nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

01.09.2011

Logit Model to Predict Outcomes of Litigated Employee Obesity Cases

verfasst von: Helen LaVan, Marsha Katz

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Given that there are no specific legal protections for obese employees, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the litigated case characteristics and case outcomes when an employee is subjected to negative consequences in the workplace and subsequently sues the employer.

Design/Methodology/Approach

The study is an analysis of a random sample of 276 litigated cases based on adverse employment decisions of individuals who were obese. These cases were retrieved using Lexis/Nexis over the past 10 years. Eighty cases were included in the empirical analysis. This analysis considered demographic characteristics, organizational and cases characteristics, legal bases, and confounding physical factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed in order to investigate the effect of the independent variables.

Findings

The employee prevailed in almost 40% of the cases. The case characteristics associated with the employer prevailing included the employee being a professional, being in the public sector and filing lawsuits under discrimination, health and disability laws.

Implications

Some of the findings are contrary to popular perception. Obese employees have legal protections under various discrimination laws, even though there does not seem to be explicit protections under the law. Thus, organizations must be more vigilant in sanctioning obesity. However, this sanctioning is neither a disability nor a gender issue.

Originality/Value

This is the first study using qualitative content analysis of litigated cases and logistic regression to analyze litigated cases in which obese employees were disciplined.

Vorheriger Artikel The Influence of Psychological Contract Breach on Temporary Workers’ Commitment and Behaviors: A Multiple Agency Perspective

Nächster Artikel Expecting the Worst: Moderating Effects of Social Cynicism on the Relationships Between Relationship Conflict and Negative Affective Reactions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

A condition characterized by a cluster of factors: hypertension, excessive abdominal fact, abnormal cholesterol levels, triglycerides and insulin resistance or glucose intolerance.

See Francis v. City of Meriden, 129 F.3d 281, 284 n.5 (2d Cir. 1997). In Francis, the Second Circuit affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's claim because he did not allege that his employer believed that his weight condition constituted a physical impairment; he merely alleged that he was disciplined for failing to meet a weight standard. Id. at 287. But see Connor v. McDonald's Rest., No. 3:02 CV 382 SRU, 2003 WL 1343259 (D.Conn. March 19, 2003) holding that plaintiff who alleged that McDonald's refused to hire him because it perceived him as substantially limited in the major life activity of working based on his morbid obesity stated a claim.

Implications from employers are presented. These include having concern for obese female applicants not being treated in a different way than obese male applicants. The courts have approved both gender and age related adjustments to weight standards. Physical examinations need to be conducted relative to specific abilities and not to a job in general. Additionally, while few employee or applicants will be able to demonstrate weight-based disabilities, either physical or psychological, employers might be advised to make accommodations voluntarily.

http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logit.htm, downloaded December 3, 2007.

Americans with Disabilities Act, the Vocational Rehabilitation Act, Title VII coverages for sex and national origin, Age Discrimination Act, various state discrimination laws, and Jones Act.

Anonymous. (2005). More companies commit to wellness plans, despite little hard data on results. HR Focus, 82(4), S1, S3.

Anonymous. (2005). Obesity creates an array of workplace ergo challenges. CTDNEWS Workplace Solutions for Repetitive Stress Injuries, 14(7).

Anonymous. (2006). Employers spend millions each year on obesity epidemic, study finds. Workers Compensation Monitor, 19(7).

Anonymous. (2006). Obesity increases medical, indirect costs. Federal EEO Advisor, 8(12).

Baum, C. I., & Ford, W. F. (2004). The wage effects of obesity: a longitudinal study. Health Economics, 13(9), 885–899.PubMedCrossRef

Beegle, K., & Stock, W. (2003). The labor market effects of disability discrimination laws. Journal of Human Resources, 38(4), 806–859.CrossRef

Bellizzi, J. A., & Hasty, R. W. (1998). The effects of obesity and gender as moderated by job-related factors: Territory assignment decisions and supervising unethical selling behavior. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18(2), 35–49.

Bellizzi, J. A., & Hasty, R. W. (2000). Does successful work experience mitigate weight- and gender-based employment discrimination in face-to-face industrial selling? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(6), 384–398.CrossRef

Bello, J. (2004). Attractiveness as hiring criteria: Savvy business practice or racial discrimination? The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 8(483), 483–506.

Bemmels, B. (1988). The effect of grievants’ gender on arbitrators’ decisions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 42, 63–76.CrossRef

Benforado, A., Hanson, J., & Yosifon, D. (2004). Broken scales: Obesity and justice in America. 53 Emory Law Journal, 53, 1645.

Carp, R. A., & Rowland, C. K. (1983). Policymaking and politics in the federal district courts. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

Carpenter, K. M., Hasin, D. S., Allison, D. B., & Faith, M. S. (2000). Relationships between obesity and DSM-IV major depressive disorder, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts: results from a general population study. American Journal of Public Health, 90(2), 251–257.PubMedCrossRef

Carr, D., & Friedman, M. A. (2005). Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(3), 244–260.PubMedCrossRef

DeMaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Finkelstein, E., Fiebelkorn, C., & Wang, G. (2005). The costs of obesity among full time employees. American Journal Health Promotion, 20(1), 45–51.

Friedman, M. A., & Brownell, K. D. (1995). Psychological correlates of obesity: Moving to the next research generation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 3–20.PubMedCrossRef

Friedman, K. E., Reichmann, S. K., Costanzo, P. R., Zelli, A., Ashmore, J. A., & Musante, G. J. (2005). Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: Relation to psychological functioning in obese adults. Obesity Research, 13, 907–916.PubMedCrossRef

Grossman, R. J. (2004). Countering a weight crisis. HR Magazine, 49, 42–51.

Hartman, P. (2005). “Interacting with others” as a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Seton Hall Circuit Review, 2, 139.

Hebl, M. R., & Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 28–38.PubMedCrossRef

Hertz, R. P., Unger, A. N., McDonald, M., Lustik, M. D., & Biddulph-Krentar, J. (2004). The impact of obesity on work limitations and cardiovascular risk factors in the U.S. Workforce. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(12), 1196–1203.PubMed

Horner, K. (2005). Comment: A growing problem. Why the federal government needs to shoulder the burden in protecting workers from weight discrimination. The Catholic University Law Review, 54(589), 489–625.

Hotchkiss, J. (2004). A closer look at the employment impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources, 39(4), 887–911.CrossRef

Huff, C. (2005). Health care benefits: Struggling with surging premiums, more companies are delving into high-deductible plans aimed at getting employees to think twice about making frivolous treatment decisions. Workforce Management, 84(1), 47–51.

Istvan, J., Zavela, K., & Weidner, G. (1992). Body weight and psychological distress in NHANES I. International Journal of Obesity, 16, 999–1003.PubMed

Jupp, J. (2004, Jun 22, 2004). Rising levels of obesity are a cause for concern. Personnel Today, 12.

Kimm, S. Y. S., Sweeney, C. G., Janosky, J. E., & MacMillan, J. P. (1991). Self-concept measures and childhood obesity: A descriptive analysis. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 12, 19–24.CrossRef

King, E. B., Shapiro, J. R., Hebl, M. R., Singletary, S. L., & Turner, S. (2006). The stigma of obesity in customer service: A mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 579–593.PubMedCrossRef

Klaff, L. G. (2005, Oct 10). Employers slow to address ‘metabolic syndrome’ despite sharp impact on health costs. Workforce Management, 84, 68.

Klesges, R. C., Haddock, C. K., Stein, R. J., Klesges, L. M., Heck, L. H., & Hanson, C. L. (1992). Relationship between psychological functioning and bodyfat in preschool children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 793–796.PubMedCrossRef

Kristen, E. (2002). Addressing the problem of weight discrimination in employment. California Law Review, 90(1), 57–109.CrossRef

Kruse, D., & Schur, L. (2003). Employment of people with disabilities following the ADA. Industrial Relations, 42(1):31–66, 31–68.

Laabs, J. J. (1995). Does image matter? Personnel Journal, 74(12), 48–53.

Maranto, C., & Stenoien, Ann. (2000). Weight discrimination: A multi-disciplinary analysis. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12(1), 9–24.CrossRef

Marshall, E. (2004). Public enemy number one: Tobacco or obesity? Science, 304(5762), 804.PubMedCrossRef

McEvoy, S. A. (1992). Fat chance: Employment discrimination against the overweight. Labor Law Journal, 42(1), 3–14.

Mesch, D. J. (1995). Grievance arbritration in the public sector: A conceptual framework and empircal analysis of public and private sector arbitration cases. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15(4), 22–36.CrossRef

Mesch, D. J., & Shamayeva, O. (1996). Arbitration in practice: A profile of public sector arbitration cases. Public Personnel Management, 25(1), 22.

Mirza, P. (2003). Fight the flab at work. Human Resources, (September), 11.

Morris, S. (2006). Body mass index and occupational attainment. Journal of Health Economics, 25(2), 347–364.PubMedCrossRef

Nemarkommula, A. R., Singh, K., Lykens, K., & Hilsenrath, P. (2003). A growing market. Marketing Health Services, 23(4), 34–38.PubMed

O’Neil, P. M., & Jarrell, M. P. (1992). Psychological aspects of obesity and dieting. In T. A. Wadden & T. B. VanItallie (Eds.), Treatment of the seriously obese patient (pp. 252–270). New York, NY: Guilford.

Olson, E. (2003). Obesity in the workplace: A case for treatment. American Journal of Bariatric Medicine.

Osbourne, L. (2005). A look back at 2005, and a look at trends for 2006. Employee Benefit Plan Review, 60(6), 16–20.

Puhl, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788–805.PubMedCrossRef

Puhl, K. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2006). Confronting and coping with weight stigma: An investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity, 14(10), 1802–1815.PubMedCrossRef

Reisman, M. D. (2005). Traveling to the farthest reaches of the ADA or taking aim at employment discrimination on the basis of perceived disability. Cardozo Law Review, 26, 2121.

Roehling, M. V. (1999). Weight-based discrimination in employment. Personnel Psychology, 52(4), 969–1016.CrossRef

Rogge, M. M. (2004). Obesity, stigma, and civilized oppression. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(4), 301–315.PubMed

Rowland, C. K., & Carp, R. A. (1996). Politics and judgment in federal district courts. Lawrence, Kan: University of Kansas Press.

Schmier, J. K., Jones, M. L., & Halpren, M. T. (2006). Cost of obesity in the workplace. Scandinavian Journal of Work, 32(1), 5–11.

Songer, D. R. (1998). United States Courts of Appeals Database Phase 1, 1925–1998. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Spaeth, H. (1999). United States Supreme Court Database, 1953–1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Stunkard, A. J., & Wadden, T. A. (1992). Psychological aspects of severe obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55, 524S–532S.PubMed

Thomas, D. (2005, Oct 25). Fattism is last bastion of employee discrimination. Personnel Today, 4.

Thompson, D., Edelsberg, J., Kinsey, K. L., & Oster, G. (1998). Estimated economic costs of obesity to US business American. Journal of Health Promotion, 13(2), 120.

Tunceli, K., Kemeng, L., & Williams, L. K. (2006). Long-term effects of obesity on employment, work limitations among U.S. adults, 1986 to 1999. Obesity, 14, 1637–1646.PubMedCrossRef

Venturini, B., Castelli, L., & Tomerlleri, S. (2006). Not all jobs are suitable for fat people: Experimental evidence of a link between being fat and out-of-sight jobs. Social behavior and personality, 34(4), 9–39.CrossRef

Weatherly, L. A. (2004). The rising cost of health care: Strategic and societal considerations for employers. HR Magazine, 49(9), A1–A11.

Titel: Logit Model to Predict Outcomes of Litigated Employee Obesity Cases
verfasst von: Helen LaVan
Marsha Katz
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9191-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology/Approach

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

A Dispositional Approach to Work–School Conflict and Enrichment

To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs

Expecting the Worst: Moderating Effects of Social Cynicism on the Relationships Between Relationship Conflict and Negative Affective Reactions

Testing Differential Mediation Effects of Sub-dimensions of Political Skills in Linking Proactive Personality to Employee Performance

Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty on the Internet

The Multidimensional Nature of Continuance Commitment: Commitment Owing to Economic Exchanges Versus Lack of Employment Alternatives

Premium Partner