aircraft wing, and job shop manufacturing system
verfasst von
Timothy W. Simpson
Mary Frecker
Russell R. Barton
Ling Rothrock
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Engineering with Computers / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-006-0045-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Engineering with Computers 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Three-dimensional analysis of Marangoni flow and radial segregation in Ge x Si1-x melt with Czochralski configuration

Original Article

Dimensional reduction of 3D building models using graph theory and its application in building energy simulation

Original Article

Comparative performance study of QN and LM algorithms in predictive control for NNARX-identified model of hydro-power plant

Erratum

Comparative performance study of QN and LM algorithms in predictive control for NNARX-identified model of hydro-power plant

Original Article

A paralleled element-free Galerkin analysis for structures with cyclic symmetry

Original Article

Interactive collision detection in three-dimensional visualizations of simulated construction operations

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise