nach oben

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

04.04.2024 | Original Paper

Measuring restoration likelihood of tall building scapes: physical features and vegetation

verfasst von: Pooria saadativaghar, Esmaeil zarghami, Abdulhamid ghanbaran

Erschienen in: Landscape and Ecological Engineering

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The framework proposed in this article has investigated the effects of physical and vegetational features of tall building scapes on restoration likelihood. This framework focuses on the form of window openings and gaps in the building and, in the case of vegetation of tall building scapes, studies the amount and type of vegetation. Physical and vegetational variables were manipulated in simulation environments to obtain 120 color images. 54 participants in 6 groups evaluated these images based on restoration likelihood, fascination, being away, preference, perceived complexity, and perceived enclosure. Results indicated a more significant role of physical variables than vegetation in restoration likelihood. Moreover, increasing openings and gaps in the physics of a tall building has reduced restoration; however, they had no indirect effect on restoration through mediator variables of fascination and being away. Increasing vegetation and using more bulky vegetation (from flowers to trees and green walls) have shown positive effects on restoration and indirectly affected it through the mediator variable of being away. Moreover, analyzing different categories of physical and vegetational variables of tall building scapes showed that horizontal opening, absence of gap, increasing horizontal vegetation, and using more bulky vegetation significantly impact restoration (positively).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abkar M, Kamal M, Maulan S, Mariapan M, Davoodi SR (2011) Relationship between the preference and perceived restorative potential of urban landscapes. HortTechnology Hortte. 21(5):514–519. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.514CrossRef

Alkhresheh MM (2007) Enclosure as a function of height-to-width ratio and scale: Its influence on user’s sense of comfort and safety in urban street space (doctoral dissertation). Gainesville, FL: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Florida. Retrieved July 29, 2009 from http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0019676/alkhresheh_m.pdf.

Al-Kodmany K (2011) Placemaking with tall buildings. Urban Des Int 16(4):252–269. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.13CrossRef

Al-Kodmany K (2012) Guidelines for tall buildings development. Int. J. High Rise Build. 1(4): 255–269. http://ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/05ijhrb01.php. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Al-Kodmany K (2013) Placemaking in the high-rise city: architectural and urban design analyses. Int. J. High Rise Build. 2 (2): 153–169. http://ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/05ijhrb01.php. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Al-Kodmany Kheir (2017). Understanding Tall Buildings; A Theory of Placemaking. Routledge, New York. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317608660. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Al-Kodmany K, Ali M (2013) The Future of the City. Wit Press, Southampton. https://www.witpress.com/books/978-1-84564-410-9. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Asgarzadeh M, Koga T, Yoshizawa N, Munakata J, Hirate K (2010) Investigating green urbanism; building oppressiveness. J Asian Archit Build Eng 9(2):555–562. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.9.555CrossRef

Asgarzadeh M, Koga T, Yoshizawa N, Munakata J, Hirate K (2009) A transdisciplinary approach to oppressive cityscapes and the role of greenery as key factors in sustainable urban development. IEEE International Conference on Science and Technology for Humanity: 1042_1047. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tP=&arnumber=5444528&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F5438532%2F5444349%2F05444528.pdf%3Farnumber%3D5444528. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Avalone Neto O (2017) The Effects of Design Elements on Users’ Perceptions and Impressions of Privately Owned Public Spaces (Doctoral dissertation, 千葉大学= Chiba University).‏ https://opac.ll.chiba-u.jp/da/curator/103083/

Berto R (2014) The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness. Behav Sci 4(4):394–409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Berto R, Massaccesi S, Pasini M (2008) Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. J Environ Psychol 28(2):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.004CrossRef

Berto R, Barbiero G, Barbiero P, Senes G (2018) An individual’s connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments Some Observations about Biophilia. Behavior Sci 8(3):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8030034CrossRef

Bishop ID, Miller DR (2007) Visual assessment of off-shorewind turbines: the influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables. Renew Energy 32(5):814–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.009CrossRef

Bornioli A, Parkhurst G, MorganPhillip L (2018) Psychological wellbeing benefits of simulated exposure to five urban settings: an experimental study from the pedestrian’s perspective. J Transp Health. 9:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.02.003CrossRef

Byun K, Yoshizawa N, Munakata J, Koga T, Hirate K (2011) A discussion on the evaluating indicators of the sense of physical oppression and the sense of openness using imaging experiments. J Environ Eng. 76(660):107–113. https://doi.org/10.3130/aije.76.107. (Japanese)CrossRef

Chang CY, Hammitt WE, Chen PK, Machnik L, Su WC (2008) Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landsc Urban Plan 85(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010CrossRef

Coeterier JF (1983) A photo validity test. J Environ Psychol 3(4):315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80034-6CrossRef

Conniff A, Craig T (2016) A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 19:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.019CrossRef

CTBUH Criteria for Defining and Measuring Tall Buildings, n.d. Ctbuh.org. URL http:// www.ctbuh.org/TallBuildings/HeightStatistics/Criteria/tabid/446/language/en-US/ Default.aspx (Accessed 2. 20. 17).

CTBUH (n.d.) Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. (Online). Available at: <http://www.ctbuh.org/> (Accessed: March 15, 2016).

Dahlkvist D, Hartig T, Nilsson A, Högberg H, Skovdahl K, Engström M (2016) Relationships between garden greenery and the health of older people in residential care facilities: a multi-level cross-sectional study. J Adv Nurs. 72:2065–2076. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12968CrossRefPubMed

Daniel TC, Boster RS (1976) Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. Res. Pap. RM-RP-167. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station. 66: 167.‏ https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/20911. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Dong H, Qin B (2017) Exploring the link between neighborhood environment and mental wellbeing: a case study in Beijing. China Landsc Urban Plan 164:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.005CrossRef

Drozdz M, Appert M, Harris A (2018) High-rise urbanism in contemporary Europe. Built Environment 43(4):469–480. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.43.4.469CrossRef

Feimer NR, Smardon RC, Craik KH (1981) Evaluating the effectiveness of observer based visual resource and impact assessment methods. Landsc Res 6(1):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426398108705963CrossRef

Felsten G (2009) Where to take a study break on the college campus: an attention restoration theory perspective. J Environ Psychol 29:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.006CrossRef

Felsten G (2014) Personality predicts perceived potential for attention restoration of natural and urban scenes / La personalidad predice el potencial percibido de restauración atencional de los paisajes naturales y urbanos. Psyecology 5(1):37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2014.881663CrossRef

Galindo MP, Hidalgo MC (2005) Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes. Int J Psychol 40(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000104

Gerstenberg T (2017) Tree parameters’ impact on visual perception, preference, and recreation.‏ Dissertation in echnische Universität Dresden, Dresden. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-227721. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Gerstenberg T, Hofmann M (2016) Perception and preference of trees: a psychological contribution to tree species selection in urban areas. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 15:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.004CrossRef

Gifford R, McGunn LJ (2012) Appraisals of built environments and approaches to building design that pomote well-benig and healthy behavior. In: Steg L, van den Berg AE, de Groot JIM (eds) Environmental psychology: an introduction. Wiley, Hoboken

Gillis K, Gatersleben B (2015) A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings 5(3):948–963CrossRef

Gray T, Birrell C (2014) Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:12204–12222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greco E (2018) Questioning the vertical urbanization of post-industrial cities: the cases of Turin and Lyon. Built Environment 43(4):555–570. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.43.4.555CrossRef

Han K (2003) A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landsc Urban Plan 64:209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4CrossRef

Hartig T (2004) Restorative environments. In: Spielberger C (ed) Encyclopedia of applied psychology 3. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 273–279CrossRef

Hartig T (2007) Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In: WardThompson C, Travlou P (eds) Open space People space. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 163–179

Hartig T, Staats H (2006a) Linking preference for environments with their restorative quality. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning 12. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 279–292CrossRef

Hartig T, Staats H (2006b) The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. J Environ Psychol 26(3):215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.007CrossRef

Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav 23(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001CrossRef

Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Bowler PA (1997a) Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness (Working Paper No. 5). Gävle, Sweden: Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University.

Hartig T, Korpela K, Evans GW (1997b) A measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Scand Housing Plan Res 14:175–194CrossRef

Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environ Psychol 23(2):109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3CrossRef

Hartig T, Bringslimark T, Patil GG (2008) Restorative environmental design: what, when, where and for whom? In: Kellert SR, Heerwagen J, Mador M (eds) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley, Hoboken

Hartig T, Korpela KM, Evans GW, Ga¨rling T.(1996) Validation of a Measure of Perceived Environmental Restorativeness. Goteborg Psychological Report Number 7, Sweden: Goteborg University.

Hartig T, van den Berg AE, Hagerhall CM, Tomalak M, Bauer N, Hansmann R, Waaseth G (2011) Health benefits of nature experience: psychological, social and cultural processes. Forests, trees and human health. pp 127–168.

Harvey CW (2014) Measuring streetscape design for livability using spatial data and methods. Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. p 268. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/268. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Harvey C, Aultman-Hall L, Hurley SE, Troy A (2015) Effects of skeletal streetscape design on perceived safety. Landsc Urban Plan 142:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007CrossRef

Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 2nd. Guilford Press, New York, London. http://www.afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplus-macros-and-code.html. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Health Council of the Netherlands. (2004) Nature and Health: The Influence of Nature on Social, Psychological and Physical Well-being. Health Council of theNetherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, DenHague.

Heath T, Smith SG, Lim B (2000) Tall buildings and the urban skyline: the effect of visual complexity on preferences. Environ Behav. 32(4):541–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972658CrossRef

Hernández B, Hidalgo MC, Berto R, Peron E (2001) The role of familiarity on the restorative value of a place. Research on a Spanish sample. Bull People- Environ Stud 18:22–24

Herzog TR (1992) A cognitive analysis of preference for urban spaces. J Environ Psychol 12(3):237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80138-0CrossRef

Herzog TR, Black AM, Fountaine KA, Knotts DJ (1997) Reflection and attentional recovery as two distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J Environ Psychol 17(2):165–170. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0051CrossRef

Herzog TR, MaguireC P, Nebel MB (2003) Assessing the restorative components of environments. J Environ Psychol 23(2):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5CrossRef

Hidalgo MC, Berto R, Galindo MP, Getrevi A (2006) Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano 7(2):115–133

Hipp JA, Ogunseitan OA (2011) Effect of environmental conditions on perceived psychological restorativeness of coastal parks. J Environ Psychol 31(4):421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.008CrossRef

Hiyoshi S, Takei M (1990) A study on the sense of oppression by a large scale building in consideration of the effect of environmental buildings and on the limit of allowance. In: Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. D Environ Eng. pp. 23–24. (Japanese).

Hull RB, Michael SE (1995) Nature-based recreation, mood change, and stress restoration. Leisure Sci 17:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409509513239CrossRef

Hung SH, Chang CY (2021) Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: a review. J People, Plants, Environ 24(1):1–16CrossRef

Hwang T (2007) A study of the oppressive feeling in urban space, PhD dissertation, Department of Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University (Japanese).

Imamoglu Ç (2000) COMPLEXITY, LIKING AND FAMILIARITY: ARCHITECTURE AND NON-ARCHITECTURE TURKISH STUDENTS’ASSESSMENTS OF TRADITIONAL AND MODERN HOUSE FACADES. J Environ Psychol 20(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155CrossRef

Ivarsson CT, Hagerhall CM (2008) The perceived restorativeness of gardens Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 7(2):107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.001CrossRef

Joye Y (2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture Rev. Gen Psychol 11:305–328CrossRef

Joye Y, van den Berg A (2011) Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 10:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.004CrossRef

Kalcheva E, Taki A, Hadi Y (2016) High-Rises and Urban Design: The Reasons for Unsuccessful Place-making with Residential High-Rises in England. ICBAU 2016: 18th International Conference on Building, Architecture and Urbanism, March 14–15, 2016 in Paris, France. http://hdl.handle.net/2086/11881. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15:169–182CrossRef

Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav 33:507–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115CrossRef

Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Brown T (1989) Environmental preference: a comparison of four domains of predictors. Environ Behav 21:509–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589215001CrossRef

KarimiMoshaver M, AbrarAsari H (2014) The effect of tall facades complexity on the aesthetic quality of urban landscape (the case study: Tehran-Iran. Appl Math Eng, Manag Technol 2(5):146–156

Kellert SR (2008) Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Heerwagen J, Mador M (eds) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley, Hoboken

Kellert SR (2015) Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design. Available online: http://humanspaces.com/2015/06/01/nature-by-design-the-practice-of-biophilic-design/ (Accessed on 23 August 2015).

Kim J (2017) Comparing the influences of the D/H ratio, size, and facade design of an enclosed square on its perceptual qualities as a sustainable urban space in South Korea. Sustainability 9(4):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040675CrossRef

Kno¨ll Martin, Li Yang, Neuheuser Katrin, Rudolph-Cleff Annette (2015) Using Space Syntax to analyse stress ratings of open public spaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, at: University College London, London, UK 123(1)-23(15). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280491334.

Knöll M, Neuheuser K, Cleff T, Rudolph-Cleff A (2018) A tool to predict perceived urban stress in open public spaces. Environ Plan b: Urban Anal City Sci 45(4):797–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516686971CrossRef

Korpela K, Hartig T (1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16(3):221–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018CrossRef

Kusmane AS, Ile U, Ziemelniece A (2019) Importance of trees with low-growing branches and shrubs in perception of urban spaces. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 471(9):092061CrossRef

Laumann K, Gärling T, Stormark KM (2001) Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. J Environ Psychol 21:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0179CrossRef

Laumann K, Garling T, Stormark KM (2003) Selective attention and heartrate responses to natural and urban environments. J EnvironmentalPsychology 23(2):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-XCrossRef

Li X, Santi P, Courtney TK, Verma SK, Ratti C (2018) Investigating the association between streetscapes and human walking activities using Google Street View and human trajectory data. Trans GIS 22(4):1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12472CrossRef

Lim B, Heath T (1993) What is a skyline: a quantitative approach. In: J. Hayman (Ed.), Architectural science: Past, present and future. Proceedings of the Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Architectural Science Association. Sydney: Department of Architecture, University of Sydney. pp. 23–32

Lin L, Homma R, Iki K (2018) Preferences for a lake landscape: effects of building height and lake width. Environ Impact Assess Rev 70:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.03.001CrossRef

Lindal PJ (2013) Restorative Environmental Design for Densifying Cities, A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Architecture, Design & Planning, The university of Sydney. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/453. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Lindal PJ, Hartig T (2013) Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. J Environ Psychol 33(2013):26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003CrossRef

Lindal PJ, Hartig T (2015) Effects of urban street vegetation on judgments of restoration likelihood. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 14:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.001CrossRef

Loïse Lenne (2018) 1980s London: a laboratory for contemporary high-rise architecture. The case of the Richard Rogers partnership. Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.43.4.481CrossRef

Masoudinejad S, Hartig T (2018) Window view to the sky as a restorative resource for residents of a densely populated city. Environ Behav. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518807274CrossRef

Mehrdad K, Philipp W (2018) A framework for assessing tall buildings’ impact on the city skyline: aesthetic, visibility, and meaning dimensions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 73:164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.08.007CrossRef

Morteza A, Anne L, Takaaki K, Kotaroh H (2012) Measuring oppressiveness of streetscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 107:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.001CrossRef

Morteza A, Takaaki K, Kotaroh H, Maryam F, Anne L (2014) Investigating oppressiveness and spaciousness in relation to building, trees, sky and ground surface: a study in Tokyo. Landsc Urban Plan 131:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.011CrossRef

Nasar JL (1989) The effect of sign complexity and coherence on the perceived quality of retail scenes. In: Nasar JL (ed) Envimnmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300–320

Nasar JL (1994) Urban design aesthetics. The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environ Behav. 26(3):377–401CrossRef

Nasar JL, Terzano K (2010) The desirability of views of city skylines after dark. J Environ Psychol 30:215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.007CrossRef

Ng WY (2014) Development of decision making tools for street planning in high density cities (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University).‏ http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7422. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Ng WY, Chau CK, Powell G, Leung TM (2015) Preferences for street configuration ad street tree planting in urban Hong Kong. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 14(1):30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.002CrossRef

Nordh H (2012) Quantitative methods of measuring restorative components in urban public parks. J Landsc Archit 7(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2012.693780CrossRef

Nordh H, Hartig T, Hagerhall CM, Fry G (2009) Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 8:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003CrossRef

Nordh H, Hagerhall CM, Holmqvist K (2013) Tracking restorative components: patterns in eye movements as a consequence of a restorative rating task. Landsc Res 38(1):101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.691468CrossRef

Ohly H, White MP, Wheeler BW, Bethel A, Ukoumunne OC, Nikolaou V, Garsid R (2016) Attention restoration theory: a systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J Toxicol Environ Health, Part B 19(7):305–343CrossRef

Pazhouhanfar M, Kamal MSM (2014) Effect of predictors of visual preference as characteristics of urban natural landscapes in increasing perceived restorative potential. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 13:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.08.005CrossRef

Peron E, Berto R, Purcell T (2002) Restorativeness, preference and the perceived naturalness of places. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano 3(1):19–34

Purcell T, Peron E, Berto R (2001) Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environ Behav 33:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972882CrossRef

Ryan CO, Browning WD, Clancy JO, Andrews SL, Kallianpurkar NB (2014) Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. Int J Archit Res 8:62–75

Saadativaghar P (2023) The effect of visible configuration and scape of tall buildings from urban pathways on the perceptual-psychological reactions of people (case study: Zagros tower in Hamedan). Motaleate Shahri 12(47):33–50. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.020CrossRef

Samavatekbatan A, Gholami S, Karimimoshaver M (2016) Assessing the visual impact of physical features of tall buildings: Height, top, color. Environ Impact Assess Rev 57:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.008CrossRef

Senoglu B, Oktay HE, KinoshitaI. (2018) Visual Effect of Modern Buildings on a Traditional Japanese Garden. Environment-Behav Proc J. 3(8):97–105. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v3i8.1393CrossRef

Sharghi A (2011) Effects of University Campus Landscapes on Learning Quality of Students. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar 8(18): 51–62. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=252467. Accessed from 26 October 2019 to 16 January 2020

Smith SG, Heath T, Lim B (1995) The influence of building height and spacing on the evaluation of city skylines:Acomparison between architects and non-architects. In: J. Nasar, P. Grannis, K. Hanyu (Eds), Environmental design research: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Oklahoma City: Environmental Design Research Association. pp. 65–69

Sommer R, Summit J (1995) An exploratory study of preferred tree form. Environ Behav 27(4):540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595274005CrossRef

Sonntag-Öström E, Nordin M, Lundell Y, Dolling A, Wiklund U, Karlsson M, Järvholm LS (2014) Restorative effects of visits to urban and forest environments in patients with exhaustion disorder. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 13(2):344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.007CrossRef

Staats H, Kieviet A, Hartig T (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J Environ Psychol 23:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3CrossRef

Staats H, Van Gemerden E, Hartig T (2010) Preference for restorative situations: interactive effects of attentional state, activity-in-environment, and social context. Leisure Sci Interdiscip J 32:401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2010.510990CrossRef

Staats H, Jahncke H, Herzog TR, Hartig T (2016) urban options for psychological restoration: common strategies in everyday situations. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0146213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stamps AE (1990a) Use of photographs to simulate environments: a meta-analysis. Percept Mot Skills 71:907–913. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.907CrossRef

Stamps AE (1990b) Preliminary findings regarding effects of photographic and stimulus variables on preferences for environmental scenes. Perceptual Motor Skills 71(1):231–234. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.71.1.231CrossRef

Stamps A (1991) Public preference for high rise buildings: stylistic and demographic effects. Percept Mot Skills 72:839–844. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1991.72.3.839CrossRef

Stamps AE (1999a) Physical determinants of preferences for residential facades. Environ Behav 31(6):723–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972326CrossRef

Stamps AE (2000) Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Kluwer Academic, MassachusettsCrossRef

Stamps AE (2002) Entropy, visual diversity, and preference. J Gen Psychol 129(3):300–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602100CrossRefPubMed

Stamps AE III (2004) Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 24(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9CrossRef

Stamps AE (2005) Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety and enclosure. Environ Behav 37:587–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505276741CrossRef

Stamps AE (2010) Use of static and dynamic media to simulate environments: a metaanalysis. Percept Mot Skills 111(2):355–364. https://doi.org/10.2466/22.24.27.PMS.111.5.355-364CrossRefPubMed

Stamps A, Nasar J, Hanyu K (2005) Using pre-construction validation to regulate urban skylines. J Am Plan Assoc 71(1):73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976406CrossRef

Stevenson MP, Schilhab T, Bentsen P (2018) Attention restoration theory II: a systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. J Toxicol Environ Health,Part B 21(4):227–268CrossRef

Stewart TR, Middleton P, Downton M, Ely D (1984) Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. J. Environ. Psychol 4(4):283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80001-8CrossRef

Takei M, Oohara M (1977) Experimental study on measurement of the sense of oppression by a building: (Part-1) psychological analysis of the sense of oppression caused by a building and the device for the experiment. Transac. Architect. Inst. Jpn 261:105–114. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.261.0_105. (Japanese)CrossRef

Takei M, Oohara M (1977) Experimental study on measurement of the sense of oppression by a building: (Part-2) selection process of the physical scale and proposal of the equation for estimating the sense of oppression caused by a building in housing area. Transac. Architect. Inst. Jpn 262:103–113. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.262.0_103. (Japanese)CrossRef

Takei M, Oohara M (1978) Experimental study on measurement of the sense of oppression by a building: (Part-3) consideration of the distance to a building, and relation between color effect of exterior wall and the sense of oppression. Transac. Architect. Inst. Jpn 263:71–80. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.263.0_71. (Japanese)CrossRef

Taylor AF, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2002) Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. J Environ Psychol 22(1–2):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241CrossRef

Tennessen CM, Cimprich B (1995) Views to nature: effects on attention. J Environ Psychol 15(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0CrossRef

Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. J Environ Psychol 38:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005CrossRef

Ulrich RS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421CrossRefPubMed

Valtchanov D, Barton KR, Ellard C (2010) Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 13(5):503–512. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0308CrossRefPubMed

Van den Berg AE, Jorgensen A, Wilson ER (2014) Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan 127:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012CrossRef

Van den Berg AE, Wesselius JE, Maas J, Tanja-Dijkstra K (2017) Green walls for a restorative classroom environment: a controlled evaluation study. Environ Behav 49(7):791–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516667976CrossRef

Van Kempen E, Musterd S (1991) High-rise housing reconsidered: Some research and policy-implications. Hous Stud 6(2):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039108720699CrossRef

Wandira Puspitasari A, Jongwook K (2017) The Influence of Tall Buildings to the Modern Urban Landscape of Jakarta City. UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress. pp. 1–6.

Wells NM (2000) At home with nature “Effects of Greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environ Behav 32(6):775–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793CrossRef

Weng PY, Chiang YC (2014) Psychological restoration through indoor and outdoor leisure activities. J Leis Res 46(2):203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950320CrossRef

White EV, Gatersleben B (2011) Greenery on residential buildings: does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty? J Environ Psychol 31(1):89–98CrossRef

White M, Smith A, Humphryes K, Pahl S, Snelling D, Depledge M (2010) Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J Environ Psychol 30:482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004CrossRef

Wilkie S, Stavridou A (2013) Influence of environmental preference and environment type congruence on judgments of restoration potential. Urban Forestry Urban Greening 12(2):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.004CrossRef

Wohlwill JF (1968) Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity. Percept Psychophys 4(5):307–312. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210521CrossRef

Yaran A (2015) Investigating the effect of tall buildings on tehran city landscape. Armanshahr Archit Urban Dev 8(14):81–89

Zarghami E, Karimimoshaver M, Ghanbaran A, SaadatiVaghar P (2019a) Assessing the oppressive impact of the form of tall buildings on citizens: Height, width, and height-to-width ratio. Environ Impact Assess Rev 79:106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106287CrossRef

Zarghami E, Ghanbaran A, Karimimoshaver M, Saadativaghar P (2019b) Effect of height and color of tall buildings on the perceived psychological restoration of residents. J Archit Plan Res 36(4):321–342

Zarghami E, Ghanbaran A, Karimimoshaver M, SaadatiVaghar P (2020) Investigating the visual- psychological pollution of tall buildings through fish eye images and citizen’s opinion; case study: pastor and Jahannama tower in Hamadan. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development 13(32):143–159. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.147680.1675CrossRef

Zube EH, Pitt DG, Anderson TW (1974) Perception and measurement of scenic resources in the Southern Connecticut River Valley. R-74–1. Institute for Man and His Environment, Massachusetts.

Titel: Measuring restoration likelihood of tall building scapes: physical features and vegetation
verfasst von: Pooria saadativaghar
Esmaeil zarghami
Abdulhamid ghanbaran
Publikationsdatum: 04.04.2024
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Landscape and Ecological Engineering
Print ISSN: 1860-1871
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-188X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-024-00600-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"