nach oben

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Erschienen in:

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Flexible Decision Modeling for Evaluating the Risks in Green Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and IRP Methodologies

verfasst von: Sachin K. Mangla, Pradeep Kumar, Mukesh Kumar Barua

Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

There are several different risks and risk factors involved in managing the green supply chain (GSC) practices successfully. These risks and risk factors have a tendency to disrupt the typical GSC operations, and hence, reduce the success rate. To mitigate the consequences, therefore, a flexible decision modeling which could evaluate the risks in the context of GSC is needed from the industrial viewpoint. The present research work intends to propose a flexible decision model based on combined fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and interpretive ranking process (IRP) methodology to evaluate the risks associated with implementation of GSC practices under the fuzzy surroundings. Fuzzy AHP approach estimates the priority or ranking of the identified risks by determining of their relative importance. To analyze the risks ranking obtained through the fuzzy AHP, the methodology of IRP is applied. The methodology of IRP, however, also enables the decision makers to understand the interpretive logic for dominance of one risk over the other for each pair wise comparison. The proposed flexible risk evaluation model is applied to an empirical case of Indian poly plastic manufacturing company. The model proposed in this study offers logical means to understand the significance of different risks in the strategic decision processes. It would help the managers and practitioners to interpret the influence of key strategic actions on the performance and to improve the effectiveness of the processes by building some robust and flexible strategies for managing risks in GSC.

Vorheriger Artikel Performance Measurement in Banking & Software Firm: An Empirical Research

Nächster Artikel Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Competitive Priorities of the Manufacturing Performance in Karachi

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Adler, J., (2006). Going green. Newsweek, July 17, pp. 42–52. www.msnbc.msn.com.

Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), 332–342.CrossRef

Chan, F. T. S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Choy, K. L. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3825–3857.CrossRef

Chang, D. Y. (1992). Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1(1), 352–355.

Chang, C. W., Wu, C. R., Lin, C. T., & Chen, H. C. (2007). An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52(2), 296–307.CrossRef

Dan-Li, D., Ju, Q., Hong-Yan, Z. (2011). Risk assessment study of manufacturing green supply chain based on grey theory. In: Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), China, pp. 234–240.

Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1979). Operations in a fuzzy-valued logic. Information and Control, 43(2), 224–240.

Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green Supply Chain Initiatives among Certified Companies in Malaysia and Environmental Sustainability: Investigating the Outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), 495–506.CrossRef

Giovanni, P. D., & Vinzi, V. E. (2012). Covariance versus component-based estimates of performance in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 907–916.CrossRef

Godfrey, R. (1998). Ethical purchasing: developing the supply chain beyond the environment. In T. Russel (Ed.), Greener purchasing: opportunities and innovations (pp. 244–251). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.CrossRef

Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART B), 555–568.CrossRef

Gunasekaran, A., & Gallear, D. (2012). Special Issue on Sustainable development of manufacturing and services. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 1–6.CrossRef

Gurnani, H., Mehrotra, A., & Ray, S. (2012). Supply Chain Disruptions: Theory and Practice of Managing Risk Springer-Verlag London Limited, ISBN 978-0-85729-777-8, e-ISBN 978-0-85729-778-5. doi 10.1007/978-0-85729-778-5.

Haleem, A., Sushil, Qadri. M. A., & Kumar, S. (2012). Analysis of critical success factors of world class manufacturing practices: an application of interpretive structural modelling and interpretive ranking process. Production Planning and Control, 23(10–11), 722–734.

Harputlugil, T., Prins, M., Gultekin, T., & Topcu, I. (2011). Conceptual Framework for Potential Implementations of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods for Design Quality Assessment. Amsterdam: Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment, June 20–23 (ISBN: 9789052693958).

Hill, J. D., & Warfield, J. N. (1972). Unified Program Planning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC, 2(5), 610–621.CrossRef

Hsu, C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2008). Green supply chain management in the electronic industry. International Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 205–216.CrossRef

Ishikava, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220.CrossRef

Khurana, M. K., et al. (2010). Modeling of information sharing enablers for building trust in Indian manufacturing industry: an integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(6), 1651–1669.

Kumar, S., Teichman, S., & Timpernagel, T. (2012). A green supply chain is a requirement for profitability. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1278–1296.CrossRef

Lin, R. J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32–39.CrossRef

Lippmann, S. (1999). Supply chain environmental management: elements of success. Corporate Environmental Strategies, 6(2), 175–182.CrossRef

Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2013). Identifying and ranking of strategies to implement green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industry using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(4), 930–962.CrossRef

Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2014). Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian automobile industry. Production Planning & Control, (ahead-of-print), 1–24.

Mangla, S., Kumar, P., & Barua, M.K. (2013a). Flexible Decision Modeling for Evaluating Green Supply Chain Risks using Fuzzy AHP Methodology. Published in: GLOGIFT 13, IIT Delhi, India, pp. 575-583.

Mangla, S., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014a). An evaluation of attribute for improving the green supply chain performance via DEMATEL method. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Robotics Research, 1(1), 30–35.

Mangla, S., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014b). Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 113–130.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Kumar, P., & Barua, M.K. (2014d). A flexible decision framework for building risk mitigation strategies in green supply chain using SAP-LAP and IRP approaches. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1–16 (2014d). doi:10.1007/s40171-014-0067-8).

Mangla, S., Madaan, J., & Chan, F. T. S. (2012). Analysis of performance focused variables for multi-objective decision modeling approach of flexible product recovery systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 77–86.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Madaan, J., & Chan, F. T. S. (2013b). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3443–3462.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Madaan, J., Sarma, P. R. S., & Gupta, M. P. (2014c). Multi-objective decision modeling using interpretive structural modeling(ISM) for green supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 17(2), 125–142.CrossRef

Mangla, S., Kumar, P., & Barua, M.K. An integrated methodology of FTA and fuzzy AHP for risk assessment in green supply chain. International Journal of Operational Research, (in press).

Min, H., & Kim, I. (2012). Green supply chain research: past, present, and future. Logistics Research, 4(1–2), 39–47.CrossRef

Mitchell, V. W. (1995). Organizational risk perception and reduction: a literature review. British Journal of Management, 6(2), 115–133.CrossRef

Narasimhan, R., & Carter, J. R. (1998). Environmental supply chain management. Tempe, AZ: The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University.

Nelson, D. M., Marsillac, E., & Rao, S. S. (2012). Antecedents and evolution of the green supply chain. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management Special Issue, 1, 29–43.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73, 20–34.

Qianlei, L. (2012). The study on the risk management of agricultural products green supply chain based on systematic analysis. In: Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN), Second International Conference, pp. 250-253.

Qureshi, M. N., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2009). Selection of 3PL service providers: a combined approach of AHP and graph theory. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 12(1), 35–60.CrossRef

Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898–916.CrossRef

Ruimin, M., Yao, L., & Huang, R. (2012). The green supply chain management risk analysis. Advanced Materials Research, 573–574, 734–739.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.CrossRef

Sarkis, J. (2006). Greening the supply chain. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef

Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1–15.CrossRef

Siegel, D. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: an economic/strategic perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.CrossRef

Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.CrossRef

Sushil, (2005). Interpretive matrix: A tool to aid interpretation of management and social research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 6(2), 27–30.

Sushil, (2009a). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), 1–10.

Sushil, (2009b). SAP-LAP linkages—a generic interpretive framework for analyzing managerial contexts. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(2), 11–20.

Tseng, M. L., Lin, Y. H., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2009). FAHP based study of cleaner production implementation in PCB manufacturing firms, Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(14), 1249–1256.CrossRef

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012). A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.CrossRef

Ware, N. R., Singh, S. P., & Banwet, D. K. (2012). Supplier selection problem: a state of-the-art review. Management Science Letters, 2(5), 1465–1490.CrossRef

Ware, N. R., Singh, S. P., & Banwet, D. K. (2014). Modeling flexible supplier selection framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(3), 261–274.CrossRef

Warfield, J. W. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transcript on Systems, Men and Cybernetics, 4(1), 51–81.

Waters, D. (2007). Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. London: Kogan page.

Wee, H. M., Lee, M. C., Yu, J. C. P., & Wang, C. E. (2011). Optimal replenishment policy for a deteriorating green product: life cycle costing analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 608–611.CrossRef

Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835.CrossRef

Wu, H. H., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(11), 2114–2124.CrossRef

Yang, Z. K., & Li. J. (2010). Assessment of green supply chain risk based on circular economy. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), IEEE 17th International Conference, Xiamen, pp. 1276–1280.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–352.CrossRef

Zayed, T., Amer, M., & Pan, J. (2008). Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 408–419.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2011). Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 808–821.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486.CrossRef

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRef

Titel: Flexible Decision Modeling for Evaluating the Risks in Green Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and IRP Methodologies
verfasst von: Sachin K. Mangla
Pradeep Kumar
Mukesh Kumar Barua
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2015
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0972-2696
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-0198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0081-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Development of Enhanced Marketing Flexibility by Optimally Allocating Sales Campaign Days for Maximizing Total Expected Sales

Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM) of the Enablers of a Flexible Control System for Industry

Managing Wastivity for Sustainability

Performance Measurement in Banking & Software Firm: An Empirical Research

Fuzzy-TISM: A Fuzzy Extension of TISM for Group Decision Making

Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Competitive Priorities of the Manufacturing Performance in Karachi

Premium Partner