nach oben

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Erschienen in:

17.09.2020

Improving the accuracy of machine-learning models with data from machine test repetitions

verfasst von: Andres Bustillo, Roberto Reis, Alisson R. Machado, Danil Yu. Pimenov

Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The modelling of machining processes by means of machine-learning algorithms is still based on principles that are especially adapted to mechanical approaches, in which very few inputs are varied with little repetition of experimental conditions. These principles might not be ideal to achieve accurate machine-learning models and they are certainly not aligned with the practicalities of industrial machining in factories. In this research the effect of a new strategy to improve machine-learning model accuracy is studied: experimental repetition. Tool-life prediction in the face-turning operations of AISI 1045 steel discs, depending on different cooling systems and tool geometries, is selected as a case study. Both the side rake and the relief angles of HSS tools are optimized using the Brandsma facing test under dry, MQL, and flooding conditions. Different machine-learning algorithms, such as regression trees, kNNs, artificial neural networks, and ensembles (bagging and Random Forest) are tested. On the one hand, the results of the study showed that artificial neural networks of Radial Basis Functions presented the highest model accuracy (11.4 mm RMSE), but required a very sensitive and complex tuning process. On the other hand, they demonstrated that ensembles, especially Random Forest, provided models with accuracy in the same range, but with no tuning procedure (12.8 mm RMSE). Secondly, the effect of an increased dataset size, by means of experimental repetition, is evaluated and compared with traditional experimental modelling that used average values. The results showed that some machine-learning techniques, including both ensemble types, significantly improved their accuracy with this strategy, by up to 23%. The results therefore suggested that the use of raw experimental data, rather than their averaged values, can achieve machine-learning models of higher accuracy for tool-wear processes.

Vorheriger Artikel Underdetermined blind source extraction of early vehicle bearing faults based on EMD and kernelized correlation maximization

Nächster Artikel Hierarchical multistrategy genetic algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abainia, S., & Ouelaa, N. (2015). Experimental study of the combined influence of the tool geometry parameters on the cutting forces and tool vibrations. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79(5–8), 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6885-9.CrossRef

Abiodun, O. I., Jantan, A., Omolara, A. E., Dada, K. V., Mohamed, N. A., & Arshad, H. (2018). State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey. Heliyon, 4(11), e00938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938.CrossRef

Aha, D., & Kibler, D. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6, 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022689900470.CrossRef

Amini, M., & Chang, S. (2018). A review of machine learning approaches for high dimensional process monitoring. In IISE annual conference and expo (pp. 390–395).

Antony, J., & Kaye, M. (2000). Analysis and interpretation of data from Taguchi experiments. In Experimental quality. Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5293-2_9.

Arnaiz-Gonzalez, A., Fernandez-Valdivielso, A., Bustillo, A., & Lopez de Lacalle, L. N. (2016). Using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dimensional error on inclined surfaces manufactured by ball-end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(5), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7543-y.CrossRef

Benardos, P. G., & Vosniakos, G. C. (2002). Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 18(5–6), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00005-4.CrossRef

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.CrossRef

Bustillo, A., Díez-Pastor, J.-F., Quintana, G., & García-Osorio, C. (2011). Avoiding neural network fine tuning by using ensemble learning: Application to ball-end milling operations. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 57(5), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3300-z.CrossRef

Bustillo, A., Grzenda, M., & Macukow, B. (2016). Interpreting tree-based prediction models and their data in machining processes. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 23(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-160513.CrossRef

Bustillo, A., Pimenov, D. Y., Matuszewski, M., & Mikolajczyk, T. (2018). Using artificial intelligence models for the prediction of surface wear based on surface isotropy levels. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 53, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2018.03.011.CrossRef

Bustillo, A., Pimenov, D. Y., Mia, M., & Kapłonek, W. (2020). Machine-learning for automatic prediction of flatness deviation considering the wear of the face mill teeth. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01645-3.

Chandrasekaran, M., Muralidhar, M., Krishna, C., & Dixit, U. (2010). Application of soft computing techniques in machining performance prediction and optimization: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 46(5), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2104-x.CrossRef

Cuka, B., & Kim, D.-W. (2017). Fuzzy logic based tool condition monitoring for end-milling. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 47, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.12.009.CrossRef

Da Silva, F. J., Franco, S. D., Machado, A. R., Ezugwu, E. O., & Souza, A. M. S., Jr. (2006). Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear, 261, 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.017.CrossRef

Davim, J. P. (2008). Machining: Fundamentals and recent advances. Machining Fundamentals and Recent Advances. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-213-5.CrossRef

Debnath, S., Reddy, M. M., & Yi, Q. S. (2014). Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.071.CrossRef

Dogra, M., Sharma, V. S., & Dureja, J. (2011). Effect of tool geometry variation on finish turning: A review. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 4(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Grzenda, M., & Bustillo, A. (2013). The evolutionary development of roughness prediction models. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), 2913–2922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.070.CrossRef

Grzenda, M., & Bustillo, A. (2019). Semi-supervised roughness prediction with partly unlabeled vibration data streams. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(2), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1413-z.CrossRef

Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., Quintana, G., & Ciurana, J. (2012). Improvement of surface roughness models for face milling operations through dimensionality reduction. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 19(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-2012-0398.CrossRef

Günay, M., Korkut, I., Aslan, E., & Seker, U. (2005). Experimental investigation of the effect of cutting tool rake angle on main cutting force. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 166, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.092.CrossRef

He, C., Ma, M., & Wang, P. (2020). Extract interpretability-accuracy balanced rules from artificial neural networks: A review. Neurocomputing, 387, 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.036.CrossRef

Juez-Gil, M., Erdakov, I. N., Bustillo, A., & Pimenov, D. Y. (2019). A regression-tree multilayer-perceptron hybrid strategy for the prediction of ore crushing-plate lifetimes. Journal of Advanced Research, 18, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.008.CrossRef

Kattan, I. A., & Currie, K. R. (1996). Developing new trends of cutting tool geometry. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 61, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02492-2.CrossRef

Kohavi, R. (1995). The power of decision tables. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 912, 174–189.CrossRef

Kountanya, R., Al-Zkeri, I., & Altan, T. (2009). Effect of tool edge geometry and cutting conditions on experimental and simulated chip morphology in orthogonal hard turning of 100Cr6 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(11), 5068–5076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.02.011.CrossRef

Kovacs, T., & Ko, A. (2009). Monitoring pneumatic actuators’ behavior using real-world data set. SN Computer Science, 1, 196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00202-2.CrossRef

Krolczyk, G. M., Maruda, R. W., Krolczyk, J. B., Wojciechowski, S., Mia, M., Nieslony, P., et al. (2019). Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.017.CrossRef

Kuncheva, L. I. (2014). Combining pattern classifiers: Methods and algorithms (2nd ed.). Joboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914564.CrossRef

Leonard, J. A., & Kramer, M. A. (1991). Radial basis function networks for classifying process faults. IEEE Control Systems, 11(3), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.75576.CrossRef

Li, A., Zhang, J., & Zhao, J. (2020). Effect of cutting parameters and tool rake angle on the chip formation and adiabatic shear characteristics in machining Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 107(7–8), 3077–3091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05145-9.CrossRef

Martellotti, M. E. (1941). An analysis of the milling process. Transactions of ASME, 63, 667.

Maudes, J., Bustillo, A., Guerra, A. J., & Ciurana, J. (2017). Random forest ensemble prediction of stent dimensions in microfabrication processes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(1–4), 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9695-9.CrossRef

Mesquita, R. A., Barbosa, C. A., & Machado, A. R. (2017) Heat treatment of tool steels, book chapter in comprehensive materials finishing. Elsevier, Organized by Professor Shahjahan Mridha, Ph.D., (edited by Saleem Hashmi) (Vol. 2, pp. 214–245). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09191-8.

Mir, A., Luo, X., Cheng, K., & Cox, A. (2017). Investigation of influence of tool rake angle in single point diamond turning of silicone. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(5–8), 2343–2355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1021-7.CrossRef

Nalbant, M., Gökkaya, H., Toktaş, I., & Sur, G. (2009). The experimental investigation of the effects of uncoated, PVD- and CVD-coated cemented carbide inserts and cutting parameters on surface roughness in CNC turning and its prediction using artificial neural networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25(1), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.11.004.CrossRef

Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.CrossRef

Patra, K., Pal, S. K., & Bhattacharyya, K. (2010). Fuzzy radial basis function (FRBF) network based tool condition monitoring system using vibration signals. Machining Science and Technology, 14(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2010.500954.CrossRef

Pimenov, D. Y., Bustillo, A., & Mikolajczyk, T. (2018). Artificial intelligence for automatic prediction of required surface roughness by monitoring wear on face mill teeth. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(5), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1381-8.CrossRef

Quinlan, J. R. (1992). Learning with continuous classes. In Proceedings of the 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence, 92 m Singapore (pp. 343–348).

Rehorn, A. G., Jiang, J., & Orban, P. E. (2005). State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: A review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(7–8), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2038-2.CrossRef

Ren, Y., Zhang, L., & Suganthan, P. N. (2016). Ensemble classification and regression-recent developments, applications and future directions [review article]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 11(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2015.2471235.CrossRef

Saglam, H., Unsacar, F., & Yaldiz, S. (2006). Investigation of the effect of rake angle and approaching angle on main cutting force and tool tip temperature. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.05.002.CrossRef

Sales, W. F., Diniz, A. E., & Machado, A. R. (2001). Application of cutting fluids in machining processes. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 23(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-73862001000200009.CrossRef

Sanchez-Egea, A. J., & Lopez de Lacalle, L. N. (2018). Machines, processes, people and data, the keys to the 4.0 revolution. DYNA, 93(6), 576–577. https://doi.org/10.6036/8807.CrossRef

Santos, P., Maudes, J., & Bustillo, A. (2015). Identifying maximum imbalance in datasets for fault diagnosis of Gearboxes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1110-0.CrossRef

Sick, B. (2002). On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: A review of more than a decade of research. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16(4), 487–546. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2001.1460.CrossRef

Singh, D., & Rao, P. V. (2006). A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32(11–12), 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0429-2.CrossRef

Suárez, A., López de Lacalle, L. N., Polvorosa, R., Veiga, F., & Wretland, A. (2017). Effects of high-pressure cooling on the wear patterns on turning inserts used on alloy IN718. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 32(6), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1244838.CrossRef

Suresh, R., Basavarajappa, S., & Samuel, G. L. (2012). Some studies on hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using multilayer coated carbide tool. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 45(7), 1872–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.024.CrossRef

Teixidor, D., Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., & Ciurana, J. (2015). Modeling pulsed laser micromachining of micro geometries using machine learning techniques. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0835-x.CrossRef

Trent, E. M., & Wright, P. K. (2000). Metal cutting (4th ed.). London: Butterworths.

Tunç, L. T., & Budak, E. (2012). Effect of cutting conditions and tool geometry on process damping in machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 57, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.009.CrossRef

Wang, T., Wang, J., Wu, Y., & Sheng, X. (2020). A fault diagnosis model based on weighted extension neural network for turbo-generator sets on small samples with noise. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.06.024.CrossRef

Wang, G., Yang, Y., & Li, Z. (2014). Force sensor based tool condition monitoring using a heterogeneous ensemble learning model. Sensors, 14(11), 21588–21602. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141121588.CrossRef

Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., & Pal, C. J. (2016). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (book). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 1–621.

Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Gao, R. X., & Kumara, S. (2017). A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: Tool wear prediction using random forests. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 139(7), 071018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036350.CrossRef

Zhang, S., Zhang, H., & Zonga, W. (2019). Modeling and simulation on the effect of tool rake angle in diamond turning of KDP crystal. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 273, 116259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116259.CrossRef

Zheng, P., Wang, H., Sang, Z., Zhong, R. Y. E., Liu, Y., Yu, S., et al. (2018). Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0499-5.CrossRef

Zuperl, U., & Cus, F. (2003). Optimization of cutting conditions during cutting by using neural networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(1–2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00079-0.CrossRef

Titel: Improving the accuracy of machine-learning models with data from machine test repetitions
verfasst von: Andres Bustillo
Roberto Reis
Alisson R. Machado
Danil Yu. Pimenov
Publikationsdatum: 17.09.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0956-5515
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8145
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01661-3

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Continual learning of neural networks for quality prediction in production using memory aware synapses and weight transfer

Tool wear condition monitoring based on a two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine using sound sensor for milling process

A novel transfer learning fault diagnosis method based on Manifold Embedded Distribution Alignment with a little labeled data

Intelligent setting of process parameters for injection molding based on case-based reasoning of molding features

Genetic algorithm based approaches to solve the order batching problem and a case study in a distribution center

Investigation on industrial dataspace for advanced machining workshops: enabling machining operations control with domain knowledge and application case studies

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten