Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Erschienen in: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 3/2018

09.10.2017

Swimming on Land: Some Suggestions for Today’s Public Administration

verfasst von: Lihi Lahat

Erschienen in: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent decades researchers have suggested various models for public administration organizations. These models and reforms, generally called New Public Management and Post-New Public Management, ignore the different developmental phases of public organizations, especially when dealing with non-Western countries. Instead of asking how public organizations should look, we suggest asking what should they do? To answer this question, we present several principles on the individual and organizational levels that can serve as a good compass for public managers. On the individual level, we maintain that public employees should focus on listening, helping and learning. On the organizational level, we advocate incorporating public policy with public administration, embracing core principles as opposed to trying to achieve ends, and returning public administration to its key role. These principles reinforce each other and thus can enhance the capability of public organizations.
Vorheriger Artikel Introduction to “Swimming on Land: Some Suggestions for Today’s Public Administration”

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Ansell, C. (2012). Collaborative governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 499–511). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Practice, 18, 543–571.CrossRef
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity, 17. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: a very short introduction. Hampshire: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Blau, P. M., & Meyer, M. (1971). Bureaucracy in modern society (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60, 91–115.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice & responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i253–i277.CrossRef
Brown, P. R., & Calnan, M. (2011). The civilizing process of trust: developing quality mechanisms which are local, professional-led and thus legitimate. Social Policy & Administration, 45, 19–34.
Christensen, T., Fimreite, A., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Joined-up government for welfare administration reform in Norway. Public Organization Review, 14, 439–456.CrossRef
Cohen, N. (2016). Forgoing new public management and adopting post-new public management principles: the on-going civil service reform in Israel. Public Administration and Development, 36, 20–34.CrossRef
Cohen, N., & Gershgoren, S. (2013). The incentives of street-level bureaucrats and inequality in tax assessments. Administration & Society, 48, 267–289.CrossRef
Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (Eds.). (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
Dery, D. (1996). Introduction to public administration. Israel: The Open University of Israel (in Hebrew).
Dolowitz, D. P. (2004). Bring back the states: correcting for the omissions of globalization. International Journal of Public Policy and Management, 29, 263–280.
Dommett, K., MacCarthaigh, M., & Hardiman, N. (2016). Reforming the Westminster model of agency governance: Britain and Ireland after the crisis. Governance, 29, 535–552.CrossRef
Downs, A., & Rand Corporation. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Du Gay, P. (2011). Without regard to person': problems of involvement and attachment in 'post bureaucratic' public management. In S. R. Clegg, M. Harris, & H. Hopfl (Eds.), Managing modernity: beyond bureaucracy? (pp. 11–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.CrossRef
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29.CrossRef
Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic management in public services organizations: concepts, schools and contemporary issues. New-York: Routledge.
Flinders, M. (2012). Defending politics: why democracy matters in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2014). Introduction: knowledge in policy–embodied, inscribed, enacted. In R. Freeman & S. Sturdy (Eds.), Knowledge in policy: embodied, inscribed, enacted (pp. 1–20). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRef
Ghorpade, J., Lackritz, J., & Singh, G. (2001). Work values and preferences for employee involvement in the management of organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(4), 191–203.CrossRef
Gray, A., & Jenkins, B. (1995). From public administration to public management: reassessing a revolution? Public Administration, 73, 75–99.CrossRef
Gregory, L. (2015). Trading time: can exchange lead to social change? Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRef
Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRef
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: the art of the possible. Public Administration, 93, 195–211.CrossRef
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47, 711–739.CrossRef
Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 484–511.CrossRef
Homburg, V., Pollitt, C., & van Thiel, S. (2007). Introduction. In C. Poliitt, S. van Thiel, & V. Homburg (Eds.), New public management in Europe. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystem (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Itkonen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2010). Disability or learning difficulty? Politicians or educators? Constructing special education in Finland and the United States. Comparative Sociology, 9, 182–201.CrossRef
Jones, L. R., & Kettel, D. F. (2003). Assessing public management reform in an international context. International Public Management Review, 4(1), 1–19.
Klijn, E. H. (2010). Trust in governance networks: looking for conditions for innovative solutions and outcomes. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance?: emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 303–321). Abington and New York: Routledge.
Kondrasuk, J. N. (2004). The effects of 9/11 and terrorism on human resource management: recovery, reconsideration, and renewal. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16(1), 25–35.CrossRef
Koppell, G. S. J. (2010). Administration without borders. Public Administration Review, Special Issue, 70, s46–s55.CrossRef
Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. London, New York: Routledge.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th ann. ed.). New-York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Meier, K. J. (2014). Proverbs and evolution of public administration. Public Administration Review, 75, 15–24.CrossRef
Meier, K. J., & Hill, G. C. (2005). Bureaucracy in the twenty – first century. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Jr Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 51–72). Hampshire: Oxford University Press.
Metcalfe, L., & Richards, S. (1987). Improving public management. Oxford: Sage.
Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review, 74, 320–332.CrossRef
Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78, 555–573.CrossRef
O'Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2010). Implementation and managerial networking. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance?: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 322–336). Abington, New York: Routledge.
Perry, J. L. (2012). Does making a difference make a difference? Answers from research on public service motivation. In G. Tria & G. Valotti (Eds.), Reforming the public sector - how to achieve better transparency service and leadership (pp. 51–67). Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing complex societies: trajectories and scenarios. New York: Palgrave.CrossRef
Pollitt, C. (2007). Convergence or divergence: what has been happening in Europe? In Pollitt C., Thiel S.V., & Homburg V. (Eds.), New public management in Europe (pp. 10–25). Palgrave: Hampshire.
Pollitt, C. (2016). Advanced introduction to public management and administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Comparative public management reform: an introduction to the key debates. In C. Pollitt & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Public management reform: a comparative analysis (3rd ed., pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65, 138–151.CrossRef
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). New labour's civil service: summing-up joining-up. The Political Quarterly, 71(2), 151–166.CrossRef
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2012). Waves of governance (pp. 33-48) In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 406–421.CrossRef
Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2002). Introduction: public policy in changing world. In D. Richards & M. Smith (Eds.), Governance and public policy in the UK (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford Press.
Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., & Borick, C. P. (2009). Introducing public administration (6th ed.). New York: Pearson: Longman.
Shapiro, S. (2016). Analysis and public policy: successes, failures and directions for reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Spender, J. C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, 63–78.CrossRef
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36, 41–57.CrossRef
Stone, D. A. (2012). Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. New York: WW Norton.
Van Buuren, A. (2009). Knowledge for governance, governance of knowledge: inclusive knowledge management in collaborative governance processes. International Public Management Journal, 12, 208–235.CrossRef
Van Ostaijen, M., & Jhagroe, S. (2015). Get those voices at the table!’: interview with Deborah stone. Policy Sciences, 48, 127–133.CrossRef
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2009). Building strong nation. Fanham: Ashgate.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Mizrahi, S. (2014). Managing democracies in turbulent times: trust, performance, and governance in modern states. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRef
Wamsley, G. L., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations. Public Administration Review, 33, 62–73.CrossRef
Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2004). Policy analysis: concepts and practice (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Metadaten
Titel
Swimming on Land: Some Suggestions for Today’s Public Administration
verfasst von
Lihi Lahat
Publikationsdatum
09.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0892-7545
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3378
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-017-9306-4

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise