Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2016

Open Access 01.12.2016 | Research

Some new weakly singular integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations

verfasst von: Run Xu, Fanwei Meng

Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Ausgabe 1/2016

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

Some new inequalities with weakly singular integral kernel are developed, which generalize some known inequalities and can be used in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the solutions to certain fractional differential equations.
Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RX carried out the generalized weakly singular integral inequalities and completed the corresponding proof. FM participated in Section 4 - Applications. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

1 Introduction

The well-known inequalities, such as the Gronwall type inequality, the Gronwall-Bellman type inequality, the Henry-Gronwall type inequality, the Henry-Bihari type inequality and their variants in retarded form played important roles in the research of quantitative analysis of the solutions to differential and integral equations, as well as in the modeling of engineering and science problems. Recently, with the development of fractional differential equations, integral inequalities with weakly singular kernels have drawn more attention [111]. In 1981, Henry [12] proposed a method to find solutions and proved some results concerning linear integral inequalities with a weakly singular kernel. In 1997, Medved̆ [3] presented a new method to solve integral inequalities of Henry-Gronwall type and their Bihari version, then he got the explicit bounds with a quite simple formula, similar to the classic Gronwall-Bellman inequalities. Furthermore, he also obtained global solutions of the semilinear evolutions in [4].
In 2011, Ye and Gao [5] presented the integral inequalities of Henry-Gronwall type,
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u(t) \leq a(t)+\int_{ t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta -1}[b(s)u(s)+c(s)u(s-r)]\,ds, \quad t\in[t_{0}, T), \\ u(t)\leq\varphi(t), \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
In 2013, Shao and Meng [6] established Gronwall-Bellman type inequalities with a weakly singular integral
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u(t) \leq a(t)+\int_{ t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}b(s)u(s)\,ds+\int_{ t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}p(s)u^{\gamma}(s-r)\,ds, \quad t\in[t_{0}, T), \\ u(t)\leq\varphi(t), \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
In [7], Feng and Meng studied the following Gronwall-Bellman type inequalities:
$$ u^{p}(x) \leq a(x)+ \int_{0}^{x}b(t)u^{q}(t)\,dt+ \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha )}h(x) \int_{0}^{x}(x-t)^{\alpha-1}L \bigl(t, u(t) \bigr) \,dt. $$
In 2008, by using the modified Medved̆ method, Ma and Pečarić [8] studied the inequality
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+b(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta -1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds,\quad t\in R_{+}. $$
The aim of this paper was to give explicit bounds to some new nonlinear Henry-Gronwall type retarded integral inequalities with weakly singular integral kernel of the form
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{l}(s-r)\,ds, \quad t\in I, \\ u(t)\leq\varphi(t), \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}), \end{cases} $$
and Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with nonlinear weakly singular integral kernel of the form
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{m}(s)\,ds+d(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta -1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
which can be used as handy and effective tools in the study of the delay fractional differential equations. We also give some examples to illustrate applications of our results.

2 Preliminary knowledge

In the following, R denotes the set of real numbers, N denotes the set of integer numbers, \(R_{+}= [0, +\infty)\), \(I=[t_{0}, T)\subset R_{+}\), \(T<\infty\). For convenience, we give some lemmas which will be used in the proof of the main results.
Lemma 2.1
(Jensen’s inequality)
Let \(n\in N\), \(a_{1}, a_{2}, \ldots, a_{n}\) be nonnegative real numbers. Then, for \(r>1\),
$$ \Biggl(\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i} \Biggr)^{r}\leq n^{r-1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}^{r} . $$
Lemma 2.2
(see [13])
Let \(a\geq0\), \(p\geq q\geq0\), \(p\neq0\), then
$$ a^{\frac{q}{p}}\leq \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a+\frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \quad \textit{for any } K> 0 . $$
Lemma 2.3
(see [14])
Let α, β, γ, and p be positive constants, then
$$ \int^{t}_{0} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{p(\beta-1)}s^{p(\gamma -1)}\,ds=\frac{t^{\theta}}{\alpha}B \biggl[ \frac{p(\gamma -1)+1}{\alpha}, p(\beta-1)+1 \biggr], \quad t\in R_{+}. $$
Here \(B(m,n)=\int^{1}_{0}s^{m-1}(1-s)^{n-1}\,ds\) (\(m > 0\), \(n > 0\)) is the B-function, \(\theta=p[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma-1]+1\).
Definition 2.1
(see [15])
Let \([x, y, z]\) be an ordered parameter group of nonnegative real numbers. The group is said to belong to the first class distribution and denoted by \([x, y, z] \in I\) if the conditions \(x \in(0, 1]\), \(y \in(\frac {1}{2}, 1) \), and \(z \geq\frac{3}{2}-y\) are satisfied; the group is said to belong to the second class distribution and denoted by \([x, y, z]\in\mathit{II}\) if the conditions \(x\in(0, 1]\), \(y \in(0, \frac{1}{2}]\), and \(z > \frac {1-2y^{2}}{1-y^{2}}\) are satisfied.
Lemma 2.4
(see [15])
Suppose that the positive constants α, β, γ, \(p_{1}\), and \(p_{2}\) satisfy the conditions
(a)
if \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in I\), \(p_{1}=\frac {1}{\beta}\);
 
(b)
if \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in \mathit{II}\), \(p_{2}=\frac {1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}\), then
$$ B \biggl[\frac{p_{i}(\gamma-1)+1}{\alpha}, p_{i}(\beta-1)+1 \biggr]\in(0, \infty) $$
and
$$ \theta_{i}=p_{i} \bigl[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma-1 \bigr]+1 \geq0 $$
are valid for \(i=1, 2\).
 
Lemma 2.5
([13])
Let \(a(t), b(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\), \(p\geq q>0\). If \(u(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\), and
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
then
$$ u(t) \leq \biggl\{ a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{1}(s)e^{\int _{s}^{t}B_{1}(\tau)\,d\tau}\,ds \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in I. $$
(2.1)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& A_{1}(t)=b(t) \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr],\qquad B_{1}(t)= \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}b(t). \end{aligned}$$
Lemma 2.6
Let \(a(t), b(t), c(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\), \(p\geq q>0\), \(p\geq l>0\), \(\varphi(t)\in C([t_{0}-r, t_{0}], R_{+})\), \(a(t_{0})=\varphi(t_{0})\). If \(u(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\), and
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds+\int _{t_{0}}^{t}c(s) u^{l}(s-r)\,ds, \quad t\in I, \\ u(t)\leq\varphi(t), \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
(2.2)
Then, for \(t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r)\),
$$ u(t) \leq \biggl\{ a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c(s)\varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds+ \int _{t_{0}}^{t}A_{2}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}B_{2}(\tau)\,d\tau} \,ds \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}. $$
(2.3)
Here \(r\in R_{+}\),
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} &A_{2}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b(t) \biggl(a(t)+ \int ^{t}_{t_{0}}c(s)\varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}}, \\ &B_{2}(t)=B_{1}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b(t). \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
For \(t\in[t_{0}+r, T)\),
$$ u(t) \leq \biggl\{ a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{3}(s)e^{\int _{s}^{t}B_{3}(\tau)\,d\tau} \,ds \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, $$
(2.4)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& A_{3}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a(t)b(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}}b(t)+\frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}a(t-r)c(t)+ \frac{p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}}c(t), \\& B_{3}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}b(t)+ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac{l-p}{p}}c(t). \end{aligned}$$
Proof
For \(t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r)\), we get
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c(s) \varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
then from Lemma 2.5, the inequality (2.3) holds.
For \(t\in[t_{0}+r, T)\), let \(z(t)=\int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}c(s) u^{l}(s-r)\,ds\), then \(z(t_{0})=0\), \(z(t)\) is nondecreasing, and
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+z(t). $$
Then from Lemma 2.2 we obtain, for any \(K>0\),
$$\begin{aligned} z'(t) =&b(t) u^{q}(t)+c(t) u^{l}(t-r) \\ \leq& b(t) \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}} \bigl(a(t)+z(t) \bigr)+ \frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr] \\ &{}+c(t) \biggl[\frac{l}{p}K^{\frac{l-p}{p}} \bigl(a(t-r)+z(t-r) \bigr)+ \frac {p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}} \biggr] \\ \leq& A_{3}(t)+B_{3}(t)z(t), \end{aligned}$$
and we have \(z(t)\leq \int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{3}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}B_{3}(\tau)\,d\tau}\,ds\). Then the inequality (2.4) holds. □
Lemma 2.7
([16])
Let \(a(t)\), \(b(t, s)\), \(b'(t,s)\) be continuous and nonnegative. If \(u(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\) and
$$ u(t) \leq a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(t, s)u(s)\,ds, $$
then
$$ u(t) \leq a(t)+e^{\int_{t_{0}}^{t}b(t, s)\,ds} \int_{t_{0}}^{t}e^{-\int _{t_{0}}^{\tau} b(\tau, s)\,ds} \biggl[a(\tau)b(\tau, \tau)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{\tau }b'_{\tau}(\tau, s)a(s)\,ds \biggr]\,d\tau. $$
(2.5)

3 Main results

We are now to deal with a certain class of Henry-Gronwall type retarded inequalities with weak integral kernels.
Theorem 3.1
Let \(a(t), b(t), c(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\), \(p\geq q>0\), \(p\geq l>0\), \(\varphi(t)\in C([t_{0}-r, t_{0}], R_{+})\), \(a(t_{0})=\varphi(t_{0})\), \(u(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\). Suppose
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{l}(s-r)\,ds, \quad t\in I, \\ u(t)\leq\varphi(t), \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}), \end{cases} $$
(3.1)
where \(\beta> 0\).
(i) Suppose that \(\beta>\frac{1}{2}\), then
$$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} u(t) \leq \{a_{1}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}c_{1}(s)\varphi ^{l}(s-r)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{4}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}B_{4}(\tau)\,d\tau }\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r), \\ u(t)\leq \{a_{1}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{5}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}B_{5}(\tau )\,d\tau}\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}+r, T). \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& a_{1}(t)=3a^{2}(t)e^{-2t} , \qquad b_{1}(t)=\frac{6\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta}}b^{2}(t)e^{2t(\frac{q}{p}-1)} , \\& c_{1}(t)=\frac{6\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta}}c^{2}(s)e^{2t(\frac{l}{p}-1)} , \\& A_{4}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b_{1}(t) \biggl[a_{1}(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c_{1}(s) \varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr]+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} , \\& B_{4}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}b_{1}(t) , \\& A_{5}(t)= \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a_{1}(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]b_{1}(t)+ \biggl[ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}a_{1}(t-r) +\frac{p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}} \biggr]c_{1}(t) , \\& B_{5}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b_{1}(t)+ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}c_{1}(t) . \end{aligned}$$
(ii) If \(0<\beta\leq\frac{1}{2}\), let \(q_{1}=\frac{1+\beta }{\beta}\), \(p_{1}=1+\beta\), then
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} u(t) \leq \{a_{2}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}c_{2}(s)\varphi ^{l}(s-r)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{6}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}B_{6}(\tau)\,d\tau }\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r), \\ u(t)\leq \{a_{2}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}A_{7}(s)e^{\int _{s}^{t}B_{7}(\tau)\,d\tau}\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}},\quad t\in [t_{0}+r, T). \end{cases} $$
(3.3)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& a_{2}(t)=3^{q_{1}-1}a^{q_{1}}(t)e^{-q_{1}t} , \qquad b_{2}(t)=3^{q_{1}-1} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(1-(1-\beta )p_{1})}{p_{1}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{1}}} \biggr)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p_{1}}}b^{q_{1}}(t)e^{(-q_{1}+\frac {q_{1}q}{p})t} , \\& c_{2}(t)=3^{q_{1}-1} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(1-(1-\beta )p_{1})}{p_{1}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{1}}} \biggr)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p_{1}}} c^{q_{1}}(t)e^{(-q_{1}+\frac{q_{1}l}{p})t} , \\& A_{6}(t)=\frac {q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b_{2}(t) \biggl(a_{2}(t)+ \int _{t_{0}}^{t}c_{2}(s) \varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac {q}{p}} , \\& B_{6}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b_{2}(t), \\& A_{7}(t)= \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a_{2}(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]b_{2}(t)+ \biggl[ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}a_{2}(t-r) +\frac{p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}} \biggr]c_{2}(t) , \\& B_{7}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}b_{2}(t)+ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}c_{2}(t) . \end{aligned}$$
Proof
(i) Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality by (3.1), we get
$$\begin{aligned} u^{p}(t) \leq& a(t)+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}e^{s}e^{-s}b(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}e^{s}e^{-s}c(s) u^{l}(s-r)\,ds \\ \leq& a(t)+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{2\beta-2}e^{2s} \,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2q}(s)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ &{}+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{2\beta-2}e^{2s} \,ds \biggr)^{\frac {1}{2}} \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ \leq&a(t)+ \biggl(\frac{2e^{2t}\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl[ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2q}(s)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{2}}+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac {1}{2}} \biggr] . \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.1 for \(n=3\), \(r=2\), we obtain
$$ u^{2p}(t)\leq3a^{2}(t)+3\frac{2e^{2t}\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta }} \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2q}(s)\,ds+ \int _{t_{0}}^{t}c^{2}(s)e^{-2s} u^{2l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr). $$
Let \(v(t)=e^{-\frac{2}{p}t}u^{2}(t)\), then we get
$$\begin{aligned} v^{p}(t) \leq&3a^{2}(t)e^{-2t}+\frac{6\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta }} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{2}(s)e^{2s(\frac{q}{p}-1)} v^{q}(s)\,ds+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{2}(s)e^{2s(\frac{l}{p}-1)} v^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.6, we get (3.2).
(ii) By the hypothesis, we get \(\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac {1}{q_{1}}=1\), using the Hölder inequality by (3.1), we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} u^{p}(t) \leq& a(t)+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{p_{1}(\beta -1)}e^{p_{1}s} \,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}} \biggl( \int _{t_{0}}^{t}b^{q_{1}}(s)e^{-q_{1}s} u^{q_{1}q}(s)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac {1}{q_{1}}} \\ &{}+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{p_{1}(\beta-1)}e^{p_{1}s} \,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}} \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}e^{-q_{1}s}c^{q_{1}}(s) u^{q_{1}l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}} \\ =&a(t)+ \biggl(\frac{e^{p_{1}t}\Gamma(1-(1-\beta )p_{1})}{p_{1}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{1}}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl[ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{q_{1}}(s)e^{-q_{1}s} u^{q_{1}q}(s)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}}+ \biggl( \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{q_{1}}(s)e^{-q_{1}s} u^{q_{1}l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr)^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}} \biggr] . \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.1 for \(n=3\), \(r=q_{1}\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} u^{pq_{1}}(t) \leq&3^{q_{1}-1} a^{q_{1}}(t)+3^{q_{1}-1} \biggl(\frac {e^{p_{1}t}\Gamma(1-(1-\beta)p_{1})}{p_{1}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{1}}} \biggr)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p_{1}}} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl[ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{q_{1}}(s)e^{-q_{1}s} u^{q_{1}q}(s)\,ds+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{q_{1}}(s)e^{-q_{1}s} u^{q_{1}l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr] . \end{aligned}$$
Let \(v(t)=e^{-\frac{q_{1}}{p}t}u^{q_{1}}(t)\), then we get
$$\begin{aligned} v^{p}(t) \leq&3^{q_{1}-1} a^{q_{1}}(t)e^{-q_{1}t}+3^{q_{1}-1} \biggl(\frac {\Gamma(1-(1-\beta)p_{1})}{ p_{1}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{1}}} \biggr)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p_{1}}} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl[ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}b^{q_{1}}(s)e^{(-q_{1}+\frac {q_{1}q}{p})s} v^{q}(s)\,ds+ \int_{t_{0}}^{t}c^{q_{1}}(s)e^{(-q_{1}+\frac{q_{1}l}{p})s} v^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr]. \end{aligned}$$
By Lemma 2.6 we get (3.3). This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. □
Remark 3.1
If \(p=q=1\), then Theorem 3.1 becomes Theorem 5 in [5]. If \(p=q=l=1\), then Theorem 3.1 becomes Theorem 2.5 in [3]. If \(p=l=1\), \(b(t)=0\), then Theorem 3.1 becomes Theorem 2.4 in [3].
Theorem 3.2
Suppose that \(u(t)\), \(a(t)\), \(b(t)\), \(c(t)\), \(d(t)\), \(f(t)\) are nonnegative continuous functions for \(t\in R_{+}\). Let p, m, q be constants with \(p\geq m>0\), \(p\geq q >0\). If
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{m}(s)\,ds+d(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta -1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
(3.4)
then for \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in I\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{1}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{1}(t,s)\,ds}\int_{0}^{t}e^{-\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{1}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl( \bar{a}_{1}(s) \bar{b}_{1}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{1\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{1}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{1-\beta} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.5)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{1}(t) = 3^{\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{1}^{\beta}A^{1-\beta}_{1}(t)+d(t) \bigl(N_{1} t^{\theta_{1}} \bigr)^{\beta}B_{1}^{1-\beta}(t) \bigr]^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}, \\& \bar{b}_{1}(t,s) = 3^{\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t}M_{1}^{\beta} \biggr)^{\frac {1}{1-\beta}} e^{-\frac{1}{1-\beta}s} c^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}(s) \\& \hphantom{\bar{b}_{1}(t,s) ={}}{}+ \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{1}t^{\theta_{1}} \bigr)^{\beta} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}f^{\frac {1}{1-\beta}}(s) \biggr], \\& M_{1} = \frac{\Gamma (1-(1-\beta)\frac{1}{\beta} )}{ (\frac{1}{\beta} )^{1-(1-\beta)\frac{1}{\beta}}}= \frac{\Gamma(2-\frac{1}{\beta})}{ \beta^{\frac{1}{\beta}-2}}, \\& N_{1} = \frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot B \biggl(\frac{\frac{\gamma-1}{\beta }+1}{\alpha}, \frac{\beta-1}{\beta}+1 \biggr)=\frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot B \biggl(\frac{\beta+\gamma-1}{\alpha}, \frac{2\beta-1}{\beta} \biggr), \\& \theta_{1} = \frac{1}{\beta} \bigl[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma-1 \bigr]+1, \\& A_{1}(t) = \int_{0}^{t}e^{-\frac{1}{1-\beta}s}c^{\frac{1}{1-\beta }}(s) \biggl(\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p} K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}\,ds, \\& B_{1}(t) = \int_{0}^{t}f^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}(s) \biggl( \frac {q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-q}{p} K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}\,ds; \end{aligned}$$
for \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in \mathit{II}\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{2}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{2}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t}e^{-\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{2}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl( \bar{a}_{2}(s) \bar{b}_{2}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{2\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{2}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{\frac{ \beta}{1+4\beta }} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{2}(t) = 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{2}^{\frac{1+3 \beta}{1+4\beta}}A^{\frac{\beta}{1+4\beta }}_{2}(t)+d(t) \bigl(N_{2} t^{\theta_{2}} \bigr)^{\frac{1+3\beta}{1+4 \beta}}B_{2}^{\frac{\beta }{1+4\beta}}(t) \bigr]^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}, \\& \bar{b}_{2}(t,s)= 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t}M_{2} ^{\frac{1+3\beta}{1+4\beta}} \biggr)^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}} e^{-\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}s} c^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \\& \hphantom{\bar{b}_{2}(t,s)={}}{}+ \biggl(\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{2}t^{\theta_{2}} \bigr)^{\frac{1+3\beta}{1+4 \beta}} \biggr) ^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}f^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \biggr], \\& M_{2} = \frac{\Gamma (1-(1-\beta)\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta } )}{ (\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta} )^{1-(1-\beta )\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}}} =\frac{\Gamma (\frac{4\beta^{2}}{1+3\beta} )}{ (\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta} )^{\frac{4\beta^{2}}{1+3\beta }}}, \\& N_{2} = \frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot B \biggl(\frac{\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}(\gamma-1)+1}{\alpha}, \frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}(\beta-1)+1 \biggr) \\& \hphantom{N_{2}}=\frac{1}{\alpha }\cdot B \biggl( \frac{\gamma-\beta+4\beta\gamma}{\alpha(1+3\beta)},\frac {4\beta^{2}}{1+3\beta} \biggr), \\& \theta_{2} = \frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta} \bigl[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma-1 \bigr]+1, \\& A_{2}(t) = \int_{0}^{t}e^{-\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}s}c^{\frac {1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \biggl(\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p} K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr)^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}\,ds, \\& B_{2}(t) = \int_{0}^{t}f^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \biggl( \frac {q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-q}{p} K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr)^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
Define
$$ v(t)=b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{m}(s)\,ds+d(t) \int _{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
(3.7)
then
$$ u^{p}(t)\leq a(t)+v(t)\quad \mbox{or} \quad u(t)\leq \bigl\{ a(t)+v(t) \bigr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}. $$
(3.8)
By Lemma 2.2, from (3.7), for any \(K>0\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) \leq& b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) \biggl[ \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}} \bigl(a(s)+v(s) \bigr)+\frac{p-m}{p}K^{\frac {m}{p}} \biggr] \,ds \\ &{}+d(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma -1}f(s) \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}} \bigl(a(s)+v(s) \bigr)+\frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]\,ds \\ =&A(t)+\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta -1}c(s) v(s)\,ds \\ &{}+ \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t) \int _{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma -1}f(s)v(s)\,ds \\ =&A(t)+\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)\cdot B(t)+\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t) \cdot C(t). \end{aligned}$$
(3.9)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& A(t) = b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) \biggl[ \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p}K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr] \,ds \\& \hphantom{A(t) ={}}{} + d(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}f(s)s^{\gamma -1} \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}a(s)+ \frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]\,ds, \\& B(t) = \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) v(s)\,ds, \\& C(t) = \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s)v(s)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Now we try to estimate \(A(t)\), \(B(t)\), and \(C(t) \).
If \([\alpha,\beta,\gamma]\in I\), let \(p_{1}=\frac{1}{\beta}\), \(q_{1}=\frac{1}{1-\beta}\); if \([\alpha,\beta,\gamma]\in\mathit{II}\), let \(p_{2}=\frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}\), \(q_{2}=\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}\). Then \(\frac{1}{p_{i}}+\frac{1}{q_{i}}=1\) for \(i=1, 2\). Using Hölder’s inequality, Lemma 2.3, and Lemma 2.4 we get
$$\begin{aligned} A(t) \leq& b(t) \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{p_{i}(\beta -1)}e^{p_{i}s} \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} e^{-q_{i}s}c^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac{m}{p}K^{\frac {m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p}K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}} \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ &{}+d(t) \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{p_{i}(\beta -1)}s^{p_{i}(\gamma-1)}\,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}f^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}}\,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ =&b(t) \biggl(\frac{e^{p_{i}t}\Gamma(1-(1-\beta )p_{i})}{p_{i}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{i}}} \biggr) ^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} e^{-q_{i}s}c^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac{m}{p}K^{\frac {m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p}K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}} \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ &{}+d(t) \biggl[\frac{t^{\theta_{i}}}{\alpha}B \biggl(\frac {p_{i}(\gamma-1)+1}{\alpha}, p_{i}(\beta-1)+1 \biggr) \biggr]^{\frac {1}{p_{i}}} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}f^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}}\,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ =& b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}A_{i}^{\frac {1}{q_{i}}}(t)+d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta_{i}} \bigr)^{\frac {1}{p_{i}}}B_{i}^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}}(t). \end{aligned}$$
(3.10)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& \theta_{i} = p_{i} \bigl[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma-1 \bigr]+1, \\& M_{i} = \frac{\Gamma(1-(1-\beta)p_{i})}{p_{i}^{1-(1-\beta)p_{i}}},\qquad N_{i}= \frac{1}{\alpha}B \biggl(\frac{p_{i}(\gamma -1)+1}{\alpha}, p_{i}(\beta-1)+1 \biggr), \\& A_{i}(t) = \int_{0}^{t} e^{-q_{i}s}c^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-m}{p}K^{\frac{m}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}} \,ds, \\& B_{i}(t) = \int_{0}^{t}f^{q_{i}}(s) \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}a(s)+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr)^{q_{i}}\,ds , \quad i=1, 2. \end{aligned}$$
Similarly, we can get
$$\begin{aligned} B(t) \leq& \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{p_{i}(\beta-1)}e^{p_{i}s} \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}e^{-q_{i}s} c^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ =&e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t}e^{-q_{i}s} c^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \end{aligned}$$
(3.11)
and
$$\begin{aligned} C(t) \leq& \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{p_{i}(\beta -1)}s^{p_{i}(\gamma-1)}\,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int _{0}^{t} f^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ =& \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta_{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} f^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.12)
From (3.9), (3.11), and (3.12) we get
$$\begin{aligned} v(t) \leq& A(t)+\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac {1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} e^{-q_{i}s} c^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \\ &{}+\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta_{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggl[ \int_{0}^{t} f^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}}. \end{aligned}$$
Using Lemma 2.1 and (3.10) we can get
$$\begin{aligned} v^{q_{i}}(t) \leq& 3^{q_{i}-1} A^{q_{i}}(t)+3^{q_{i}-1} \biggl(\frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggr)^{q_{i}} \int_{0}^{t} e^{-q_{i}s} c^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \\ &{}+3^{q_{i}-1} \biggl(\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta _{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggr)^{q_{i}} \int_{0}^{t} f^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \\ =&3^{q_{i}-1} A^{q_{i}}(t)+e_{i}(t) \int_{0}^{t}e^{-q_{i}s} c^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds+g_{i}(t) \int_{0}^{t} f^{q_{i}}(s)v^{q_{i}}(s) \,ds \\ \leq&3^{q_{i}-1} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}A_{i}^{\frac {1}{q_{i}}}(t) +d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta_{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}B_{i}^{\frac {1}{q_{i}}}(t) \bigr]^{q_{i}} \\ &{}+ \int_{0}^{t} \bigl[e_{i}(t)e^{-q_{i}s}c^{q_{i}}(s)+g_{i}(t) f^{q_{i}}(s) \bigr]v^{q_{i}}(s)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(3.13)
Here
$$ e_{i}(t)=3^{q_{i}-1} \biggl(\frac{m}{p}K^{\frac {m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggr)^{q_{i}},\qquad g_{i}(t)=3^{q_{i}-1} \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta_{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}} \biggr)^{q_{i}}. $$
By Lemma 2.7 we have
$$ v^{q_{i}}(t) \leq \bar{a}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar{b}(t,s)\,ds} \int _{0}^{t}e^{-\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}(\tau,s)\,ds} \biggl[\bar{a}(s) \bar {b}(\tau, \tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{\tau}( \tau,s)\bar {a}(s)\,ds \biggr]\,d\tau. $$
(3.14)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{i}(t)=3^{q_{i}-1} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{i}^{\frac {1}{p_{i}}}A_{i}^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}}(t)+d(t) \bigl(N_{i}t^{\theta _{i}} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{p_{i}}}B_{i}^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}}(t) \bigr]^{q_{i}}, \\& \bar{b}_{i}(t, s)=e_{i}(t)e^{-q_{i}s}c^{q_{i}}(s)+g_{i}(t)f^{q_{i}}(s). \end{aligned}$$
Combining (3.8) and (3.14) we get
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{i}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar{b}_{i}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t} e^{-\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{i}(\tau,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl( \bar{a}_{i}(s)\bar {b}_{i}(\tau, \tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{i\tau}( \tau, s)\bar{a}_{i}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{\frac{1}{q_{i}}} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.15)
Considering the two situations for \(i=1, 2\) and using the parameters α, β, and γ to \(p_{i}\), \(q_{i}\) and \(\theta_{i}\) in (3.15), we can get (3.4) and (3.5), respectively. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.2. □
Corollary 3.1
Suppose that the conditions of Theorem  3.2 hold, if \(b(t)=0\), then
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+d(t) \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta -1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds $$
and we deduce the following results.
For \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in I\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{3}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{3}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t}e^{\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{3}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl( \bar{a}_{3}(s) \bar{b}_{3}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{3\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{3}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{1-\beta} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.16)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{3}(t) = \bigl(3^{\beta}d(t)N_{1}^{\beta}t^{(\alpha +1)(\beta-1)+\gamma} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}B_{1}(t), \\& \bar{b}_{3}(t,s) = 3^{\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}} \biggl(\frac {q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t)N_{1}^{\beta}t^{(\alpha+1)(\beta -1)+\gamma} f(s) \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}, \end{aligned}$$
\(N_{1}\), \(B_{1}(t)\) are the same as in Theorem  3.2.
For \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in \mathit{II}\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{4}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{4}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t}e^{\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{4}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl( \bar{a}_{4}(s) \bar{b}_{4}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{4\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{4}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{\frac{ \beta}{1+4\beta }} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.17)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{4}(t) = 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \bigl[d(t)N_{2}^{\frac {1+3\beta}{1+4\beta}} t^{\frac{ [\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma ](1+3\beta)+\beta}{1+3\beta }} \bigr]^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}B_{2}(t), \\& \bar{b}_{4}(t,s) = 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \biggl(\frac {q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}d(t)N_{2}^{\frac{1+3\beta}{1+4\beta}} t^{\frac{[\alpha(\beta-1)+\gamma](1+3\beta)+\beta}{1+3\beta }}f(s) \biggr)^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}, \end{aligned}$$
\(N_{2}\), \(B_{2}(t)\) are the same as in Theorem  3.2.
Corollary 3.2
Suppose that the conditions of Theorem  3.2 hold, \(\alpha=\gamma=1\). If
$$ u^{p}(t) \leq a(t)+b(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s) u^{m}(s)\,ds+d(t) \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}f(s) u^{q}(s)\,ds, $$
then for \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in I\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{5}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{1}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t}e^{\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{1}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot \biggl( \bar{a}_{5}(s) \bar{b}_{1}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{5\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{5}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{1-\beta} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.18)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{5}(t) = 3^{\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{1}^{\beta}A_{1}^{1-\beta}(t) +d(t) \bigl(\bar{N}_{1}t^{\bar{\theta}_{1}} \bigr)^{\beta}B_{1}^{1-\beta }(t) \bigr]^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}, \\& \bar{b}_{5}(t,s) = 3^{\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)M_{1}^{\beta} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta }}e^{\frac{1}{\beta-1}s} c^{\frac{1}{\beta-1}}(s)+ \biggl( \frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(N_{1}t^{\bar{\theta}_{1}} \bigr)^{\beta} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}f^{\frac{1}{1-\beta}}(s) \biggr], \\& \bar{N}_{1} = B \biggl(1, \frac{2\beta-1}{\beta} \biggr), \qquad \bar{ \theta}_{1}=\frac{1}{\beta}(\beta-1)+1=\frac{2\beta -1}{\beta}, \end{aligned}$$
\(M_{1}\), \(A_{1}(t)\), \(B_{1}(t)\) are the same as in Theorem  3.2.
For \([\alpha, \beta, \gamma]\in \mathit{II}\),
$$\begin{aligned} u(t) \leq& \biggl\{ a(t)+ \biggl[\bar{a}_{6}(t)+e^{\int_{0}^{t}\bar {b}_{6}(t,s)\,ds} \int_{0}^{t}e^{\int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}_{6}(\tau ,s)\,ds} \\ &{}\cdot\biggl( \bar{a}_{6}(s) \bar{b}_{6}(\tau,\tau)+ \int_{0}^{\tau}\bar{b}'_{6\tau}( \tau ,s)\bar{a}_{6}(s)\,ds \biggr)\,d\tau \biggr]^{\frac{ \beta}{1+4\beta }} \biggr\} ^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.19)
where
$$\begin{aligned}& \bar{a}_{6}(t) = 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \bigl[b(t)e^{t}M_{2}^{\frac{1+3 \beta}{1+4\beta}}A_{2}^{\frac{\beta }{1+4\beta}}(t)+d(t) \bigl(\bar{N}_{2} t^{\bar{\theta}_{2}} \bigr)^{\frac{1+3\beta}{1+4\beta}}B_{2}^{\frac{\beta}{1+4\beta}}(t) \bigr]^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}, \\& \bar{b}_{6}(t,s) = 3^{\frac{1+3\beta}{\beta}} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac {m}{p}K^{\frac{m-p}{p}}b(t)e^{t} M_{2}^{\frac{1+3 \beta}{1+4\beta}} \biggr)^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}} e^{-\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}s} c^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \\& \hphantom{\bar{b}_{6}(t,s) ={}}{}+ \biggl(\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac {q-p}{p}}d(t) \bigl(\bar{N}_{2}t^{\bar{\theta}_{2}} \bigr)^{\frac {1+3\beta}{1+4\beta}} \biggr) ^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}f^{\frac{1+4\beta}{\beta}}(s) \biggr], \\& \bar{N}_{2} = B \biggl(1, \frac{4\beta^{2}}{1+3\beta} \biggr), \\& \bar{\theta}_{2} = \frac{1+4\beta}{1+3\beta}(\beta-1)+1=\frac {4\beta^{2}}{1+3\beta}, \end{aligned}$$
\(M_{2}\), \(A_{2}(t)\), \(B_{2}(t)\) are the same as in Theorem  3.2.
Remark 3.2
If \(b(t)=0\), then Theorem 3.2 becomes Theorem 2.6 in [2].
Remark 3.3
If \(b(t)=d(t)=1\), \(p=m=\alpha =\gamma=1\), then Theorem 3.2 becomes Theorem 4 in [4]. Due to the difference in methods, our results are not the same as in [2]. The results in Theorem 3.2 have the simple exponential function of Theorem 4 in [2].

4 Applications

(1) Consider the delay fractional differential equations with initial condition
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} {}^{\mathrm{C}}_{t_{0}}D_{t}^{\beta}x^{p}(t)=f(t, x(t), x(t-r)), \quad t\in I=[t_{0}, T), \\ {}^{\mathrm{C}}_{t_{0}}D_{t}^{\beta} x(t_{0})=b_{k}, \quad k=0,1,2,\ldots,m-1, \\ x(t)=\varphi(t), \quad t\in I=[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
(4.1)
Here \({}^{\mathrm{C}}_{t_{0}}D_{t}^{\beta}\) is the Caputo fractional derivative of order β (\(m-1\leq\beta< m\)), \(r\in R_{+}\) is a real constant, \(f(t, y, z)\in C(I\times R^{2}, R)\), φ is a given continuously differentiable function on \([t_{0}-r, t_{0}]\) up to order m (\(m=-[-\beta]\)). In this case, we denote \(\varphi^{k}(t_{0})=b_{k}\), \(k=0,1,2,\ldots, m-1\).
In [17], the initial value problem (4.1) is equivalent to the Volterra fractional integral equation
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} x^{p}(t)=\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}\frac{b_{k}}{k!}(t-t_{0})^{k}+\frac {1}{\Gamma(\beta)}\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}f(s, x(s), x(s-r))\,ds, \quad t\in I, \\ x(t)=\varphi(t), \quad t\in I=[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
(4.2)
The next theorem deals with the estimates of the solution of (4.2).
Theorem 4.1
Suppose that \(|f(t,y,z)|\leq b(t)|y|^{q}+c(t)|z|^{l}\), \(t\in I\), \(m, p, q, l\in R_{+}\), \(p\geq q\), \(p\geq l\), \(b(t), c(t)\in C(I, R_{+})\). If \(x(t)\) is the solution of initial problem (4.2), then the following estimations hold.
(i) Suppose that \(\beta>\frac{1}{2}\), then
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} |x(t)| \leq \{g_{1}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}k_{1}(s)\varphi ^{l}(s-r)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}F_{1}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}G_{1}(\tau)\,d\tau }\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r), \\ |x(t)|\leq \{g_{1}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}F_{2}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}G_{2}(\tau )\,d\tau}\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}} \quad t\in[t_{0}+r, T). \end{cases} $$
(4.3)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& g_{1}(t)=3e^{-2t} \Biggl[\sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \frac {|b_{k}|}{k!}(t-t_{0})^{k} \Biggr]^{2}, \qquad h_{1}(t)=\frac{6\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta}}e^{2t(\frac {q}{p}-1)} \biggl[ \frac{b(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggr]^{2}, \\& k_{1}(t)=\frac{6\Gamma(2\beta-1)}{4^{\beta}} \biggl[\frac {c(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggr]^{2}e^{2t(\frac{l}{p}-1)}, \\& F_{1}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{1}(t) \biggl[g_{1}(t)+ \int _{t_{0}}^{t}k_{1}(s) \varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr]+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}},\qquad G_{1}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{1}(t), \\& F_{2}(t)= \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}g_{1}(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]h_{1}(t)+ \biggl[ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}g_{1}(t-r) +\frac{p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}} \biggr]k_{1}(t), \\& G_{2}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{1}(t)+ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}k_{1}(t) . \end{aligned}$$
(ii) If \(0<\beta\leq\frac{1}{2}\), then
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} |x(t)| \leq \{g_{2}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}k_{2}(s)\varphi ^{l}(s-r)\,ds+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}F_{3}(s) e^{\int_{s}^{t}G_{3}(\tau)\,d\tau}\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}, t_{0}+r), \\ |x(t)|\leq \{g_{2}(t)+\int_{t_{0}}^{t}F_{4}(s)e^{\int_{s}^{t}G_{4}(\tau )\,d\tau}\,ds \}^{\frac{1}{p}}, \quad t\in[t_{0}+r, T). \end{cases} $$
(4.4)
Here
$$\begin{aligned}& g_{2}(t)=3^{\frac{1}{\beta}}e^{-\frac{1+\beta}{\beta}t} \Biggl[\sum _{k=0}^{m-1}\frac{|b_{k}|}{k!}(t-t_{0})^{k} \Biggr]^{\frac {1+\beta}{\beta}}, \\& h_{2}(t)=3^{\frac{1}{\beta}} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\beta ^{2})}{(1+\beta)^{\beta^{2}}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} e^{ [-\frac{1+\beta}{\beta}+\frac{q}{p}(1+\beta) ]t} \biggl[\frac{b(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggr]^{\frac{1+\beta}{\beta }}, \\& k_{2}(t)=3^{\frac{1}{\beta}} \biggl(\frac{\Gamma(\beta ^{2})}{(1+\beta)^{\beta^{2}}} \biggr)^{\frac{1}{\beta}} e^{ [-\frac{1+\beta}{\beta}+\frac{q}{p}(1+\beta) ]t} \biggl[\frac{c(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \biggr]^{\frac{1+\beta}{\beta }}, \\& F_{3}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{2}(t) \biggl[g_{2}(t)+ \int _{t_{0}}^{t}k_{2}(s) \varphi^{l}(s-r)\,ds \biggr]+\frac{p-q}{p}K^{\frac {q}{p}}, \qquad G_{3}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{2}(t), \\& F_{4}(t)= \biggl[\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}g_{2}(t)+ \frac {p-q}{p}K^{\frac{q}{p}} \biggr]h_{2}(t)+ \biggl[ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}g_{2}(t-r) +\frac{p-l}{p}K^{\frac{l}{p}} \biggr]k_{2}(t), \\& G_{4}(t)=\frac{q}{p}K^{\frac{q-p}{p}}h_{2}(t)+ \frac{l}{p}K^{\frac {l-p}{p}}k_{2}(t) . \end{aligned}$$
Proof
By (4.2), we derive that
$$ \textstyle\begin{cases} |x(t)|^{p}\leq\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}\frac{|b_{k}|}{k!}(t-t_{0})^{k}+\frac {1}{\Gamma(\beta)}\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}b(s)|x(s)|^{q}\,ds \\ \hphantom{|x(t)|^{p}\leq{}}{}+\frac{1}{\Gamma(\beta)}\int_{t_{0}}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta-1}c(s)|x(s-r)|^{l}\,ds,\quad t\in I, \\ |x(t)|=|\varphi(t)|, \quad t\in[t_{0}-r, t_{0}). \end{cases} $$
(4.5)
Using Theorem 3.1, we get the desired conclusion. This proves the results (4.3) and (4.4). □
(2) In this section, based on the definition of Riemann-Liouville (R-L) and Erdélyi-Kober (E-K) fractional integral, we will study the boundedness of a certain FDE with R-L fractional operator and E-K fractional operator. The definitions of two fractional operators are given below.
Definition 4.1
([17])
The R-L fractional integral and fractional derivative of order α of the function \(f(x)\in C(R_{+}, R)\) are given by
$$\begin{aligned}& I^{\alpha}f(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_{0}^{x}(x-t)^{\alpha-1}f(t)\,dt, \quad \alpha>0, \\& D^{\alpha}f(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(1-\alpha)}\frac{d}{dx} \int _{0}^{x}(x-t)^{-\alpha}f(t)\,dt,\quad 0< \alpha< 1, \end{aligned}$$
provided that the right side is point-wise defined on \(R_{+}\).
Definition 4.2
([18, 19])
The E-K fractional integral of continuous function \(f(x)\in C(R_{+}, R)\) is defined by
$$ I^{\gamma,\delta}_{\beta}f(x)=\frac{x^{-\beta(\gamma+\delta )}}{\Gamma(\delta)} \int_{0}^{x} \bigl(x^{\beta}-t^{\beta} \bigr)^{\delta -1}t^{\beta\gamma}f(t)d \bigl(t^{\beta} \bigr),\quad \delta, \gamma, \beta\in R_{+}, $$
provided that the right side is point-wise defined on \(R_{+}\).
Consider the following Volterra type integral equations:
$$ u^{p}(t)-\frac{b(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta -1}c(s)u^{m}(s) \,ds-\frac{d(t)}{\Gamma(\beta)} \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma-1}f(s)u^{q}(s)\,ds=a(t). $$
(4.6)
Theorem 4.2
Let \(u(t), a(t), b(t), c(t), d(t), f(t)\in C[0,\infty)\), p, m, q, α, β, γ be the same as in Theorem  3.2. Then, for any \(K>0\), every solution of equation (4.6) has the bounds and the same modality as (3.5), (3.6), in which we have \(|u(t)|\), \(|a(t)|\), \(\frac{|b(t)|}{\Gamma (\beta)}\), \(|c(t)|\), \(\frac{|d(t)|}{\Gamma(\beta)}\), \(|f(t)|\) instead of \(u(t)\), \(a(t)\), \(b(t)\), \(c(t)\), \(d(t)\), and \(f(t)\).
Proof
From (4.6) we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert u(t) \bigr\vert ^{p} \leq& \bigl\vert a(t) \bigr\vert + \frac{\vert b(t)\vert }{\Gamma(\beta)} \int_{0}^{t}(t-s)^{\beta -1} \bigl\vert c(s) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert u(s) \bigr\vert ^{m}\,ds \\ &{}-\frac{\vert d(t)\vert }{\Gamma(\beta)} \int_{0}^{t} \bigl(t^{\alpha}-s^{\alpha} \bigr)^{\beta-1}s^{\gamma-1} \bigl\vert f(s) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert u(s) \bigr\vert ^{q}\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
Then by the difference in the selection of \(a(t)\), \(b(t)\), \(c(t)\), \(d(t)\), \(f(t)\), p, m, q, α, β, γ, we get the desired results. □

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Science Foundation of China (11171178 and 11271225).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RX carried out the generalized weakly singular integral inequalities and completed the corresponding proof. FM participated in Section 4 - Applications. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye, H, Gao, J, Ding, Y: A generalized Gronwall inequality and its application to a fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328, 1075-1081 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Ye, H, Gao, J, Ding, Y: A generalized Gronwall inequality and its application to a fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328, 1075-1081 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Medved̆, M: A new approach to an analysis of Henry type integral inequalities and their Bihari type versions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 214, 349-366 (1997) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Medved̆, M: A new approach to an analysis of Henry type integral inequalities and their Bihari type versions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 214, 349-366 (1997) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Medved̆, M: Integral inequalities and global solutions of semilinear evolution equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 267, 643-650 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Medved̆, M: Integral inequalities and global solutions of semilinear evolution equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 267, 643-650 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye, H, Gao, J: Henry-Gronwall type retarded integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations with delay. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 4152-4160 (2011) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Ye, H, Gao, J: Henry-Gronwall type retarded integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations with delay. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 4152-4160 (2011) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng, Q, Meng, F: Some new Gronwall-type inequalities arising in the research of fractional differential equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 429 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Feng, Q, Meng, F: Some new Gronwall-type inequalities arising in the research of fractional differential equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 429 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, Q, Pečarić, Q: Some new explicit bounds for weakly singular integral inequalities with applications to fractional differential and integral equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 341, 894-905 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Ma, Q, Pečarić, Q: Some new explicit bounds for weakly singular integral inequalities with applications to fractional differential and integral equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 341, 894-905 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung, WS, Ma, QH, Tseng, S: Some new nonlinear weakly singular integral inequalities of Wendroff type with applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, Article ID 909156 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Cheung, WS, Ma, QH, Tseng, S: Some new nonlinear weakly singular integral inequalities of Wendroff type with applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008, Article ID 909156 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H, Zheng, K: Some nonlinear weakly singular integral inequalities with two variables and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, Article ID 345701 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Wang, H, Zheng, K: Some nonlinear weakly singular integral inequalities with two variables and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, Article ID 345701 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhal, F: A new nonlinear integral inequity of Wendroff type with continuous and weakly singular kernel and its application. J. Math. Inequal. 6(3), 367-379 (2012) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Lakhal, F: A new nonlinear integral inequity of Wendroff type with continuous and weakly singular kernel and its application. J. Math. Inequal. 6(3), 367-379 (2012) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry, D: Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Springer, Berlin (1981) MATH Henry, D: Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Springer, Berlin (1981) MATH
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang, FC, Meng, FW: Explicit bounds on some new nonlinear integral inequalities with delay. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 205, 479-486 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Jiang, FC, Meng, FW: Explicit bounds on some new nonlinear integral inequalities with delay. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 205, 479-486 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Prudnikov, AP, Brychkov, YA, Marichev, OI: Integrals and Series: Elementary Functions, vol. 1. Nauka, Moscow (1981) (in Russian) MATH Prudnikov, AP, Brychkov, YA, Marichev, OI: Integrals and Series: Elementary Functions, vol. 1. Nauka, Moscow (1981) (in Russian) MATH
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, QH, Yang, EH: Estimations on solutions of some weakly singular Volterra integral inequalities. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 25, 505-515 (2002) MathSciNetMATH Ma, QH, Yang, EH: Estimations on solutions of some weakly singular Volterra integral inequalities. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 25, 505-515 (2002) MathSciNetMATH
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, H, Meng, F: Integral inequalities in two independent variables for retarded Volterra equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 199, 90-98 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Zhang, H, Meng, F: Integral inequalities in two independent variables for retarded Volterra equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 199, 90-98 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999) MATH Podlubny, I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999) MATH
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiryakova, VS: Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications. Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., vol. 301. Longman, Harlow (1994) MATH Kiryakova, VS: Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications. Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., vol. 301. Longman, Harlow (1994) MATH
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Saqabi, B, Kiryakova, VS: Explicit solutions of fractional integral and differential equations involving Erdélyi-Kober operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 95, 1-13 (1998) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Al-Saqabi, B, Kiryakova, VS: Explicit solutions of fractional integral and differential equations involving Erdélyi-Kober operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 95, 1-13 (1998) MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Some new weakly singular integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations
verfasst von
Run Xu
Fanwei Meng
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Ausgabe 1/2016
Elektronische ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-1015-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner