Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education 1/2010

01.04.2010

Why university members use and resist technology? A structure enactment perspective

verfasst von: Canchu Lin, Ross Singer, Louisa Ha

Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This case study investigated university members’ use of and resistance to a communication information technology system in a higher education organization. This case study utilized the technology enactment framework to examine structure enactment in university members’ technology use and resistance. We found that the following structures were enacted in organizational members’ interactions with the system: maximum use, enhancing teaching, augmenting service, limited use, and resistance. Besides providing empirical evidence to the enactments of inertia, application, and change, this case study added a new enactment type, i.e., resistance, to the existing enactment typology. The findings provided empirical support to the structuration principle—the enabling and constraining nature of structure. Important implications were addressed with respect to adoption and implementation of technology in higher education institutions.
Vorheriger Artikel Incorporating collaborative technologies into university curricula: lessons learned
Nächster Artikel A content analysis of CESNET-L e-mail messages: directions for information delivery in higher education

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Applegate, L. M., McFarlan, F. W., & Mckenney, J. L. (1996). Corporate information systems management: Text and cases. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Bedeian, A. (2007). Even if the tower is “ivory”, it isn’t “white:” Understanding the consequences of faculty cynicism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 9–32.
Bennett, L. (2001). Technology standards for the preparation of teachers. International Journal of Social Education, 15, 1–11.
Blackboard.com retrieved on October 23, 2009.
Carnevale, D. (2006). Online. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(24), A37.
Chan, S. C. H., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: How ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17, 289–315.CrossRef
Chapman, B. F., & Heath-Camp, B. (2005). Factors influencing the computer technology adoption rate of business teacher educators. Business Education Digest, 14, 15–30.
Duhaney, D. C. (2001). Teacher education: Preparing teachers to integrate technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28, 23–30.
Eisenberg, E. M., Murphy, A., & Andrews, L. (1998). Openness and decision making in the search for a university provost. Communication Monographs, 65, 1–23.CrossRef
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eynon, R. (2008). The use of the world wide web in learning and teaching in higher education: Reality and rhetoric. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 15–23.CrossRef
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gerdes, C., & Kuhr, P. (2004). The Blackboard course makeover of ethics and the media. TechTrends, 48(5), 71–74.CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkley: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Groves, M. M., & Zemel, P. C. (2000). Instructional technology adoption in higher education: An action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 57–65.
Jablin, F. M. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 732–818). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jefferies, P., Grodzinsky, F., & Griffin, J. (2003). Advantages and problems in using information communication technologies to support the teaching of a multi-institutional computer ethics course. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 191–202.CrossRef
Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). Online ‘chat’ facilities as pedagogic tools. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6, 145–159.CrossRef
Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2005). A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 461–491.
Larkin, T. L., & Belson, S. I. (2005). Blackboard technologies: A vehicle to promote student motivation and learning in physics. Journal of STEM Education, 6, 14–27.
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 2–26.CrossRef
Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.CrossRef
Roberts-DeGennaro, M., Brown, C., Min, J. W., & Siegel, M. (2005). Using an online support site to extend the learning to a graduate field practicum in the United States. Social Work Education, 24, 327–342.CrossRef
Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Barrios-Choplin, J. R. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18, 563–598.CrossRef
Vannatta, R. A. (2000). Evaluation to planning: Technology integration in a school of education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 231–246.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRef
Yao, J. E., Xu, X., Liu, C., & Lu, J. (2003). Organizational size: A significant predictor of IT innovation adoption. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43, 76–82.
Metadaten
Titel
Why university members use and resist technology? A structure enactment perspective
verfasst von
Canchu Lin
Ross Singer
Louisa Ha
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9028-1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise