Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2016

23.09.2014

Removing Vacant Chairs: Does Independent Directors’ Attendance at Board Meetings Matter?

verfasst von: Huilong Liu, Hong Wang, Liansheng Wu

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we investigate whether independent directors’ attendance at board meetings enhances investor protection using a difference-in-difference approach. We find that independent directors’ attendance alleviates tunneling. This effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) than in state-owned enterprises. The reinforcement of external supervision substitutes for the role of independent directors’ attendance and this substitution effect is more significant in non-SOEs. Together, these results imply that independent directors’ attendance at board meetings can play an important role in protecting investors, especially in non-SOEs and when external supervision is weak. This paper sheds new light on independent directors’ function in corporate governance, and has implications for institutional improvements.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The legalization index reported by Fan et al. (2011) ends in 2009. Our sample period is 2004–2011, implying that we cannot obtain legalization index data for the 2010–2011 period. As the rankings of legalization level are quite stable, we use the legalization index of 2009 to proxy for the legislation index of this district in 2010–2011.
 
2
This means the potential heterogeneous behavioral responses problem in difference-in-difference approach is not severe in the paper.
 
3
A prerequisite for the validity of the difference-in-difference assumption is that the program is not implemented based on the pre-existing differences in outcomes. An important target of the Notice is to restrict tunneling and the Notice applies to all listed firms in China, no matter they are SOEs or non-SOEs. Therefore, the Notice is not implemented based on the pre-existing differences in Tun between non-SOEs and SOEs. Moreover, the Notice does not affect the ownership nature of firms, so our classification of non-SOEs and SOEs is not based on the Notice. Hence, the “targeting based on differences” problem is not serious in this paper.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(03), 377–397.CrossRef Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(03), 377–397.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2), 411–437.CrossRef Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2), 411–437.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.CrossRef Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 203–243.CrossRef Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 203–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
Zurück zum Zitat Berkman, H., Cole, R. A., & Fu, L. J. (2009). Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(1), 141–156.CrossRef Berkman, H., Cole, R. A., & Fu, L. J. (2009). Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(1), 141–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–273. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–273.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475.CrossRef Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A theory of privatisation. The Economic Journal, 106(435), 309–319.CrossRef Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A theory of privatisation. The Economic Journal, 106(435), 309–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Terry, R. L. (1994). Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(3), 371–390.CrossRef Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Terry, R. L. (1994). Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(3), 371–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brickley, J. A., & James, C. M. (1987). The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), 161–180.CrossRef Brickley, J. A., & James, C. M. (1987). The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), 161–180.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers?: Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.CrossRef Byrd, J. W., & Hickman, K. A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers?: Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448.CrossRef Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.CrossRef Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.CrossRef Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the sec. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.CrossRef Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the sec. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.CrossRef Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). Chinese Market Index: 2011 report on regional relative marketization process. Beijing: Economic Science Press. Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). Chinese Market Index: 2011 report on regional relative marketization process. Beijing: Economic Science Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1112.CrossRef Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1112.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.CrossRef Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang, G., Lee, C., & Yue, H. (2010). Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 1–20.CrossRef Jiang, G., Lee, C., & Yue, H. (2010). Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275–304.CrossRef Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275–304.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.CrossRef Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mace, M. (1986). Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Mace, M. (1986). Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallette, P., & Fowler, K. L. (1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of “poison pills”. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1010–1035.CrossRef Mallette, P., & Fowler, K. L. (1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of “poison pills”. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1010–1035.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163–184.CrossRef Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Park, Y. W., & Shin, H. H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), 431–457.CrossRef Park, Y. W., & Shin, H. H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), 431–457.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471.CrossRef Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453–471.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S5–S26.CrossRef Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S5–S26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191.CrossRef Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 175–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853.CrossRef Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, Q. Q., Luo, D. L., & Wang, L. (2005). Controlling shareholders tunneling and resistant powers: The evidence from Chinese stock market. China Accounting Review, 1, 63–85. Tang, Q. Q., Luo, D. L., & Wang, L. (2005). Controlling shareholders tunneling and resistant powers: The evidence from Chinese stock market. China Accounting Review, 1, 63–85.
Zurück zum Zitat Vafeas, N. (2000). Board structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(2), 139–160.CrossRef Vafeas, N. (2000). Board structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(2), 139–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.CrossRef Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.CrossRef Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, L. (2004). Types of large shareholders, corporate governance, and firm performance: Evidence from China’s listed companies. Working Paper. Xu, L. (2004). Types of large shareholders, corporate governance, and firm performance: Evidence from China’s listed companies. Working Paper.
Zurück zum Zitat Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Removing Vacant Chairs: Does Independent Directors’ Attendance at Board Meetings Matter?
verfasst von
Huilong Liu
Hong Wang
Liansheng Wu
Publikationsdatum
23.09.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2402-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner