Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 3/2020

14.06.2019

Physical layer security schemes for MIMO systems: an overview

verfasst von: Reem Melki, Hassan N. Noura, Mohammad M. Mansour, Ali Chehab

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Physical layer security (PLS) has become an increasingly attractive topic since it promises current and future wireless systems both reliable and secure communication, without imposing any assumptions on the computational power of the eavesdroppers. PLS benefits from the randomness property of the wireless channel, which provides better immunity and prevents different attacks. On the other hand, the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system has emerged as a key technology to support high data rates and improved energy and spectral efficiency, in addition to overcoming the effect of shadowing and fading. Recently, MIMO-based PLS has been addressed in the literature due to its wide adoption and its essential role in wireless communication systems. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of various MIMO-based PLS techniques that target all kinds of security services namely, key generation and distribution, data confidentiality, authentication, and availability. With this overview, readers will have a better understanding of the MIMO-based PLS techniques present in the literature, their current limitations, and challenges.
Vorheriger Artikel Energy harvesting relay-antenna selection in cooperative MIMO/NOMA network over Rayleigh fading
Nächster Artikel Characterization of untrusted relaying networks in the presence of an adversary jammer

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Saxena, N., Roy, A., Sahu, B., & Kim, H. (2017). Efficient IoT gateway over 5G wireless: A new design with prototype and implementation results. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(2), 97–105.CrossRef
2.
Ford, R., Zhang, M., Mezzavilla, M., Dutta, S., Rangan, S., & Zorzi, M. (2017). Achieving ultra-low latency in 5G millimeter wave cellular networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(3), 196–203.CrossRef
3.
Sun, S., MacCartney, G., & Rappaport, T. (2017). A novel millimeter-wave channel simulator and applications for 5G wireless communications. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
4.
Rappaport, T., Xing, Y., et al. (2017). Overview of millimeter wave communications for fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks-with a focus on propagation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1708.​02557
5.
Wong, V., Schober, R., Ng, D., & Wang, L. (2017). Key technologies for 5G wireless systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
6.
Cho, Y., Kim, J., Yang, W., & Kang, C. (2010). MIMO-OFDM wireless communications with MATLAB. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
7.
Fan, W., Carton, I., et al. (2017). A step toward 5G in 2020: Low-cost OTA performance evaluation of massive MIMO base stations. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 59(1), 38–47.CrossRef
8.
Molisch, A., et al. (2017). Hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 134–141.CrossRef
9.
Umebayashi, K., et al. (2014). A study on secure pilot signal design for OFDM systems. In Asia-Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA) (pp. 1–5).
10.
Massey, J. (1986). Cryptography—a selective survey. Digital Communications, 85, 3–25.
11.
Bloch, M., et al. (2008). Wireless information-theoretic security. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54(6), 2515–2534.CrossRefMathSciNetMATH
12.
13.
Ahlswede, R., et al. (1993). Common randomness in information theory and cryptography. I. Secret sharing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 39(4), 1121–1132.CrossRefMathSciNetMATH
14.
15.
Bloch, M., & Barros, J. (2011). Physical-layer security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefMATH
16.
Mukherjee, A., et al. (2014). Principles of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1550–1573.CrossRef
17.
18.
Gibalina, Z., et al. (2018). Estimation of capabilities of cooperative CubeSat systems based on Alamouti transmission scheme. In Systems of signal synchronization, generating and processing in telecommunications (SYNCHROINFO) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
19.
Shehab, W., & Al-qudah, Z. (2017). Singular value decomposition: Principles and applications in multiple input multiple output communication system. International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 9(1), 13–21.CrossRef
20.
Abdelrahman, R.B.M., Mustafa, A.B.A., & Osman, A.A. (2015). A comparison between IEEE 802.11 n and ac standards. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE), 17(5), 30–34.
21.
22.
Schindler, D., et al. (2018). MIMO–OFDM radar using a linear frequency modulated carrier to reduce sampling requirements. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 66(7), 3511–3520.CrossRef
23.
Rahmatallah, Y., & Mohan, S. (2013). Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(4), 1567–1592.CrossRef
24.
Bingham, J. (1990). Multicarrier modulation for data transmission: An idea whose time has come. IEEE Communications Magazine, 28(5), 5–14.CrossRef
25.
Prasad, R. (2004). OFDM for wireless communications systems. Norwood: Artech House.
26.
27.
28.
He, Q., & Schmeink, A. (2015). Comparison and evaluation between FBMC and OFDM systems. In Proceedings of the international ITG workshop on smart antennas (WSA) (pp. 1–7). VDE.
29.
Roessler, A. (2016). 5G waveform candidates application note. Technical Report. 1MA271. Munich: Rohde & Schwarz.
30.
Barker, E., et al. (2012). Recommendation for key management part 1: General (revision 3). NIST Special Publication, 800(57), 1–147.
31.
Zhang, J., et al. (2015). Verification of key generation from individual OFDM subcarrier’s channel response. In Proceedings of the IEEE global communication conference workshops (GC workshops) (pp. 1–6).
32.
Rahbari, H., & Krunz, M. (2017). Exploiting frame preamble waveforms to support new physical-layer functions in OFDM-based 802.11 systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(6), 3775–3786.CrossRef
33.
34.
Paar, C., & Pelzl, J. (2009). Understanding cryptography: A textbook for students and practitioners. Berlin: Springer.MATH
35.
Wankhede, S.B. (2019). Study of network-based DoS attacks. In Nanoelectronics, circuits and communication systems (Vol. 511, pp. 611–616). Singapore: Springer.
36.
Wang, F., et al. (2017). Poster abstract: Security in uplink MU-MIMO networks. In V. Nath, JK Mandal (Eds.), IEEE/ACM second international conference on internet-of-things design and implementation (IoTDI) (pp. 351–352).
37.
Tomasin, S. (2017). Comparison between asymmetric and symmetric channel-based authentication for MIMO systems. In International ITG workshop on smart antennas (WSA) (pp. 1–5).
38.
Xiao, L., et al. (2017). Game theoretic study on channel-based authentication in MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(8), 7474–7484.CrossRef
39.
Xiao, L., et al. (2016). Channel-based authentication game in MIMO systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6).
40.
Topal, O., et al. (2017). Space-frequency grouping based key extraction for MIMO–OFDM systems. In International Symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS) (pp. 320–324).
41.
Chen, K., & Natarajan, B. (2016). Evaluating node reliability in cooperative MIMO networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 11(7), 1453–1460.CrossRef
42.
Cheng, L., et al. (2015). Secret key generation via random beamforming in stationary environment. In Proceedings of the international conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–5).
43.
Yakovlev, V., et al. (2016). Secret key agreement based on a communication through wireless MIMO fading channels. In Federated conference on computer science and information systems (FedCSIS) (pp. 823–830).
44.
Qin, D., & Ding, Z. (2016). Exploiting multi-antenna non-reciprocal channels for shared secret key generation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 11(12), 2693–2705.CrossRef
45.
Chen, K., et al. (2015). Secret key generation rate with power allocation in relay-based LTE-A networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 10(11), 2424–2434.CrossRef
46.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2017). Secret key establishment technique using channel state information driven phase randomisation in multiple-input multiple-output orthogonal frequency division multiplexing. IET Information Security, 11(1), 1–7.CrossRef
47.
Choi, J. (2017). Secret key transmission for OFDM based machine type communications. Journal of Communications and Networks, 19(4), 363–370.CrossRef
48.
Choi, J., & Ha, J. (2016). Secret key transmission based on channel reciprocity for secure IoT. In European conference on networks and communications (EuCNC) (pp. 388–392).
49.
Furqan, H., et al. (2016). Secret key generation using channel quantization with SVD for reciprocal MIMO channels. In International Symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS) (pp. 597–602).
50.
Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). High security orthogonal factorized channel scrambling scheme with location information embedded for MIMO-based VLC system. In IEEE Proceedings of the vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–5).
51.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2016). Secret key exchange under physical layer security using MIMO private random precoding in FDD systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).
52.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2015). A MIMO precoding based physical layer security technique for key exchange encryption. In IEEE Proceedings of the vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–5).
53.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2017). Secret key exchange using private random precoding in MIMO FDD and TDD systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(6), 4823–4833.CrossRef
54.
Yaacoub, E. (2016). On secret key generation with massive MIMO antennas using time-frequency-space dimensions. In IEEE Middle East conference on antennas and propagation (MECAP) (pp. 1–4).
55.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2017). Secret key exchange and authentication via randomized spatial modulation and phase shifting. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(3), 2165–2177.CrossRef
56.
Taha, H., & Alsusa, E. (2017). PHY-SEC: Secret key exchange and authentication via random spatial modulation and phase shifting. In IEEE proceedings of the international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 1327–1332).
57.
Chen, X., Ng, D., Gerstacker, W., & Chen, H. (2017). A survey on multiple-antenna techniques for physical layer security. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(2), 1027–1053.CrossRef
58.
Guan, K., et al. (2016). A computationally efficient shift-register based information scrambling approach to physical layer security in MIMO-SDM systems. In Optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC) (pp. 1–3).
59.
Guan, K., et al. (2015). Enhanced physical layer security of MIMO-SDM systems through information scrambling. In European conference on optical communication (ECOC) (pp. 1–3).
60.
Tanigawa, Y., et al. (2017). A physical layer security scheme employing imaginary receiver for multiuser MIMO–OFDM systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).
61.
Ahmed, M., & Bai, L. (2017). Space time block coding aided physical layer security in Gaussian MIMO channels. In International Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST) (pp. 805–808).
62.
Liu, Y., et al. (2017). Secrecy capacity analysis of artificial noisy MIMO channels—an approach based on ordered eigenvalues of Wishart matrices. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(3), 617–630.CrossRef
63.
Li, G., & Hu, A. (2016). Virtual MIMO-based cooperative beamforming and jamming scheme for the clustered wireless sensor network security. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference communications China (ICCC), (pp. 2246–2250).
64.
Chen, X., et al. (2015). Security in MIMO wireless hybrid channel with artificial noise. In International conference on cyber security of smart cities, industrial control system and communications (SSIC) (pp. 1–4).
65.
Shafie, A., et al. (2017). Hybrid spatio-temporal artificial noise design for secure MIMOME–OFDM systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(5), 3871–3886.
66.
Kozai, Y., & Saba, T. (2015). An artificial fast fading generation scheme for physical layer security of MIMO–OFDM systems. In International conference on signal processing and communication systems (ICSPCS) (pp. 1–5).
67.
Li, X., et al. (2017). Hybrid massive MIMO for secure transmissions against stealthy eavesdroppers. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(1), 81–84.CrossRef
68.
Khandaker, M., et al. (2017). Constructive interference based secure precoding. In IEEE proceedings of the international Symposium on information theory (ISIT), (pp. 2875–2879).
69.
Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Mode selection in MU-MIMO downlink networks: A physical-layer security perspective. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(2), 1128–1136.CrossRef
70.
El Shafie, A., et al. (2016). Enhancing the PHY-layer security of MIMO buffer-aided relay networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 5(4), 400–403.CrossRefMathSciNet
71.
Zhang, L., et al. (2016). The performance of the MIMO physical layer security system with imperfect CSI. In IEEE conference on communications and network security (CNS) (pp. 346–347).
72.
Chen, B., et al. (2016). Original symbol phase rotated secure transmission against powerful massive MIMO eavesdropper. IEEE Access, 4, 3016–3025.CrossRef
73.
Chen, B., et al. (2016). Securing uplink transmission for lightweight single-antenna UEs in the presence of a massive MIMO eavesdropper. IEEE Access, 4, 5374–5384.CrossRef
74.
Zhang, L., et al. (2017). Non-linear transceiver design for secure communications with artificial noise-assisted MIMO relay. IET Communications, 11(6), 930–935.CrossRef
75.
Yaacoub, E., & Al-Husseini, M. (2017). Achieving physical layer security with massive MIMO beamforming. In European conference on antennas and propagation (EUCAP) (pp. 1753–1757).
76.
Tang, J., et al. (2015). Combining MIMO beamforming with security codes to achieve unconditional communication security. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference on communications in China (ICCC) (pp. 105–109).
77.
Tang, J., & Wen, H., et al. (2015). Combining MIMO beamforming with security codes to achieve unconditional communication security. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference on communications in China (ICCC) (pp. 105–109).
78.
Wen, H., et al. (2014). Achieving secure communications over wiretap channels via security codes from resilient functions. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 3(3), 273–276.CrossRef
79.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2015). Joint transmit antenna selection and jamming for security enhancement in MIMO wiretap channels. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference on communications in China (ICCC) (pp. 1–6).
80.
Jayasinghe, K., et al. (2015). Physical layer security for relay assisted MIMO D2D communication. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference on communications workshop (ICCW) (pp. 651–656).
81.
Fan, Y., et al. (2017). Physical layer security based on interference alignment in K-User MIMO Y wiretap channels. IEEE Access, 5, 5747–5759.CrossRef
82.
Gong, S., et al. (2017). Millimeter-wave secrecy beamforming designs for two-way amplify-and-forward MIMO relaying networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(3), 2059–2071.CrossRef
83.
Qassim, Y., et al. (2017). Post-quantum hybrid security mechanism for MIMO systems. In International conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC) (pp. 684–689).
84.
Lei, H., et al. (2017). On secure underlay MIMO cognitive radio networks with energy harvesting and transmit antenna selection. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 1(2), 192–203.CrossRefMathSciNet
85.
Kalantari, A., et al. (2016). Directional modulation via symbol-level precoding: A way to enhance security. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 10(8), 1478–1493.CrossRef
86.
Hafez, M., et al. (2017). Secure spatial multiple access using directional modulation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17, 563–573.CrossRef
87.
Li, Z., et al. (2015). Cooperative jamming for secure communications in MIMO cooperative cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 7609–7614).
88.
Li, L., et al. (2016). Improving wireless physical layer security via exploiting co-channel interference. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 10(8), 1433–1448.CrossRef
89.
Ahn, S., et al. (2016). Enhancing physical-layer security in MISO wiretap channel with pilot-assisted channel estimation: Beamforming design for pilot jamming. In IEEE proceedings of the international conference on signal processing and communication systems (ICSPCS) (pp. 1–5).
90.
Yan, Q., et al. (2016). Jamming resilient communication using MIMO interference cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 11(7), 1486–1499.CrossRef
91.
92.
Javed, I., et al. (2017). Novel schemes for interference-resilient OFDM wireless communication. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(6), e3095.CrossRef
93.
Basciftci, Y., et al. (2015). Securing massive MIMO at the physical layer. In IEEE conference on communications and network security (CNS) (pp. 272–280).
94.
Sodagari, S., & Clancy, T. (2012). Efficient jamming attacks on MIMO channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 852–856). IEEE.
95.
Do, T., et al. (2017). Jamming-resistant receivers for the massive MIMO uplink. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 13(1), 210–223.CrossRef
96.
Shen, W., et al. (2014). MCR decoding: A MIMO approach for defending against wireless jamming attacks. In IEEE Proceedings of the conference on communications and network security (CNS), (pp. 133–138). IEEE.
97.
Shen, W., et al. (2015). No time to demodulate-fast physical layer verification of friendly jamming. In IEEE proceedings of the military communications conference (MILCOM) (pp. 653–658). IEEE.
98.
Li, L., & Chigan, C. (2016). A virtual MIMO based anti-jamming strategy for cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
99.
Chaturvedi, P., & Gupta, K. (2013). Detection and prevention of various types of jamming attacks in wireless networks. IRACST-International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications (IJCNWC), 3(2), 2250–3501.
Metadaten
Titel
Physical layer security schemes for MIMO systems: an overview
verfasst von
Reem Melki
Hassan N. Noura
Mohammad M. Mansour
Ali Chehab
Publikationsdatum
14.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02060-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Wireless Networks 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Energy-saving routing metric for aggregate low-rate wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Nash network formation among unmanned aerial vehicles

OriginalPaper

VANETs QoS-based routing protocols based on multi-constrained ability to support ITS infotainment services

OriginalPaper

Effective capacity optimization for cognitive radio networks under primary QoS provisioning

OriginalPaper

A distributed energy-efficient approach for hole repair in wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

The nonlinear-phase design of FBMC prototype filter based on filter coefficient symmetry characteristic

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise