Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 3/2012

01.02.2012

Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling for a Treated Hilly Watershed in Eastern Himalaya Using the Water Erosion Prediction Project Model

verfasst von: R. K. Singh, R. K. Panda, K. K. Satapathy, S. V. Ngachan

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) watershed model was calibrated and validated for a hilly watershed treated with graded bunding and water-harvesting tank in high rainfall condition of eastern Himalayan range in India. The performance of the model for the treated watershed was unacceptable with percent deviation of −45.81 and −38.35 respectively for runoff and sediment yield simulations when calibrated parameter values for the nearby untreated watershed were used. This was possibly due to differences in soil properties and average land slope. When soil parameters were calibrated for the treated watershed, the model performance improved remarkably. During calibration, the model simulated surface runoff and sediment yield with percent deviations equal to +6.24 and +9.02, and Nash–Sutcliffe simulation coefficients equal to 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. During validation period, the model simulated runoff and sediment yield with percent deviations equal to +8.56 and +9.36, and Nash–Sutcliffe simulation coefficients equal to 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. The model tended to slightly under-predict runoff and sediment yield of higher magnitudes. The model performance was quite sensitive to soil parameters namely, rill erodibility, interrill erodibility, hydraulic conductivity, critical shear stress and Manning’s roughness coefficient with varying levels. The WEPP model picked up the hydrology associated with bund and water-harvesting tank, and simulated runoff and sediment yield well with overall deviations within ±10% and Nash–Sutcliffe simulation coefficients >0.80. Simulation results indicate that in high slope and high rainfall conditions of eastern Himalayan region of India where vegetative measures are not adequate to restrict soil loss within the permissible limit, the WEPP model can be applied to formulate structure-based management strategies to control soil loss and to develop water resources.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Amore E, Modic C, Nearing MA, Santoro VC (2004) Scale effect in USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins. J Hydrol 293:100–114CrossRef Amore E, Modic C, Nearing MA, Santoro VC (2004) Scale effect in USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins. J Hydrol 293:100–114CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89CrossRef Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ASCE Task Committee (1993) Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J Irrig Drain Eng 119:429–442CrossRef ASCE Task Committee (1993) Criteria for evaluation of watershed models. J Irrig Drain Eng 119:429–442CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ascough JC II, Baffut C, Nearing MA, Liu BY (1997) The WEPP watershed model: I. Hydrology and erosion. Trans ASAE 40(4):921–933 Ascough JC II, Baffut C, Nearing MA, Liu BY (1997) The WEPP watershed model: I. Hydrology and erosion. Trans ASAE 40(4):921–933
Zurück zum Zitat Ascough JC II, Deer-Ascough LA, Weesies GA (1998) CPIDS: a plant parameter selection programme for erosion prediction modeling. Comput Electron Agric 20:263–276CrossRef Ascough JC II, Deer-Ascough LA, Weesies GA (1998) CPIDS: a plant parameter selection programme for erosion prediction modeling. Comput Electron Agric 20:263–276CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baffaut C, Nearing MA, Ascough JC II, Liu BY (1997) The WEPP watershed model: II. Sensitivity analysis and discretization on small watersheds. Trans ASAE 40:935–943 Baffaut C, Nearing MA, Ascough JC II, Liu BY (1997) The WEPP watershed model: II. Sensitivity analysis and discretization on small watersheds. Trans ASAE 40:935–943
Zurück zum Zitat Balacco G, Fratino U, Piccinni AF (2003) Evaluation of potential water erosion to different application scales. Geophys Res Abstr 5:5591 Balacco G, Fratino U, Piccinni AF (2003) Evaluation of potential water erosion to different application scales. Geophys Res Abstr 5:5591
Zurück zum Zitat Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1982) Modeling sediment yield from agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 37:113–117 Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1982) Modeling sediment yield from agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 37:113–117
Zurück zum Zitat Bedient PB, Huber WC (1992) Hydrology and floodplain analysis, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York Bedient PB, Huber WC (1992) Hydrology and floodplain analysis, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Bhuyan SJ, Kalita PK, Janssenc KA, Barnesa PL (2002) Soil loss predictions with three erosion simulation models. Environ Model Softw 17:135–144CrossRef Bhuyan SJ, Kalita PK, Janssenc KA, Barnesa PL (2002) Soil loss predictions with three erosion simulation models. Environ Model Softw 17:135–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bingner RL, Murphee CE, Mutchler CK (1989) Comparison of sediment yield models on various watersheds in Mississippi. Trans ASAE 32(2):529–534 Bingner RL, Murphee CE, Mutchler CK (1989) Comparison of sediment yield models on various watersheds in Mississippi. Trans ASAE 32(2):529–534
Zurück zum Zitat Brunner AC, Park SJ, Ruecker GR, Dikau R, Vlek PLG (2004) Catenary soil development influencing erosion susceptibility along a hillslope in Uganda. Catena 58:1–22CrossRef Brunner AC, Park SJ, Ruecker GR, Dikau R, Vlek PLG (2004) Catenary soil development influencing erosion susceptibility along a hillslope in Uganda. Catena 58:1–22CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee BN, Maiti S (1981) Principles and practices of rice growing. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi Chatterjee BN, Maiti S (1981) Principles and practices of rice growing. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi
Zurück zum Zitat Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 680 Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 680
Zurück zum Zitat Croke J, Nethery M (2006) Modelling runoff and soil erosion in logged forests: scope and application of some existing models. Catena 67:35–49CrossRef Croke J, Nethery M (2006) Modelling runoff and soil erosion in logged forests: scope and application of some existing models. Catena 67:35–49CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 22:1783–1798CrossRef Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 22:1783–1798CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan DC, Livingston SJ (1995) USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project-WEPP user summary. NSREL report no. 11. USDA-ARS NSERL, West Lafayette, IN Flanagan DC, Livingston SJ (1995) USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project-WEPP user summary. NSREL report no. 11. USDA-ARS NSERL, West Lafayette, IN
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (1995) USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL report no. 10. West Lafayette, IN Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (1995) USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL report no. 10. West Lafayette, IN
Zurück zum Zitat Gronsten HA, Lundekvam H (2006) Prediction of surface runoff and soil loss in southeastern Norway using the WEPP Hillslope model. Soil Till Res 85:186–199CrossRef Gronsten HA, Lundekvam H (2006) Prediction of surface runoff and soil loss in southeastern Norway using the WEPP Hillslope model. Soil Till Res 85:186–199CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta SC, Kapoor VK (2002) Exact sampling distributions. In: Fundamentals of mathematical statistics. Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi, pp 14.1–14.74 Gupta SC, Kapoor VK (2002) Exact sampling distributions. In: Fundamentals of mathematical statistics. Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi, pp 14.1–14.74
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Zurück zum Zitat Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. Conservation Research Report No 26 USDA, Washington D.C. (USA), 643p Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. Conservation Research Report No 26 USDA, Washington D.C. (USA), 643p
Zurück zum Zitat Larose M, Oropeza-Mota JL, Norton D, Turrent-Fernandez A, Martinez-Menez M (2004) Application of the WEPP model to hillside lands in the Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México. Agrociencia ISSN–1405–3195 38(2):155–163 Larose M, Oropeza-Mota JL, Norton D, Turrent-Fernandez A, Martinez-Menez M (2004) Application of the WEPP model to hillside lands in the Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México. Agrociencia ISSN–1405–3195 38(2):155–163
Zurück zum Zitat Leagates DR, McCabe CJ Jr (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241CrossRef Leagates DR, McCabe CJ Jr (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martinec J, Rango A (1989) Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrologic models. Water Resour Bull AWRA 25:421–432CrossRef Martinec J, Rango A (1989) Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrologic models. Water Resour Bull AWRA 25:421–432CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 18:37–53CrossRef McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 18:37–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) Worldwide delivery of river sediments to the oceans. J Geol 91:1–21CrossRef Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) Worldwide delivery of river sediments to the oceans. J Geol 91:1–21CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRef Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nearing MA, Deer-Ascough L, Laflen JM (1990) Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP Hillslope profile erosion model. Trans ASAE 33:839–849 Nearing MA, Deer-Ascough L, Laflen JM (1990) Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP Hillslope profile erosion model. Trans ASAE 33:839–849
Zurück zum Zitat Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process-based soil erosion model for USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project technology. Trans ASAE 32:1587–1593 Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process-based soil erosion model for USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project technology. Trans ASAE 32:1587–1593
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 21:729–746CrossRef Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 21:729–746CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC, Billib M (2008) Runoff and sediment yield modelling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model. J Hydrol 348:305–319CrossRef Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC, Billib M (2008) Runoff and sediment yield modelling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model. J Hydrol 348:305–319CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pieri L, Bittelli M, Wu JQ, Dun S, Flanagan DC, Pisa PR, Ventura F, Salvatorelli F (2007) Using the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model to simulate field-observed runoff and erosion in the Apennines mountain range, Italy. J Hydrol 336:84–97CrossRef Pieri L, Bittelli M, Wu JQ, Dun S, Flanagan DC, Pisa PR, Ventura F, Salvatorelli F (2007) Using the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model to simulate field-observed runoff and erosion in the Apennines mountain range, Italy. J Hydrol 336:84–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raclot D, Albergel J (2006) Runoff and water erosion modelling using WEPP on a Mediterranean cultivated catchment. Phys Chem Earth 31:1038–1047CrossRef Raclot D, Albergel J (2006) Runoff and water erosion modelling using WEPP on a Mediterranean cultivated catchment. Phys Chem Earth 31:1038–1047CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Renard KG, Foste GR, Yoder DC, McCool DK (1994) RUSLE revisited: status, questions, answers, and the future. J Soil Water Conserv 49(3):213–220 Renard KG, Foste GR, Yoder DC, McCool DK (1994) RUSLE revisited: status, questions, answers, and the future. J Soil Water Conserv 49(3):213–220
Zurück zum Zitat Romero CC, Baigorria GA, Stroosnijder L (2007) Changes of erosive rainfall for El Niño and La Niña years in the northern Andean highlands of Peru. Clim Chang 85:343–356CrossRef Romero CC, Baigorria GA, Stroosnijder L (2007) Changes of erosive rainfall for El Niño and La Niña years in the northern Andean highlands of Peru. Clim Chang 85:343–356CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Satapathy KK (1996) Shifting cultivation in North Eastern Region: an overview. Indian J Soil Water Conserv 34:171–179 Satapathy KK (1996) Shifting cultivation in North Eastern Region: an overview. Indian J Soil Water Conserv 34:171–179
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Bhadoria PBS (2011) Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 173:789–801CrossRef Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Bhadoria PBS (2011) Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 173:789–801CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: model documentation. USDA Technical Bull no 1768. p 235 Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: model documentation. USDA Technical Bull no 1768. p 235
Zurück zum Zitat Singh (2010) Development of vegetative and structural management strategies for eastern Himalayan hilly watersheds using field measurements and a physically based model. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Department AgFE, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India, variously paged Singh (2010) Development of vegetative and structural management strategies for eastern Himalayan hilly watersheds using field measurements and a physically based model. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Department AgFE, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India, variously paged
Zurück zum Zitat Singh RK, Panda RK, Satapathy KK, Ngachan SV (2011) Simulation of runoff and sediment yield from a hilly watershed in the eastern Himalaya, India using the WEPP model. J Hydrol 405:261–276CrossRef Singh RK, Panda RK, Satapathy KK, Ngachan SV (2011) Simulation of runoff and sediment yield from a hilly watershed in the eastern Himalaya, India using the WEPP model. J Hydrol 405:261–276CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1995) Model calibration. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publication, Highlands Ranch, pp 23–68 Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1995) Model calibration. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publication, Highlands Ranch, pp 23–68
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanium K (1996) Engineering hydrology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, pp 180–190 Subramanium K (1996) Engineering hydrology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, pp 180–190
Zurück zum Zitat Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks AL (Ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 1201–1230 Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks AL (Ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 1201–1230
Zurück zum Zitat Thomann RV (1982) Verification of water quality models. J Environ Eng 108:923–940 Thomann RV (1982) Verification of water quality models. J Environ Eng 108:923–940
Zurück zum Zitat Tiwari AK, Risse LM, Nearing MA (2000) Evaluation of WEPP and its comparison with USLE and RUSLE. Trans ASAE 43(5):1129–1135 Tiwari AK, Risse LM, Nearing MA (2000) Evaluation of WEPP and its comparison with USLE and RUSLE. Trans ASAE 43(5):1129–1135
Zurück zum Zitat Verma AK, Jha MK, Mahana RK (2010) Evaluation of HEC-HMS and WEPP for simulating watershed runoff using remote sensing and geographical information system. Paddy Water Environ 8:131–144CrossRef Verma AK, Jha MK, Mahana RK (2010) Evaluation of HEC-HMS and WEPP for simulating watershed runoff using remote sensing and geographical information system. Paddy Water Environ 8:131–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vilayutham M (1999) Soil resources of India—potential problems and strategies for the future. Lead paper: National seminar on Strategies for Agricultural Research in North East, November 10–12, 1999, Umiam, Meghalaya, India Vilayutham M (1999) Soil resources of India—potential problems and strategies for the future. Lead paper: National seminar on Strategies for Agricultural Research in North East, November 10–12, 1999, Umiam, Meghalaya, India
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JR (1975) Sediment yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor, Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources. Report ARS-S-40, USDA-ARS, Washington, DC, pp. 244–252 Williams JR (1975) Sediment yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor, Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources. Report ARS-S-40, USDA-ARS, Washington, DC, pp. 244–252
Zurück zum Zitat Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion loss: a guide to conservation planning. USDA Handbook 537, Washington, DC, pp. 58 Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion loss: a guide to conservation planning. USDA Handbook 537, Washington, DC, pp. 58
Zurück zum Zitat Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espinao A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sorensen H, Feyen J (1997) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE-SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as a case study. Water Resour Manag 11:219–242CrossRef Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espinao A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sorensen H, Feyen J (1997) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE-SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as a case study. Water Resour Manag 11:219–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1989) AGNPS: a non-point source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44:68–73 Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1989) AGNPS: a non-point source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J Soil Water Conserv 44:68–73
Zurück zum Zitat Yu B, Rosewell CJ (2001) Evaluation of WEPP for runoff and soil loss prediction at Gunnedah, NSW, Australia. Aust J Soil Res 39:1131–1145CrossRef Yu B, Rosewell CJ (2001) Evaluation of WEPP for runoff and soil loss prediction at Gunnedah, NSW, Australia. Aust J Soil Res 39:1131–1145CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang XC, Liu WZ (2005) Simulating potential response of hydrology, soil erosion, and crop productivity to climate change in Changwu tableland region on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric For Meteorol 131:127–142CrossRef Zhang XC, Liu WZ (2005) Simulating potential response of hydrology, soil erosion, and crop productivity to climate change in Changwu tableland region on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric For Meteorol 131:127–142CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling for a Treated Hilly Watershed in Eastern Himalaya Using the Water Erosion Prediction Project Model
verfasst von
R. K. Singh
R. K. Panda
K. K. Satapathy
S. V. Ngachan
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9937-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Water Resources Management 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe