Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2016

23.09.2014

Donate Money, but Whose? An Empirical Study of Ultimate Control Rights, Agency Problems, and Corporate Philanthropy in China

verfasst von: Justin Tan, Yuejun Tang

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using empirical evidence gathered from Chinese listed companies, this article explores the relationship between micro-governance mechanisms and corporate philanthropy from a corporate governance perspective. In China’s emerging market, ultimate controlling shareholders of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are reluctant to donate their assets or resources to charitable organizations; in private enterprises (PEs) marked by more deviation in voting and cash flow rights, such donations tend to be more likely. However, the ultimate controllers in PEs refuse to donate assets or resources they control or own, which implies that corporate philanthropy by PEs comes at the cost of others, through assets or resources owned by minority shareholders. Even after devastating natural disasters such as the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, the controlling shareholders continue to express reluctance to donate any assets they control. Despite widespread evidence that corporate philanthropy boosts corporate growth and profitability, these ultimate controllers indicate no intention to donate their own money as a means to improve corporate performance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
According to agency theory, corporate philanthropy improves the private benefits of CEOs but does not maximize shareholders’ interests (Atkinson and Galaskiewicz 1988). Corporate philanthropy can help managers improve their social status, self-image, and reputation (Galaskiewicz 1997; Haley 1991).
 
2
Strategic motivations for political–corporate philanthropy behaviors reflect the goal of maximizing returns on political investments (Sa´nchez 2000). Neiheisel’s (1994) political enterprise model suggests that corporate philanthropy can help companies achieve certain political benefits and thus earn more money. With data from 2,870 PEs in China, Ma and Parish (2006) find that Chinese enterprises obtain political legitimacy and status by donating money to the government.
 
3
Graham and Dodd (1934) note that investors can invest less but gain benefits and survive by taking advantage of a pyramid structure. Bebchuk et al. (1999) demonstrate that shareholders can control many companies, with little investment.
 
4
Similarly, it may keep managers from donating for their own utility (Atkinson and Galaskiewicz 1988; Galaskiewicz 1997; Haley 1991).
 
5
Sa´nchez (2000) notes that corporate philanthropy can help companies build brand cognition and loyalty, as well as attract and retain employees. Hess et al. (2002), Smith (1994), and Vidaver-Cohen and Altman (2000) confirm that corporate philanthropy is a good global market entry strategy. Su and Zhong (2009) find that CSR activities (including donations) relate positively to the degree of industry internalization.
 
6
Researchers disagree about the relationship between corporate donations and financial performance. For example, using empirical evidence from listed Fortune 1,000 companies, Seifert et al. (2004) find that corporate donations have no significant impact on corporate performance; Wang et al. (2008), using a cost–benefit analysis framework, indicate an inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate donations and financial performance. These conflicting findings indicate that strategic philanthropy includes institutional motivations that move beyond economic objectives, and the top management of companies also may lack donation knowledge and skills, such that they waste corporate resources.
 
7
After the Wenchuan Earthquake on May 12, 2008, consumers were so moved by Wang Laoji’s donations to relief efforts that the soft drink brand ran out of stock in 2 days. In this textbook case, charitable donations enhanced performance and encouraged positive market reactions.
 
8
The relatively few A-share listed companies between 2003 and 2005 led the regression analysis to focus on data obtained between 2006 and 2008. The empirical results and conclusions did not change. Space limitations prevent the presentation of these empirical analysis results, but they are available on request.
 
9
The regression results of Model I are significant at 10.7 %, close to the 10 % criterion.
 
10
La Porta et al. (1999) and Claessens et al. (2000) indicate that deviations of VR and CFR are easy to find in family-controlled enterprises.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 641–654.CrossRef Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 641–654.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Almeida, H. V., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2637–2680.CrossRef Almeida, H. V., & Wolfenzon, D. (2006). A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2637–2680.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.CrossRef Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 82–100.CrossRef Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 82–100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Attig N., Fischer, K., & Gadhoum, Y. (2003). On the determinants of pyramidal ownership: Evidence on dilution of minority interests. Working paper, University of Quebec at Montreal. Attig N., Fischer, K., & Gadhoum, Y. (2003). On the determinants of pyramidal ownership: Evidence on dilution of minority interests. Working paper, University of Quebec at Montreal.
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.CrossRef Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18.CrossRef Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies, Business Ethics. European Review, 15(3), 234–245. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies, Business Ethics. European Review, 15(3), 234–245.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, J., Huang, Q., Peng, H., & Zhong, H. (2010). Research report on corporate social responsibility of China. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press. Chen, J., Huang, Q., Peng, H., & Zhong, H. (2010). Research report on corporate social responsibility of China. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741–2771.CrossRef Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741–2771.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81–112.CrossRef Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81–112.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Claessens, S., Simeon, D., Fan, Joseph P. H., & Lang, Larry H. P. (1999). Expropriation of minority shareholders in East Asia. Working paper, World Bank. Claessens, S., Simeon, D., Fan, Joseph P. H., & Lang, Larry H. P. (1999). Expropriation of minority shareholders in East Asia. Working paper, World Bank.
Zurück zum Zitat Crampton, W., & Patten, D. (2008). Social responsiveness, profitability and catastrophic events: Evidence on the corporate philanthropic response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 863–873.CrossRef Crampton, W., & Patten, D. (2008). Social responsiveness, profitability and catastrophic events: Evidence on the corporate philanthropic response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 863–873.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2007). Socially responsible institutional investment in private equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 395–416.CrossRef Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2007). Socially responsible institutional investment in private equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 395–416.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRef Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisman, R., G. Heal, & V. B. Nair (2005). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working paper, Columbia University. Fisman, R., G. Heal, & V. B. Nair (2005). A model of corporate philanthropy. Working paper, Columbia University.
Zurück zum Zitat Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRef Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–1981, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 445–471.CrossRef Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–1981, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 445–471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gao, Y. (2011). Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1377–1382.CrossRef Gao, Y. (2011). Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1377–1382.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haley, U. C. V. (1991). Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 485–509.CrossRef Haley, U. C. V. (1991). Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 485–509.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.CrossRef Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.CrossRef Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 301–361.CrossRef Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 301–361.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90, 22–27.CrossRef Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90, 22–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, D., & Parish, W. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85, 943–964.CrossRef Ma, D., & Parish, W. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85, 943–964.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.CrossRef Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRef McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muller, A., & Kraussl, R. (2011). Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 911–929.CrossRef Muller, A., & Kraussl, R. (2011). Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 911–929.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neiheisel, S. R. (1994). Corporate strategy and the politics of goodwill. New York: Peter Lang. Neiheisel, S. R. (1994). Corporate strategy and the politics of goodwill. New York: Peter Lang.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hagan, J., & Harvey, D. (2000). Why do companies sponsor arts events? Some evidence and a proposed classification. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24(3), 205–224.CrossRef O’Hagan, J., & Harvey, D. (2000). Why do companies sponsor arts events? Some evidence and a proposed classification. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24(3), 205–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78.
Zurück zum Zitat Sa´nchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 363–375.CrossRef Sa´nchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 363–375.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saiia, D. H. (2002). Philanthropy and corporate citizenship: Strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(2), 57–74. Saiia, D. H. (2002). Philanthropy and corporate citizenship: Strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(2), 57–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy when corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRef Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy when corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat See, G. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 1–22.CrossRef See, G. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211.CrossRef Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161.CrossRef Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shan, L., Gan, L., & Zheng, T. (2008). Corporate donations and economic incentives: An empirical study based on corporate donations following the 5.12 earthquake in China. Economic Research Journal, 11, 51–61. Shan, L., Gan, L., & Zheng, T. (2008). Corporate donations and economic incentives: An empirical study based on corporate donations following the 5.12 earthquake in China. Economic Research Journal, 11, 51–61.
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 735–786. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 735–786.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105–116. Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105–116.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, G., & Stodghill, R. (1994). Are good causes good marketing? BusinessWeek, 3363, 64–66. Smith, G., & Stodghill, R. (1994). Are good causes good marketing? BusinessWeek, 3363, 64–66.
Zurück zum Zitat Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 73–90.CrossRef Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 73–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Su, R. X., & Zhong, W. Z. (2009). An empirical study of CSR in list companies: A corporate communication perspective. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium for Corporate Governance, vol. 1 and 2, pp. 841–854. Su, R. X., & Zhong, W. Z. (2009). An empirical study of CSR in list companies: A corporate communication perspective. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium for Corporate Governance, vol. 1 and 2, pp. 841–854.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, J. (2002). Impact of ownership type on environment, strategy, and performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333–354.CrossRef Tan, J. (2002). Impact of ownership type on environment, strategy, and performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, J. (2009). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 171–189.CrossRef Tan, J. (2009). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 171–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment–strategy coevolution and coalignment: A staged-model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141–157.CrossRef Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment–strategy coevolution and coalignment: A staged-model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141–157.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRef Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Useem, M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88.CrossRef Useem, M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Altman, B. W. (2000). Corporate citizenship in the new millennium: Foundation for an architecture of excellence. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 145–168.CrossRef Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Altman, B. W. (2000). Corporate citizenship in the new millennium: Foundation for an architecture of excellence. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 145–168.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.CrossRef Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.CrossRef Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRef Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weidenbaum, M. (1996). The Chinese family business enterprise. California Management Review, 38(4), 141–156.CrossRef Weidenbaum, M. (1996). The Chinese family business enterprise. California Management Review, 38(4), 141–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wokutch, R. E., & Spencer, B. A. (1987). Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Review, 29(2), 62–77.CrossRef Wokutch, R. E., & Spencer, B. A. (1987). Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Review, 29(2), 62–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh, Y. H., & Woidtke, T. (2005). Commitment or entrenchment: Controlling shareholders and board composition. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1857–1885.CrossRef Yeh, Y. H., & Woidtke, T. (2005). Commitment or entrenchment: Controlling shareholders and board composition. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1857–1885.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2009). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan Earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 51–63.CrossRef Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2009). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan Earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 51–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong, H., Zhang, E., Zhang, T., & Sun, X. (2009). Report on China Top Firm CSR Index. Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing House. Zhong, H., Zhang, E., Zhang, T., & Sun, X. (2009). Report on China Top Firm CSR Index. Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing House.
Zurück zum Zitat Zingales, L. (1995). What determines the value of corporate votes? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1047–1073.CrossRef Zingales, L. (1995). What determines the value of corporate votes? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1047–1073.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zou, D. T. (2009). Annul report on enterprise citizenship in China. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press. Zou, D. T. (2009). Annul report on enterprise citizenship in China. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Donate Money, but Whose? An Empirical Study of Ultimate Control Rights, Agency Problems, and Corporate Philanthropy in China
verfasst von
Justin Tan
Yuejun Tang
Publikationsdatum
23.09.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2386-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner