nach oben

Electronic Commerce Research

Erschienen in:

06.08.2020

Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence

verfasst von: Radovan Dráb, Tomáš Štofa, Radoslav Delina

Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite the existence of research in the field of electronic reverse auctions (eRAs), there is still a limited understanding of the determinants of auction savings that exist in this process, especially factors that can change information asymmetry during auctions. In comparison with other studies, attempts have been made to test the effects of various levels of information asymmetry through the prolongation of auctions and through changes to minimum bid amounts on auction results, as well as other modifiable variables. More than 11,000 eRAs were analysedusing data from a leading auction platform in Central Europe. The application of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test on data divided by medians of analyzed variables has been confirmed as a valid method for verifying the significance of the developed conceptual model relationships. While confirming several relations indicated by laboratory experiments and other studies, several findings to the contrary of the expected relationships were also confirmed.

Vorheriger Artikel The impact of online video highlights on TV audience ratings

Nächster Artikel What motivates consumer to engage in microblogs? The roles of brand post characteristics and brand prestige

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bapna, R., Goes, P. A., & Gupta, A. (2001). Insights and analyses of online auctions. Communications of the ACM, 44(11), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/384150.384160.CrossRef

Beall, S., Carter, C., Carter, P. L., Germer, T., Hendrick, T., Jap, S., et al. (2003). The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. Tempe, AZ: CAPS Research.

Carter, C. R., Kaufmann, L., Beall, S., Carter, P. L., Hendrick, T. E., & Petersen, K. J. (2004). Reverse auctions—grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.004.CrossRef

Delina, R., & Grof, M. (2019). Empirical problems of savings calculation in electronic reverse auction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762019000200111.CrossRef

Delina, R., Senderakova, L., Olejarova, R., & Macik, M. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of new participants on final price savings and process of electronic reverse auctions. In 2019 42nd international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO), IEEE, Opatija, Croatia (pp. 1256–60). https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8757191.

Dráb, R., Delina, R., & Štofa, T. (2018). Electronic auctions: Role of visibility settings in transparency analysis. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 22(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059.CrossRef

Earls, A. (2009). Reverse auctions provide good chemistry for Shell. Purchasing, 138(3), 36–37.

Elmaghraby, W. J., Katok, E., & Santamaría, N. (2012). A laboratory investigation of rank feedback in procurement auctions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0354.CrossRef

European Parliament. (2014). Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance [Internet]. 094, 32014L0024.

10.

Hanak, T. (2016). Electronic reverse auctions in public construction procurement–empirical evidence from the Czech Republic. Archives of Civil Engineering, 62(3), 47–60.CrossRef

11.

Hanák, T., & Serrat, C. (2018). Analysis of construction auctions data in slovak public procurement. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9036340.CrossRef

12.

Hartley, J. L., Lane, M. D., & Duplaga, E. A. (2006). Exploring the barriers to the adoption of e-auctions for sourcing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641675.CrossRef

13.

Haruvy, E., & Katok, E. (2013). Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production and Operations Management, 22(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01356.x.CrossRef

14.

Hawkins, T. G., Gravier, M. J., & Wittmann, C. M. (2010). Enhancing reverse auction use theory: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011018102.CrossRef

15.

Hong, Y., Chen, P.-Y., Shao, B., & Liang, C. (2018). The role of auction parameters in online outsourcing platforms for service procurement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161216.CrossRef

16.

Hong, Y., Wang, C., & Pavlou, P. A. (2016). Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0606.CrossRef

17.

Jap, S. D. (2003). An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.96.18651.CrossRef

18.

Karabağ, O., & Tan, B. (2019). An empirical analysis of the main drivers affecting the buyer surplus in E-auctions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(11), 3435–3465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1536835.CrossRef

19.

Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2006). Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in Internet auctions. Information Technology and Management, 7(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-9181-4.CrossRef

20.

Koppius, O. R., van Heck, E., & Wolters, M. J. J. (2004). The importance of product representation online: Empirical results and implications for electronic markets. Decision Support Systems, 38(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00097-6.CrossRef

21.

Lösch, A., & Lambert, J. S. (2007). E-reverse auctions revisited: An analysis of context, buyer-supplier relations and information behavior. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(4), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2007.00040.x.CrossRef

22.

Marusteri, M., & Bacarea, V. (2010). Comparing groups for statistical differences: How to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.004.CrossRef

23.

Millet, I., Parente, D. H., Fizel, J. L., & Venkataraman, R. R. (2004). Metrics for managing online procurement auctions. Interfaces, 34(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1040.0073.CrossRef

24.

Mithas, S., & Jones, J. L. (2009). Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production and Operations Management, 16(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00272.x.CrossRef

25.

Moorhouse, A. (2008). Playing the game: Effective strategies for combating reverse auctions. Velocity, 10(2), 25–31.

26.

Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2012). E-procurement management for successful electronic government systems. IGI Global.

27.

Park, J. H., Lee, J. K., & Lau, H. C. (2012). Bidder behaviors in repeated B2B procurement auctions. In Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on electronic commerce - ICEC ’12, ACM Press, Singapore, Singapore (pp. 145–152). https://doi.org/10.1145/2346536.2346563.

28.

Pavel, J., & Sičáková-Beblavá, E. (2013). Do E-auctions realy improve the efficiency of public procurement? The case of the Slovak municipalities. Prague Economic Papers, 22(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.443.CrossRef

29.

Pearcy, D. H., & Giunipero, L. C. (2006). The impact of electronic reverse auctions on purchase price reduction and governance structure: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 7(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2006.010048.CrossRef

30.

Pham, L., Teich, J., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2015). Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.043.CrossRef

31.

Pomazalová, N. (2012). Public sector transformation processes and internet public procurement: Decision support systems. IGI Global.

32.

Raventós, P., & Zolezzi, S. (2015). Electronic tendering of pharmaceuticals and medical devices in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2569–2578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.024.CrossRef

33.

Setia, P., & Speier-Pero, C. (2015). Reverse auctions to innovate procurement processes: Effects of bid information presentation design on a supplier’s bidding outcome: Reverse auctions to innovate procurement processes. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 333–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12127.CrossRef

34.

Shalev, M. E., Asbjornsen, S. (2010). Electronic reverse auctions and the public sector—Factors of success [Internet]. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Report No.: ID 1727409.

35.

Schoenherr, T., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality. Business Horizons, 50(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.03.003.CrossRef

36.

Schrader, R. W., Schrader, J. T., & Eller, E. P. (2004). Strategic implications of reverse auctions. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 11(1–2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v11n01_05.CrossRef

37.

Singer, M., Konstantinidis, G., Roubik, E., & Beffermann, E. (2009). Does e-procurement save the state money? Journal of Public Procurement, 9(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-01-2009-B002.CrossRef

38.

Smeltzer, L. R., & Carr, A. (2002). Reverse auctions in industrial marketing and buying. Business Horizons, 45(2), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(02)00187-8.CrossRef

39.

Smeltzer, L. R., & Carr, A. S. (2003). Electronic reverse auctions. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(6), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00257-2.CrossRef

40.

Smith, A. D. (2009). The impact of e-procurement systems on customer relationship management: A multiple case study. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2(3), 314–338.CrossRef

41.

Stoll, S., & Zöttl, G. (2017). Transparency in buyer-determined auctions: Should quality be private or public? Production and Operations Management, 26(11), 2006–2032. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12736.CrossRef

42.

Surowiecki, J. (2011). Going, going, gone: Who killed the internet auction? Wired, 19(6), 2011.

43.

Wyld, D. C. (2011). Current research on reverse auctions: Part II-implementation issues associated with putting competitive bidding to work. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 2(4), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2011.2401.CrossRef

44.

Yeniyurt, S., Watson, S., Carter, C. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2011). To bid or not to bid: Drivers of bidding behavior in electronic reverse auctions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03214.x.CrossRef

Titel: Analysis of the efficiency of electronic reverse auction settings: big data evidence
verfasst von: Radovan Dráb
Tomáš Štofa
Radoslav Delina
Publikationsdatum: 06.08.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1389-5753
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09433-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Understanding customer regional differences from online opinions: a hierarchical Bayesian approach

A study on cross-border e-commerce partner selection in B2B mode

Thesaurus matching in electronic commerce

Proposing improved meta-heuristic algorithms for clustering and separating users in the recommender systems

The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior

Consumer characteristics and e-grocery services: the primacy of the primary shopper