nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

02.02.2016

Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive Cloud-Classroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses

verfasst von: Wei-Kai Liou, Kaushal Kumar Bhagat, Chun-Yen Chang

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The present study compares the highly interactive cloud-classroom (HIC) system with traditional methods of teaching materials science that utilize crystal structure picture or real crystal structure model, in order to examine its learning effectiveness across three dimensions: knowledge, comprehension and application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the (HIC) system, which incorporates augmented reality, virtual reality and cloud-classroom to teach basic materials science courses. The study followed a pretest–posttest quasi-experimental research design. A total of 92 students (aged 19–20 years), in a second-year undergraduate program, participated in this 18-week-long experiment. The students were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group (36 males and 10 females) was instructed utilizing the HIC system, while the control group (34 males and 12 females) was led through traditional teaching methods. Pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest scores were evaluated by multivariate analysis of covariance. The results indicated that participants in the experimental group who used the HIC system outperformed the control group, in the both posttest and delayed posttest, across three learning dimensions. Based on these results, the HIC system is recommended to be incorporated in formal materials science learning settings.

Vorheriger Artikel Performance and Perception in the Flipped Learning Model: An Initial Approach to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Teaching Methodology in a General Science Classroom

Nächster Artikel Drawing and Writing in Digital Science Notebooks: Sources of Formative Assessment Data

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ainsworth S (1999) The functions of multiple representations. Comput Educ 33(2–3):131–152. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9 CrossRef

Ainsworth S (2006) DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn Instr 16(3):183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 CrossRef

Ash K (2012) Educators evaluate” flipped classrooms. Educ Week 32(2):s6–s8

Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence 6(4):355–385

Baker J (2000) The “classroom flip”: using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Paper presented at the selected papers from the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning

Barak M, Dori YJ (2011) Science education in primary schools: is an animation worth a thousand pictures? J Sci Educ Technol 20(5):608–620. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9315-2 CrossRef

Bergmann J, Sams A (2012) Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education

Bergmann J, Sams A (2014) 4 learning strategies that make the most of flipped learning Retrieved 16 February, 2015, from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=14&category=In-the-classroom&article=4-learning-strategies-that-make-the-most-of-flipped-learning

Bergmann J, Overmyer J, Wilie B (2012) The flipped class: myths versus reality. Retrieved 14 February, 2015, from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php

Billinghurst M, Dünser A (2012) Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer 45:56–63. doi:10.1109/MC.2012.111 CrossRef

Brooks FP Jr (1999) What’s real about virtual reality? Comput Gr Appl IEEE 19(6):16–27CrossRef

Bujak KR, Radu I, Catrambone R, MacIntyre B, Zheng R, Golubski G (2013) A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Comput Educ 68:536–544. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017 CrossRef

Chen Y, Wang Y, Kinshuk, Chen NS (2014) Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Comput Educ 79:16–27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004 CrossRef

Chiang THC, Yang SJH, Hwang GJ (2014) Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Comput Educ 78:97–108. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006 CrossRef

Chien YT, Chang CY (2015) Supporting socio-scientific argumentation in the classroom through automatic group formation based on students’ real-time responses. In: Khine MS (ed) Science education in East Asia: pedagogical innovations and research-informed practices. Springer, Berlin

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey

Cohen CA, Hegarty M (2014) Visualizing cross sections: training spatial thinking using interactive animations and virtual objects. Learn Individ Diff 33:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.002 CrossRef

Davies R, West R (2013) Technology integration in school settings. In: Spector M, Merrill D, Elen J, Bishop MJ (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 4th edn. Taylor and Francis Ltd., New York

Di Serio Á, Ibáñez MB, Kloos CD (2013) Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput Educ 68:585–596. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 CrossRef

Diggins D (2005) ARLib: A C++ augmented reality software development kit. MSc computer animation NCCA Bournemouth University

Dove A (2013) Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. Society for information technology and teacher education international conference, pp 393–398

Echeverría A, Améstica M, Gil F, Nussbaum M, Barrios E, Leclerc S (2012) Exploring different technological platforms for supporting co-located collaborative games in the classroom. Comput Hum Behav 28(4):1170–1177. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.027 CrossRef

Findlay-Thompson S, Mombourquette P (2014) Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Bus Educ Accredit 6(1):63–71

Flipped Learning N (2014) What is flipped learning? The four pillars of F-L-I-P. Flipped Learning Network 501:2

Fonseca D, Martí N, Redondo E, Navarro I, Sánchez A (2014) Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Comput Hum Behav 31:434–445. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006 CrossRef

Gilbert J (2008) Visualization: an emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In: Gilbert J, Reiner M, Nakhleh M (eds) Visualization: theory and practice in science education. Vol. 3. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–24CrossRef

Hao Y (2014) Students’ attitude towards a flipped classroom and its relationship with motivation orientations in an undergraduate course. Paper presented at the society for information technology and teacher education international conference

Hargrave C, Kenton J (2000) Preinstructional simulations: implications for science classroom teaching. J Comput Math Sci Teach 19(1):47–58

Ho CML, Nelson ME, Müeller-Wittig W (2011) Design and implementation of a student-generated virtual museum in a language curriculum to enhance collaborative multimodal meaning-making. Comput Educ 57(1):1083–1097. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.003 CrossRef

Hsu Y-S, Thomas RA (2002) The impacts of a web-aided instructional simulation on science learning. Int J Sci Educ 24(9):955–979. doi:10.1080/09500690110095258 CrossRef

Ibáñez MB, Di Serio Á, Villarán D, Delgado Kloos C (2014) Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Comput Educ 71:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004 CrossRef

Johnson C (2014) The flipped classroom. Retrieved 16 February 2015, from http://ciep.hunter.cuny.edu/the-flipped-classroom/

Johnson L, Adams Becker S, Estrada V, Freeman A (2014) NMC horizon report: 2014 higher education edition. Austin, Texas

Kim J-H, Park S, Lee H, Yuk K-C, Lee H (2001) Virtual reality simulations in physics education. Interact Multimed Electron J Comput Enhanc Learn 3:2

Kim MK, Kim SM, Khera O, Getman J (2014) The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet Higher Educ 22:37–50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003 CrossRef

Kong SC (2014) Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: an experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Comput Educ 78:160–173. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009 CrossRef

Lee EA-L, Wong KW (2014) Learning with desktop virtual reality: low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Comput Educ 79:49–58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010 CrossRef

Liu TY, Tan TH, Chu YL (2009) Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educ Technol Soc 12:161–175. doi:10.1109/MACE.2011.5988881

Manseur R (2005) Virtual reality in science and engineering education. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE’05. Proceedings 35th annual conference

Martín-Gutiérrez J, Luís Saorín J, Contero M, Alcañiz M, Pérez-López DC, Ortega M (2010) Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Comput Gr 34(1):77–91. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2009.11.003 CrossRef

Mason GS, Shuman TR, Cook KE (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Trans Educ 56(4):430–435. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2249066 CrossRef

Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. Ieice Trans Inf Syst 77(12):1321–1329

Nielsen L (2012) Five reasons I’m not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technol Learn 32(10):46

November A, Mull B (2012) Flipped learning: a response to five common criticisms. Retrieved 14 February, 2015, from http://novemberlearning.com/assets/flipped-learning-a-response-to-five-commoncriticisms.pdf

Papadopoulos C, Roman AS (2010) Implementing an inverted classroom model in engineering statics: initial results. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education

Pardo A, Perez-Sanagustin M, Hugo A, Parada HA, Leony D (2012) Flip with care. Paper presented at the SoLAR southern flare conference

Patrick MD, Carter G, Wiebe EN (2005) Visual representations of DNA replication: middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. J Sci Educ Technol 14(3):353–365. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-7200-6 CrossRef

Prain V, Waldrip B (2006) An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. Int J Sci Educ 28(15):1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09500690600718294 CrossRef

Ramasundaram V, Grunwald S, Mangeot A, Comerford N, Bliss C (2005) Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory. Comput Educ 45(1):21–34CrossRef

Reiner M, Pea RD, Shulman DJ (1995) Impact of simulator-based instruction on diagramming in geometrical optics by introductory physics students. J Sci Educ Technol 4(3):199–226CrossRef

Richards J, Barowy W, Levin D (1992) Computer simulations in the science classroom. J Sci Educ Technol 1(1):67–79. doi:10.1007/BF00700244 CrossRef

Rosei F, Vayssieres L, Mensah P (2008) Materials science in the developing world: challenges and perspectives for Africa. Adv Mater 20(24):4627–4640CrossRef

Rutten N, van Joolingen WR, van der Veen JT (2012) The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput Educ 58(1):136–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 CrossRef

Sayed E, M, N. A, Zayed HH, Sharawy MI (2011) {ARSC}: augmented reality student card–an augmented reality solution for the education field. Comput Educ, 56(4):1045–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019

Schmidt SMP, Ralph DL (2014) The flipped classroom: a twist on teaching. Paper presented at the clute institute international academic conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Schultz D, Duffield S, Rasmussen SC, Wageman J (2014) Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. J Chem Educ. doi:10.1021/ed400868x

See S, Conry JM (2014) Flip My Class! A faculty development demonstration of a flipped-classroom. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 6(4):585–588. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2014.03.003 CrossRef

Smetana LK, Bell RL (2012) Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: a critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ 34(9):1337–1370. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.605182 CrossRef

Smith JD (2013) Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom. Chem Educ Res Pract 14:607. doi:10.1039/c3rp00083d CrossRef

Smith WF, Hashemi J (2006) Foundations of materials science and engineering. Mcgraw-Hill Publishing, New York

Sommerauer P, Müller O (2014) Augmented reality in informal learning environments: a field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Comput Educ 79:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013 CrossRef

Wojciechowski R, Cellary W (2013) Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Comput Educ 68:570–585. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014 CrossRef

Wu H-K, Puntambekar S (2012) Pedagogical affordances of multiple external representations in scientific processes. J Sci Educ Technol 21(6):754–767. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7 CrossRef

Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ 62:41–49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 CrossRef

Zappe S, Leicht R, Messner J, Litzinger T, Lee HW (2009) Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education

Titel: Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive Cloud-Classroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses
verfasst von: Wei-Kai Liou
Kaushal Kumar Bhagat
Chun-Yen Chang
Publikationsdatum: 02.02.2016
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9606-8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Identifying the Factors Leading to Success: How an Innovative Science Curriculum Cultivates Student Motivation

Drawing and Writing in Digital Science Notebooks: Sources of Formative Assessment Data

Spiral and Project-Based Learning with Peer Assessment in a Computer Science Project Management Course

Development of a Computer-Assisted Instrumentation Curriculum for Physics Students: Using LabVIEW and Arduino Platform

Students’ Views About Potentially Offering Physics Courses Online

Development and Evaluation of the Diagnostic Power for a Computer-Based Two-Tier Assessment

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten