Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Materials Science
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science 1/2019

27.08.2018 | Electronic materials

Probing the difference in friction performance between graphene and MoS2 by manipulating the silver nanowires

verfasst von: Xingzhong Zeng, Yitian Peng, Haojie Lang, Kang Yu

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Graphene and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) are promising solid lubricants to deal with the interfacial friction and adhesion concerns in silver nanowires (Ag NWs)-based nanodevices, but their difference in friction performance is seldom considered. Here, the difference in friction performance between graphene and MoS2 has been comparatively studied by manipulating the Ag NWs on graphene and MoS2 surfaces through atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip-on-side and tip-on-top manipulations. The tip-on-side and tip-on-top manipulations demonstrate the atomically thin MoS2 has better friction performance than graphene. The tip-on-top manipulation further shows the shear strength in NW–MoS2 interface is smaller than in NW–graphene interface. The underlying mechanism for the friction difference between the two interfaces is attributed to the different interfacial adhesion interactions. The relatively small adhesion interaction in NW–MoS2 interface leads to a small interfacial shear strength, resulting in a small friction when the NW slides on MoS2 surface. The measured water contact angles, calculated work of adhesion and the adhesion force directly measured by AFM tip confirm the relatively small adhesion interaction in NW–MoS2 interface. These findings suggest that MoS2 may be more appropriate as lubricants for application in the NW-based nanodevices.
Vorheriger Artikel Magnetic semiconducting and strain-induced semiconducting–metallic transition in Cu-doped single-layer WSe2
Nächster Artikel Ferromagnetism and microwave absorption properties of Cr-doped MoS2 nanosheets

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zhu Y, Qin Q, Gu Y, Wang Z (2009) Friction and shear strength at the nanowire-substrate interfaces. Nanoscale Res Lett 5:291–295CrossRef
2.
Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee S, Ryu S, Park I (2014) Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano 8:5154–5163CrossRef
3.
Song L, Myers AC, Adams JJ, Zhu Y (2014) Stretchable and reversibly deformable radio frequency antennas based on silver nanowires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4248–4253CrossRef
4.
Lee D, Lee H, Ahn Y, Jeong Y, Lee D-Y, Lee Y (2013) Highly stable and flexible silver nanowire-graphene hybrid transparent conducting electrodes for emerging optoelectronic devices. Nanoscale 5:7750–7755CrossRef
5.
Hu L, Kim HS, Lee J-Y, Peumans P, Cui Y (2010) Scalable coating and properties of transparent, flexible, silver nanowire electrodes. ACS Nano 4:2955–2963CrossRef
6.
Xiang X-Z, Gong W-Y, Kuang M-S, Wang L (2016) Progress in application and preparation of silver nanowires. Rare Met 35:289–298CrossRef
7.
Kholmanov IN, Magnuson CW, Aliev AE et al (2012) Improved electrical conductivity of graphene films integrated with metal nanowires. Nano Lett 12:5679–5683CrossRef
8.
Bhushan B (2007) Nanotribology and nanomechanics of MEMS/NEMS and BioMEMS/BioNEMS materials and devices. Microelectron Eng 84:387–412CrossRef
9.
Theerthagiri J, Senthil RA, Senthilkumar B, Polu AR, Madhavan J, Ashokkumar M (2017) Recent advances in MoS2 nanostructured materials for energy and environmental applications: a review. J Solid State Chem 252:43–71CrossRef
10.
Wu W, Wang J, Ercius P et al (2018) Giant mechano-optoelectronic effect in an atomically thin semiconductor. Nano Lett 18:2351–2357CrossRef
11.
Spear JC, Ewers BW, Batteas JD (2015) 2D-nanomaterials for controlling friction and wear at interfaces. Nano Today 10:301–314CrossRef
12.
Lee C, Li QY, Kalb W et al (2010) Frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets. Science 328:76–80CrossRef
13.
Peng Y, Zeng X, Liu L, Cao X, Zou K, Chen R (2017) Nanotribological characterization of graphene on soft elastic substrate. Carbon 124:541–546CrossRef
14.
Lancaster JK, Pritchard JR (1981) The influence of environment and pressure on the transition to dusting wear of graphite. J Phys D Appl Phys 14:747–762CrossRef
15.
Donnet C, Martin JM, LeMogne T, Belin M (1996) Super-low friction of MoS2 coatings in various environments. Tribol Int 29:123–128CrossRef
16.
Bryant PJ, GutshallL IL, Taylor LH (1964) A study of mechanisms of graphite friction and wear. Wear 7:118–126CrossRef
17.
Martin JM, Donnet C, Lemogne T, Epicier T (1993) Superlubricity of molybdeum-disulfide. Phys Rev B 48:10583–10586CrossRef
18.
Kawai S, Benassi A, Gnecco E et al (2016) Superlubricity of graphene nanoribbons on gold surfaces. Science 351:957–961CrossRef
19.
Liu S-W, Wang H-P, Xu Q et al (2017) Robust microscale superlubricity under high contact pressure enabled by graphene-coated microsphere. Nat Commun 8:14029CrossRef
20.
Xa Cao X, Gan Y Peng et al (2018) An ultra-low frictional interface combining FDTS SAMs with molybdenum disulfide. Nanoscale 10:378–385CrossRef
21.
Maharaj D, Bhushan B (2015) Friction, wear and mechanical behavior of nano-objects on the nanoscale. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep 95:1–43CrossRef
22.
Seo HW, Han C-S, Jang WS, Park J (2006) Manipulation of carbon nanotubes and nanowires. Curr Appl Phys 6:E216–E219CrossRef
23.
Dietzel D, Feldmann M, Fuchs H, Schwarz UD, Schirmeisen A (2009) Transition from static to kinetic friction of metallic nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 95:053104CrossRef
24.
Kim HJ, Kang KH, Kim DE (2013) Sliding and rolling frictional behavior of a single ZnO nanowire during manipulation with an AFM. Nanoscale 5:6081–6087CrossRef
25.
Guo W, Yin J, Qiu H, Guo Y, Wu H, Xue M (2014) Friction of low-dimensional nanomaterial systems. Friction 2:209–225CrossRef
26.
Bordag M, Ribayrol A, Conache G et al (2007) Shear stress measurements on InAs nanowires by AFM manipulation. Small 3:1398–1401CrossRef
27.
Conache G, Gray SM, Ribayrol A et al (2009) Friction measurements of InAs nanowires on silicon nitride by AFM manipulation. Small 5:203–207CrossRef
28.
Kim HJ, Nguyen GH, Ky DLC, Tran DK, Jeon KJ, Chung KH (2016) Static and kinetic friction characteristics of nanowire on different substrates. Appl Surf Sci 379:452–461CrossRef
29.
Tran DK, Chung KH (2015) Simultaneous measurement of elastic properties and friction characteristics of nanowires using atomic force microscopy. Exp Mech 55:903–915CrossRef
30.
Qin Q, Zhu Y (2011) Static friction between silicon nanowires and elastomeric substrates. ACS Nano 5:7404–7410CrossRef
31.
Zeng X, Peng Y, Lang H, Liu L (2017) Controllable nanotribological properties of graphene nanosheets. Sci Rep 7:41891CrossRef
32.
Zeng X, Peng Y, Lang H, Cao Xa (2018) Nanotribological behavior of a single silver nanowire on graphite. Nanotechnology 29:085706CrossRef
33.
Zeng X, Peng Y, Lang Haojie, Cao Xa (2018) Tuning the nanotribological behaviors of single silver nanowire through various manipulations. Appl Surf Sci 440:830–840CrossRef
34.
Wagner K, Cheng P, Vezenov D (2011) Noncontact method for calibration of lateral forces in scanning force microscopy. Langmuir 27:4635–4644CrossRef
35.
Gupta A, Chen G, Joshi P, Tadigadapa S, Eklund PC (2006) Raman scattering from high-frequency phonons in supported n-graphene layer films. Nano Lett 6:2667–2673CrossRef
36.
Nemes-Incze P, Osvath Z, Kamaras K, Biro LP (2008) Anomalies in thickness measurements of graphene and few layer graphite crystals by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Carbon 46:1435–1442CrossRef
37.
Lee C, Yan H, Brus LE, Heinz TF, Hone J, Ryu S (2010) Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS2. ACS Nano 4:2695–2700CrossRef
38.
Khac BCT, Jeon KJ, Choi ST, Kim YS, DelRio FW, Chung KH (2016) Laser-induced particle adsorption on atomically thin MoS2. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:2974–2984CrossRef
39.
Dietzel D, Schwarz UD, Schirmeisen A (2014) Nanotribological studies using nanoparticle manipulation: principles and application to structural lubricity. Friction 2:114–139CrossRef
40.
Grierson DS, Flater EE, Carpick RW (2005) Accounting for the JKR-DMT transition in adhesion and friction measurements with atomic force microscopy. J Adhes Sci Technol 19:291–311CrossRef
41.
Carpick RW, Ogletree DF, Salmeron M (1999) A general equation for fitting contact area and friction vs load measurements. J Colloid Interface Sci 211:395–400CrossRef
42.
Gao JP, Luedtke WD, Gourdon D, Ruths M, Israelachvili JN, Landman U (2004) Frictional forces and Amontons’ law: from the molecular to the macroscopic scale. J Phys Chem B 108:3410–3425CrossRef
43.
Mo YF, Turner KT, Szlufarska I (2009) Friction laws at the nanoscale. Nature 457:1116–1119CrossRef
44.
Pettes MT, Shi L (2014) A reexamination of phonon transport through a nanoscale point contact in vacuum. J Heat Transf-Trans ASME 136:032401CrossRef
45.
Carkner CJ, Haw SM, Mosey NJ (2010) Effect of adhesive interactions on static friction at the atomic scale. Phys Rev Lett 105:056102CrossRef
46.
Dong YL (2014) Effects of substrate roughness and electron-phonon coupling on thickness-dependent friction of graphene. J Phys D-Appl Phys 47:055305CrossRef
47.
Koenig SP, Boddeti NG, Dunn ML, Bunch JS (2011) Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat Nanotechnol 6:543–546CrossRef
48.
Li P, You Z, Cui T (2013) Molybdenum disulfide dc contact MEMS shunt switch. J Micromech Microeng 23:045026CrossRef
49.
Zeng XZ, Peng YT, Lang HJ (2017) A novel approach to decrease friction of graphene. Carbon 118:233–240CrossRef
50.
Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–87CrossRef
51.
Delcheva I, Ralston J, Beattie DA, Krasowska M (2015) Static and dynamic wetting behaviour of ionic liquids. Adv Coll Interface Sci 222:162–171CrossRef
52.
Kwok DY, Neumann AW (2000) Contact angle interpretation in terms of solid surface tension. Colloids Surf A 161:31–48CrossRef
53.
Wang SR, Zhang Y, Abidi N, Cabrales L (2009) Wettability and surface free energy of graphene films. Langmuir 25:11078–11081CrossRef
54.
Wang W, Dai S, Li X, Yang J, Srolovitz DJ, Zheng Q (2015) Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite. Nat Commun 6:7853CrossRef
55.
Gaur APS, Sahoo S, Ahmadi M, Dash SP, Guinel MJF, Katiyar RS (2014) Surface energy engineering for tunable wettability through controlled synthesis of MoS2. Nano Lett 14:4314–4321CrossRef
56.
Jung JH, Park C-H, Ihm J (2018) A rigorous method of calculating exfoliation energies from first principles. Nano Lett 18:2759–2765CrossRef
57.
Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59:1–152CrossRef
58.
Wei Z, Zhao Y-P (2007) Growth of liquid bridge in AFM. J Phys D-Appl Phys 40:4368–4375CrossRef
59.
Jiang J-W (2015) Graphene versus MoS2: a short review. Front Phys 10:287–302CrossRef
60.
Dienwiebel M, Verhoeven GS, Pradeep N, Frenken JWM, Heimberg JA, Zandbergen HW (2004) Superlubricity of graphite. Phys Rev Lett 92:126101CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Probing the difference in friction performance between graphene and MoS2 by manipulating the silver nanowires
verfasst von
Xingzhong Zeng
Yitian Peng
Haojie Lang
Kang Yu
Publikationsdatum
27.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Materials Science / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2839-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Journal of Materials Science 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Review

Quantification of strain-induced damage in semi-crystalline polymers: a review

Energy materials

Highly conductive NiSe2 nanostructures for all-solid-state battery–supercapacitor hybrid devices

Polymers

Thermomechanical characterization of leathers under tension using infrared thermography

Chemical routes to materials

Saturable and reverse saturable absorption of a Cu2O–Ag nanoheterostructure

Ceramics

Lamellar and bundled domain rotations in barium titanate

Composites

Modification of graphene oxide to induce beta crystals in isotactic polypropylene

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise