Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Colloid and Polymer Science 11/2006

Open Access 01.08.2006 | Original Contribution

Negatively charged hyperbranched polyether-based polyelectrolytes

verfasst von: Emilie Barriau, Holger Frey, Anton Kiry, Manfred Stamm, Franziska Gröhn

Erschienen in: Colloid and Polymer Science | Ausgabe 11/2006

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The preparation of carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerols of narrow polydispersity was achieved by modification (78–90%) of the hydroxyl end groups via Michael addition of acrylonitrile, followed by hydrolysis. High conversion could only be achieved for low molecular weight starting materials (520 and 1,030 g mol−1). The solution properties of the resulting materials were investigated by dynamic light scattering (DLS), showing the formation of large aggregates with size depending on the pH value. After deposition on a negatively charged mica surface, the structures observed by atomic force microscope (AFM) show the coexistence of aggregates and single macromolecules. Most interesting, in the case of the lower molecular weight sample (PG 520 g mol−1), extended and ordered terrace structures were formed, which are unprecedented for hyperbranched polymers and are of interest for surface modification in general.

Introduction

Polyelectrolytes play an important role in numerous areas, e.g., to control the stability and rheology of complex fluids, for flocculation, and biomineralization processes. Polyelectrolyte-based materials are also widely applied in coatings, thickeners, dispersants, detergent-additives, and ion-exchange resins. Thus, the development of novel polyelectrolytes with unusual topology has become a topic of broad interest for both Colloid and Polymer Science, as these polymers are likely to exhibit peculiar properties in aqueous solution, that can strongly influence the fluid characteristics of aqueous suspensions and slurries, permit the introduction of surface charges on neutral particles via adsorption and may also lead to strong interaction with ions or colloidal aggregates of opposite charge.
In several recent works, highly branched polyelectrolyte structures have been introduced that are mostly based on perfectly branched dendrimer scaffolds [14]. Müller et al. have described a versatile strategy for hyperbranched polyelectrolytes based on the self-condensing vinyl (co)polymerization of protected acrylate monomers and subsequent hydrolysis [5].
A long-known example of a highly branched polyelectrolyte is poly(ethyleneimine), PEI. For PEI, pH-variation leads to strong variation of the properties in aqueous solution, as the charge–density on the amine-groups is pH-dependent [6]. Furthermore, a number of theoretical works has dealt with charged, branched polyelectrolyte structures [79]. Among the hyperbranched structures, polyglycerol prepared by slow addition of glycidol to a partially deprotonated polyol core [10] represents a particularly interesting material, as it is biocompatible [11] and can be prepared with controlled molecular weight and low polydispersity. In an elegant recent work, Schwab and Mecking reported the preparation of cationically charged polyglycerol-based polyelectrolytes, based on the attachment of pyridinium and imidazolium functionalities to polyglycerol [12]. Haag et al. have recently introduced a synthesis for hyperbranched polyglycerol-based carboxylates based on conversion with sodium chloro-acetate, which, however, only led to a limited conversion of 26% of the hydroxyl end groups [12].
For the synthesis of polyamine-dendrimers, poly(propylene imines) [1315], the Michael addition to the amino end groups plays a key role to obtain the polynitrile intermediates. In this case, even in high dendrimer generations, the dendrimer periphery can be fully modified. A subsequent hydrolysis step can also be employed to generate carboxylic acid end groups, thus, leading to dendritic polyelectrolytes. This method has also been successfully employed for the preparation of amphiphilic linear-dendritic block copolymers by Meijer et al. [16].
In this paper, a convenient pathway for the modification of the hydroxyl end groups of hyperbranched polyglycerol into carboxylic acid groups, and thereby, the formation of a hyperbranched, anionically charged polyelectrolyte is presented. The solution properties of these new hyperbranched polyelectrolytes will be discussed. Furthermore, the materials have been deposited on mica to generate ultrathin multilayers that have been investigated by atomic force microscope (AFM).

Experimental part

Materials

Acetone, methanol, tert-butoxide, sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfite, and 30% weight H2O2 solution were used as received from Fluka. Acrylonitrile and dimethylformamide (DMF) were obtained from Fluka and distilled before use.

Syntheses

Preparation of 3-(O-Polyglycerol)propanenitrile

Hyperbranched polyglycerol (500 mmol) was placed in a reactor and dissolved in 15-ml absolute DMF under argon atmosphere. Potassium tert-butoxide was added to the polymer solution to achieve 10% deprotonation of the hydroxyl groups. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated up to 80 °C for 4 h and then cooled down to 0 °C. Distilled acrylonitrile (61 mmol) was slowly added via a syringe to the reactor and the temperature was kept at 0 °C. After 4 h, the reactor was heated up to 5 °C, the solution became slightly red. The reaction mixture was kept at 5 °C for another 20 h, and finally, for 48 h at room temperature. Then 1 g of a cationic exchange resin was added to the reactor and that was stirred for 24 h. After filtration, DMF and the remaining acrylonitrile were removed by distillation. The modified polyglycerol was first dissolved in acetone and then precipitated in methanol, obtaining a brownish product. Both fractions were analyzed. The acetone fraction is a solid and the methanol soluble fraction is a highly viscous oil. The 3-(O-polyglycerol)propanenitrile was dried in vacuum at 50 °C.
Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) (300 MHz, DMSO-d6 or (CD3)2CO, δ in ppm): 3.9–3.3 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH 2 –CH2–CN] x , m); 2.7 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH 2 –CN] x , s); 1.3 (CH3–CH 2 –C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–CN] x , m); 0.87 (CH 3 –CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–CN] x , m).

Preparation of 3-(O-polyglycerol)propanoate

3-(O-polyglycerol)propanenitrile (2 g) was placed in 120-ml 3-N sodium hydroxide solution. A 30% weight H2O2 solution (10 ml) was carefully added, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at 70 °C, then for 1 day at 80 °C, and finally cooled down to room temperature for 2 days. A 2-M sodium sulfite solution was added and the reaction mixture was dialyzed for 2 days in water. The product is a slightly yellow solid.
Modified procedure: the product was precipitated in ethanol, and the reaction was repeated, until the conversion of the nitrile to carboxylate was satisfactory.
1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, δ in ppm): 3.9–3.3 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH 2 –CH2–COONa] x m); 2.4 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH 2 –COONa] x , s); 1.3 (CH3–CH 2 –C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x , m); 0.87 (CH 3 –CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x , m).
13C NMR (75.4 MHz, D2O, δ in ppm): 180 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2COONa] x ); 77–66 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PGCH2–CH2–COONa] x ); 61 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x ); 43 (CH3–CH2C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x ); 37 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2CH2–COONa] x ); 22 (CH3CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x ); 7.5 (CH3–CH2–C(CH2–O)3–[PG–CH2–CH2–COONa] x ).

Methods

AFM measurements were carried out in the dry state with a multimode AFM instrument (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara) operated with amplitude feedback in “light” tapping mode (amplitude set point in the range of 0.99–0.95). Silicon tips with a radius of 10–20 nm, spring constant of 0.3 N m−1, and resonance frequency of 250–300 kHz were used after the calibration with gold nanoparticles (diameter: 5.22 nm, Pelco AFM Gold Standard Kit.) to evaluate the tip radius. All measurements were done at ambient conditions (temperature: 21±2 °C; relative humidity: 50–70%).
Light scattering measurements were performed with a setup for combined static and dynamic light scattering consisting of an ALV/SP-86 goniometer and an ALV-5000/E multitau correlator. A He–Ne laser operating at a wavelength of 532 nm with a maximum output power of 375 mW was used as light source. Solutions were cleared by using a Millipore 0.22-μm pore size Teflon filter into 1-cm diameter dust-free quartz cells.
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) measurements were performed with a Shodex differential refractometer RI 71 in DMF with LiBr (75 °C, column PSS GRAL e4/3/2) or chloroform (30 °C, columns PSS SDV e4/3/2 and SDV e9/5/4) as eluent by injection of 150 μl of the polymer solution. Polystyrene standards were used for calibration.
NMR spectra were recorded at concentrations of 100 g l−1 on Bruker ARX 300 spectrometer operating at 300 MHz (1H NMR) and 75.4 MHz (13C NMR).

Results and discussion

Synthesis

Hyperbranched polyglycerol was prepared by slow addition of glycidol to a trimethylolpropane core, leading to low polydispersities in the range of M w /M n =1.3–1.7 and controlled molecular weight, as described previously [10]. This polyether-polyol can conveniently be modified at the hydroxyl end groups. Reactions employed for the functionalization should fulfill the following criteria: (1) high degree of conversion, (2) the compounds have to remain soluble in the medium, and (3) the work-up procedure has to be convenient. Modification into carboxylic groups was achieved via Michael addition reaction followed by hydrolysis, as shown in Scheme 1.
In the first step, the hydroxyl groups are converted into nitrile groups. Obviously, the products obtained after this step are hydrophobic. Hyperbranched polyglycerol was dissolved in DMF and partially deprotonated (10% mol of the hydroxyl groups). During addition of acrylonitrile, the temperature had to be kept under 0 °C to control the reaction. The materials were precipitated twice from acetone solution into methanol. The products obtained were viscous and brownish. DSC measurements showed that the glass transition temperature of the polymer was not affected by the functionalization; it remained at around −20 °C. In the second step, the nitrile groups were hydrolyzed with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of sodium hydroxide (Scheme 1). After this procedure the materials became soluble in aqueous solution. The carboxylated products were then precipitated in diethyl ether. The carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerols are obtained as solid, slightly yellow materials. The products were additionally purified by dialysis in water.
Figure 1a shows the 1H NMR spectrum of hyperbranched polyglycerol. The signals between 3.3 and 3.8 ppm are due to the polyether protons. Resonances at 0.8 ppm are due to the methyl group and signals at 1.3 ppm stem from the methylene group of the inititor-core TMP. After the Michael addition reaction, the two protons next to the nitrile group result in a new signal at 2.7 ppm (Fig. 1b). This signal is shifted to 2.4 ppm after hydrolysis (Fig. 1c). Elemental analysis has also been performed to trace the nitrogen content before and after hydrolysis to monitor the extent of hydrolysis.
The 13C NMR spectrum of the carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerol (Fig. 2) also shows the expected signals at 180 ppm for the carboxylic acid groups and at 37 ppm for the carbon next to this group, confirming hydrolysis.
A series of hyperbranched polyglycerols with different molecular weights has been transformed to the respective polyelectrolytes (Table 1). For the samples 1 and 2, the degree of modification achieved was between 80 and 90% and around 60% for the samples 3 and 4 (higher molecular weights). As expected, the degree of conversion decreased with increasing molecular weight, i.e., with increasing end-group functionality. The reaction of hydroxyl groups located in the proximity of the core of the hyperbranched architecture is most likely more difficult than transformation of the ones present at the periphery. This is analogous to the difficulties encountered when functionalizing the interior of dendrimer structures. It is obvious that all samples possess some remaining hydroxyl groups. This can be interesting in the case of application, e.g., for guest encapsulation [17]. In this case, such groups may act, e.g., as interaction site for guest molecules.
Table 1
Characterization data for the carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerols (HBPG-cx)
Sample
HBPG
Carboxylated HBPG-cx
% Modif.
\(\overline{M} _{{\text{n}}}\)
OH groups/polymer
COONa+ groups/polymer
\(\overline{M} _{{\text{n}}}\)
1
520
8.2
6.4
970
78%
2
1,030
15.1
13.5
2,280
89.4%
3
2,880
40.1
22.5
4,140
56.1%
4
6,480
89.7
55
10,220
62%
The values have been obtained from 1H NMR spectra; M n values in g mol−1
The hyperbranched polynitriles are also interesting for further conversion into other functional groups, such as amine groups after reduction, in analogy to the preparation of polypropylenimine (PPI) dendrimers [1315].

Structures in solution and after surface deposition

The solution properties of the hyperbranched polyelectrolytes have been studied by dynamic light scattering (DLS) in aqueous solution and by AFM after deposition on a surface. All samples exhibit good solubility in aqueous solution at a wide range of pH values. With increasing molecular weight, the solubility in methanol decreases, which is a consequence of the multiple charges at the molecular termini.
The DLS results for sample 3 are summarized in Table 2. At basic, neutral, and acidic pH, the data always show two modes of distribution. It appears that in solution, unimolecular hyperbranched carboxylated polymers (R h, 1) (unimers) coexist with large aggregates (R h, 2). The values of R h, 1 have to be taken carefully, because they are near the resolution limit of DLS. It is only possible to conclude that these unimers do not show any strong dependence on concentration and pH.
Table 2
Dynamic light scattering data of the carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerol sample 3. Rh, 1 and RH, 2: unimolecular and aggregates of the hyperbranched carboxylated polymers. Rh, 1 and Rh, 2 give the hydrodynamic radii of respective modes
Concentration (g l−1)
pH
D 1 (nm)
D2 (nm)
2
10
1.8
168.9
2
7
2.4
138.5
2
2
1.1
98.2
1
10
4.3
152.9
1
7
9.3
105.6
1
2
2.5
73.6
The second size distribution, (R h,2) aggregates, shows a clear dependence on pH and concentration. The carboxylic acid groups become more dissociated, as the pH decreases, which leads to a decrease of the size of the aggregates. Clearly, the charges promote aggregation, which is a consequence of an increasing amphiphilicity of the resulting structures. Concentration also influences the size of the aggregates, but this effect is not as strong as the influence of the pH value. Measurements at lower concentration (as low as 0.02 g/l) did not permit to observe the unimers’ mode only. We conclude that aggregation is a dominant mechanism even at a low concentration. This is most probably due to the presence of a rather apolar core in combination with the charged periphery of the macromolecules, resulting in core-shell amphiphilicity.
Tapping-mode AFM measurements for the samples 1 (Fig. 3) and 3 (Fig. 4) were performed after deposition on mica as a negatively charged substrate. The solutions were prepared at different pH in, all cases, at the concentration of 1 g l−1 and spin-coated. Sample 1 (from a PG with 520 g mol−1) prepared under acidic conditions (pH=2) shows very small conglomerates of spherical particles (2–3 nm in height), sometimes with beads-on-string morphology. This aggregation occurs already in solution, as the DLS results show. At pH 2, unimers are more collapsed (and form, therefore, higher structural features of 2–3 nm), presumably due to intramolecular hydrogen bonding. At neutral pH, the AFM images show small structures (less than 1 nm in height) co-existing with large aggregates (10 nm in height). Unimers display extended conformation, as they are partially ionized (several Angstroms (Å) in height). Most interesting, at pH 10, the formation of extended and highly ordered terrace structures of about 1.5 nm in height can be observed. Fragments of bilayers are also observed. Obviously, such terraces form upon evaporation of solvent for sample 1. Similar structures do not exist at pH 7. This shows that for ordered aggregation, the macromolecules should be in the fully extended (open) conformation to minimize intramolecular interaction, which leads to a collapse of the unimers, and thereby, maximizes intermolecular interactions. All measurements were performed on a strongly charged substrate, and in the case of charged materials (at pH 10 and partially at pH 7), adsorption is not favorable onto a surface with similar charges. This may explain why the surface is not fully covered with the first monolayer as the next monolayer already starts to be formed. The formation of rather flat mono- and bilayer structures is unprecedented for hyperbranched polymers. Similar images have been obtained for liquid crystalline dendrimers with perfectly branched structures [18]. This formation of ordered surface structures is most probably a consequence of the low polydispersity of the materials.
Sample 3 (from PG of 2,880 g mol−1) forms aggregates upon adsorption at pH 2 (diameter: 100–300 nm, the height is about 3–5 nm). These structures are arranged not regularly (particularly regarding their distance) as charged micelles. On the other hand, the pattern observed cannot be the result of coincidental adsorption. Also, this arrangement cannot be driven by charge repulsions, as the carboxylic acid groups are not ionized at pH 2, nor because of excluded volume interaction, as the distance between them is too large (ordering can occur in the case of closely packed particles). Therefore, this material may either be molecularly dissolved in solution at pH 2 or exist as loosely connected, swollen aggregates and initially adsorb onto the surface. As a consequence, it covers the surface more or less fully. Then, upon water evaporation, the material does not undergo only Z-collapse (in the vertical direction that leads to the dense layer) but also XY (lateral) collapse (in a “dewetting” like process). Thus, the film forms islands, and their shrinkage occurs more or less with the same rate. In the case of the toroids, shrinkage may occur simultaneously from the center and from the periphery of the islands. This mechanism is not sufficient to form intermolecular aggregates in the case of lower molecular weight (sample 1). The formation of the ring-like, toroidal structures therefore may be envisaged as an interplay of segment mobility during the drying process, dewetting phenomena and remaining surface charge distribution, which constitutes a complex non-equilibrium process depending on preparation route and conditions.
At pH 7, sample 3 forms larger aggregates (up to 15-nm high), which also appear to exist in solution. On the surface, these structures are not well-defined. They usually consist of a dense core and an extended, stabilized shell. In this case, these are low-density aggregates, the ratio diameter/height (500-nm large and 15-nm high) is 33, if assuming a near spherical geometry and merely Z-collapse upon drying. For the Z-collapse of dense micelles, the diameter/height ratio is usually considerably lower, for example, 3.33 for polystyrene-block-poly(2-vinylpyridine).
Under basic conditions, smaller aggregates are observed, but they are arranged in an unexpected manner: several particles of very different diameters are localized in close proximity, but are not connected to each other in most cases. Between such “populations” empty spaces are observed. This might reflect breaking of larger aggregates that existed in solution during the deposition onto several smaller ones.

Conclusion

The preparation of carboxylated hyperbranched polyglycerols was achieved by post-modification of the hydroxyl groups via Michael addition of acrylonitrile, followed by hydrolysis. High conversion (89%) could only be achieved for low molecular weight starting materials (PG 520 and 1,030 g mol−1). Nevertheless, the modification based on Michael addition of acrylonitrile and subsequent hydrolysis afforded considerably higher degrees of modification than previously reported procedures [12]. The solution properties of the materials have been investigated by DLS. The results show the formation of large aggregates with the size depending on the pH value. After deposition on a negatively charged mica surface, the structures observed by AFM show the coexistence of aggregates and unimers. In the case of the lower molecular weight sample (PG 520 g mol−1), extended and highly ordered terrace structures were formed, which are unprecedented for hyperbranched polymers.
In a recent work, the materials have successfully been employed for the fabrication of composite organic–inorganic multilayer thin films, using electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly [19]. The consecutive, alternating deposition of multilayers led to linear growth behavior with increasing number of deposition steps.
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner SR, Walter F, Voit BI, Mourey TH (1994) Macromolecules 27:1611CrossRef Turner SR, Walter F, Voit BI, Mourey TH (1994) Macromolecules 27:1611CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong A, Liu C, Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen C, Xi F (1999) Macromol Rapid Commun 20:492CrossRef Gong A, Liu C, Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen C, Xi F (1999) Macromol Rapid Commun 20:492CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Duivenbode RC, Rajanayagam A, Koper GJM, Baars MWPL, de Waal BFM, Meijer EW (2000) Macromolecules 33:46CrossRef van Duivenbode RC, Rajanayagam A, Koper GJM, Baars MWPL, de Waal BFM, Meijer EW (2000) Macromolecules 33:46CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat De Groot D, de Waal BFM, Reek JNH, Schenning, APHJ, Kamer PCJ, Meijer EW, van Leeuwen PWNM (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:8453CrossRef De Groot D, de Waal BFM, Reek JNH, Schenning, APHJ, Kamer PCJ, Meijer EW, van Leeuwen PWNM (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:8453CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori H, Seng DC, Lechner H, Zhang M, Müller AHE (2002) Macromolecules 35:9270CrossRef Mori H, Seng DC, Lechner H, Zhang M, Müller AHE (2002) Macromolecules 35:9270CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat a) Dautzenberg H, Jaeger W, Kötz J, Philipp B, Seidel C, Stscherbina D, (1994) Polyelectrolytes—formation, characterization and application. Hanser, Munich b) Akari S, Schrepp W, Horn D (1996) Phys Chem 100:1014 a) Dautzenberg H, Jaeger W, Kötz J, Philipp B, Seidel C, Stscherbina D, (1994) Polyelectrolytes—formation, characterization and application. Hanser, Munich b) Akari S, Schrepp W, Horn D (1996) Phys Chem 100:1014
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramzi A, Scherrenberg R, Joosten J, Lemstra P, Mortensen K (2002) Macromolecules 35:827CrossRef Ramzi A, Scherrenberg R, Joosten J, Lemstra P, Mortensen K (2002) Macromolecules 35:827CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunder A, Hanselmann R, Frey H, Mülhaupt R (1999) Macromolecules 32:4240CrossRef Sunder A, Hanselmann R, Frey H, Mülhaupt R (1999) Macromolecules 32:4240CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kainthan RK, Janzen J, Levin E, Devine DV, Brooks DE (2006) Biomacromolecules 7:703CrossRef Kainthan RK, Janzen J, Levin E, Devine DV, Brooks DE (2006) Biomacromolecules 7:703CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat a) Schwab E, Mecking S (2005) J Polym Sc Polym Chem 43:4609 b) Türk H, Haag R, Alban S (2004) Bioconjug Chem 15:162CrossRef a) Schwab E, Mecking S (2005) J Polym Sc Polym Chem 43:4609 b) Türk H, Haag R, Alban S (2004) Bioconjug Chem 15:162CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Buhleier E, Wehner W, Vögtle F (1978) Synthesis 155:8 Buhleier E, Wehner W, Vögtle F (1978) Synthesis 155:8
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Brabander-van den Berg EMM, Meijer EW (1993) Angew Chem Int Ed 32:1308CrossRef Brabander-van den Berg EMM, Meijer EW (1993) Angew Chem Int Ed 32:1308CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hest JCM, Baars MWPL, Elissen Román C, van Genderen MHP, Meijer EW (1995) Macromolecules 28:6689CrossRef van Hest JCM, Baars MWPL, Elissen Román C, van Genderen MHP, Meijer EW (1995) Macromolecules 28:6689CrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Collaud Coen M, Lorenz K, Kressler J, Frey H, Mülhaupt R (1996) Macromolecules 29:8069CrossRef Collaud Coen M, Lorenz K, Kressler J, Frey H, Mülhaupt R (1996) Macromolecules 29:8069CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DH, Lee OJ, Barriau E, Lee X, Caminade AM, Majoral JP, Frey H, Knoll WJ (2006) Nanosci Nanotechnol (in press) Kim DH, Lee OJ, Barriau E, Lee X, Caminade AM, Majoral JP, Frey H, Knoll WJ (2006) Nanosci Nanotechnol (in press)
Metadaten
Titel
Negatively charged hyperbranched polyether-based polyelectrolytes
verfasst von
Emilie Barriau
Holger Frey
Anton Kiry
Manfred Stamm
Franziska Gröhn
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Colloid and Polymer Science / Ausgabe 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0303-402X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-006-1522-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2006

Colloid and Polymer Science 11/2006 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.