Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Telecommunication Systems
Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems 2/2018

27.09.2017

A genetic algorithm approach for multi-attribute vertical handover decision making in wireless networks

verfasst von: Ali F. Almutairi, Mohannad Hamed, Mohamed Adnan Landolsi, Mishal Algharabally

Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Mobile terminals can typically connect to multiple wireless networks which offer varying levels of suitability for different classes of service. Due to the changing dynamics of network attributes and mobile users’ traffic needs, vertical handovers across heterogeneous networks become highly desirable. Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) techniques offer an efficient approach for ranking competing networks and selecting the best one according to specific quality of service parameters. In this paper, a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to optimize network attributes’ weighting by emphasizing ranking differences among candidate networks, thereby aiding correct decision making by reducing unnecessary handovers and ranking abnormalities. The performance of the proposed GA-based vertical handover is investigated with typical MADM techniques including Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The results show that the proposed GA-based weight determination approach reduces the abnormality observed in the conventional SAW and TOPSIS techniques substantially. The results of this paper will help ensuring the application of MADM methods to more dynamic and challenging decision making problems encountered in wireless network.
Vorheriger Artikel MIMO blind equalization algorithm based on successive interference cancellation
Nächster Artikel A fast handover protocol for 6LoWPAN wireless mobile sensor networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Bhuvaneswari, A. (2012). An overview of vertical handoff decision making algorithms. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 4(9), 55–62.CrossRef
2.
Wang, H., Katz, R., & Giese, J. (1999). Policy-enabled handoffs across heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proceedings of the second IEEE workshop on mobile computer systems and applications (pp. 51–60).
3.
Akhila, S., Murthy, J., Shankar, A., & Kumar, S. (2012). An overview on decision techniques for vertical handovers across wireless heterogeneous networks. International Journal of Science and Engineering Research, 3(1), 1–6.
4.
Arshad, R., Elsawy, H., Sorour, S., Al-Naffouri, T. Y., & Alouini, M.-S. (2017). Velocity-aware handover management in two-tier cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(3), 1851–1867.CrossRef
5.
Zhang, H., Ma, W., Li, W., Zheng, W., Wen, X., & Jiang, C. (2011). Signalling cost evaluation of handover management schemes in LTE-advanced femtocell. 2011 IEEE 73rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–5).
6.
Zhang, H., Jiang, C., Cheng, J., & Leung, V. C. M. (2015). Cooperative interference mitigation and handover management for heterogeneous cloud small cell networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(3), 92–99.CrossRef
7.
Zhang, H., Zheng, W., Wen, X., & Jiang, C. (2011). Signalling overhead evaluation of HeNB mobility enhanced schemes in 3GPP LTE-advanced. IEEE vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5). Budapest.
8.
Su, D., Wen, X., Zhang, H., & Zheng, W. (2010). A self-optimizing mobility management scheme based on cell ID information in high velocity environment. In 2010 2nd International conference on computer science and network technology (pp. 285–288).
9.
Zhang, H., Wen, X., Wang, B., Zheng, W., & Sun, Y. A novel handover mechanism between femtocell and macrocell for LTE based networks. In 2010 2nd International conference on communication software and networks (pp. 228–231).
10.
Stevens-Navarro, E., & Wong, V. (2006). Comparison between vertical handoff decision algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 63rd vehicular technology conference (Vol. 2, pp. 947–951).
11.
Gondara, M. K., & Kadam, S. (2011). Requirements of vertical handover mechanism in 4G wireless networks. The International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 3(2), 18–27.CrossRef
12.
Tran, P. N., & Boukhatem, N. (2008). Comparison of MADM decision algorithms for interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In 16th International conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (pp. 119–124).
13.
Alyousfi, E. A., & Alkhawlani, M. M. (2016). Optimization of vertical handover performance using elimination based MCDM algorithm. Journal of Science and Technology, 21(1), 47–61.CrossRef
14.
Mohamed, L., Leghris, C., & Abdellah, A. (2012). A survey and comparison study on weighting algorithms for access network selection. In 9th Annual conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services (WONS) (pp. 35–38).
15.
Almutairi, A. F., Landolsi, M. A., & Al-Hawaj, A. O. (2016). Weighting selection in GRA-based MADM for vertical handover in wireless networks. In 2016 UKSim-AMSS 18th International conference on computer modeling and simulation (UKSim) (pp. 331–336).
16.
Almutairi, A. F., Landolsi, M. A., & Al-Mashmoum, H. Q. (2016). Performance of different weighting techniques with DIA MADM method in heterogeneous wireless networks. In International wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 921–925).
17.
Bari, F., & Leung, V. (2007). Multi-attribute network selection by iterative TOPSIS for heterogeneous wireless access. In Proceedings of 4th IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (pp. 808–812).
18.
Senouci, M. A., Hoceini, S., & Mellouk, A. (2016). Utility function-based TOPSIS for network interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).
19.
Wang, Y., & Elhag, T. M. (2006). An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1474–1480.CrossRef
20.
Radhika, K., & Reddy, A. V. (2011). AHP and group decision making for access network selection in multi-homed mobile terminals. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 3(10), 3412–3421.
21.
Ren, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2007). Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS. Applied Mathematics Research eXpress, 2007, abm005. doi:10.​1093/​amrx/​abm005.
22.
Mohamed, L., Leghris, C., & Abdellah, A. (2012). An intelligent network selection strategy based on MADM methods in heterogeneous networks. The International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 4(1), 83–96.CrossRef
23.
Huszak, A., & Imre, S. (2010). Eliminating rank reversal phenomenon in GRA-based network selection method. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 1–6).
24.
Jahan, A., & Edwards, K. L. (2015). A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design. Materials & Design, 1980–2015(65), 335–342.CrossRef
25.
Liu, C., Sun, Y., Yang, P., Liu, Z., Zhang, H., & Wen, Z. A two-step vertical handoff decision algorithm based on dynamic weight compensation. In Communications workshops (ICC), 2013 IEEE international conference, pp. 1031–1035.
26.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.CrossRef
27.
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., & Adib, A. (2014). Performance analysis of normalization techniques for network selection access in heterogeneous wireless networks. In 9th International conference on intelligent systems pp. (1–5).
28.
Chakraborty, S., & Yeh, C.-H. (2009). A simulation comparison of normalization procedures for TOPSIS. In International conference on computers and industrial engineering (pp. 1815–1820).
29.
Escobar, L., Navarro, A., Arteaga, A., Guerrero, F., & Salazar, C. (2010). Vertical handoff algorithms—A new approach for performance evaluation. In IEEE Globecom workshops (pp. 1724–1728).
30.
Suhaimi, N. S., Kamarudin, S. N. K., Othman, Z., & Arbin, N. (2014). Multi-objective genetic algorithm in solving conflicted goals for questions generating problem. In 2014 5th International conference intelligent systems, modelling and simulation (pp. 60–63).
31.
Nag, K., & Pal, N. R. (2016). A multiobjective genetic programming-based ensemble for simultaneous feature selection and classification. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 46(2), 499–510.CrossRef
32.
Chandralekha, & Behera, P. K. (2010). Minimization of number of handover using genetic algorithm in heterogeneous wireless network. The International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, 1(2), 24–28.
33.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34.
Nkansah-Gyekye, Y., & Agbinya, J. I. (2008). A vertical handoff decision algorithm for next generation wireless networks. In 3rd International conference of broadband communication, information technology and biomedical applications (pp. 358–364).
35.
Haoliang, P., Wenxiao, S., Shuxiang, L., & Chuanjun, X. (2012). A GA-FNN based vertical handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer science and automation engineering (CSAE) (Vol. 2, pp. 37–40).
36.
Elahi, A., Qureshi, I. M., Atif, M., & Gul, N. Interference reduction in cognitive radio networks using genetic and firefly algorithms. In 2017 International conference on communication, computing, and digital systems (C-CODE) (pp. 96–100).
Metadaten
Titel
A genetic algorithm approach for multi-attribute vertical handover decision making in wireless networks
verfasst von
Ali F. Almutairi
Mohannad Hamed
Mohamed Adnan Landolsi
Mishal Algharabally
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Telecommunication Systems / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1018-4864
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0364-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Telecommunication Systems 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

MIMO blind equalization algorithm based on successive interference cancellation

OriginalPaper

Pricing strategies and categories for LTE networks

OriginalPaper

Joint power allocation and relay selection strategy for 5G network: a step towards green communication

OriginalPaper

Fairness constrained diffusion adaptive power control for dense small cell network

OriginalPaper

A fast handover protocol for 6LoWPAN wireless mobile sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Optimized design and availability analysis of large-scale shared backup path protected networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise