Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Information Systems Frontiers
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 2/2011

01.04.2011

How social influence affects we-intention to use instant messaging: The moderating effect of usage experience

verfasst von: Aaron X. L. Shen, Christy M. K. Cheung, Matthew K. O. Lee, Huaping Chen

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the advent of Web 2.0, the business world is fast changing its way of communicating and collaborating. In this study, we regarded the use of instant messaging in team collaboration as a social behavior and examined the changing roles of social influence processes in the formation of usage we-intention (i.e. social intention). Building on the belief-desire-intention model and the social influence theory, an integrated model was developed and empirically tested using survey data collected from 482 students. The results demonstrated that desire partially mediates the effects of group norm and social identity on we-intention to use. In addition, the effect of group norm is more significant for users with lower usage experience, whereas the effect of social identity is more significant for users with higher usage experience. We believe this study provides several important implications for both research and practice.
Vorheriger Artikel ISF special issue on emerging social and legal aspects of information systems with Web 2.0
Nächster Artikel Integrating constraints to support legally flexible business processes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the concept of intentional social action in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 388–396.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 2–21.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006a). Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Science, 52(7), 1099–1115.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006b). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45–61.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. H. (2002). Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 226–247.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y., & Phillips, W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.CrossRef
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef
Beck, R., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., & König, W. (2008). Network effects as drivers of individual technology adoption: Analyzing adoption and diffusion of mobile communication services. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 415–429.CrossRef
Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intention, plans and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bratman, M. E. (1997). I Intend that We J. In G. Holmström-Hintikka & R. Tuomela (Eds.), Contemporary Action Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual teacher community: an empirical investigation. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279–298.CrossRef
Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.CrossRef
Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 241–263.CrossRef
Dulany, D. E. (1997). Consciousness in the explicit (deliberative) and implicit (evocative). In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRef
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. London: Routledge.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Joreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In K. G. Joreskog, & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.CrossRef
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.CrossRef
Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., & Saarinen, T. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software project. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 299–325.CrossRef
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60.CrossRef
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. H. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095–1104.CrossRef
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., Lim, K. H., & Sia, C. L. (2006). Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards - An exploratory study. Internet Research, 16(3), 289–303.CrossRef
Li, D., Chau, P. Y. K., & Lou, H. (2005). Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(4), 102–129.
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. (2005). A multidimensional commitment model of volitional systems adoption and usage behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 117–151.
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behavior: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79–98.CrossRef
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2004). The distinction between desires and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 69–84.CrossRef
Song, J., & Kim, Y. J. (2006). Social influence process in the acceptance of a virtual community service. Information Systems Frontiers, 8, 241–252.CrossRef
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., & Watson, R. T. (1998). Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact of an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44(9), 1263–1278.CrossRef
Thompson, R., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 167–187.
Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tuomela, R. (2005). We-intention revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125(3), 327–369.CrossRef
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton-Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.CrossRef
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
Wallace, D. W., Giese, J. L., & Johnson, J. L. (2004). Customer retailer loyalty in the context of multiple channel strategies. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 249–263.CrossRef
Wold, H. (1989). Introduction to the second generation of multivariate analysis. In H. Wold (Ed.), Theoretical empiricism: A general rationale for scientific model-building. New York, USA: Paragon House.
Metadaten
Titel
How social influence affects we-intention to use instant messaging: The moderating effect of usage experience
verfasst von
Aaron X. L. Shen
Christy M. K. Cheung
Matthew K. O. Lee
Huaping Chen
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9193-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Information Systems Frontiers 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Trust perceptions of online travel information by different content creators: Some social and legal implications

OriginalPaper

Towards promoting interactivity in a B2B web community

OriginalPaper

Taxonomy, technology and applications of smart objects

OriginalPaper

Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning

OriginalPaper

A computing theory for collaborative and transparent decision making under time constraint

OriginalPaper

A university-oriented Web 2.0 services portal

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise