nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015

Legal vs. Normative CSR: Differential Impact on Analyst Dispersion, Stock Return Volatility, Cost of Capital, and Firm Value

verfasst von: Maretno A. Harjoto, Hoje Jo

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study examines how the sell-side analysts interpret firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Specifically, we examine the differential impact of overall, legal, and normative CSR on the analysts’ earnings forecast dispersion, stock return volatility, cost of equity capital, and firm value. Employing a sample of U.S. public firms during 1993–2009, we find that overall CSR intensities reduce analyst dispersion of earnings forecast, volatility of stock return and cost of capital (COC), and increase firm value. However, its impact is reduced for firms with better accounting and disclosure quality. When we disaggregate CSR into legal and normative CSR, we find that legal (normative) CSR decreases (increases) analysts’ dispersion, stock return volatility, and COC, while legal (normative) CSR increases (decreases) firm value. The sell-side analysts tend to have less (greater) information asymmetry regarding the net benefits of pursuing CSR that is (not) required by laws. We find, however, that the benefit of having normative CSR realized in 1 year lag such that analyst dispersion, stock return volatility, COC decrease, respectively, and firm value increases. Furthermore, we find that the benefit of normative CSR is offset for firms with higher accounting and disclosure quality.

Nächster Artikel The Evolution of Vocabularies and Its Relation to Investigation of White-Collar Crimes: An Institutional Work Perspective

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We contrast the analysts’ reactions toward CSR activities that are required by laws (legal CSR), such as labor rights, antitrust, and product safety violations; and CSR activities that follow the norms, ethics, and discretionary social responsibility (normative CSR), such as charitable giving, work life benefits, and employment of the disabled.

A few corporations are able to provide more tangible evidence of “doing well while doing good,” such as Whole Foods (Whole Foods Markets Annual Report 2010) and Patagonia (Casadesus-Masanell et al. 2009). Others struggle to achieve both firm profits and social responsibilities (i.e., British Petroleum and Pfizer).

Our hypotheses are based on a theoretical model of asymmetric information between managers and external market participants, namely shareholders and analysts (Leland and Pyle 1977; Grossman and Stiglitz 1980; Myers and Majluf 1984). Gennotte and Leland (1990) present a theoretical model based on Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) where asymmetric information plays a key role in generating price volatility and market crashes, when market participants are not completely informed about the existence of hedging activities. Attanasio (1990) argues that in the presence of asymmetric information, asset prices tend to be more volatile than in the financial markets with full information.

For instance, Johnson and Johnson’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare division product recall during 2011 for consumer (product) safety that is required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated that both the company and the media news continuously disclosed the net impact of product recall was expected to reduce its net sales by 12 % (Loftus 2011). In contrast, Johnson and Johnson was unable to disclose the impact of its recent initiative on its cost and profit to phase out formaldehyde from its cosmetic products to fulfill consumers and society pressures beyond what is required by law (Thomas 2012).

Focusing on the CSR brand, Ogrizek (2002) argues that CSR branding is also becoming of paramount importance. If the firm mismanages the CSR branding, its reputation can be damaged, which could have direct and indirect negative effects on firm performance. Luo and Bhattacharya (2006) use CSR to investigate the relation between CSR and firm value. They develop a conceptual framework for predicting that (a) customer satisfaction partially mediates the relation between CSR and firm market value, (b) corporate abilities moderate the financial returns to CSR and (c) these moderated relations are mediated by customer satisfaction. They find the results supporting the reputation-building framework and customer satisfaction plays a significant role in the relation between CSR and CFP.

When we exclude KLD corporate governance category from our sample, however, our main results remain qualitatively unchanged.

We also conduct robustness check with CSR counts instead of CSR index. Our unreported results using CSR counts are consistent with results reported in this paper.

Moffitt (1999) suggest using the IV method, which focuses on finding a variable (or variables) that influences the first-stage, but does not influence the second-stage dependent variable (and thus is not correlated with the random error term in the second-stage equation). Angrist (2000) asserts that the IV method works if the researcher focuses on the causal effects. Moffitt (1999) further suggests that each IV that is indeed uncorrelated with the random error term in the second-stage (i.e., analyst dispersion, firm risk, cost of capital, and firm value) equation will yield unbiased estimates. Certain IVs will yield more precise estimates, however. The more highly correlated the IV is with the first-stage dependent variable, i.e., CSR engagement, the more precise the estimates will be. Thus, the challenge in an IV estimation is to find an appropriate IV that is highly correlated with the first-pass CSR variable, but uncorrelated with the second-pass analyst dispersion, firm risk, cost of capital, and firm value. Unfortunately, it is often hard to find variables that meet both of these requirements, and therefore it is difficult to find good IVs among the many potential IVs.

Our results remain qualitatively unchanged when we use discretionary accruals based on the Jones (1991) model instead of Kothari et al.’s (2005) performance-adjusted discretionary accruals.

We also examine 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year lag effect, but find insignificant results.

We further examine 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year lag effect, but find insignificant results.

For instance, General Mills, Intel Corporation, Starbucks, and many other corporations listed and have improved their rankings in Corporate Responsibility Magazine 100 Best Corporate Citizens when they continuously provide news and media releases about their progresses in CSR activities especially those which are not required by laws.

APCO Worldwide (2004) is a consulting firm that addresses firms’ interests and objectives through communication and public affairs and consulting that combines a global perspective with local expertise to understand the issues, events and trends that impact businesses and organizations around the world (http://www.apcoworldwide.com/).

Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243–253.CrossRef

Angrist, J. (2000). Estimation of limited-dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. NBER#248.

APCO Worldwide. (2004). Communicating CSR: Talking to people who listen, Global CSR Study, September 2004. http://www.apcoworldwide.com/content/pdfs/Global_CSR_Study_Sept2004.pdf.

Attanasio, O. (1990). Asset price volatilities and price structures. Economic Letters, 33(2), 159–164.CrossRef

Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 419–445.CrossRef

Baron, D., Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1–46.CrossRef

Blazovich, J., & Smith, M. (2011). Ethical corporate citizenship: Does it pay? In C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting) (Vol. 15, pp. 127–163). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Botosan, C., Plumlee, M., & Xie, Y. (2004). The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 233–259.CrossRef

Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2011). Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 159–173.CrossRef

Campbell, H. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 298–345.CrossRef

Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

Casadesus-Masanell, R., Crooke, M., Reinhardt, F., & Vasishth, V. (2009). Households’ willingness to pay for “green” goods: Evidence from Patagonia’s introduction of organic cotton sportswear. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 203–233.CrossRef

Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3), 741–771.CrossRef

Chatterji, A., Levine, D., & Toffel, M. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18, 125–169.CrossRef

Chung, K., & Jo, H. (1996). The impact of security analysts’ monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 493–512.CrossRef

Claus, J., & Thomas, J. (2001). Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. Journal of Finance, 56, 1629–1666.CrossRef

Crespo, A. H., & del Bosque, I. R. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369–385.CrossRef

Creyer, E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432.CrossRef

Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRef

Dhaliwal, D., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.CrossRef

Diether, K., Malloy, C., & Scherbina, A. (2002). Differences of opinion and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 57, 2113–2141.CrossRef

Dische, A. (2002). Dispersion in analyst forecasts and the profitability of earnings momentum strategies. European Financial Management, 8, 221–228.CrossRef

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

Easton, P. (2004). PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. Accounting Review, 79, 73–95.CrossRef

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRef

European Commission. (2010). Corporate social responsibility (CSR). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm.

Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–197.CrossRef

Fieseler, C. (2011). On the corporate social responsibility perceptions of equity analysts. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(2), 131–147.CrossRef

Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2005). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working Paper, Columbia University.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (p. 46). Boston: Pitman.

French, K., Schwert, G. W., & Stambaugh, R. F. (1987). Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 3–29.CrossRef

Friedman, M. (1970). Money and income: Comment on Tobin. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 318–327.CrossRef

Gebhardt, W., Lee, C., & Swaminathan, B. (2001). Towards an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 135–176.CrossRef

Gelb, D., & Strawer, J. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 1–33.CrossRef

Gennotte, G., & Leland, H. (1990). Market liquidity, hedging, and crashes. American Economic Review, 80(5), 999–1021.

Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810.CrossRef

Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046.CrossRef

Greene, W. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280.CrossRef

Grossman, S., & Stiglitz, G. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70(1), 393–408.

Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility? An economic and financial framework. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 30, 387–409.

Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 431–449.CrossRef

Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRef

Husted, B. W. (2005). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 175–183.CrossRef

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2010). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations. Harvard Business School Working Paper No 11-017. http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/11-017.pdf.

Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRef

Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRef

Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2007). Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 561–590.CrossRef

Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2008). Ethics and disclosure: A study of the financial performance of firms in the seasoned equity offerings market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 855–878.CrossRef

Johnson, T. (2004). Forecast dispersion and the cross section of expected return. Journal of Finance, 59(5), 1957–1977.CrossRef

Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193–228.CrossRef

Karnani, A. (2010). The case against corporate social responsibility. Wall Street Journal, August 23.

Kim, Y., Park, M., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796.CrossRef

Knyazeva, D. (2007). Corporate governance, analyst following, and firm behavior. Working Paper, New York University.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163–197.CrossRef

Kothari, S. P., Li, X., & Short, J. (2009). The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and financial press on the equity cost of capital: A study using content analysis. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1639–1670.CrossRef

Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. Accounting Review, 71(4), 467–492.

Lee, D., & Faff, R. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44, 213–237.CrossRef

Leland, H., & Pyle, D. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.CrossRef

Lim, T. (2001). Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. Journal of Finance, 56, 369–385.CrossRef

Loftus, P. (2011). J&J profits drops 12% on recall costs, sluggish sales. Wall Street Journal, January 25.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 1–18.CrossRef

Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 409–422.CrossRef

Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.

Miller, E. (1977). Risk, uncertainty and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1151–1168.CrossRef

Milne, M., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRef

Moffitt, R. (1999). New developments in econometric methods for labor market analysis. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), The handbook of labor economics (Vol. IIIA, Chap. 24). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRef

Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRef

Ogrizek, M. (2002). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the branding of financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6(3), 215–228.CrossRef

Ohlson, J., & Juettner-Nauroth, B. (2005). Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value. Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 349–365.CrossRef

Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41, 483–515.CrossRef

Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40(4), 369–396.CrossRef

Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social–financial performance relationship. Business and Society, 36(4), 419–429.CrossRef

Salama, A., Anderson, K., & Toms, J. (2011). Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk: Evidence from UK panel data 1994-2006. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20, 192–204.CrossRef

Springkle, G., & Maines, L. (2010). The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizon, 53, 445–453.CrossRef

Starks, L. (2009). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: What do investors care about? What should investors care about? Financial Review, 44, 461–468.CrossRef

Thomas, K. (2012). Johnson & Johnson to remove formaldehyde from products, The New York Times, August 15.

Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRef

Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRef

Whole Foods Markets. (2010). Annual Stakeholders’ Report. http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/pdfs/ar10.pdf.

Yu, F. (2008). Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 245–271.CrossRef

Titel: Legal vs. Normative CSR: Differential Impact on Analyst Dispersion, Stock Return Volatility, Cost of Capital, and Firm Value
verfasst von: Maretno A. Harjoto
Hoje Jo
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2082-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Different Shades of Green Consciousness: The Interplay of Sustainability Labeling and Environmental Impact on Product Evaluations

Service as a Bridge between Ethical Principles and Business Practice: A Catholic Social Teaching Perspective

Heroic Drucker

Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective

Oil and Water Do Not Mix, or: Aliud Est Credere, Aliud Deponere

Personal Motives, Moral Disengagement, and Unethical Decisions by Entrepreneurs: Cognitive Mechanisms on the “Slippery Slope”