Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Public Organization Review 1/2009

01.03.2009

Thinking About Stakeholders of Public Agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation Stakeholder Audit

verfasst von: John Clayton Thomas, Theodore H. Poister

Erschienen in: Public Organization Review | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Practitioners and scholars have grown increasingly interested in recent decades in how public administrators should and can work with the constituencies they serve. To date, most of this conversation has focused on citizens and broader communities rather than on stakeholders more generally, but these other stakeholders, ranging from oversight policy-making bodies to private sector and nonprofit contractors to governmental partners, are no less important than the general public. The purpose of this paper is to propose a first step that many agencies might take in thinking about their range of stakeholders, a step that we term a “stakeholder audit.” A stakeholder audit entails (1) mapping the universe of an agency’s stakeholders, (2) assessing the agency’s perceived needs for additional information relative to various stakeholder groups, and (3) developing suggestions on how to obtain that information. After first discussing the more general idea of stakeholder analyses, we describe the stakeholder audit technique, and illustrate how it has been applied to a particular agency, the State of Georgia’s Department of Transportation. We conclude by considering how a stakeholder audit could represent a first step for an agency in improving relationships with its stakeholders.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. 2001. Big questions in public network research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11: 295–326. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. 2001. Big questions in public network research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11: 295–326.
Zurück zum Zitat Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. 2005. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65: 547–558. (September/October). doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x.CrossRef Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. 2005. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65: 547–558. (September/October). doi:10.​1111/​j.​1540-6210.​2005.​00482.​x.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. J. 2002. What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62: 568–584. (September/October). doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00238.CrossRef Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. J. 2002. What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62: 568–584. (September/October). doi:10.​1111/​1540-6210.​00238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. 2003. Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing the models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2): 131–140. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00274.CrossRef Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. 2003. Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing the models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2): 131–140. doi:10.​1111/​1540-6210.​00274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. 2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16: 417–446. (July).CrossRef Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. 2006. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16: 417–446. (July).CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Kettl, D. F. 2002. Managing indirect government. In Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance: 490–510. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kettl, D. F. 2002. Managing indirect government. In Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance: 490–510. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. W. 2002. Why decisions fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. W. 2002. Why decisions fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, T. J., & Modoveanu, M. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28: 204–219.CrossRef Rowley, T. J., & Modoveanu, M. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28: 204–219.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salamon, L. M. (Ed.) 2002. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.) 2002. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas, J. C. 1995. Public involvement in public decisions: New guidelines and strategies for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Thomas, J. C. 1995. Public involvement in public decisions: New guidelines and strategies for public managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandekerckhove, W., & Dentchev, N. A. 2005. A network perspective on stakeholder management: facilitating entrepreneurs in the discovery of opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 60: 221–232. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0130-7.CrossRef Vandekerckhove, W., & Dentchev, N. A. 2005. A network perspective on stakeholder management: facilitating entrepreneurs in the discovery of opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 60: 221–232. doi:10.​1007/​s10551-005-0130-7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Thinking About Stakeholders of Public Agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation Stakeholder Audit
verfasst von
John Clayton Thomas
Theodore H. Poister
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Public Organization Review / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0070-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Public Organization Review 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner