Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4/2008

01.12.2008

The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation

verfasst von: Andreas Lund, Ingvill Rasmussen

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using Vygotsky’s notion of double stimulation as an analytical tool, we discuss the complex relationship between tasks, tools, and agency in CSCL environments. Empirically we examine how learners in a Norwegian senior high school class learning English as a foreign language approach and respond to an open-ended and collectively oriented task using a wiki. Our findings show that collectively oriented knowledge and language production takes place locally in small groups as well as in the larger collective of the class, and that learners find it difficult to maintain awareness of both levels of activity. However, when facing a breakdown in the wiki application, learners sustained strategies that carried many of the characteristics of collective production. We argue that there is a need to further theorize the task-tool relationship in activities involving collective knowledge production and that we need to align pedagogical as well as technological designs in order to give support for such efforts.
Vorheriger Artikel Leveraging online communities in fostering adaptive schools
Nächster Artikel Exploring embedded guidance and self-efficacy in educational multi-user virtual environments

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(2), 167–185.CrossRef
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2(2–3), 133–158.CrossRef
Augar, N., Raitman, R., & Zhou, W. (2004). Teaching and learning online with wikis. Paper presented at the Beyond the Comfort Zone, ASCILITE Conference, Perth, Australia.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/2000). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bergquist, K. (1990). Doing schoolwork. Task premises and joint activity in the comprehensive classroom. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Communication Studies.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
de Jong, T., & Jules, P. (2005). The design of powerful learning environments. In P. A. Alexander, & A. P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). London: LEA.
Désilets, A., Paquet, S., & Vinson, N. G. (2005). Are wikis usable? Paper presented at the WikiSym’05, San Diego, CA, October 16–18.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University, The Netherlands.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning, working, and imagining. Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.
Gallego, M. A., & Cole, M. (2001). Classroom culture and culture in classroom. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Fourth Edition of the handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: a framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121.CrossRef
Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.CrossRef
Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Ludvigsen, S. (2008). What counts as knowledge: Learning to use categories in computer environments. In R. Säljö (Ed.), ICT and transformation of learning practices. Oxford: Pergamon (in press).
Lund, A. (2004). The teacher as interface. Teachers of EFL in ICT-rich environments: Beliefs, practices, appropriation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.
Lund, A. (2006). WIKI i klasserommet: Individuelle og kollektive praksiser [WIKI in the classroom: Individual and collective practices]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 90(4), 274–288.
Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: a collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54.CrossRef
Lund, A., & Smørdal, O. (2006). Is there a space for the teacher in a wiki? In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym ‘06) (pp. 37–46). Odense, Denmark: ACM Press.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.CrossRef
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: Future learning environment tools. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Designing new media for a new millennium. Proceedings of CSCL 1999. CA, USA: Palo Alto.
Nespor, J. (1987). Academic tasks in a high school English class. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 203–228.CrossRef
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constrains in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff, & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition. Development in social context (pp. 172–193). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: Language and learning in hundreds of English lessons. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue. Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 30–74). New York: Teachers College Press.
O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S.-H., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 361–373.CrossRef
Portes, P. R., Smith, T. L., Zady, M. F., & Del Castillo, K. (1997). Extending the double stimulation method in cultural-historical research: Parent–child interaction and cognitive change. Mind, Culture and Activity, 4(2), 108–123.CrossRef
Rasmussen, I. (2005). Project work and ICT: Studying learning as participation trajectories. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2003). The process of understanding the task: How is agency distributed between students, teachers and representations in technology-rich learning environments? International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 839–849.CrossRef
Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). New York, NY: Routledge.
Säljö, R. (2000). Lärandet i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in Practice: A sociocultural perspective]. Stockholm, SE: Prisma.
Sawyer, R. K., & Berson, S. (2004). Study group discourse: how external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 15, 387–412.CrossRef
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14.CrossRef
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (2004). What We Know About CSCL...and what we do not (but need to) know about CSCL. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 245–259). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRef
Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: a research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(3), 315–337.CrossRef
Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225–233.CrossRef
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (vol. 1, pp. 1–34). London, UK: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wang, H.-C., Lu, C.-H., Yang, J.-Y., Hu, H.-W., Chiou, G.-F., Chiang, Y.-T., et al. (2005). An empirical exploration of using wiki in an English as a second language course. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, July.
Wasson, B., & Ludvigsen, S. (2003). Designing for knowledge building (no. 19). Oslo, NO: Forsknings–og kompetansesenteret for IT i utdanning, University of Oslo.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Metadaten
Titel
The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation
verfasst von
Andreas Lund
Ingvill Rasmussen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9050-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4/2008 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Exploring embedded guidance and self-efficacy in educational multi-user virtual environments

OriginalPaper

Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning

OriginalPaper

Leveraging online communities in fostering adaptive schools

OriginalPaper

Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols

EditorialNotes

CSCL practices

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise