nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

26.06.2023 | Research Paper

Mindfulness and Subjective Well-being Among Chinese Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study and a Weekly Diary Investigation

verfasst von: Liping Ma, Yanhui Xiang

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Enhancing subjective well-being is essential for enlightening individual pursuit of a better life in positive psychology. Although numerous research projects have preliminarily investigated the effect of mindfulness (MD) on subjective well-being (SWB) and its potential mechanisms, few longitudinal studies have investigated the bidirectional association between MD and SWB at both trait and state levels. On this basis, this study aimed to comprehensively explain the temporary and longitudinal relationships between MD and SWB [positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), life satisfaction (LS)] at both trait and state levels using the longitudinal and weekly diary methods. A two-wave longitudinal survey with a time interval of eight months from a sample of 504 adolescents (N = 504; M = 15.11; 56.2% female) and a seven-week weekly diary survey from a sample of 117 adolescents (N = 117; M = 15.64; 65.81% female) were designed in studies 1 and 2, respectively. In study 1, first, the confirmatory factor analysis was performed on SWB as a hierarchical construct to confirm that the global subjective well-being (gSWB) could explain the covariance among its first-order factors (PA, NA LS, Model 1). Then, two cross-lagged models (Model 2: MD - PA, NA, LS; Model 3: MD - gSWB) were constructed to explore the bidirectional relationship between trait mindfulness and SWB (PA, NA, LS, and gSWB) through Mplus 8.3. In study 2, the hierarchical linear models were initially constructed to explore the correlation between state mindfulness and SWB. Furthermore, the longitudinal hierarchical linear models were conducted to examine the cross-lagged relationship between state mindfulness and SWB. Overall, the results of the longitudinal study revealed that (1) trait mindfulness positively predicted PA and LS and negatively predicted NA; (2) trait mindfulness showed a reciprocal prediction with NA; (3) gSWB positively predicted trait mindfulness. In addition, the results of the weekly diary study indicated that (1) state mindfulness of the current week positively predicted PA and LS in the following week and negatively predicted NA in the following week. (2) PA and LS of the current week positively predicted state mindfulness in the following week. Findings suggest that, to some extent, there is a reciprocal relationship between MD and SWB, which not only contributes to our understanding of mindfulness at both trait and state levels, but also provides an empirical foundation for improving adolescents’ subjective well-being.

Nächster Artikel Informal Caregivers and Life Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abasi, I., Mohammadkhani, P., Pourshahbaz, A., & Dolatshahi, B. (2017). The psychometric properties of attentional control scale and its relationship with symptoms of anxiety and depression: A study on iranian population. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 12(2), 109–117.

Baer, R., Gu, J., Cavanagh, K., & Strauss, C. (2019). Differential sensitivity of mindfulness questionnaires to change with treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 31(10), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000744.suppCrossRef

Bajaj, B., & Pande, N. (2016). Mediating role of resilience in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and affect as indices of subjective well-being. Personality and individual differences, 93, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.005CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323CrossRef

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph077CrossRef

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary method: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(2), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030CrossRef

Bravo, A. J., Pearson, M. R., Wilson, A. D., & Witkiewitz, K. (2018). When traits match states: Examining the associations between self-report trait and state mindfulness following a state mindfulness induction. Mindfulness, 9(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0763-5CrossRef

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822CrossRef

Busseri, M. A. (2015). Toward a resolution of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12116CrossRef

Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310391271CrossRef

Castro, S. L. (2002). Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00105-9CrossRef

Chen, X., Liang, K., Huang, L., Mu, W., Dong, W., Chen, S., & Chi, X. (2022). The psychometric properties and cutoff score of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) in chinese primary school students. Children, 9(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040499

Christopher, M. S., Charoensuk, S., Gilbert, B. D., Neary, T. J., & Pearce, K. L. (2009). Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: A case of apples versus oranges? Journal of clinical psychology, 65(6), 590–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20580CrossRef

Cohen, J., Cohen, J., Cohen, J. W., Cohen, J., Cohen, J., Cohen, J., Cohen, J., Cohen, J. W., Cohen, N., & Cohen, C. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Technometrics, 31(4), 499–500. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587CrossRef

Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Fireman, P., Gwaltney, J. M., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). State and trait negative affect as predictors of objective and subjective symptoms of respiratory viral infections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.159CrossRef

Díaz, A., Soriano, J. F., & Beleña, Á. (2016). Perceived vulnerability to disease questionnaire: Factor structure, psychometric properties and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.036CrossRef

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34CrossRef

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13CrossRef

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115CrossRef

Ding, X., Du, J., Zhou, Y., An, Y., Xu, W., & Zhang, N. (2019). State mindfulness, rumination, and emotions in daily life: An ambulatory assessment study. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12383CrossRef

Du, J., An, Y., Ding, X., Zhang, Q., & Xu, W. (2019). State mindfulness and positive emotions in daily life: An upward spiral process. Personality and Individual Differences, 141(122), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.037CrossRef

Egan, R. P., Hill, K. E., & Foti, D. (2018). Differential effects of state and trait mindfulness on the late positive potential. Emotion, 18(8), 1128–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000383CrossRef

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of general psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.2.3.300CrossRef

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218CrossRef

Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., Goldin, P., & Frederickson, B. L. (2015a). Mindfulness broadens Awareness and builds eudaimonic meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 26(4), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.106429CrossRef

Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., Goldin, P. R., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2015b). The mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Extensions, applications, and challenges at the attention-appraisal-emotion interface. Psychological Inquiry, 26(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.1092493CrossRef

Garland, E. L., Hanley, A. W., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data. Plos One, 12(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187727CrossRef

Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138CrossRef

Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022819CrossRef

Gunthert, K. C., & Wenze, S. J. (2012). Daily diary methods. In M. R. Mehl, & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 144–159). The Guilford Press.

Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological methods, 19(4), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889CrossRef

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

Huang, J., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Bayesian dynamic mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 22(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000073CrossRef

Huang, J. Y., Sedlovskaya, A., Ackerman, J. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Immunizing against prejudice: Effects of disease protection on attitudes toward out-groups. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1550–1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417261CrossRef

Jislin-Goldberg, T., Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2012). Mindfulness and positive affect: Cross-sectional, prospective intervention, and real-time relations. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.700724CrossRef

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: The program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. New York, NY: Dell.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Mindfulness Meditation for Everyday Live. London: Piatkus Books.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564844CrossRef

Kang, Y., O’Donnell, M. B., Strecher, V. J., & Falk, E. B. (2017). Dispositional mindfulness predicts adaptive affective responses to health messages and increased exercise motivation. Mindfulness, 8(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0608-7CrossRef

Karim, J., Weisz, R., & Rehman, S. U. (2011). International positive and negative affect schedule short-form (I-PANAS-SF): Testing for factorial invariance across cultures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011), 2016–2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.046CrossRef

Kenny, D. A. (2012). Measuring Model Fit. Davidakenny.Net, 1985, 1–10. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.115CrossRef

Kiken, L. G., Garland, E. L., Bluth, K., Palsson, O. S., & Gaylord, S. A. (2015). From a state to a trait: Trajectories of state mindfulness in meditation during intervention predict changes in trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.044CrossRef

Koo, N., Leite, W. L., & Algina, J. (2016). Mediated effects with the parallel process latent growth model: An evaluation of methods for testing mediation in the presence of nonnormal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 32–44.CrossRef

LeBlanc, S., Uzun, B., & Aydemir, A. (2021). Structural relationship among mindfulness, reappraisal and life satisfaction: The mediating role of positive affect. Current Psychology, 40(9), 4406–4415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00383-xCrossRef

Li, X., Ma, L., & Li, Q. (2022). How Mindfulness affects life satisfaction: Based on the mindfulness-to-meaning theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 3434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887940CrossRef

Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010CrossRef

Lischetzke, T. (2014). Daily diary methodology. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1413–1419). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef

Liu, X., Chi, X., & Zhang, J. (2019). Validation of child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) in chinese adolescents. Psychological Exploration, 39(3), 250–256. [in Chinese].

Machell, K. A., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Nezlek, J. B. (2015). Relationships between meaning in life, social and achievement events, and positive and negative affect in daily life. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12103CrossRef

Manuel, J. A., Somohano, V. C., & Bowen, S. (2017). Mindfulness practice and its relationship to the Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 8(2), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0605-xCrossRef

Marmor, G. S., & Montemayor, R. (1977). The cross-lagged panel design: A review. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(3), 883–893. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.45.3.883CrossRef

Metler, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2017). Further evaluation of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental studies. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12233CrossRef

Miao, M., Zheng, L., & Gan, Y. (2017). Meaning in life promotes proactive coping via positive affect: A daily diary Study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1683–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9791-4CrossRef

Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary Studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452CrossRef

Quaglia, J. T., Braun, S. E., Freeman, S. P., McDaniel, M. A., & Brown, K. W. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for effects of mindfulness training on dimensions of self-reported dispositional mindfulness. Psychological assessment, 28(7), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000268CrossRef

Raila, H., Scholl, B. J., & Gruber, J. (2015). Seeing the world through rose-colored glasses: People who are happy and satisfied with life preferentially attend to positive stimuli. Emotion, 15(4), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000049CrossRef

Rau, H. K., & Williams, P. G. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness: A critical review of construct validation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.035CrossRef

Schwartz, B., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2016). Internal motivation, instrumental motivation, and eudaimonia. Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 123–134). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychology, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5CrossRef

Sheng, R., Liu, T., Wang, S., Yu, S., & Xu, W. (2022). Mindfulness and late adolescents’ subjective well-being: The serial mediating roles of rejection sensitivity and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111707.CrossRef

Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of happiness. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00461162CrossRef

Tiberius, V. (2016). The future of eudaimonic well-being: Subjectivism, objectivism and the lump under the carpet. Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 565–569). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Tiberius, V., & Hall, A. (2010). Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism, and why it matters. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003790971CrossRef

Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of Disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015474CrossRef

Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the mindful attention awareness scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.020CrossRef

Van Dam, N. T., van Vugt, M. K., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Gorchov, J., Fox, K. C. R., Field, B. A., Britton, W. B., Brefczynski-Lewis, J. A., & Meyer, D. E. (2018). Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569161770958CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRef

Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(5), 820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820

Williams, J. M. G. (2010). Mindfulness and psychological process. Emotion, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018360CrossRef

Wu, B. P., & Chang, L. (2012). The social impact of pathogen threat: How disease salience influences conformity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.023CrossRef

Xiang, Y., Yuan, R., & Zhao, J. (2021). Childhood maltreatment and life satisfaction in adulthood: The mediating effect of emotional intelligence, positive affect and negative affect. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(13), 2460–2469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320914381CrossRef

Xue, Y., & Xiang, Y. (2022). How daily mindfulness predicts life satisfaction: From the perspective o-f mindfulness coping model. The Journal of Psychology, 156(8), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2022.2085236CrossRef

Titel: Mindfulness and Subjective Well-being Among Chinese Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study and a Weekly Diary Investigation
verfasst von: Liping Ma
Yanhui Xiang
Publikationsdatum: 26.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00662-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

State Contexts, Job Insecurity, and Subjective Well-being in the Time of COVID-19

Pleasure or Meaning: Subjective Well-Being Orientations and the Willingness to Help Close Versus Distant Others

Who Benefits from Domestic Market Integration?

Informal Caregivers and Life Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands

What’s Your Humor Profile? A Latent Profile Analysis on the State-Trait Model of Cheerfulness as the Temperamental Basis of Humor

The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Well-Being via Brain Functional Connectivity