Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Information Systems Frontiers
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 5/2022

27.07.2021

On the Popularity of Internet of Things Projects in Online Communities

An Empirical Study of Hackster.io

verfasst von: Taher Ahmed Ghaleb, Daniel Alencar da Costa, Ying Zou

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Online Internet of Things (IoT) communities allow IoT engineers to publish information about their projects to a wider audience of users. Despite the growing adoption of IoT technologies in business, the popularity of IoT projects remains unexplored. Understanding how to improve the popularity of IoT projects helps project owners attract more users and foster business opportunities. In this paper, we explore the important characteristics of popular IoT projects across three facets: views count, respects count, and trending scores. We study over 18,000 IoT projects hosted on Hackster.io—a large online IoT community. In particular, we perform a time-series clustering to identify the evolution of each of the three popularity facets. In addition, we construct linear mixed-effect models to investigate the most important factors associated with the popularity of IoT projects. We provide insights to online IoT communities to improve the user guidelines to help (new) IoT engineers make their projects more eye-catching.
Vorheriger Artikel Examining Client-Vendor Relationship in the Outsourcing of a Work Environment Virtualisation: An Activity Theory Perspective
Nächster Artikel A Bilingual Comparison of Sentiment and Topics for a Product Event on Twitter

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
Literatur
Aggarwal, K., Hindle, A., & Stroulia, E. (2014). Co-evolution of project documentation and popularity within github. In Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (pp. 360–363). ACM.
Agresti, A. (1989). Tutorial on modeling ordered categorical response data. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 290.CrossRef
Alsmadi, I., & Alazzam, I. (2017). Software attributes that impact popularity. In 2017 8Th international conference on information technology (ICIT) (pp. 205–208). IEEE.
Barnaghi, P., & Sheth, A. (2016). On searching the internet of things: Requirements and challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 71–75.CrossRef
Bauman, K., & Tuzhilin, A. (2014). Discovering contextual information from user reviews for recommendation purposes. In CBREcsys@ recsys (pp. 2–9).
Berndt, D.J., & Clifford, J. (1994). Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. KDD workshop, 10(16), 359–370.
Billet, B., & Issarny, V. (2014). From task graphs to concrete actions: a new task mapping algorithm for the future internet of things. In 11Th international conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor systems (MASS) (pp. 470–478). IEEE.
Borges, H., Hora, A., & Valente, M.T. (2016). Understanding the factors that impact the popularity of github repositories. arXiv:1606.​04984.
Borges, H., & Valente, M.T. (2018). What’s in a github star? understanding repository starring practices in a social coding platform. Journal of Systems and Software, 146, 112–129.CrossRef
Botta, A., De Donato, W., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2014). On the integration of cloud computing and internet of things. In International conference on future internet of things and cloud (ficloud) (pp. 23–30). IEEE.
Chattopadhyay, T., Banerjee, S., Maiti, S., Dey, S., Jaiswal, D., & Barik, B. (2015). Way to make ourselves redundant: A semantic framework for automated workflow generation for iot TCS Technical Architects.
Chen, M., & Liu, X. (2011). Predicting popularity of online distributed applications: itunes app store case analysis. In iConference (pp. 661–663). ACM.
Cosentino, V., Izquierdo, J.L.C., & Cabot, J. (2017). A systematic mapping study of software development with github. IEEE Access, 5, 7173–7192.CrossRef
Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4), 525–535.CrossRef
De, S., Elsaleh, T., Barnaghi, P., & Meissner, S. (2012). An internet of things platform for real-world and digital objects. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 13(1), 45–58.
D’Oca, S., & Hong, T. (2014). A data-mining approach to discover patterns of window opening and closing behavior in offices. Building and Environment, 82, 726–739.CrossRef
Domingos, P. (2012). A few useful things to know about machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 55(10), 78–87.CrossRef
Eisenhauer, M., Rosengren, P., & Antolin, P. (2010). Hydra: a development platform for integrating wireless devices and sensors into ambient intelligence systems. In The internet of things (pp. 367–373). Springer.
Faraway, J.J. (2016). Extending the linear model with r: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models, Vol. 124, CRC press, Boca Raton.
Florescu, D., Grünhagen, A., & Kossmann, D. (2003). Xl: an xml programming language for web service specification and composition. Computer Networks, 42(5), 641–660.CrossRef
Fox, G.C., Kamburugamuve, S., & Hartman, R.D. (2012). Architecture and measured characteristics of a cloud based internet of things. In International conference on collaboration technologies and systems (CTS) (pp. 6–12). IEEE.
Ghaleb, T.A., Da Costa, D.A., & Zou, Y. (2019). An empirical study of the long duration of continuous integration builds. Empirical Software Engineering, 24(4), 2102–2139.CrossRef
Hachem, S., Teixeira, T., & Issarny, V. (2011). Ontologies for the internet of things. In 8th middleware doctoral symposium (p. 3). ACM.
Harrell, F.E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies, with applications to linear models, survival analysis and logistic regression. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Huang, Z., Tsai, B.L., Chou, J.J., Chen, C.Y., Chen, C.H., Chuang, C.C., Lin, K.J., & Shih, C.S. (2015). Context and user behavior aware intelligent home control using wukong middleware. In International conference on consumer electronics-taiwan (ICCE-TW) (pp. 302–303). IEEE.
Islam, M.R., & Zibran, M.F. (2017). Leveraging automated sentiment analysis in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (pp. 203–214). IEEE Press.
Jin, J., Gubbi, J., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2014). An information framework for creating a smart city through internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(2), 112– 121.CrossRef
Kamilaris, A., Pitsillides, A., & Trifa, V. (2011). The smart home meets the web of things. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(3), 145–154.CrossRef
Krutz, D.E., Munaiah, N., Meneely, A., & Malachowsky, S.A. (2016). Examining the relationship between security metrics and user ratings of mobile apps: a case study. In International workshop on app market analytics (pp. 8–14). ACM.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is twitter, a social network or a news media?. In 19Th international conference on world wide web (pp. 591–600). ACM.
Lawrence, I., & Lin, K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 255–268.
Lewis, A.J. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Springer, Berlin.
Li, L., Li, S., & Zhao, S. (2014). Qos-aware scheduling of services-oriented internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1497–1505.CrossRef
Li, S., Da Xu, L., & Zhao, S. (2015). The internet of things: a survey. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 243–259.CrossRef
Liao, T.W. (2005). Clustering of time series data—a survey. Pattern Recognition, 38(11), 1857–1874.CrossRef
MacQueen, J., et al. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, (Vol. 1 pp. 281–297).
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining r2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142.CrossRef
Nambi, S.A.U., Sarkar, C., Prasad, R.V., & Rahim, A. (2014). A unified semantic knowledge base for iot. In Internet of things (WF-iot), 2014 IEEE world forum on (pp. 575–580). IEEE.
Noei, E., Da Costa, D.A., & Zou, Y. (2018). Winning the app production rally. In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM joint meeting on european software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering (pp. 283–294). ACM.
Noru, M.J. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics 19 guide to data analysis, Prentice hall, Pearson.
Patel, P., & Cassou, D. (2015). Enabling high-level application development for the internet of things. Journal of Systems and Software, 103, 62–84.CrossRef
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T.R., & Feinstein, A.R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49 (12), 1373–1379.CrossRef
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Context aware computing for the internet of things: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 414–454.CrossRef
Rao, B.P., Saluia, P., Sharma, N., Mittal, A., & Sharma, S.V. (2012). Cloud computing for internet of things & sensing based applications. In 6Th international conference on sensing technology (ICST) (pp. 374–380). IEEE.
Reijers, N., Lin, K.J., Wang, Y.C., & Shih, C.S. (2013). Hsu, J.Y.j.: Design of an intelligent middleware for flexible sensor configuration in m2m systems. In Sensornets, pp. 41–46.
Sarle, W. (1990). The varclus procedure SAS/STAT User’s Guide.
Sen, R. (2006). Open source software development projects: determinants of project popularity. Tech. rep., EERI Research Paper Series.
Sheoran, J., Blincoe, K., Kalliamvakou, E., Damian, D., & Ell, J. (2014). Understanding watchers on github. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (pp. 336–339). ACM.
Shull, F., Singer, J., & Sjøberg, D.I. (2007). Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Secaucus: Springer-verlag New York, Inc.
Singh, K.J., & Kapoor, D.S. (2017). Create your own internet of things: a survey of iot platforms. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 6(2), 57–68.CrossRef
Stewart, K., & Ammeter, T. (2002). An exploratory study of factors influencing the level of vitality and popularity of open source projects. In ICIS (p. 88).
Su, P.H., Shih, C.S., Hsu, J.Y.J., Lin, K.J., & Wang, Y.C. (2014). Decentralized fault tolerance mechanism for intelligent iot/m2m middleware. In Internet of things (WF-iot), 2014 IEEE world forum on (pp. 45–50). IEEE.
Syer, M.D., Nagappan, M., Hassan, A.E., & Adams, B. (2013). Revisiting prior empirical findings for mobile apps: an empirical case study on the 15 most popular open-source android apps. In Conference of the center for advanced studies on collaborative research (pp. 283–297). IBM corp.
Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T. (2018). Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15.
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2544–2558.
Tian, Y., Nagappan, M., Lo, D., & Hassan, A.E. (2015). What are the characteristics of high-rated apps? a case study on free android applications. In International conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME) (pp. 301–310). IEEE.
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411–423.CrossRef
Tzortzis, G., & Spyrou, E. (2016). A semi-automatic approach for semantic iot service composition. In Workshop on artificial intelligence and internet of things in conjunction with SETN.
Ustek-Spilda, F., Vega, D., Magnani, M., Rossi, L., Shklovski, I., Lehuede, S., & Powell, A. (2020). A twitter-based study of the european internet of things. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15.
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2015). Model comparison and the principle. In The oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology, Vol. 300. Oxford library of psychology.
Weber, S., & Luo, J. (2014). What makes an open source code popular on git hub?. In International conference on data mining workshop (ICDMW) (pp. 851–855). IEEE.
Winter, B. (2013). A very basic tutorial for performing linear mixed effects analyses. arxiv:1308.​5499.
Ye, H.J., Chua, C.E.H., & Sun, J. (2019). Enhancing mobile data services performance via online reviews. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(2), 441–452.CrossRef
Yu, C.H. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Methods, 2, 131–160.
Zarrella, D. (2009). The social media marketing book. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Zaslavsky, A., Perera, C., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2013). Sensing as a service and big data. arxiv:1301.​0159.
Zhang, Z., Li, X., Liu, C., Su, S., & Han, Y. (2017). A service-based approach to situational correlation and analyses of stream sensor data. In International conference on web services (ICWS) (pp. 572–579). IEEE.
Zhou, S., Lin, K.J., Na, J., Chuang, C.C., & Shih, C.S. (2015). Supporting service adaptation in fault tolerant internet of things. In 8Th international conference on service-oriented computing and applications (SOCA) (pp. 65–72). IEEE.
Zhu, J., Zhou, M., & Mockus, A. (2014). Patterns of folder use and project popularity: a case study of github repositories. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, p. 30. ACM.
Metadaten
Titel
On the Popularity of Internet of Things Projects in Online Communities
An Empirical Study of Hackster.io
verfasst von
Taher Ahmed Ghaleb
Daniel Alencar da Costa
Ying Zou
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10157-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Information Systems Frontiers 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Sustaining Patient Portal Continuous Use Intention and Enhancing Deep Structure Usage: Cognitive Dissonance Effects of Health Professional Encouragement and Security Concerns

OriginalPaper

Using the Anchoring Effect and the Cultural Dimensions Theory to Study Customers’ Online Rating Behaviors

OriginalPaper

Examining Client-Vendor Relationship in the Outsourcing of a Work Environment Virtualisation: An Activity Theory Perspective

OriginalPaper

Cashless Japan: Unlocking Influential Risk on Mobile Payment Service

OriginalPaper

Ontology-Based Approach for the Measurement of Privacy Disclosure

OriginalPaper

Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise