Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 4/2015

01.12.2015

A model driven framework to address challenges in a mobile learning environment

verfasst von: Ferial Khaddage, Rhonda Christensen, Wing Lai, Gerald Knezek, Cathie Norris, Elliot Soloway

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper a review of the pedagogical, technological, policy and research challenges and concepts underlying mobile learning is presented, followed by a brief description of categories of implementations. A model Mobile learning framework and dynamic criteria for mobile learning implementations are proposed, along with a case study of one site that is used to illustrate how the proposed model can be applied. Implementation challenges including pedagogical challenges, technological challenges, policy challenges, and research challenges are described. These align well with the themes of EduSummIT 2013 that hosted the dialogue resulting in this paper.
Vorheriger Artikel Research-informed strategies to address educational challenges in a digitally networked world
Nächster Artikel Preparing teachers for schooling in the digital age: A meta-perspective on existing strategies and future challenges

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Ali, A., Ouda, A., & Capretz, L. (2012). A conceptual framework for measuring the quality aspects of m-learning. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 14(4), 31–34.
Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2). http://​lthe.​zu.​ac.​ae.
Boulos, M. N., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., & Jones, R. (2011). How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomedical Engineering Online, 10(1), 24.CrossRef
Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 411–433.CrossRef
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook for information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2014). The technology proficiency self-assessment questionnaire (TPSA): Evolution of a self-efficacy measure for technology integration. In T. Brinda, N. Reynolds & R. Romeike (Eds.) Proceedings of KEYCIT 2014 – Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT, 2014, pp. 190–196.
Christensen, R., & Williams, M. (2015). Teacher and student perceptions during the first year of a one-to-one mobile learning initiative. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1428–1433). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Ciampa, K. (2013). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 133–148.CrossRef
Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly, 2, 51–58.
Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.MathSciNetCrossRef
Donelly, C. (2013). Innovation Drives Lab School @ Punahou. Punahou News, July 23, 2013.
Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2).
Frohberg, D., Goth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects – a critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 307–311.CrossRef
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Griffin, D., & Christensen, R. (1999). Concerns-Based Adoption Model Levels of Use of an Innovation (CBAM-LOU). Adapted from Hall, Loucks, Rutherford, & Newlove (1975). Denton: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.
Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: a framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 52–56.CrossRef
Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. W. (2011). Education beyond the cloud: anytime-anywhere learning in a smart campus environment. In Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), 2011 International Conference (pp. 718–723). IEEE.
Hsu, H., Wang, S., & Cormac, L. (2008). Using audio blogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 181–198.CrossRef
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.CrossRefMATH
Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.CrossRef
Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of a participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.
Khaddage, F. (2013). The iPad global embrace! Are we branding mobile learning?. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1, 3234–3240.
Khaddage, F., & Cosío, J. H. (2014). Trends and barriers on the fusion of mobile apps in higher education where to next and how? In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 903–909). Chesapeake: AACE.
Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). iLearn via mobile technology: A comparison of mobile learning attitudes among university Students in two nations. Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). Beijing, China.
Khaddage, F., & Lattemann, C. (2013). The future of mobile apps for teaching and learning. In Z. Berge & L. Muilen-burg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning: Definitions (pp. 119–128). London: Routledge.
Khaddage, F., & Zeidan, F. (2012) iPad in Education in the Middle East, Ready or Not? A College Case Study. Published in: Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2012 15th International Conference, E-ISBN : 978-1-4673-2426-7 DOI: 10.​1109/​ICL.​2012.​6402161.
Khaddage, F., Lanham, E., & Zhou, W. (2009). A mobile learning model for universities: re-blending the current learning environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 3(1), 18–23.
Kim, J. (2013). measuring factors that influence teachers’ willingness in using mobile phone in the classroom. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 3730–3737). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. http://​www.​editlib.​org/​p/​48689.
Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25–47). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Sharples, M. (2009). Editorial: mobile and contextual learning. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 159–160.CrossRef
Lai, K., Khaddage, F., Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Looi, C., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: the journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers & Education, 71, 222–236.
Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287.
Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2010). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 269–287.CrossRef
Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 515–525.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef
Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Learning and schooling in the age of mobilism. Educational Technology, 51(6), 3.
Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2013). Los Angeles’ 640,000 iPad purchase: too big to fail. THE Journal.
Pachler, N. (2009). Research methods in mobile and informal learning: Some issues. In G. Vavoula., N. Pachler, A. Kukulska-Hulme (eds.). Researching Mobile Learning (pp. 1–15). Peter Lang.
Project Tomorrow. (2010). Project K-Nect evaluation report. Irvine: Project Tomorrow.
Project Tomorrow. (2011). Speak-up national findings, K-12 students and parents report. Irvine: Project Tomorrow.
Project Tomorrow: Speak Up. (2011). Learning in the 21st century. Mobile devices + social media = personalized learning. Washington: Blackboard K-12.
Project Tomorrow: Speak Up. (2014). The new digital learning playbook: Understanding the spectrum of students’ activities and aspirations. Irving: Project Tomorrow.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386.CrossRef
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.CrossRef
Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (1996). Teacher change in technology-rich classrooms. In C. Fisher, D. C. Dwyer, & K. Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms (pp. 281–299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seilhamer, R., Chen, B., Sugar, A. (2013). A framework for implementing mobile technology. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Sha, L., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. (2011). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 366–378.CrossRef
Sharpes, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, F. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff et al. (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. Proceedings of mLearn 2005, 1(1), 1–9.
Shih, K., Chen, H., Chang, C., & Kao, T. (2010). The development and implementation of scaffolding-based self-regulated learning system for e/m-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 80–93.
Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook for information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning. The moving finger writes and having writ…. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 8(2), 1–12.
UB Custom Publishing Group (2012). Abilene Christian University mobilizes learning with smartphones, University Business.
Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 81–102.
UNESCO. (2012). Working paper series on mobile learning: Turning on mobile learning in North America. Paris: UNESCO.
Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (Eds.) (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (Vol. 20). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Williams, B., & Bearman, M. (2008). Podcasting lectures: the next silver bullet? Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 6(3), 109–112.
Winters, N. (2006). What is mobile learning. In M. Sharples (ed.). Big issues in mobile learning (pp. 5–9). University of Nottingham.
Wu, W.-H., Wu, J., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59, 817–827.CrossRef
Wyatt, T. H., Krauskopf, P. B., Gaylord, N. M., Ward, A., Huffstutler-Hawkins, S., & Goodwin, L. (2010). Cooperative m-learning with nurse practitioner students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 109–112.
Young, J. R. (2011). Smartphones on campus: the search for ‘killer’ apps. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B6–B8.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.CrossRef
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 235–243.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A model driven framework to address challenges in a mobile learning environment
verfasst von
Ferial Khaddage
Rhonda Christensen
Wing Lai
Gerald Knezek
Cathie Norris
Elliot Soloway
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9400-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Education and Information Technologies 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Research-informed strategies to address educational challenges in a digitally networked world

OriginalPaper

Digital citizenship within global contexts

OriginalPaper

Preparing teachers for schooling in the digital age: A meta-perspective on existing strategies and future challenges

OriginalPaper

Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice

OriginalPaper

Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings

OriginalPaper

Data science in educational assessment