nach oben

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

Erschienen in:

12.01.2019

On the Determinants of REIT Capital Structure: Evidence from around the World

verfasst von: Yunus Yasin Dogan, Chinmoy Ghosh, Milena Petrova

Erschienen in: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Using a sample of REITs from twelve countries around the world, we examine the determinants of REIT capital structure. We investigate firm-specific and country-specific factors, and account for the unique legal requirements that REITs face in each country. Our results suggest that legal requirements are significant determinants of the capital structure of REITs. Specifically, we find that REITs have the highest book debt ratio in countries where they must pay out most of their operating income. This result implies that REITs prefer debt financing to equity financing. Additionally, we find that in countries with no payout requirement, but leverage restrictions, REITs have lower book leverage, which suggests that internal financing is preferred to external financing. Our findings also indicate that country-specific factors do not have significant impact on REIT leverage.

Vorheriger Artikel Herding Behavior among Residential Developers

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Several other studies explore the capital structure of REITs. Recent studies include Brown and Riddiough (2003), Giambona et al. (2008), Boudry et al. (2010), and Hardin III and Wu (2010). These studies report similar leverage ratios for REITs.

Other notable studies that analyze REIT corporate policies in an international context include Giacomini et al. (2015), Pavlov et al. (2015), Brounen et al. (2012), Erol and Tirtiroglu (2011), and Brounen and Eichholtz (2001). Most of these studies focus on the impact of differential regulation on REITs’ risk and return. Interestingly, Giacomini et al. (2015) contend that although rules regarding REITs’ dividend distribution and leverage ratios vary across countries, there is significant commonality in these rules which has contributed to the growing cross-border investment in real estate assets.

Though there are leverage restriction in the UK and Turkey, they are not as strict (limiting) as in the other countries. Thus, we put the UK and Turkey in the group of countries with no restrictions on leverage.

Brown and Riddiough (2003) argue that as more stable cash flows support higher debt levels, debt capacity may vary across property types. Although, we control for property type in all models, we suppress their coefficients in the tables for brevity.

The excluded countries with established REIT regimes are Germany and New Zealand due to lack of sufficient data for analysis. We further include three countries (Belgium, South Africa and Turkey) who have an existing REIT structure, but in an emerging state.

See https://www.reit.com/advocacy/policy/cross-border-issues. An example of this position can be seen in NAREIT Discussion Paper South Africa, 2012 available online at

: https://www.reit.com/sites/default/files/media/Files/Policy/NAREIT-Discussion-Paper-South-Africa-7-31-12.pdf

This feature makes REITs an attractive investment, by providing REIT investors not only with a liquid vehicle to invest in real estate, but also with high income return through dividends.

Before the 2000s only few governments legislated the REIT system in their countries. REITs still do not exist in many countries, but their popularity continues to grow.

EY’s 2016 REIT report lists in addition to the eleven countries with established REITs, ten countries where the REIT structure has been adopted recently and the REIT regime is in an emerging stage (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Spain and Turkey). Finally, the REIT structure is in planning stage in fifteen countries (Bahrain, Brazil, Bulgaria, Costa Rica, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Kenya, Pakistan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, UAE, and Vietnam).

There are three companies covered by SNL in each, Germany and New Zealand, with a total of 14 and 22 usable observations, respectively. Further details on our sample selection are provided in the data section.

In South Africa, prior to the introduction of the REITs in 2013, two broad types of property companies existed - Property Unit Trust (PUT) and Property Loan Stock (PLS). Both PUTs and PLSs were exempt from income taxation and were required to distribute 100% of their taxable earnings. However, due to important differences in legal requirements and inconsistencies between the two property companies, foreign investors were hesitant to invest in these property vehicles. Consequently, PUTs and PLSs were replaced in 2013 by the widely-accepted REIT structure.

Due to the favorable tax treatment, REITs are required to distribute large amounts of taxable income as dividends. In most the countries where the REIT system is established the dividend payout requirement is at least 90% or more (e.g. for Singapore-, US-, UK-based REITs 90%, for Dutch REITs 100%). However, in practice REITs pay-out at least 100% of their taxable earnings to avoid paying taxes completely.

Consistent with the tradeoff theory, several studies report that growth opportunities – proxied by market to book ratio – are associated with lower leverage ratio (Myers 1977; Baker and Wurgler 2002; De Jong et al. 2008). Harrison et al. (2011) find similar results for U.S. REITs.

However, Fan et al. (2012) report that firms in countries with large government bond markets have lower debt ratios and shorter maturity debt. They assert that government bonds crowd out long-term corporate debt.

Considering Turkey and South Africa as emerging markets, it would appear that REITs in emerging markets have lower leverage ratios. Lower leverage ratio is consistent also with the fact that the securities markets in these countries are still developing. In addition, cultural and other differences in REIT regimes also affect firms’ leverage decisions, and definitive conclusions must await further analysis.

Note that currently there are no REITs with payout requirement, but no tax exemption. However, the base of the tax exemption varies. There are two broad considerations – qualified income (e.g. qualified real property income in Belgium, profit from tax-exempt property business in the UK, or income derived from RE outside of HK for Hong Kong REITs) and distributed income (e.g. taxable income from properties located in Singapore distributed within the year, taxable income distributed in the US). REITs would be tax exempt to the extent that their income is qualified or distributed, depending on their home country legislation.

Using this approach, we can easily capture the effect of the two possible regulations when leverage restriction is ignored – no payout requirement and corporate tax exempt or no payout requirement and non-exempt status. An alternative approach would be to include a dummy variable indicating no payout requirement and an interaction variable between no payout and non-exempt status. Our approach is favored when the expectation is that the effect between the two regimes may be different and we want to isolate each one, as opposed to looking at the effect of no payout restriction in general.

Note that by including these interaction variables it is easier to identify the effect of lack of leverage restriction in regimes with vs. without payout requirements. The comparison group is REITs with leverage restrictions. The alternative approach is to include a dummy variable for no leverage restriction and an interactive variable NOPAYOUT_NOLEVRESTRICT. Our approach, provides direct estimates of the effects without having to add coefficients in the case of no payout restrictions.

Business risk is usually defined as (levered beta)/(1 + (1-T)*(D/E)), where T is the corporate income tax rate, and D/E is the debt-to-equity ratio.

De Jong et al. (2008) use standard deviation of operating income over the book value of total assets as a proxy for risk for non-REITs. We do not include this variable because for majority of the countries in their sample, this variable is not significant. The literature discusses several other variables as potential determinants of capital structure. Our choice of variables is dictated by the availability of data and their relevance and significance.

Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1–32.CrossRef

Barclay, M. J., Heitzman, S. M., & Smith, C. W. (2013). Debt and taxes: evidence from the real estate industry. Journal of Corporate Finance, 20, 74–93.CrossRef

Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1994). Did risk-based capital allocate bank credit and cause a credit crunch in the United States? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 26(August), 585–628.CrossRef

Boudry, W. I., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2010). An analysis of REIT security issuance decisions. Real Estate Economics, 38(1), 91–120.CrossRef

Brounen, D., & Eichholtz, P. M. A. (2001). Capital structure theory: evidence from European property companies’ capital offerings. Real Estate Economics, 29(4), 615–632.CrossRef

Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Ling, D. C. (2012). Shareholder composition, share turnover, and returns in volatile markets: the case of international REITs. Journal of International Money and Finance., 31, 1867–1889.CrossRef

Brown, D. T., & Riddiough, T. J. (2003). Financing choice and liability structure of real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Economics, 31(3), 313–346.CrossRef

Cashman, G. D., Harrison, D. M., & Sheng. (2015). Political risk and the cost of capital in Asia-Pacific property markets. International Real Estate Review, 18(3), 331–364.

Cashman, G. D., Harrison, D. M., & Seiler, M. J. (2016). Capital structure and political risk in Asia-Pacific real estate markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 53(2), 115–140.CrossRef

Chikolwa, B. (2011). Investigating the capital structure of A-REITs. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 19(2), 391–411.

De Jong, A., Kabir, R., & Nguyen, T. T. (2008). Capital structure around the world: the roles of firm- and country specific determinants. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1954–1969.CrossRef

Delcoure, N., & Dickens, R. N. (2004). REIT and REOC systematic risk sensitivity. Journal of Real Estate Research, 26(3), 237–254.

Demirgüc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1996). Stock market development and firm financing choices. World Bank Economic Review, 10(2), 341–369.CrossRef

Demirgüc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1999). Institutions, financial markets and firm debt maturity. Journal of Financial Economics, 54(3), 295–336.CrossRef

Deng, K.K., Wong, S.K., & Chau, K.W. (2018). Institutions and capital structure: the case of chinese property firms. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 56(3), 352–385.

Dolde, W., & Knopf, J. D. (2009). Insider ownership, risk, and leverage in REITs. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 41(4), 412–432.CrossRef

Erol, I., & Tirtiroglu, D. (2011). Concentrated ownership, no dividend payout requirement and capital structure of REITs: Evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(1), 174–204.CrossRef

Ertugrul, M., & Giambona, E. (2011). Property segment and REIT capital structure. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43, 505–526.CrossRef

EY. (2016). Global perspectives: 2016 REIT report. 2016 EYGM Limited.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predication about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1–33.CrossRef

Fan, J., Titman, S., & Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(1), 23–56.CrossRef

Feng, Z., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2007). On the capital structure of real estate investment trusts (REITs). Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 34(1), 81–105.CrossRef

Giacomini, E., Ling, D. C., & Naranjo, A. (2015). Leverage and returns: a cross-country analysis of public real estate markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 51(2), 125–159.CrossRef

Giambona, E., Harding, J. P., & Sirmans, C. F. (2008). Explaining the variation in REIT capital structure: the role of asset liquidation value. Real Estate Economics, 36(1), 111–137.CrossRef

Han, B. (2006). Insider ownership and firm value: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32(4), 471–493.CrossRef

Hardin III, W. G., & Wu, Z. (2010). Banking relationships and REIT capital structure. Real Estate Economics, 38, 257–284.CrossRef

Harrison, D. M., Panasian, A. C., & Seiler, M. J. (2011). Further evidence on the capital structure of REITs. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 133–166.CrossRef

Maris, B. A., & Elayan, A. F. (1990). Capital structure and the cost of capital for untaxed firms: the case of REITs. Real Estate Economics, 18(1), 22–39.CrossRef

Morri, G., & Beretta, C. (2008). The capital structure determinants of REITs. Is it a peculiar industry? Journal of European Real Estate Research, 1(1), 6–57.CrossRef

Morri, G., & Cristanziani, F. (2009). What determines the capital structure of real estate companies? An analysis of the EPRA/NAREIT Europe index. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 27(4), 318–372.CrossRef

Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.CrossRef

Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592.CrossRef

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRef

Niskanen, J., & Falkenback, H. (2012). European listed real estate: the capital structure perspective. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 9(1), 76–97.

Ooi, J. T. L., Ong, S.-E., & Li, L. (2008). An analysis of the financing decision of REITs: the role of market timing and target leverage. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40(2), 130–160.CrossRef

Ott, S. H., Riddiough, T. J., & Yi, H. C. (2005). Finance, investment and investment performance: Evidence from the REIT sector. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 203–235.CrossRef

Pavlov, S., Steiner, A. E., & Wachter, S. (2015). Macroeconomic risk factors and the role of mispriced credit in the returns from international real estate securities. Real Estate Economics, 43(1), 241–270.CrossRef

Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460.CrossRef

Rovolis, A., & Feidakis, A. (2013). Evaluating the impact of economic factors on REITs’ capital structure around the world. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 32(1), 5–20.CrossRef

Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), 219–244.CrossRef

Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.CrossRef

Welch, I. (2011). Two common problems in capital structure research: the financial debt-to-asset ratio and issuing activity versus leverage changes. International Review of Finance, 11(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Titel: On the Determinants of REIT Capital Structure: Evidence from around the World
verfasst von: Yunus Yasin Dogan
Chinmoy Ghosh
Milena Petrova
Publikationsdatum: 12.01.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0895-5638
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-045X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-018-9687-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

The Impact of Geographic and Cultural Dispersion on Information Opacity

What Motivates a Developer to Sell before Completion?

Are REIT Investors Overly Optimistic after Equity Offerings?: Evidence from Analyst Forecast Errors

2016 Asia Pacific Real Estate Research Symposium Special Issue

Land acquisition outcome, developer risk attitude and land development timing

Herding Behavior among Residential Developers