Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Universal Access in the Information Society
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2016

01.11.2016 | Review Paper

A systematic review on multi-device inclusive environments

verfasst von: Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Maria Cecília Baranauskas, Roberto Pereira, Diego Dermeval, Seiji Isotani, Patrícia Jaques

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The challenge of designing universal access to knowledge demands considerations on multi-device interaction. A systematic review of inclusive environments built from multiple devices was conducted based on studies published during the period of 2002–2013. The search strategy combined manual and automatic searches from which 8889 studies were identified; 34 studies were found proposing software tools for building multi-device inclusive environments (0.38 % of the original sample). Thus, this study analyzes the ways academic and industrial communities have developed tools for building inclusive environments. The main findings of this review are: (1) an urgent need for the recognition of accessibility as an important non-functional requirement; (2) a need for taking into account the social conditions of users, such as illiteracy and people living in underserved communities; and (3) the identification of new research questions in the context of multi-device inclusive environments.
Vorheriger Artikel Universal Access Index assessment and appropriate optimization strategy
Nächster Artikel Benefit factors: American students, International students, and deaf/hard of hearing students’ willingness to pay for captioned online courses

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Terms related to the software engineering approaches (e.g. platform, “model-driven”, MDA, “software product line”, authoring, “component-based”, middleware, “service-oriented”, API) were considered during the terms definition process. However, the inclusion of such terms did not provide new results. For this reason, they were excluded.
 
2
Note that terms related to adaptation were considered in both “Multiple Devices” and “Interaction Design” because some papers presented adaptation related to “Multiple Devices” and others to “Interaction “Design”.
 
9
Although there are other common and more traditional sources to gather the paper citation, for some studies it was not possible to gather the information about citations. For this reason, it was decided to use Google Citation, as it was more precise to identify citations of the selected studies.
 
10
Regarding the number of citations, it is important to take into account the relation between the number of citations and the year of publication of the paper research.
 
11
These studies were not excluded previously because they passed on the “Studies that focus on design approaches for different users needs” criterion.
 
Literatur
1.
Almeida, L.D.A.; Baranauskas, M.C.C. Accessibility in rich internet applications: people and research. In: IHC’12, Brazilian symposium on human factors in computing systems, 2012, Cuiabá. Proceedings of IHC’12, 11th Brazilian symposium on human factors in computing systems. v. 1. pp. 3–12 (2012)
2.
Aspray, W., Goyal, A., Irwin, M. J., Jones, A., Lazowska, E., Patterson, D., Pollack, J., Sproull, B., Wulf, W. (2002). Grand research challenges in information systems. Technical report, Computing Research Association
3.
Baranauskas, M.C.C., Socially aware computing. In: ICECE 2009 VI International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education, pp. 1–5. (2009)
4.
Baranauskas, C.C., Bonacin, R.: Design—indicating through signs. Des. Issues 24, 30–45 (2008)CrossRef
5.
6.
Benyon, D., Murray, D.: Adaptive systems: from intelligent tutoring to autonomous agents. Knowl. Based Syst. 6(4), 197–219 (1993)CrossRef
7.
Biolchini, J., Mian, P.G., Candida, A., Natali, C.: Systematic review in software engineering. Engineering 679, 165–176 (2005)
8.
Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 6(2–3), 87–129 (1996)CrossRefMATH
9.
Brusilovsky, P.: Developing adaptive educational hypermedia systems: from design models to authoring tools. In: Murray, T., Blessing, S., Ainsworth, S. (eds.) Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive, Interactive, and Intelligent Educational Software, pp. 377–409. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRef
10.
Buchdid, S.B., Baranauskas, M.C.C. (2013). HCI in context: What the words reveal about it. In: Proceedings of The 15th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2013)
11.
Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., Vanderdonckt, J.: A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact. Comput. 15, 289–308 (2003)CrossRef
12.
Chuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)
13.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G.D., Beale, R.: Evaluation techniques. In: Human-Computer Interaction. 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englwood Cliffs, (2004)
14.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G.D., Beale, R.: Universal design. In: Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englwood Cliffs, (2004)
15.
Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50, 833–859 (2008)CrossRef
16.
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., Fischer, G., Mørch, A.I., Bertelsen, O.W.: Grand challenges for future HCI research: cultures of participation, interfaces supporting learning, and expansive learning. In: Hvannberg, E.T., Lárusdóttir, M.K., Blandford, A., Gulliksen, J. (eds.) NordiCHI, pp. 863–866. ACM (2010)
17.
Erl, T.: Service-oriented architecture: concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2005)
18.
Falb, J., Popp, R., Rock, T., Jelinek, H., Arnautovic, E., Kaindl, H.: Fully-automatic generation of user interfaces for multiple devices from a high-level model based on communicative acts. 2007 40th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’07). 26–26 (2007)
22.
Fishkin, K., Moran, T., Harrison, B.: Embodied user interfaces: towards invisible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of EHCI’98 (1998)
37.
Fisher, G. Democratizing design: new challenges and opportunities for computer-supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of CSCL’09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning. v. 1. pp. 282–286
19.
Gajos, K.Z., Weld, D.S., Wobbrock, J.O.: Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple. Artif. Intell. 174, 910–950 (2010)CrossRef
20.
Garlan, D., Bachmann, F., Ivers, J., Stafford, J., Bass, L., Clements, P., Merson, P.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2010)
21.
Jørgensen, M.: Evaluation of guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Version 2.2, (2007)
23.
Kaikkonen, A.: Mobile internet: past, present, and the future. In: Human-Computer Interaction and Innovation in Handheld, Mobile and Wearable Technologies. Ed IGI Global, (2011)
24.
Kastner, W., Neugschwandtner, G., Soucek, S., Newman, H.M.: Communication systems for building automation and control. Proc. IEEE 93(6), 1178–1203 (2005)CrossRef
25.
Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J.-M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-oriented programming ECOOP’97 object-oriented programming. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 1241, 220–242 (1997)
26.
Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews, TR/SE-0401. Department of Computer Science, Keele University, Staffs (2004)
27.
Medeiros, C.B.: Grand research challenges in computer science in Brazil. Computer 41, 59–65 (2008)CrossRef
28.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010(8), 336–341 (2010)CrossRef
29.
Nerurkar, U.: Web user interface design: forgotten lessons. IEEE Softw. 18(6), 69–71 (2001)CrossRef
30.
Newell, A.F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., Macaulay, C.: User sensitive inclusive design. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 235–243 (2010)
31.
Oviatt, S.L.: Ten myths of multimodal interaction. Commun. ACM 42(11), 74–81 (1999)CrossRef
32.
Pereira, R., Miranda, L.C., Baranauskas M.C.C., Piccolo, L.S.G., Almeida, L.D. and Reis, J.C. (2011) Interaction design of social software: clarifying requirements through a culturally aware artifact. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Society—i-Society 2011, pp. 310–315
33.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, London (2002)
34.
Russell, Stuart J., Norvig, Peter, Candy, John F., Malik, Jitendra M., Edwards, Douglas D.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1996)
35.
Shaer, O., Hornecker, E.: Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact 3(1–2), 1–137 (2010)
36.
Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2010)MATH
38.
Zimmermann, H.: OSI reference model: the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection. Commun. IEEE Trans. 28(4), 425–432 (1980)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A systematic review on multi-device inclusive environments
verfasst von
Ig Ibert Bittencourt
Maria Cecília Baranauskas
Roberto Pereira
Diego Dermeval
Seiji Isotani
Patrícia Jaques
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0422-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Special issue: recent advances in sign language translation and avatar technology

Communication

Benefit factors: American students, International students, and deaf/hard of hearing students’ willingness to pay for captioned online courses

Long paper

From grammar-based MT to post-processed SL representations

Long paper

Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation

Long paper

Developing a limb repositioning robotic interface for persons with severe physical disabilities

Long paper

KAZOO: a sign language generation platform based on production rules