nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

06.05.2017

Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities

verfasst von: Martie Sanders, Ann George

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This review paper focuses on likely reasons for the rhetoric-reality gap in the use of educational information and communication technology. It is based on the assumption that the present challenges being experienced with educational ICT might be avoided in the future if we look at the current challenges from a different perspective, by revisiting past research to gain insights from the history of innovations in educational technology. Seven major lessons emerging from the review could inform future directions so that the future does not simply replicate the disappointing results achieved thus far. We argue that the vision for ICT has been unrealistically ambitious, and review reasons to justify this point of view. We suggest that setting more attainable goals, based on the actuality of educational contexts, might be a more pragmatic way to go in a future of constantly changing educational technology.

Vorheriger Artikel What do upper secondary school teachers want to know from research on the use of ICT and how does this inform a research design?

Nächster Artikel Editorial for EAIT Issue 6, 2017

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adesote, S., & Fatoki, O. (2013). The role of ICT in the teaching and learning of history in the 21st century. Educational Research Review, 8(21), 2155–2159. doi:10.5897/ERR2013.1617.

Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013.CrossRef

Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.CrossRef

Bakia, M. (2000). Costs of ICT use in higher education: What little we know. TechKnowLogia, 2(1), 46–52 www.TechKnowLogia.org.

Bakir, N. (2016). Technology and teacher education: A brief glimpse of the research and practice that have shaped the field. TechTrends, 60(1), 21–29. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0013-4.CrossRef

Banas, J., & Polly, D. (2016). Instructional design and technology trends in teacher education: An AECT teacher education division special issue of TechTrends. TechTrends, 60(1), 2–3. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0007-2.CrossRef

Becta (2003). What the research says about using ICT in maths. Becta ICT Research. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDo. Accessed 11 Sept 2015.

Bernauer, J. (1996). Technology and leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. April 9-12. ERIC: ED 394 503.

Bishop, M., & Elen, J. (2014). Emerging technologies. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 673–674). New York: Springer.

Blignaut, A., Hinostroza, J., Els, C., & Brun, M. (2010). ICT in education policy and practice in developing countries: South Africa and Chile compared through SITES 2006. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1552–1563.CrossRef

Buettner, Y. (2006). Teaching teachers to teach ICT integration—T3. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 257–268. doi:10.1007/s10639-006-9007-3.CrossRef

Castro, M., & Alves, L. (2007). The implementation and use of computers in education in Brazil: Niterói city/Rio. Computers & Education, 49, 1378–1386.CrossRef

Chen, C.-H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.CrossRef

Chigona, A., & Chigona, W. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting the use of ICT for curriculum delivery in the Western Cape, South Africa. In 18th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–12). Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/13327457. Accessed 14 Nov 2011.

Connor, C., Goldman, S., & Fishman, B. (2014). Technologies that support students’ literacy development. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 591–604). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Cook, D. (2005). The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 80(6), 541–548.CrossRef

Costa, F. (2016). Curricular development and ICT: from technological deficit to methodological deficit. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network Annual Conference. Re-imaging learning environments (pp. 435–447). Budapest.

Creating Spaces. (2003). Keys to imagination: ICT in art education. Arts Council England. www.artscouncil.org.uk.

Cronje, J. (2016). The future of our field – A STEEP perspective. TechTrends, 60, 5–10. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0009-0.CrossRef

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Online collaborative mentoring for technology integration in pre-service teacher education. TechTrends, 60(1), 48–55. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0016-1.CrossRef

Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001.CrossRef

Dunmill, M., & Arslanagic, A. (2006). ICT in arts education: A literature review. Te Puna Puoru National Centre for Research in Music Education and Sound Arts. New Zealand, Commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry of Education: University of Canterbury.

Earle, R. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13 http://bookstoread.com/etp.

Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010.CrossRef

Forsslund, T. (1991). Factors that influence the use and impact of educational television in school. Journal of Educational Television, 17(1), 15–30. doi:10.1080/1358165910170103.CrossRef

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Seattle Washington: Collaborative impact.

Gabi, F. (2015). Gauteng’s paperless classrooms. In IOLnews Retrieved from http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/gauteng-s-paperless-classrooms-1.1804443#.VcspnPmqqko.

Ghasemi, B., & Hashemi, M. (2011). ICT: New wave in English language learning/teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3098–3102. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.252.CrossRef

Gordon, l (Ed.) (2004). Education, art and ICTs: Integration for the development of one’s personality. Final report and selected materials. IITE Expert meeting: 12–13 May 2003, Moscow. Institute for Information Technologies in Education. UNESCO.

Green, T., Ponder, J., & Donovan, L. (2014). Educational technology in social sciences education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 573–582). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Greener, S., & Wakefield, C. (2015). Developing confidence in the use of digital tools in teaching. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 260–267 www.ejel.org.

Haddad, W., & Jurich, S. (2002). ICT for education: Potential and potency. In W. Haddad & a. Drexler (Eds.), technologies for education: Potentials, parameters, and prospects (pp. 34–37). Washington DC: Academy for educational development and Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.Unesco.Org/images/0011/001191/ 119129e.Pdf.

Hadfield, M., & Jopling, M. (2014). The development of an implementation model for ICT in education: An example of the interaction of affordances and multimodality. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(6), 607–617. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.924747.CrossRef

Hamat, A., & Embi, M. (2010). Constructivism in the design of online learning tools. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 237–246.

Hammond, N., & Bennett, C. (2002). Discipline differences in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 55–63. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00211.x.CrossRef

Harris, J,, & Hofer, M. (2012). Music learning activity types. Learning activity types web site. College of William and Mary School of Education. http://activitytypes.wm.edu/Music.html.

Hauge, T. (2014). Uptake and use of technology: Bridging design for teaching and learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 311-323. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2014.942750.

Haydn, T., & Barton, R. (2007). Common needs and different agendas: How trainee teachers make progress in their ability to use ICT in subject teaching. Some lessons from the UK. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1018–1036. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.006.CrossRef

Haythornwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd..CrossRef

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.

Hew, K., & Cheung, W. (2013). Use of web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Webb, M. (2009). Integrating ICT to higher education in China: From the perspective of activity theory. Education and Information Technologies, 14(2), 143–161. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9084-6.CrossRef

Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.CrossRef

Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y.CrossRef

Judge, M. (2013). Mapping out the ICT integration terrain in the school context: Identifying the challenges in an innovative project. Irish Educational Studies, 32(3), 309–333. doi:10.1080/03323315.2013.826398.CrossRef

Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1535–1554. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0.CrossRef

Kale, U., & Goh, D. (2014). Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with web 2.0. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 41–60.CrossRef

Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53, 436–444.CrossRef

Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, J., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.CrossRef

Kirkman, G., Cornelius, P., Sachs, J., & Schwab, K. (2002). The global information technology report 2001–2002: Readiness for the networked world. New York: Oxford University Press.

Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.CrossRef

Kozma, R. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRef

Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., & Sharma, P. (2009). One laptop per child: Vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 66–73. doi:10.1145/1516046.1516063.CrossRef

Lai, K., & Pratt, K. (2004). Secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.CrossRef

Law, N., Pelgrum, W., & Plomp, T. (Eds.) (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, 23.

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707–734. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5.CrossRef

Leech, D. (1980). What makes television the right medium? Journal of Educational Television, 6(1), 25–30. doi:10.1080/0260741800060108.CrossRef

Lockee, B., & Wang, F. (2014). Visual arts education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 583–590). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Lucking, R., Bligh, B., Munches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/decoding_learning_report.pdf.

Mafokwane, P. (2016). Learning tablet used for music and taking selfies. Sowetan Live. Retrieved from http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2016/01/09/learning-tablet-used-for-music-and-taking-selfies. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

Makrakis, V. (2005). Training teachers for new roles in the new era: Experiences from the United Arab Emirates ICT Program. In A. Jimoyiannis (Ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference ‘didactics of informatics’ University of Peloponnese Korinthos, Greece. Retrieved from https://www.Researchgate.Net/ publication/228408380. Accessed 02 Jan 2017.

Mashaba, S. (2016). Paperless classrooms expand in Gauteng. Sowetan Live. Retrieved from http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2016/01/17/paperless-classrooms-expand-in-gauteng. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

McCormick, R., & Scrimshaw, P. (2001). Information and communications technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Education, Communication & Information, 1(1), 37–57. doi:10.1080/14636310120048047.CrossRef

Murray, J. (1988). New technology and educational television. Journal of Educational Television, 14(1), 5–25. doi:10.1080/0260741880140102.CrossRef

National Education Technology Plan. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Educational Technology Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov.

Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 243–264.CrossRef

OECD (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi 10.1787/9789264239555-en

Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly, 280(1), 45–62 Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1997/07/the-computer-delusion/376899/.

Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab series. Report 6. http://www.Nestafuturelab.Org/Research/ reviews/se01.Htm.

Peeraer, J., & van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1247–1259. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.015.CrossRef

Pelgrum, W., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends problems and prospects. Paris: UNESCO Educational Institute for Educational Planning.

Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151–167.CrossRef

Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). Practitioner model of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 47–88.CrossRef

Rutledge, D., Duran, J., & Carroll-Miranda, J. (2007). Three years of the New Mexico laptop learning initiative (NMLLI): Stumbling toward innovation. AACE Journal, 15(4), 339–366.

Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.CrossRef

Santayana, G. (1905). The life of reason: The phases of human progress. In Volume 1: Reason in common sense. New York: Dover Publications Inc. Accessed via The Project Gutenberg ebooks http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15000/15000-h/15000-h.htm.

Shen, J., Lei, J., Chang, H., & Namdar, B. (2014). Technology-enhanced, modeling-based instruction (TMBI) in science education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 529–540). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Shepherd, C., Bolliger, D., Dousay, T., & Persichitte, K. (2016). Preparing teachers for online instruction with a graduate certificate program. TechTrends, 60(1), 41–47. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0015-2.CrossRef

Šorgo, A., Verčkovnik, T., & Kocijančič, S. (2010). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in biology teaching in Slovenian secondary schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 37–46.CrossRef

Tablets to be withdrawn from Gauteng schools (2015). SAnews.gov.za: South African government news agency. Retrieved from http://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/tablets-b-withdrawn-gauteng-schools.

Tallvid, M. (2016). Understanding teachers’ reluctance to the pedagogical use of ICT in the 1:1 classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 503–519. doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9335-7.CrossRef

Taylor, J. (2000). Using the world wide web in undergraduate geographic education: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Geography, 99(1), 11–22. doi:10.1080/00221000897894349.CrossRef

Trotter, A. (1997). Taking technologies measure. Education Week, 17(11), 6–11.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2004). Education, art and ICTs: Integration for the development of one’s personality. Final report and selected materials. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies In Education.

Voogt, J. (2008). IT and curriculum processes: Dilemmas and challenges. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 117–132). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRef

Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875–2905. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.698763.CrossRef

Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2008). Translating ICT strategic policy into action: Reaching for the wrong fruit. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 20(3), 52–61.

Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.011.CrossRef

Warren, S., Lee, J., & Najmi, A. (2014). The impact of technology and theory of instructional design since 2000. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 89–99). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Warschauer, M. (2003). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American, 289(2), 42–47.CrossRef

Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA; The MIT Press.

Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Rethinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251–266.CrossRef

Wellington, J. (1999). Integrating multimedia into science teaching: Barriers and benefits. School Science Review, 81(295), 49–54.

Wellington, J. (2000). Teaching and learning secondary science. New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Wellington, J. (2005). Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/02635140500068419.CrossRef

Weston, M., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6), 5–25.

Winslow, J., Dickerson, J., Weaver, C., & Josey, F. (2016). Iterative and event-based frameworks for university and school district technology professional development partnerships. TechTrends, 60(1), 56–61. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0017-0.CrossRef

Titel: Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities
verfasst von: Martie Sanders
Ann George
Publikationsdatum: 06.05.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9604-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Digital literacy and online video: Undergraduate students’ use of online video for coursework

What do upper secondary school teachers want to know from research on the use of ICT and how does this inform a research design?

Effects of computer-aided and blended teaching strategies on students’ achievement in civic education concepts in mountain learning ecologies

“What I learn is what I like.” How do students in ICT-supported problem-based learning rate the quality of the learning experience, and how does it relate to the acquisition of competences?

Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?

Editorial for EAIT Issue 6, 2017