nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

01.03.2014

Support for the teacher in technology-enhanced collaborative classroom

verfasst von: Eleni Voyiatzaki, Nikolaos Avouris

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the role of the teacher in computer-supported class group activities. We discuss various teacher tools that support this role. In the reported studies the students are engaged in group activities through networked computers. Typically they use a two-space collaboration tool. One shared space used for jointly producing a diagrammatic representation (concept map or other form of diagram), and one for text based communication. The group activities have a time span of typical classes: i.e. a few minutes to a few hours. In this context, we focus on the study of typical teacher actions and used representations and on the support that the tools used provided to the teacher for supervision of the class and group activities.

Vorheriger Artikel Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania

Nächster Artikel Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

see Stahl (2006) for the advantages of small groups in fruitful collaborative learning.

http://www.netop.com/classroom-management-software/products/netop-school

The notation used follows the pattern: sl.rep, where sl=social level, rep=representation used.

Abercrombie, M. L. J. (1964). Anatomy of judgment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Alport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Asterhan, C. S., & Eisenmann, T. (2011). Introducing synchronous E-discussion tools in co-located classrooms: A study on the experiences of ‘active’ and ‘silent’ secondary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2169–2177.CrossRef

Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). Online moderation of synchronous E-argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 259–282.CrossRef

Avouris, N. M., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 147–167.CrossRef

Avouris, N., Margaritis, M., & Komis, V. (2004). “Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem solving activities: The Synergo Approach.” In Proceedings of ITS 2004 Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, (pp. 13–18).

Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the‘conversation of mankind’. College English, 46(7), 635–652.CrossRef

Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. In G. Stahl & F. Hesse (Eds.), Int. J. of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 6(2), June 2011, (pp. 147–186), Springer.

Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Lagemann & L. Shulman (Eds.) (p. 15–22).

Constantino-González, M., & Suthers, D. D. (2002). Coaching collaboration in a computer-mediated learning environment. In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002 (pp. 583–584), Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Constantino-González, M., & Suthers, D. (2007). An approach for coaching collaboration based on difference recognition and participation tracking. The Role of Technology in CSCL, 87–113.

Constantino-Gonzalez, M., Suthers, D. D., & EscamilladelosSantos, J. G. (2003). Coaching web-based collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2–4), 263–299.

Crawford, V., Schlager, M., Penuel, W., & Toyama, Y. (2008). Supporting the art of teaching in a data-rich, high-performance learning environment. In E. B. Mandinach & M. Honey (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement (pp. 109–129). New York: Teachers College Press.

De Groot, R. (2010). Teachers’ use of the Argunaut system in the classroom. In N. Pinkwart & B. M. McLaren (Eds.), (Tran.), Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers.

De Groot, R., Drachman, R., Hever, R., Schwartz, B., Hoope, U., Harrer, A., et al. (2007). Computer supported moderation of E-discussions: The ARGUNAUT approach. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, C. C. Chinn et al. (Ed.), vol. 8, pp. 165–167, International Society of the Learning Sciences.

De Laat, M. F., Chamrada M., & Wegerif, R. (2008). Facilitate the facilitator: Awareness tools to support the moderator to facilitate online discussions for networked learning. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning. Halkidiki, Greece (pp. 80–86).

Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication–and how they may be overcome. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Exploring neglected planes: Social signals and class orchestration, Keynote talk, CSCL 2009, http://www.isls.org/cscl2009.

Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. New Science of Learning, 2010, 525–552.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: from design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, T., A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning. Principles and products (pp. 3–19). Springer.

Dillenbourg, P., Zufferey, G., Alavi, H., Jermann, P., Do-Lenh, S., Bonnard, Q., et al. (2011a). Classroom orchestration: The third circle of usability. In Proceedings of CSCL 2011, Vol I, (pp. 510–517).

Dillenbourg, P., Zufferey, G., Alavi, H., Jermann, P., Do-Lenh, S., Bonnard, Q., et al. (2011b). Classroom orchestration: The third circle of usability. In Proceedings of CSCL, 2011.

Dimitracopoulou, A. (2005). Designing collaborative learning systems: Current trends & future research agenda. In Proceedings of 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! 115–124, 2005.

Glassner, A. & Schwarz, B. B. (2005). The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools. Paper presented at the CSCL conference, Taipei, Taiwan.

Guzdial, M., Hmelo, C., Hübscher, R., Nagel, K., Newstetter, W., Puntambekar, S., et al. (1997). Integrating and guiding collaboration: Lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at georgia tech. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 95–105, 1997.

Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231.CrossRef

Harrer, A., McLaren, B. M., Walker, E., Bollen, L., & Sewall, J. (2006). Creating cognitive tutors for collaborative learning: Steps toward realization. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research (UMUAI), 16, 175–209.CrossRef

Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4).

Hoppe, U., & Gaßner, K. (2002). Integrating collaborative concept mapping tools with group memory and retrieval functions. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, (EDS) International Society of the Learning Sciences, pp 716–725, 2002.

Hoppe, H. U., Gaßner, K., Mühlenbrock, M., & Tewissen, F. (2000). Distributed visual language environments for co-operation and learning: Applications and intelligent support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(3), 205–220.CrossRef

Jeong, H., & Hmelo Silver, C. E. (2010). An overview of CSCL methodologies. In Proceedings of the 9th Int. Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1, 921–928, International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Kahrimanis, G., Chounta, I. A., & Avouris, N. (2012). Validating empirically a rating approach for quantifying the quality of collaboration. In T. Daradoumis, et al., (Eds.), Intelligent adaptation and personalization techniques in computer-supported collaborative learning, 408:295–310. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.

Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 211–224.CrossRef

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Lakkala, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Teachers’ pedagogical designs for technology-supported collective inquiry: A national case study. Computers in Education, 45(3), 337–356.CrossRef

LeBaron, C. (2002). Technology does not exist independent of its use. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 433–439). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ligorio, M. B. & Ritella, G. (2010). The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer-supported collaborative professional tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5(4), Springer, pp.433–452

Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers in Education, 53(3), 686–694.CrossRef

Lund, K. (2004). Human support in CSCL. What we know about CSCL (2004): 167–198.

Lund, K., & Baker, M. J. (1999). Teachers’ collaborative interpretations of students’ computer-mediated collaborative problem solving interactions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Le Mans, July 1999. S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 147–154.

McLaren, B., Bollen, L., Walker, E., Harrer, H., & Sewall, J. (2005). Cognitive tutoring of collaboration: Developmental and empirical steps towards realization, CSCL 2005, Taipei, Taiwan.

Meier, A., Voyiatzaki, E., Kahrimanis, G., Rummel, N., Spada, H., Avouris, N. (2008). Teaching students how to improve their collaboration: Assessing collaboration quality and providing adaptive feedback in a CSCL setting. “New challenges in CSCL: Towards adaptive script support” (N. Rummel and Armin Weinberger), ICLS 2008, Utrecht, June 2008.

Pinkwart, N., Hoppe, H., Bollen, L., & Fuhlrott, E. (2002). Group-oriented modelling tools with heterogeneous semantics. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 21–30, 2002.

Prieto, L. P., Holenko Dlab, M., Gutiérrez, I., Abdulwahed, M., & Balid, W. (2011). Orchestrating technology enhanced learning: a literature review and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(6), 583–598.CrossRef

Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260–272. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRef

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M, Loll, F., & Pinkwart, N. (2012). Automated analysis and feedback techniques to support and teach argumentation: A survey. In Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills. Bentham Science Publishers.

Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395–442.CrossRef

Soh, L. K., Khandaker, N., & Jiang, H. (2008). I-MINDS: A multiagent system for intelligent computer-supported collaborative learning and classroom management. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(2), 119–151.

Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press, 2006.

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suthers, D. D. (2005). Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 662–671). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Voyiatzaki, E., & Avouris, N. (2005). On teachers’ involvement in design and evaluation of collaborative activities: Case studies in secondary and higher education. Proc. Computer Supported Inquiry Learning workshop, 18–20 May 2005, Genoa (http://kaleidoscope.gw.utwente.nl/WS-IL/U8T).

Voyiatzaki, E., & Avouris, N. (2009). Alternative ways of monitoring collaboration. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2009, June 2009, Rhodes, Greece.

Voyiatzaki, E., Christakoudis, Ch., Margaritis, M., & Avouris N. (2004). Teaching algorithms in secondary education: A collaborative approach. Proceedings ED Media 2004, AACE publ, Lugano, June 2004, pp. 2781–2789.

Voyiatzaki, E., Margaritis, M., & Avouris, N. (2006). Collaborative interaction analysis: The teachers’ perspective. Proc. 8TUICALT 2006U8T—The 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. July 5–7, 2006—Kerkrade, Netherlands, pp. 345–349.

Voyiatzaki, E., Meier, A., Kahrimanis, G., Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Avouris N., (2008a). Rating the quality of collaboration during networked problem solving activities, NLC 2008. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning NLC 2008 pp. 409–416.

Voyiatzaki, E., Polyzos, P., & Avouris, N. (2008b). Teacher tools in a networked learning classroom: Monitor, view and interpret interaction data. Proc. Networked Learning Conference, Halkidiki, May 2008.

Wichmann, A., Giemza, A., Hoppe, U., & Krauss, M. (2009). “Effects of awareness support on moderating multiple parallel E-discussions.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Volume 1, 646–650.

Titel: Support for the teacher in technology-enhanced collaborative classroom
verfasst von: Eleni Voyiatzaki
Nikolaos Avouris
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9203-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

CAT model with personalized algorithm for evaluation of estimated student knowledge

Access, use and perceptions of teachers and students towards mobile phones as a tool for teaching and learning in Tanzania

mLearning: Anytime, anywhere learning transcending the boundaries of the educational box

Towards designing cognitively-enriched project-oriented courses within a blended problem-based learning context

Editorial on EAIT 2014-1

Establishing documentary production support for 21st century campuses