Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2022

26.03.2022 | Original Paper

Ambedkar, Radical Interdependence and Dignity: A Study of Women Mall Janitors in India

verfasst von: Ramaswami Mahalingam, Patturaja Selvaraj

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, using Ambedkar’s pioneering vision for engaged Buddhism, we developed the notion of radical interdependence, which consists of four interrelated processes: (a) dialogical recognition; (b) negating invisibilities; (c) dignity as an embodied praxis; (d) ordinary cosmopolitanism. Our research primarily focused on women janitors’ lives (N = 20) in a Mumbai Mall using this conception. Our participants experienced four different kinds of dignity injuries (yelling, invisibility, the target of suspicion of theft of valuables, othering). They used various strategies to preserve personal, intersubjective, and processual dignities. We also found horizontal and vertical ordinary cosmopolitanism strategies to bridge social boundaries between colleagues and mall customers. We further discuss the implications of radical interdependence for organizational research.
Vorheriger Artikel Inequality Regimes, Patriarchal Connectivity, and the Elusive Right to Own Land for Women in Pakistan
Nächster Artikel Organizations as Spaces for Caring: A Case of an Anti-trafficking Organization in India

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.CrossRef
Ackroyd, S. (2007). Dirt, work, and dignity. In S. C. Bolton (Ed.), Dimensions of dignity at work (pp. 30–49). Butterworth-Heinemann.CrossRef
Agarwal, S., & Levien, M. (2020). Dalits and dispossession: A comparison. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(5), 696–722.CrossRef
Ambedkar, B. R. (1946). Who were the Shudras? How they came to be the fourth Varna in the Indo-Aryan society. Thacker.
Ambdkar, B. R. (1969). The untouchables. Jetavan Mahvihar.
Ambedkar, B. R. (1991). What Congress and Gandhi have done to the Untouchables in Vasant Moon (ed) Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches v 9. Government of Maharashtra (reprint).
Ambedkar, B. R. (2014). Ambedkar writes: Scholarly writings (Volume II). In N. Jadhav (Ed.). Konark Publishers.
Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). “How can you do it?” Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413–434.
Banerjee, A., & Sabharwal, N. (2013). Nature and forms of discrimination experienced by Dalit Women in the urban labour market in Delhi. IIDS-IDRC Report Series No. 60.
Bapuji, H. (2015). Individuals, interactions and institutions: How economic inequality affects organizations. Human Relations, 68(7), 1059–1083.CrossRef
Bapuji, H., & Chrispal, S. (2020). Understanding economic inequality through the lens of caste. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 533–551.CrossRef
Baran, B. E., Rogelberg, S. G., & Clausen, T. (2016). Routinized killing of animals: Going beyond dirty work and prestige to understand the well-being of slaughterhouse workers. Organization, 23(3), 351–369.CrossRef
Bardia, M. (2009). Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: His ideas about religion and conversion to Buddhism. Indian Journal of Political Science, 70(3), 737–749.
Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2012). Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organization Science, 23(3), 743–757.CrossRef
Berreman, G. (1960). Caste in India and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 120–127.CrossRef
Bhatia, S. (2017). Decolonizing psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Bolton, S. C. (2007). Dignity in and at work: Why it matters? In S. C. Bolton (Ed.), Dimensions of dignity at work (pp. 1–16). Elsevier.CrossRef
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
Boussebaa, M., Sinha, S., & Gabriel, Y. (2014). Englishization in offshore call centers: A postcolonial perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9), 1152–1169.CrossRef
Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.
Buvinic, M. (2005). Social inclusion in Latin America. In M. Buvinic & J. Mazza (Eds.), Social exclusion and economic development (pp. 3–32). The John Hopkins University Press.
Campbell, D. (1996). The politics of radical interdependence: A rejoinder to Daniel Warner. Millennium, 25(1), 129–141.CrossRef
Cannon, J. (2016). Education as the practice of freedom: a social justice proposal for mindfulness educators. In R. E. Purser, D. Forbes, & A. Burke (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness (pp. 397–409). Springer.CrossRef
Carter, R. E. (1992). Becoming bamboo: Western and Eastern explorations of the meaning of life. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
Chun, J. J. (2011). Organizing at the margins: The symbolic politics of labor in South Korea and the United States. Cornell University Press.CrossRef
Dar, S. (2018). De-colonizing the boundary-object. Organization Studies, 39(4), 565–584.CrossRef
Donaghey, J., Reinecke, J., Niforou, C., & Lawson, B. (2014). From employment relations to consumption relations: Balancing labor governance in global supply chains. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 229–252.CrossRef
Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). Democratic practice and social inequality in India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 37(2), 6–37.CrossRef
Dutton, J. E., Debebe, G., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2016). Being valued and devalued at work: a social valuing perspective. In B. A. Bechky & K. D. Elsbach (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Best papers from the Davis Conference on Qualitative Research (Vol. III, pp. 9–51). Information Age Publishing.
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59–96.CrossRef
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2019). Habitability and design: Radical interdependence and the re-earthing of cities. Geoforum, 101, 132–140.CrossRef
Esposito, R. (2015). Persons and things, trans. H. Z. Cambridge. Polity Press.
Fallon, P. R., & Lucas, R. E. (1991). The impact of changes in job security regulations in India and Zimbabwe. The World Bank Economic Review, 5(3), 395–413.CrossRef
Friedman, M. (1965). An introduction. In M. Bubar (Ed.), Between man and man. MacMillan.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma-notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Gore, M. S. (1993). The social context of an ideology: Ambedkar’s political and social thought. Sage.
Guru, G. (1995). Dalit women talk differently. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(41/42), 2548–2550.
Guru, G. (2000). Dalits from margin to margin. Indian Informational Centre Quarterly, 27(2), 111–116.
Guru, G. (2013). Freedom of expression and the life of the Dalit mind. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(10), 39–45.
Hamilton, P., Redman, T., & McMurray, R. (2019). ‘Lower than a Snake’s Belly’: Discursive constructions of dignity and heroism in low-status garbage work. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 889–901.CrossRef
Hatton, E. (2017). Mechanisms of invisibility: Rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work, Employment and Society, 31(2), 336–351.CrossRef
Hodson, R. (1996). Dignity in the workplace under participative management: Alienation and freedom revisited. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 719–738.CrossRef
Holland, D. C., & Valsiner, J. (1988). Cognition, symbols, and Vygotsky’s developmental psychology. Ethos, 16(3), 247–272.CrossRef
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
Honneth, A. (2007). Recognition as ideology. In B. van den Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory (pp. 323–347). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
hooks, bell (2006). Buddhism and the politics of domination. In M. McLeod (Ed.) Mindful politics (pp. 57–64). Wisdom Publications.
Hughes, E. C. (1951). Work and the self. In J. H. Rohrer & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads: The University of Oklahoma lectures in social psychology (pp. 313–323). Harper.
Hughes, E. C. (1958). Men and their work. Free Press.
Hughes, E. C. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10(1), 3–11.CrossRef
Jacobson, N. (2009). Dignity violation in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1536–1547.CrossRef
Jagannathan, S., Selvaraj, P., & Joseph, J. (2016). The funeralesque as the experience of workers at the margins of international business: Seven Indian narratives. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 12(3), 282–305.CrossRef
Jones, M. M. (1991). Gaston Bachelard, subversive humanist: Texts and readings. University of Wisconsin Press.
Kadambi, R. (2016). Ambedkar’s framing of the ‘political’within ethical practice. Studies in Indian Politics, 4(2), 143–158.CrossRef
Kannan, K. P. (2009). Dualism, informality and social inequality: An informal economic perspective of the challenge of inclusive development in India. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 52(1), 1–32.
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730.CrossRef
Krishan, Y. (1998). Buddhism and caste system. East and West, 48(1/2), 41–55.
Kudesia, R. S. (2019). Mindfulness as metacognitive practice. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 405–423.CrossRef
Kudesia, R. S., & Nyima, V. T. (2015). Mindfulness contextualized: An integration of Buddhist and neuropsychological approaches to cognition. Mindfulness, 6(4), 910–925.CrossRef
Kumar, A. (2015). Radical equality: Ambedkar, Gandhi and the risk of democracy. Stanford University Press.CrossRef
Laden, A. (2007). Reasonable deliberation, constructive power, and the struggle for recognition. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory, 270–289.
Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 1–25.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.CrossRef
Langley, A., Lindberg, K., Mørk, B. E., Nicolini, D., Raviola, E., & Walter, L. (2019). Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 704–736.CrossRef
Lucas, K., Kang, D., & Li, Z. (2013). Workplace dignity in a total institution: Examining the experiences of Foxconn’s migrant workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 91–106.CrossRef
Magolda, P. M. (2016). The lives of campus custodians: Insights into corporatization and civic disengagement in the academy. Stylus Publishing LLC.
Mahalingam, R. (2007). Essentialism, power and the representation of social categories: A folk sociology perspective. Human Development, 50(6), 300–319.CrossRef
Mahalingam, R. (2019). Mindful mindset, interconnectedness, and dignity. Global Youth, 1, 230–253.CrossRef
Mahalingam, R., Jagannathan, S., & Selvaraj, P. (2019). Decasticization, dignity, and ‘dirty work’ at the intersections of caste, memory, and disaster. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(2), 213–239.CrossRef
Mahalingam, R., & Rodriguez, J. (2006). Culture, brain transplants, and implicit theories of identity. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3–4), 453–462.CrossRef
Messing, K. (2014). Pain and prejudice: What science can learn about work from the people who do it? Between the Lines.
Omvedt, G. (2003). Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and caste. Sage Publications India.
Ortega, R. M., & Faller, K. C. (2011). Training child welfare workers from an intersectional cultural humility perspective: A paradigm shift. Child Welfare, 90(5), 27–49.
Pachucki, M. A., Pendergrass, S., & Lamont, M. (2007). Boundary processes: Recent theoretical developments and new contributions. Poetics, 35(6), 331–351.CrossRef
Parish, S. M. (1996). Hierarchy and its discontents: Culture and the politics of consciousness in a caste society. University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef
Purser, R. (2015). The myth of the present moment. Mindfulness, 6(3), 680–686.CrossRef
Purser, R. E. (2019). McMindfulness: How mindfulness became the new capitalist spirituality. Repeater.
Queen, C. S. (1996). Introduction: the shapes and sources of engaged Buddhism. In C. S. Queen & S. B. King (Eds.), Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist Liberation Movements in Asia (pp. 1–44). New York: SUNY Press.
Queen, C. S., & King, S. B. (1996). Engaged Buddhism: Buddhist liberation movements in Asia. SUNY Press.
Rabelo, V. C., & Mahalingam, R. (2019). “They really don’t want to see us”: How cleaners experience invisible ‘dirty’ work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 113, 103–114.CrossRef
Rajadesingan, A., Mahalingam, R., & Jurgens, D. (2019). Smart, responsible, and upper caste only: Measuring caste attitudes through large-scale Analysis of matrimonial profiles. In Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Ramaswamy, G. (2005). India stinking: Manual scavengers in Andhra Pradesh and their work. Navayana Publishers.
Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of difference’and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), W39–W46.
Ricoeur, P. (2007). Reflections on the just. University of Chicago Press.
Rodrigues, V. (Ed.). (2002). The essential writings of B. Oxford University Press.
Rosemberg, M. A. S., Gosh, B., Shaver, J., Militzer, M. A. M., Seng, C. N. M., & Marjorie, C. (2018). Blood pressure and job domains among hotel housekeepers. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 11(3), 101–115.
Rosemberg, M. A. S., & Tsai, J. H. C. (2014). Connecting gender, race, class, and immigration status to disease management at the workplace. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 7(5), 13–31.
Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1998). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, R., Slutskaya, N., & Hughes, J. (2011). Emotional dimensions of dirty work: Men’s encounter with taint in the butcher trade. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 4(2), 195–212.CrossRef
Singh, B. (2014). Unseen: The truth about India’s manual scavengers. Penguin.
Skrbis, Z., & Woodward, I. (2007). The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 730–747.CrossRef
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2008). Untouchability in modern India. International Sociology, 23(2), 283–293.CrossRef
Stroud, S. R. (2017). The Rhetoric of conversion as emancipatory strategy in India: Bhimrao Ambedkar, pragmatism, and the turn to buddhism. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 35(3), 314–345.CrossRef
Thomas, B., & Lucas, K. (2019). Development and validation of the workplace dignity scale. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 72–111.CrossRef
Thorat, S. (2002). Oppression and denial: Dalit discrimination in the 1990s. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(6), 572–578.
Thorat, S. (2009). Dalits in India: Search for a common destiny. Sage.CrossRef
Thorat, S., & Attewell, P. (2007). The legacy of social exclusion: A correspondence study of job discrimination in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(41), 4141–4145.
Tiwary, R., & Phansalkar, S. J. (2007). Dalits’ access to water: Patterns of deprivation and discrimination. International Journal of Rural Management, 3(1), 43–67.CrossRef
van den Brink, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
van Hulst, M., & Ybema, S. (2020). From what to where: A setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling. Organization Studies, 41(3), 365–391.CrossRef
Verma, V. (2010). Reinterpreting buddhism: Ambedkar on the politics of social action. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(49), 56–65.
Visvanathan, S. (2001). Durban and Dalit discourse. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(33), 3123–3127.
Waghmore, S. (2019). Community, not humanity: Caste associations and Hindu cosmopolitanism in contemporary Mumbai. Journal of South Asian Studies, 42(2), 375–393.
Waldron, J. (2015). Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E., & Putnam, T. (2006). Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and Western knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 275–287.CrossRef
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Ambedkar, Radical Interdependence and Dignity: A Study of Women Mall Janitors in India
verfasst von
Ramaswami Mahalingam
Patturaja Selvaraj
Publikationsdatum
26.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05096-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Why Disability Mainstreaming is Good for Business: A New Narrative

Original Paper

Organizations as Spaces for Caring: A Case of an Anti-trafficking Organization in India

Original Paper

From Fear to Courage: Indian Lesbians’ and Gays’ Quest for Inclusive Ethical Organizations

Original Paper

Philanthropy and the Making of a New Moral Order: A History of Developing Community

Original Paper

Inequality Regimes, Patriarchal Connectivity, and the Elusive Right to Own Land for Women in Pakistan

Editorial Essay

Challenges and Insights from South Asia for Imagining Ethical Organizations: Introduction to the Special Issue

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise