Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 1/2018

12.12.2016

Is Inequality a Latent Construct? An Assessment of Economic Inequality Indicators and Their Relation with Social Cohesion in Europe

verfasst von: Silke Goubin

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the relation between different economic inequality indicators and social cohesion. Previous research usually narrows down economic inequality to income inequality, or distinguishes several types of economic inequality. Little attention has until now been given to how different aspects of economic inequality might be related to each other and can have an effect on social cohesion. This article analyses several indicators of economic inequality and makes a distinction between indicators measuring income inequality, poverty, economic strain and unequal distributions of wealth. Arguing that these indicators represent different aspects of inequality, we hypothesise that they cannot be reduced to one latent concept of inequality and have specific relations with social cohesion. In order to test this hypothesis, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. This resulted in two different factors: one associated with economic hardship, and one associated with imbalances in market outcomes. This would imply that inequality indicators can be classified into two underlying concepts. Secondly, we related the factor scores of the two latent concepts to the social cohesion indicators via regression analyses. This paper focuses on European countries and uses pooled data from the European Social Survey (period 2006–2012), in combination with macro-level data drawn from the OECD, Eurostat and the World Bank. The results demonstrate that the strength of the link between inequality and citizens’ attitudes depends on the type of inequality indicator we analyse: only the factor economic deprivation can be significantly linked to social cohesion.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In this period, four ESS rounds were organised: in 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012.
 
2
Most of the studies discussed in this section use the Gini coefficient of disposable income to measure income inequality.
 
3
In contrast to the Gini of disposable income (which is the spread of income after taxes and transfers).
 
4
Via the Gini coefficient.
 
5
Next to the S80/S20 ration, the S90/S10 ratio is also prevalent in income inequality research (the S90/S10 calculates the ratio of income held by the richest 10% to the income held by the poorest 10%). The S90/S10 focuses more on the extremes of the income distribution, the S80/S20 ratio compromises a broader view of income imbalances and was therefore preferred by the authors. Other ways of measuring within-country income inequality are, amongst others, measuring the absolute range of income, assessing the relative mean deviation, the variance of income etc. (Cowell 2011).
 
6
These indicators indeed correlate with each other and their composite ratio (Pearson’s correlation coefficients range from 0.143 to 0.728), but the correlation only becomes problematic in the case of the correlation between material deprivation and the at-risk-of-poverty and social exclusion ratio (ρ 0.951).
 
7
There is a debate on whether unemployment rates are a causal factor of economic inequality or an inherent part of it (Atkinson 2015; Stiglitz 2012). Conceptualising it as a measurement of economic strain and an unequal distribution of employment opportunities (and hence, the economic resources that emanate from it), we would like to test whether it is indeed part of (one of the) dimensions of economic inequality.
 
8
Currently several scientific initiatives are working on providing more specific information on the concentration of wealth, such as the World Wealth and Income Database (Alvaredo et al. 2016). Piketty (2015) does provide information on some European countries (such as France, Sweden and the United Kingdom), yet this dataset provides too limited information on the different European Social Survey Participants to add this as a variable in the subsequent analyses.
 
9
The KMO test value was 0.722.
 
10
A similar approach was taken with regards to the Gini coefficient of market income. Replacing the Gini index of Eurostat with the coefficient of the Standardized World Income Inequality Database did not change the factor structure.
 
11
We excluded the indicator of unemployment in the calculation of countrywide factor scores of economic inequality. We speculate that the low factor loading points at the fact that unemployment cannot be seen as a measurement of economic inequality an sich, but rather as a cause or consequence of economic inequality, which is in line with previous research.
 
12
Age of Democracy is measured via dummy coding. The reference category (0) implies that the country did not have a communist regime in its past.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.CrossRef Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality. What can be done?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality. What can be done?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barnes, M., Heady, C., Middleton, S., Millar, J., Papadopoulos, F., Room, G., et al. (2002). Poverty and social exclusion in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRef Barnes, M., Heady, C., Middleton, S., Millar, J., Papadopoulos, F., Room, G., et al. (2002). Poverty and social exclusion in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58, 403–428.CrossRef Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58, 403–428.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2014). Trust, welfare states and income inequality: Sorting out the causality. European Journal of Political Economy, 35, 183–199.CrossRef Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2014). Trust, welfare states and income inequality: Sorting out the causality. European Journal of Political Economy, 35, 183–199.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boda, Z., & Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 419–453.CrossRef Boda, Z., & Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 419–453.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Botterman, S., Hooghe, M., & Reeskens, T. (2011). ‘One size fits all’? an empirical study into the multidimensionality of social cohesion indicators in Belgian Local Communities. Urban Studies, 49(1), 185–202.CrossRef Botterman, S., Hooghe, M., & Reeskens, T. (2011). ‘One size fits all’? an empirical study into the multidimensionality of social cohesion indicators in Belgian Local Communities. Urban Studies, 49(1), 185–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cammett, M., Lynch, J., & Bilev, G. (2015). The influence of private health care financing on citizen trust in government. Perspectives on Politics, 13(4), 938–957.CrossRef Cammett, M., Lynch, J., & Bilev, G. (2015). The influence of private health care financing on citizen trust in government. Perspectives on Politics, 13(4), 938–957.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, J., To, H., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302.CrossRef Chan, J., To, H., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowell, F. (2011). Measuring inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Cowell, F. (2011). Measuring inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dickes, P., Valentova, M., & Borsenberger, M. (2010). Construct validation and application of a common measure of social cohesion in 33 European countries. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 451–473.CrossRef Dickes, P., Valentova, M., & Borsenberger, M. (2010). Construct validation and application of a common measure of social cohesion in 33 European countries. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 451–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durkheim, E. (1973 [1893]). De la Division du Travail Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Durkheim, E. (1973 [1893]). De la Division du Travail Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42(2), 347–360.CrossRef Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42(2), 347–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gustavsson, M., & Jordahl, H. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348–365.CrossRef Gustavsson, M., & Jordahl, H. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Inglehart, R. (2016). Inequality and modernisation. Foreign Affairs, 95(1), 2–10. Inglehart, R. (2016). Inequality and modernisation. Foreign Affairs, 95(1), 2–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion. London: The Commonwealth Secretariat.CrossRef Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion. London: The Commonwealth Secretariat.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1166–1178.CrossRef Lancee, B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1166–1178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loveless, M. (2013). The deterioration of democratic political culture: Consequences of the perception of inequality. Social Justice Research, 26, 471–491.CrossRef Loveless, M. (2013). The deterioration of democratic political culture: Consequences of the perception of inequality. Social Justice Research, 26, 471–491.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality. A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality. A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivera, J. (2015). Changes in inequality and generalised trust in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 124, 21–41.CrossRef Olivera, J. (2015). Changes in inequality and generalised trust in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 124, 21–41.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paskov, M., & Dewilde, C. (2012). Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 415–432.CrossRef Paskov, M., & Dewilde, C. (2012). Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 415–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Piketty, T. (2015). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Piketty, T. (2015). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.CrossRef Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016). Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: Combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 119–140.CrossRef Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016). Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: Combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 119–140.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schoon, I., & Cheng, H. (2011). Determinants of political trust: A lifetime learning model. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 619–631.CrossRef Schoon, I., & Cheng, H. (2011). Determinants of political trust: A lifetime learning model. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 619–631.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solt, F. (2015). Economic inequality and nonviolent protest. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1314–1327.CrossRef Solt, F. (2015). Economic inequality and nonviolent protest. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1314–1327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97, 1267–1281. Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 97, 1267–1281.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Uslaner, E. M. (2011). Corruption, the inequality trap and trust in government. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust. Why context matters (pp. 141–162). Colchester: ECPR Press. Uslaner, E. M. (2011). Corruption, the inequality trap and trust in government. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust. Why context matters (pp. 141–162). Colchester: ECPR Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergolini, L. (2011a). Social cohesion in Europe: How do the different dimensions of inequality affect social cohesion? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(3), 197–241.CrossRef Vergolini, L. (2011a). Social cohesion in Europe: How do the different dimensions of inequality affect social cohesion? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(3), 197–241.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vergolini, L. (2011b). Does economic vulnerability affect social cohesion? Evidence from comparative analysis. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 1–23. Vergolini, L. (2011b). Does economic vulnerability affect social cohesion? Evidence from comparative analysis. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 36(1), 1–23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wroe, A. (2016). Economic insecurity and political trust in the united states. American Politics Research, 44(1), 131–163.CrossRef Wroe, A. (2016). Economic insecurity and political trust in the united states. American Politics Research, 44(1), 131–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zmerli, S., & Castillo, J. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179–192.CrossRef Zmerli, S., & Castillo, J. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179–192.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is Inequality a Latent Construct? An Assessment of Economic Inequality Indicators and Their Relation with Social Cohesion in Europe
verfasst von
Silke Goubin
Publikationsdatum
12.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1522-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Social Indicators Research 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe