Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Policy Sciences
Erschienen in: Policy Sciences 2/2021

08.04.2021 | Research Article

Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review

verfasst von: Ishani Mukherjee, M. Kerem Coban, Azad Singh Bali

Erschienen in: Policy Sciences | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Effectiveness has been understood at three levels of analysis in the scholarly study of policy design. The first is at the systemic level indicating what entails effective formulation environments or spaces making them conducive to successful design. The second reflects more program level concerns, surrounding how policy tool portfolios or mixes can be effectively constructed to address complex policy objectives. The third is a more specific instrument level, focusing on what accounts for and constitutes the effectiveness of particular types of policy tools. Undergirding these three levels of analysis are comparative research concerns that concentrate on the capacities of government and political actors to devise and implement effective designs. This paper presents a systematic review of a largely scattered yet quickly burgeoning body of knowledge in the policy sciences, which broadly asks what capacities engender effectiveness at the multiple levels of policy design? The findings bring to light lessons about design effectiveness at the level of formulation spaces, policy mixes and policy programs. Further, this review points to a future research agenda for design studies that is sensitive to the relative orders of policy capacity, temporality and complementarities between the various dimensions of policy capacity.
Nächster Artikel Uncertainty, risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions: a case study on criminal justice in the USA

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
We thank an anonymous referee for raising this essential point.
 
2
We are aware of two major caveats. Firstly, our database only covers journal articles written in English. In addition, our database excluded monographs and edited book chapters. Studies that are written in other languages and those published as monographs and edited book chapters are likely to offer additional insights to the findings in the article, which demands further research.
 
Literatur
Alaerts, G. J. (2020). Adaptive policy implementation: Process and impact of Indonesia’s national irrigation reform 1999–2018. World Development, 129, 104880.
Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public policymaking. . Praeger.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Ansell, C., Trondal, J., & Øgård, M. (Eds.). (2016). Governance in turbulent times. . Oxford University Press.
Bajpai, K., & Chong, B. (2019). India's foreign policy capacity. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 137–162.
Bakır, C., & Çoban, M. K. (2019). How can a seemingly weak state in the financial services industry act strong? The role of organizational policy capacity in monetary and macroprudential policy. New Perspectives on Turkey, 61, 71–96.
Bakvis, H. (2002). Rebuilding policy capacity in the era of the fiscal divident: A report from Canada. Governance, 13(1), 71–103.
Bali, A. S., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Anticipating and designing for policy effectiveness. Policy and Society, 38(1), 1–13.
Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2017). Designing effective healthcare: Matching policy tools to problems in China. Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 40–508.
Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Policy capacity: A design perspective. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge handbook of policy design. (pp. 331–344). Routledge.
Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Assessing health reform: Studying tool appropriateness and critical capacities. Policy and Society, 38(1), 148–166.
Banerjee, A. V., Bardhan, P. K., & Somanathan, R. (Eds.). (2017). Poverty and income distribution in India. Juggernaut.
Bardhan, P. (2016). State and development: The need for a reappraisal of the current literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 862–892.
Baskoy, T., Evans, B., & Shields, J. (2011). Assessing policy capacity in Canada’s public services: Perspectives of deputy and assistant deputy ministers. Canadian Public Administration, 54(2), 217–234.
Bengston, D. N., Fletcher, J. O., & Nelson, K. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 271–286.
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604.
Bobrow, D. B. (2006). Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy. (pp. 75–96). Sage.
Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. . University of Pittsburgh Press.
Borrás, S. (2011). Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 725–734.
Bovens, M., & ‘t Hart, P. (2016). Revisiting the study of policy failures. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 653–666.
Braathen, N. A. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy: How many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(2), 185–235.
Braathen, N. A., & Croci, E. (2005). Environmental agreements used in combination with other policy instruments. In E. Croci (Ed.), The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues. (pp. 335–364). Springer.
Braun, D. (2008a). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 34(4), 227–239.
Braun, D. (2008b). Lessons on the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 34(4), 289–298.
Briassoulis, H. (2005). Policy integration for complex environmental problems. . Ashgate.
Brown, M. L. (2000). Scientific uncertainty ad learning in European Union environmental policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 576–596.
Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263.
Capano, G. (2018). Policy design spaces in reforming governance in higher education: The dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 75(4), 675–694.
Capano, G., Howlett, H., Jarvis, D. S. L., Ramesh, M., & Goyal, N. (2020). Mobilizing policy (in)capacity to fight COVID-19: Understanding variations in national responses. Policy and Society, 39(3), 285–308.
Capano, G., & Pavan, E. (2019). Designing anticipatory policies through the use of ICTs. Policy and Society, 38(1), 96–117.
Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 399–426.
Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., Humphreys, D., Visseren-Hamakers, I., & Rietig, K. (2019). Designing stakeholder learning dialogues for effective global governance. Policy and Society, 38(1), 118–147.
Chindarkar, N., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Conceptualizing effective social policy design: Design spaces and capacity challenges. Public Administration and Developmentv, 37(1), 3–14.
Clarke, A., & Craft, J. (2017). The vestiges and vanguards of policy design in a digital context. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 476–497.
Coban, M. K. (2020b). Diffuse interest groups and regulatory policy change: Financial consumer protection in Turkey. Interest Groups an Advocacy, 9(2), 220–243.
Coban, M. K. (2020a). Compliance forces, domestic policy process, and international regulatory standards: Compliance with Basel III. Business and Politics, 22(1), 161–195.
Compton, M., & ‘t Hart, P. (2019). How to ‘see’ great policy successes. In M. Compton & P. ‘t Hart (Eds.), Great policy successes. (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
Considine, M. (2012). Thinking outside the box? Applying design theory to public policy. Politics and Policy, 40(4), 704–724.
Craft, J., & Daku, M. (2017). A comparative assessment of elite policy recruits in Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(3), 207–226.
Dare, L. (2018). From global forests to local politics: Unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 529–547.
Daugbjerg, C., Fraussen, B., & Halpin, D. (2018). Interest group and policy capacity: Models of engagement, policy goods and networks. In X. Wu, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. (pp. 243–261). Springer.
del Río, P. (2010). Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: The impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4978–4989.
Donahue, A. K., Selden, S. C., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Measuring government management capacity: A comparative analysis of city human resources management systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 381–412.
Doremus, H. (2003). A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environmental Science & Policy, 6(3), 217–232.
Dorsch, M. J., & Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 45–64.
Dunlop, C. A. (2015). Organizational political capacity as learning. Policy and Society, 34(4–5), 259–270.
Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367–382.
Giest, S., & Mukherjee, I. (2018). Behavioral instruments in renewable energy and the role of big data: A policy perspective. Energy Policy, 123, 360–366.
Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825.
Golan, J., Sicular, T., & Umapathi, N. (2017). Unconditional cash transfers in China: Who benefits from the rural minimum living standard guarantee (Dibao) program? World Development, 93, 316–336.
Grabosky, P. N. (1994). Green markets: Environmental regulation by the private sector. Law and Policy, 16(4), 419–448.
Grant, W. (2010). Policy instruments in the common agricultural policy. West European Politics, 33(1), 22–38.
Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. N., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. . Clarendon Press.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration, 93(1), 195–211.
Hartley, K., & Zhang, J. (2018). Measuring policy capacity through governance indices. In X. Wu, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. (pp. 67–97). Springer.
Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–144.
Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy and Politics, 39(2), 163–186.
Hoppe, R. (2018). Heuristics for practitioners of design: Rule-of-thumb for structuring unstructured problems. Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), 384–408.
Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431.
Howlett, M. (2009a). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89.
Howlett, M. (2009b). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policymaking: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–172.
Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. . Routledge.
Howlett, M. (2014a). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207.
Howlett, M. (2014b). Policy design: What, who, how and why? In C. Halpern, P. Lascoumes, & L. G. Patrick (Eds.), L’instrumentation et ses effets. (pp. 281–315). Presses de Sciences Po.
Howlett, M. (2015). Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 173–182.
Howlett, M. (2018). The criteria for effective policy design: Character and context in policy instrument choice. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(3), 245–266.
Howlett, M. (2020). Dealing with the dark side of policy-making: Managing behavioural risk and volatility in policy designs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 22(6), 612–625.
Howlett, M., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Designing for robustness: Surprise, agility and improvisation in policy design. Policy and Design, 37(4), 405–421.
Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales from the Crypt: The rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration and Society, 45(3), 357–381.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2016). An Asian perspective on policy instruments: Policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 38(1), 24–42.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2018a). The importance of policy design: Effective processes, tools and outcomes. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge handbook of policy design. (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2018b). The contribution of comparative policy analysis to policy design: Articulating principles of effectiveness and clarifying design spaces. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), 72–87.
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Rayner, J. (2017). The elements of effective program design: A two-level analysis. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation. (pp. 129–144). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2015a). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2014). The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33(4), 317–327.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2015). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation and Governance, 10(4), 301–313.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Capano, G. (2020a). Policy-makers, policy-takers and policy tools: Dealing with behavioural issues in policy design. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 22(6), 487–497.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020b). Studying public policy: Principles and processes. (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (2015b). Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 209–220.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements.’ Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182.
Howlett, M., & Tosun, J. (Eds.). (2021). Routledge handbook of policy styles. . Routledge.
Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Munaretto, S., & Hildén, M. (2018). Policy experimentation: Core concepts, political dynamics, governance and impacts. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 143–159.
Jensen, O. (2018). Designing effective water policy: Capacity and effectiveness of reforms in developing countries. Policy and Society, 38(1), 77–95.
Jordan, A., Benson, D., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2011). Policy instruments in practice. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), Oxford handbook of climate change and society. (pp. 537–549). Oxford University Press.
Jordan, A., Benson, D., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2012). Environmental policy: Governing by multiple policy instruments? In J. J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a policy state? Policy dynamics in the EU. (pp. 105–124). Oxford University Press.
Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734.
Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2018). Innovation and the state: Towards an evolutionary theory of policy capacity. In X. Wu, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. (pp. 123–150). Springer.
Kelemen, R. D. (2017). Europe’s other democratic deficit: National authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union. Government and Opposition, 52(2), 211–238.
Kimbell, L., & Vesnić-Alujević, L. (2020). After the toolkit: Anticipatory logics and the future of government. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 95–108.
Lang, A. (2014). Government capacities and stakeholders: What facilitates ehealth legislation? Globalization and Health, 10(4), 1–14.
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1984). From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 237–259.
Lindquist, E. A. (1992). Public managers and policy communities: Learning to meet new challenges. Canadian Public Administration, 35(2), 127–159.
Lodge, M. (2013). Crisis, resources and the state: Executive politics in the age of the depleted state. Political Studies Review, 11(3), 378–390.
Lodhi, I. (2018). Policy capacity: Introducing a comprehensive index. Paper prepared for the international workshop on public policy—Pittsburgh 2018, June 26–28, Pittsburgh, United States.
Luetjens, J., Mintrom, M., & ‘t Hart, P. (Eds.). (2019). Successful public policy: Lessons from Australia and New Zealand. . Australian National University Press.
Maerz, S., et al. (2020). State of the world 2019: Autocratization surges–resistance grows. Democratization, 27(6), 909–927.
Majone, G. (1975). On the notion of political feasibility. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 259–274.
Maurya, D., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Program design, implementation and performance: The case of social health insurance in India. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 14(4), 487–508.
May, P. J. (2003). Policy design and implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration. (pp. 223–233). Sage Publications.
May, P. J. (2005). Regulation and compliance motivations: Examining different approaches. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 31–44.
McConnell, A. (2018). Hidden agendas: Shining a light on the dark side of public policy. European Journal of Public Policy, 25(12), 1739–1758.
McConnell, A. (2020). The use of placebo policies to escape from policy traps. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 957–976.
Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2018). The power of process: State capacity and climate policy. Governance, 31(4), 741–757.
Menahem, G., & Stein, R. (2013). High-capacity and low-capacity governance networks in welfare services delivery: A typology and empirical examination of the case of Israeli municipalities. Public Administration, 91(1), 211–231.
Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161–165.
Montpetit, É. (2008). Policy design for legitimacy: Expert knowledge, citizens, time and inclusion in the United Kingdom’s biotechnology sector. Public Administration, 86(1), 259–277.
Mukherjee, I., & Bali, A. S. (2019). Policy effectiveness and capacity: Two sides of the design coin. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 103–114.
Mukherjee, I., & Giest, S. (2019). Designing policies in uncertain contexts: Entrepreneurial capacity and the case of the European emission trading scheme. Public Policy and Administration, 34(3), 262–286.
Mukherjee, I., & Howlett, M. (2016). An Asian perspective on policy instruments: Policy styles, governance modes and critical capacity challenges. AsiaPacific Journal of Public Administration, 38(1), 24–42.
Mukherjee, I., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). Designing for sustainable outcomes: Espousing behavioural change into co-production programmes. Policy and Society, 37(3), 326–346.
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2017). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy and Politics, 45(1), 103–118.
Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2017). Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service. Public Management Review, 19(2), 157–174.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. . Cambridge University Press.
O’Flynn, J. (2019). Rethinking relationships: Clarity, contingency, and capabilities. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 115–136.
Pal, L. A., & Clark, I. D. (2015). Making reform stick: Political acumen as an element of political capacity for policy change and innovation. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 247–257.
Pestoff, V. A., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. . Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228.
Peters, B. G., Eliadis, P., Hill, M., & Howlett, M. (2005). Conclusion: The future of instruments research. In P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance. (pp. 353–363). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Peters, B. G., et al. (2018). Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. . Cambridge University Press.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2015). Governance and policy problems: Instruments as unitary and mixed modes of policy intervention. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(4), 224–235.
Rahman, M., Wellstead, A., & Howlett, M. (2019). From adaptive capacity to policy capacity adaptation assessments: Insights from the policy sciences. In E. C. H. Keskitalo & B. L. Preston (Eds.), Research handbook on climate change adaptation policy. (pp. 291–309). Edward Elgar.
Ramesh, M., & Bali, A. S. (2019). The remarkable healthcare performance in Singapore. In M. Compton & P. ‘t Hart (Eds.), Great Policy Successes. (pp. 42–62). Oxford University Press.
Rayner, J., McNutt, K., & Wellstead, A. M. (2013). Dispersed capacity and weak coordination: The challenge of climate change adaptation in Canada’s forest policy sector. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 66–90.
Rimkuté, D. (2018). Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs. Public Administration, 96(1), 70–83.
Rotberg, R. I. (2014). Good governance means performance and results. Governance, 27(3), 511–518.
Saguin, K., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Policy work and capacities in a developing country: Evidence from the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 1–22.
Schout, A., & Andrew, J. (2008). The European Union’s governance ambitions and its administrative capacities. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 957–974.
Sewerin, S., Béland, D., & Cashore, B. (2020). Designing policy for the long term: Agency, policy feedback and policy change. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 243–252.
Sidney, M. S. (2007). Policy formulation: Design and tools. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods. (pp. 79–87). CRC Taylor & Francis.
Siwale, J., & Okoye, O. (2017). Microfinance regulation and social sustainability of microfinance institutions: The case of Nigeria and Zambia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(4), 611–632.
Skeete, J. (2017). Examining the role of policy design and policy interaction in EU automotive emissions performance gaps. Energy Policy, 104, 373–381.
Skodvin, T., Gullberg, A. T., & Aakre, S. (2010). Target-group influence and political feasibility: The case of climate policy design in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 854–873.
Spendzharova, A. B. (2016). Regulatory cascading: Limitations of policy design in European banking structural reforms. Policy and Society, 35(3), 227–237.
Stazyk, E. C., & Goerdel, H. T. (2011). The benefits of bureaucracy: Public managers’ perceptions of political support, goal ambiguity, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 645–672.
Stirling, A. (2010). Keep it complex. Nature, 468(7327), 1029–1031.
Stone, D. (2003). The “knowledge bank” and the global development network. Global Governance, 9(1), 43–61.
Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.
The Economist. (2020). Countries are using apps and data networks to keep tabs on the pandemic. March 26.
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. . Cambridge University Press.
Tiernan, A., & Wanna, J. (2006). Competence, capacity, capability: Towards conceptual clarity in the discourse of declining policy skills. Paper presented at the govnet international conference. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570.
Van Der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J., & Van Twist, M. (2018). Anticipating surprise: The case of the early warning system of Rijkswaterstaat in the Netherlands. Policy and Society, 37(4), 473–490.
Vince, J., & Nursey-Bray, M. (2016). Policy capacity in oceans governance: Rio+20 and Australia’s outcomes. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 8(3), 165–179.
Virani, A. (2019). Notions of policy effectiveness and implications for policy design: Insights from public–private partnerships in India. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 198–214.
von Tunzelmann, N. (2010). Technology and technology policy in the postwar UK: Market failure or“network failure?” Revue D’économie Industrielle, 129–130, 237–258.
Walter, J., et al. (2020). Policy capacity in disruptive times. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 72–85.
Weaver, K. (2009a). If you build it, will they come? Overcoming unforeseen obstacles to program effectiveness. The Tansley Lecture, University of Saskatchewan.
Weaver, K. (2009b). Target compliance: The final frontier of policy implementation. . Brookings Institution Press.
Weber, E. P., Lovrich, N. P., & Gaffney, M. J. (2007). Assessing collaborative capacity in a multidimensional world. Administration and Society, 39(2), 194–220.
Weible, C. M., et al. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: Initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 225–241.
Wellstead, A. M., Stedman, R. C., & Howlett, M. (2011). Policy analytical capacity in changing governance contexts: A structural equation model (SEM) study of contemporary Canadian policy work. Public Policy and Administration, 26(3), 353–373.
Wen, Z. (2017). Government purchase of services in China: Similar intentions, different policy designs. Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 65–78.
Williams, R. A., & McNutt, K. (2013). Climate change adaptation and policy capacity in the Canadian finance sector: A meso analysis. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 91–113.
Woo, J. J. (2020). Policy capacity and Singapore’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy and Society, 39(3), 345–362.
Woo, J. J., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Legitimation capacity: System-level resources and political skills in public. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 271–283.
Woo, J. J., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Coban, M. K. (2016). Dynamics of global financial governance: Constraints, opportunities, and capacities in Asia. Policy and Society, 35(3), 269–282.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Policy capacity: Conceptual framework and essential components. In X. Wu, M. Howlett, & M. Ramesh (Eds.), Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. (pp. 1–25). Springer.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. (2010). The public policy primer: Managing public policy. . Routledge.
Xiarchogiannopoulou, E. (2015). Reform technology and consensus in building in discursive institutionalism: The integration of knowledge in policy formulation in Greek pension reform, 1990–2002. Critical Policy Studies, 9(4), 416–433.
Yi, H., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), 193–206.
Metadaten
Titel
Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review
verfasst von
Ishani Mukherjee
M. Kerem Coban
Azad Singh Bali
Publikationsdatum
08.04.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Policy Sciences / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09420-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Policy Sciences 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Research Article

Privatization of Canadian housing assistance: how bureaucrats on a budget added market-based progams to the toolbox

Research Article

Uncertainty, risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions: a case study on criminal justice in the USA

Research Article

Chameleonic knowledge: a study of ex ante analysis in large infrastructure policy processes

Research Article

A friction perspective for negotiating renewable energy targets: the Israeli case

Research Article

Why does the combination of policy entrepreneur and institutional entrepreneur roles matter for the institutionalization of policy ideas?

Discussion and Commentary

Autonomy of policy instrument attitudes: concept, theory and evidence

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise