Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2021

22.02.2020 | Original Paper

Towards the Development of an Empirical Model for Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East

verfasst von: Petya Koleva

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Academic research suggests that variances in contextual dynamics, and more specifically religion, may lead to disparate perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Driven by the increased geopolitical and economic importance of the Middle East and identified gaps in knowledge, the study aims to examine if indeed there is a divergent form of CSR exercised in the region. The study identifies unique CSR dimensions and constructs presented through an empirical framework in order to outline the practice and perception of CSR in a context with strong Islamic beliefs. The framework goes beyond the platform of mere Islamic philanthropy and is based on CSR-stakeholder management practices. Following an exploratory research design and collecting interview data from representatives of 63 organisations from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, the study offers a snapshot of the CSR reality from the perspective of those living the phenomenon. The results suggest that the practice and perception of CSR in the examined context are largely grounded in the areas of social and altruistic actions but they cannot be examined in isolation from the religious context of CSR operation. This focus is mainly attributed to the dominant role of Islam in the examined sample, which leads to forms of non-structured or semi-structured approaches to CSR. Apart from the theoretical advancements offered to the CSR literature, the study also provides contributions for practitioners and policy makers.
Vorheriger Artikel The Effect of Consumer Perceptions of the Ethics of Retailers on Purchase Behavior and Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Ethical Beliefs
Nächster Artikel Work–Family Practices and Complexity of Their Usage: A Discourse Analysis Towards Socially Responsible Human Resource Management

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Religion is well recognised in the literature as a social construct (e.g. McNichols and Zimmerer 1985; Barnett and Karson 1987; Barnett et al. 1996).
 
2
Corporate Social Responsibility | UAE: www.​csruae.​ae/​en.
 
3
PLCs (Publicly Listed Companies) is a sample group composed by domestic businesses listed on the local stock exchange markets.
 
4
The European Commission definition of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is firms with up to 250 employees. https://​ec.​europa.​eu/​growth/​smes/​business-friendly-environment/​sme-definition_​en.
 
5
The author uses a capital “C” and a lower case “c” to differentiate discussions concerning the categories that have been developed in the data analysis (capital C) from general methodological discussions on categories (lower case “c”).
 
6
According to Max Weber (1978):
(1) instrumentally rational (zweckrational)—determined by rational expectations, motivation associated with security, a guarantee that something will happen with a very high certainty. The expected benefit will materialise at a certain point, normally not that long in the future.
(2) value-rational (wertrational)—determined by a conscious belief in the value for its own sake of some ethical, aesthetic, religious, or other form of behaviour, independently of its prospects of success. There is no guarantee that a benefit will occur or when. If the respondents in this study expect some form of reward, that reward will be for their soul (as it will be received in the Heaven) not even in their lifetime, i.e. it is value based, not material.
 
Literatur
Agle, B., & Van Buren, H., III. (1999). God and Mammon: The modern relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(4), 563–582.
Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, E. D. M., Tensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., et al. (2008). Dialogue: Towards superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
Ahmad, N., Taiba, S., Kazmi, M. A., & Ali, H. N. (2015). Concept and elements of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its Islamic perspectives: Mainstream business management concerns in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 35(2), 925–934.
Al-Abdin, A., Roy, T., & Nicholson, J. D. (2018). Researching corporate social responsibility in the Middle East: The current state and future directions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 47–65.
Ali, M. S. (2004). The Holy Qura’ān. Surrey: Islam International Publications.
Ali, J. A. (2014). Business Ethics in Islam. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and religion. New York: Macmillan.
Annells, M. (1996). Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 379–393.
Atan, R., & Halim, N. A. A. (2012). The perception of Muslim consumers towards corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(2), 65–80.
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(2), 421–449.
Barnett, J., & Karson, M. (1987). Personal values and business decisions: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5), 371–383.
Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1161–1174.
Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sense-making. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.
Becker, H. S. (1990). Generalizing from case studies. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 233–242). New York: Teachers College Press.
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Taylor, C. R., Hill, P., & Yalchinkaya, G. (2011). A cross-cultural examination of corporate social responsibility marketing communications in Mexico and the United States: Strategies for global brands. Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 30–44.
Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 131–145.
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Editorial: Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. New York: Pearson Education Group.
Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, M. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.
Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.
Branco, C. M., & Rodriques, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. EJBO: Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5–15.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
Burton, B. K., & Goldsby, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility orientation, goals and behavior: A study of small business owners. Business & Society, 48(1), 88–104.
Butterfield, K. D., Trevin, K. L., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.
Caprar, D. V., & Neville, B. A. (2012). “Norming” and “conforming”: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 231–245.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114–120.
Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 3–26.
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441.
Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded Theory in the 21st century Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 359–380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014a). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014b). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. E. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 675–694). London: Sage.
Corley, K. G. (2015). A commentary on “what grounded theory is…” engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 600–605.
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. London: Routledge.
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2015). The influence of Christian religiosity on managerial decisions concerning the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 203–231.
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2016). Community religion, employees, and the social license to operate. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 775–807.
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2019). Christian religiosity and corporate community involvement. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(1), 85–125.
Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.
Darrag, M., & E-Bassiouny, E. (2013). An introspect into the Islamic roots of CSR in the Middle East: The case of Savola Group in Egypt. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(3), 362–378.
Darus, F., Yusoff, H., Naim, D. M. A., & Zain, M. M. (2013). Islamic corporate social responsibility (i-CSR) framework from the perspective of Maqasi al-Syariah and Maslahaha. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(2), 102–112.
De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage.
Dey, I. (2007). Grounding categories. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 167–190). London: Sage.
Dobers, P., & Halme, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(5), 237–249.
Dotson, F. (1954). Intensive interviewing in community research. Journal of Educational Sociology, 27(5), 225–230.
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5–34.
Dusuki, A. W. (2008). What does Islam say about corporate social responsibility? Review of Islamic Economics, 12(1), 5–28.
Egan, T. M. (2002). Grounded theory research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 277–295.
Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded theory method in management research users’ perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 430–455.
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In M. Morsing & A. Kakabadse (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Reconciling aspiration with application (pp. 9–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.
Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 175–187.
Gentles, S. J., Jack, S. M., Nicholas, D. B., & McKibbon, K. (2014). Critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 19(44), 1–14.
Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118–137.
Goby, V. P., & Nickerson, C. (2016). Conceptualization of CSR among Muslim consumers in Dubai: Evolving from philanthropy to ethical and economic orientations. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 167–179.
Houtsma, M. Th., Wensinck, A. J., Levi-Provencal, E., Gibb, H. A. R. and Heffening, W. (1936). The Encyclopædia of Islam: A dictionary of the geography, ethnography and biography of the Muhammadan peoples. Leiden: Brill. Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 9–18.
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610.
Idemudia, U. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries: Moving the critical CSR research agenda in Africa forward. Progress in Development Studies, 11(1), 1–18.
Idowu, S. O., & Filho, W. L. (2009). Global practices of corporate social responsibility. Berlin: Springer.
Jamali, D. (2007). The case of strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Business and Society Review, 112(1), 1–27.
Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.
Jamali, D., & Hossary, M. (2019). CSR logics in the Middle East. In B. Rettab & K. Mellahi (Eds.), Practising CSR in the Middle East (pp. 53–80). Cham, SW: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61.
Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262.
Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 599–621.
Jamali, D., & Sidani, Y. (2012). Introduction: CSR in the Middle East: Fresh perspectives. In D. Jamali & Y. Sidani (Eds.), CSR in the Middle East (pp. 1–10). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jamali, D., & Sidani, Y. (2013). Does religiosity determine affinities to CSR? Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 10(4), 309–323.
Jamali, D., Sidani, Y., & El-Asmar, K. (2009). A three country comparative analysis of managerial CSR perspectives: Insights from Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 173–192.
Jamali, D., Karam, C., Yin, J., & Soundararajan, V. (2017a). CSR logics in developing countries: Translation, adaptation and stalled development. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 343–359.
Jamali, D., Lund-Thompsen, P., & Khara, N. (2017b). CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society, 56(3), 454–486.
Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525–540.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.
Jusoh, W. N. H. W., Ibrahim, U., & Napiah, M. D. M. (2015). An Islamic perspective on corporate social responsibility of Islamic banks. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 308–315.
Katsioloudes, M. I., & Brodtkourb, T. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: An exploratory study in the United Arab Emirates. Advanced Management Journal, 72(4), 9–20.
Kazmi, A. (2016). Book review: Business ethics in Islam, by Abbas J Ali, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. UK. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 257–260.
Ketola, T., Siwar, C., & Hossain, T. (2009). An analysis of Islamic CSR concept and the opinions of Malaysian managers. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 20(3), 290–298.
Khan, M. S. U., & Karim, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Contemporary thought and Islamic perspectives. Thoughts on Economics, 21(1), 45–55.
Khan, F. R., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2011). CSR as imperialism: Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 73–90.
Khurshid, M. A., Al-Aal, A. A., Soliman, A. A., & Amin, S. M. (2014). Developing an Islamic corporate social responsibility model (ICSR). Competitiveness Review, 24(4), 258–274.
Koleva, P. (2018). A systematic review on corporate social responsibility literature in the Middle East: Conceptual gaps and challenges. In S. O. Idowu, C. Sitnikov, D. Simion, & C. G. Bocean (Eds.), Current issues in corporate social responsibility: An international consideration (pp. 237–257). Cham, SW: Springer.
Koleva, P., & Ocler, R. (2018). Using constructivist grounded theory to construct a substantive theory for corporate social responsibility. In S. O. Idowu, C. Sitnikov, D. Simion, & C. G. Bocean (Eds.), Current issues in corporate social responsibility: An international consideration (pp. 125–139). Cham: Springer.
Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–632.
Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(2009), 50–63.
Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Campbell, T. T. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in developing and transitional countries: Botswana and Malawi. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 429–440.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.
Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–442.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, A. (2008). Thinking of the organization as a system: The role of managerial perceptions in developing a corporate social responsibility strategic agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(3), 413–426.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38.
Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.
McNichols, C. W., & Zimmerer, T. W. (1985). Situational ethics: An empirical study of differentiators of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(3), 175–180.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235–255.
Murphy, M. J., MacDonald, J. B., Antoine, G., & Smolarsk, J. M. (2019). Exploring Muslim attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: Are Saudi business students different? Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1–16.
Nancarrow, C., Brace, I., & Wright, L. T. (2001). Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies: Dealing with socially desirable responses in market research. The Marketing Review, 2(1), 55–69.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Lancaster, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Towards a context-specific perspective in developing countries. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 399–415.
Peattie, K., & Samuel, A. (2018). Fairtrade towns as unconventional networks of ethical activism. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 265–282.
Peifer, J. L. (2015). The inter-institutional interface of religion and business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(3), 363–391.
Peirce, C. S. (1935). The collected papers of Charles S Peirce 1931–1935, Book 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Phillips, D. L., & Clancy, K. J. (1972). Some effects of “social desirability” in survey studies. American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–940.
Planken, B., Nickerson, C., & Sahu, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) across the globe: Dutch and Indian consumers’ responses to CSR. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(3), 357–372.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M. C., & Au, A. K. (2010). Consumer support for corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of religion and values. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 61–72.
Ray, D. E., Berman, S. L., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., & Van Buren, I. I. I. (2014). Refining normative stakeholder theory: Insights from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 11(4), 331–356.
Reichertz, J. (2010). Abduction, deduction and induction in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), 299–310.
Rest, J. (1994). Background theory and research. In J. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). New York: Psychology Press.
Rice, G. (1999). Islamic ethics and the implications for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(4), 345–358.
Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a socio-institutional perspective: The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476–485.
Robertson, D. C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 617–633.
Salehi, M., & Poour, A. A. (2014). A study on the influences of Islamic values on Iranian accounting practice and development. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 113(3199), 1–29.
Sbaraini, A., Carter, S. M., Evans, R. W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 128–138.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Schofield, J. W. (2002). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 171–203). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Selvik, K. (2013). Business and social responsibility in the Arab World: The Zakat vs CSR models in Syria and Dubai. Comparative Sociology, 12(1), 95–123.
Shah, S. (2015). Education, leadership and Islam: Theories, discourses and practices from an Islamic perspective. London: Routledge.
Soltani, E., Syed, J., Liao, Y. Y., & Iqbal, A. (2015). Managerial mindsets toward corporate social responsibility: The case of auto industry in Iran. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(4), 795–810.
Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551–556.
Stodel, M. (2015). But what will people think? Getting beyond social desirability bias by increasing cognitive load. International Journal of Market Research, 57(2), 313–322.
Story, J., & Neves, P. (2015). When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: Exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 111–124.
Syed, J., & Van Buren, I. I. I. (2014). Global business norms and Islamic views of women’s employment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 251–276.
Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65.
Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427.
Urquhart, C. (2012). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Visser, W. (2006). Revisiting Carroll’s CSR Pyramid: An African perspective. In E. R. Pedersen & M. Huniche (Eds.), Corporate citizenship in developing countries (pp. 29–56). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Votaw, D. (1972). Genius becomes rare: A comment on the doctrine of social responsibility Pt. I. California Management Review, 15(2), 25–31.
Wang, Y., & Ruhe, G. (2007). The cognitive process of decision making. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 1(2), 73–85.
Watt, W. M. (2017). Islamic philosophy and theology. London: Routledge.
Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Penguin Books.
Weber, M. (1978). Guenther Roth. In C. Wittich (Ed.), Economy and society (pp. 24–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2010). Islam and CSR: A study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam and the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 519–533.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 301–316.
Zadek, S. (2006). Corporate responsibility and competitiveness at the macro level responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 334–348.
Zadek, S. (2007). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 159–172.
Zain, M. M., Darus, F., Yusoff, H., Amran, A., Fauzi, H., Purwanto, Y., et al. (2014). Corporate ibadah: An Islamic perspective of corporate social responsibility. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 22(2), 225–232.
Metadaten
Titel
Towards the Development of an Empirical Model for Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East
verfasst von
Petya Koleva
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04465-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Translating Corporate Social Responsibility into Action: A Social Learning Perspective

Original Paper

Self-regulation of Sexist Digital Advertising: From Ethics to Law

Original Paper

Perceived Greenwashing: The Effects of Green Marketing on Environmental and Product Perceptions

Correction

Correction to: Drivers and Inhibitors of Internet Privacy Concern: A Multidimensional Development Theory Perspective

Original Paper

Normative Violence in Domestic Service: A Study of Exploitation, Status, and Grievability

Original Paper

The Effect of Consumer Perceptions of the Ethics of Retailers on Purchase Behavior and Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Ethical Beliefs

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise