nach oben

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Erschienen in:

17.12.2019

Mirror or no mirror? Architectural design of cross-border integration of Chinese multinational enterprises

verfasst von: Jiang Wei, Yang Yang, Sali Li

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

With the increase in overseas acquisitions by Chinese multinational enterprises (CMNEs), corporations face the challenge of designing and building global architecture to enhance their performance in post-acquisition integration. A well-known design rule that CMNEs could follow is the mirroring hypothesis. However, the effectiveness of this hypothesis in aligning a CMNE’s organizational structure with the underlying technical system after acquiring a new subsidiary remains unclear. Using a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyze 34 cross-border acquisitions by CMNEs, we clarify the boundary conditions of the mirroring hypothesis and identify four archetypes of design patterns, namely, modularized mirroring, integral mirroring, mirror breaking, and mirror misted-up. We also identify the respective performance implications of these archetypes on the post-acquisition integration of CMNEs. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of the mirroring hypothesis and contributes to the discussion on global architecture design by emerging multinational enterprises in general.

Vorheriger Artikel Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture resource acquisition: why context matters

Nächster Artikel Does dual Embeddedness matter? Mechanisms and patterns of subsidiary ambidexterity that links a Subsidiary’s dual Embeddedness with its learning strategy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We thank one of the reviewers for suggesting the need to rephrase the research context, specifically the context of CMNEs, instead of EMNEs in general. Given the uniqueness of manufacturing EMNEs emerging from China, we followed this advice in this version and modified the main body of our manuscript.

This classification includes industries with SIC codes 15–37. Although our initial list of firms is derived from the list of all manufacturing industries (SIC codes 20–39), the final sample excludes any observation from the instruments and related products industry (SIC code: 38) and miscellaneous manufacturing industries (SIC code: 39). However, the classification remains sufficient for us to calibrate the variable of technological dynamics.

Conghui An was vice president during the time of the acquisition of DSI and has become the executive director of Geely in 2011.

Ai, Q., & Tan, H. 2018. The intra-firm knowledge transfer in the outward M&A of EMNCs: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2):399–425.

Aggarwal, V. A., & Wu, B. 2014. Organizational constraints to adaptation: Intrafirm asymmetry in the locus of coordination. Organization Science, 26(1): 218–238.CrossRef

Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Glaister, K. W. 2016. Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention. International Business Review, 25(1): 66–75.CrossRef

Ambos, B., Asakawa, K., & Ambos, T. C. 2011. A dynamic perspective on subsidiary autonomy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 301–316.CrossRef

Anthony, C., & Tripsas, M. 2016. Organizational identity and innovation.

Argyres, N., & Bigelow, L. 2010. Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence from the early US auto industry. Organization Science, 21(4): 842–853.CrossRef

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20–39.CrossRef

Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. 2015. Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 63–86.CrossRef

Baldwin, C. Y. 2008. Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(1): 155–195.CrossRef

Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. 2000. Design rules: The power of modularity. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.

Bauer, F., Matzler, K., & Wolf, S. 2016. M&A and innovation: The role of integration and cultural differences—A central European targets perspective. International Business Review, 25(1): 76–86.CrossRef

Benito, G. R. 2015. Why and how motives (still) matter. The Multinational Business Review, 23(1): 15–24.CrossRef

Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.CrossRef

Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. 2000. Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3): 395–425.CrossRef

Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 597–621.CrossRef

Buckley, P. J., Elia, S., & Kafouros, M. 2014. Acquisitions by emerging market multinationals: Implications for firm performance. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 611–632.CrossRef

Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Voss, H., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., & Zheng, P. 2018. A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1): 4–23.CrossRef

Burton, N., & Galvin, P. 2018. When do product architectures mirror organisational architectures? The combined role of product complexity and the rate of technological change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(9): 1057–1069.CrossRef

Cabigiosu, A., & Camuffo, A. 2012. Beyond the “mirroring” hypothesis: Product modularity and interorganizational relations in the air conditioning industry. Organization Science, 23(3): 686–703.CrossRef

Campbell, J. T., Sirmon, D. G., & Schijven, M. 2016. Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 163–187.CrossRef

Center for China and Globalization (CCG) Report. 2016. Report on chinese enterprises globalization. Social Sciences Academic Press (China). Beijing.

Colfer, L., & Baldwin, C. Y. 2010. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence and exceptions. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper (10-058).

Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. 2016. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(5): 709–738.CrossRef

Colman, H. L., & Lunnan, R. 2011. Organizational identification and serendipitous value creation in post-acquisition integration. Journal of Management, 37(3): 839–860.CrossRef

Cording, M., Christmann, P., & King, D. R. 2008. Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 744–767.

Cording, M., Christmann, P., & Weigelt, C. 2010. Measuring theoretically complex constructs: The case of acquisition performance. Strategic Organization, 8(1): 11–41.CrossRef

Cosh, A., Fu, X., & Hughes, A. 2012. Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 39(2): 301–317.CrossRef

Cox Jr., T. 1991. The multicultural organization. The Executive, 5(2): 34–47.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Luo, Y., Ramamurti, R., & Ang, S. H. 2018. Impact of the home country on internationalization.CrossRef

Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. 2014. What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 488–501.CrossRef

Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. 2003. Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1): 39–68.CrossRef

Crilly, D. 2011. Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 694–717.CrossRef

Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. 2012. Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1429–1448.CrossRef

Datta, D. K. 1991. Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4): 281–297.CrossRef

Deng, P. 2013. Chinese outward direct investment research: Theoretical integration and recommendations. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 513–539.CrossRef

Dunning, J. H. 1993. Internationalizing Porter’s diamond. MIR: Management International Review: 7–15. Reading:University of Reading.

Elstak, M. N., Bhatt, M., Van Riel, C., Pratt, M. G., & Berens, G. A. 2015. Organizational identification during a merger: The role of self-enhancement and uncertainty reduction motives during a major organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1): 32–62.CrossRef

Fine, C. H., Golany, B., & Naseraldin, H. 2005. Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach. Journal of Operations management, 23(3–4): 389–403.

Fiss, P. C. 2007. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1180–1198.CrossRef

Fiss, P. C. 2011. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393–420.CrossRef

Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. 2002. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6): 618–635.CrossRef

Furlan, A., Cabigiosu, A., & Camuffo, A. 2014. When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6): 789–807.CrossRef

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6): 899–933.CrossRef

Gokpinar, B., Hopp, W. J., & Iravani, S. M. 2010. The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development. Management Science, 56(3): 468–484.CrossRef

Graebner, M. E. 2004. Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9): 751–777.CrossRef

Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122.CrossRef

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. 2010. Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 185–205.CrossRef

Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. 1991. Managing acquisitions: Creating value through corporate renewal. New York, NY:Free Press.

He, S., & Khan, Z. 2015. Subsidiary capability upgrading and parent-subsidiary relationship: Insights from a Chinese Acquisition in the United Kingdom. In The future of global organizing: 127–141. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Bingley, UK.

Hennart, J.-F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1432–1454.CrossRef

Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. 1995. A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly: 255–269.

Homburg, C., & Bucerius, M. 2005. A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: How marketing integration affects postmerger performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(1): 95–113.CrossRef

Im, S., & Workman Jr., J. P. 2004. Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2): 114–132.CrossRef

Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2017. Management of overseas acquisitions by developing country multinationals and its performance implications: The Indian example. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(2): 153–172.CrossRef

Kapoor, R., & Adner, R. 2012. What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organization Science, 23(5): 1227–1248.CrossRef

Kedia, B., Gaffney, N., & Clampit, J. 2012. EMNCs and knowledge-seeking FDI. Management International Review, 52(2): 155–173.CrossRef

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2010. Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press. Boston, MA.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.CrossRef

Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.

Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. 1999. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1): 1–26.CrossRef

Lebedev, S., Peng, M. W., Xie, E., & Stevens, C. E. 2015. Mergers and acquisitions in and out of emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 651–662.CrossRef

Lee, G. K., & Lieberman, M. B. 2010. Acquisition vs. internal development as modes of market entry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2): 140–158.

Li, J., Li, P., & Wang, B. 2019. The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 40(2): 303–327.CrossRef

Li, J., Li, Y., & Shapiro, D. 2012. Knowledge seeking and outward FDI of emerging market firms: The moderating effect of inward FDI. Global Strategy Journal, 2(4): 277–295.CrossRef

Li, J., & Oh, C. H. 2016. Research on emerging-market multinational enterprises: Extending Alan Rugman’s critical contributions. International Business Review, 25(3): 776–784.CrossRef

Liu, Y., & Meyer, K. E. 2018. Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: The case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.007.

Lubatkin, M., Schulze, W. S., Mainkar, A., & Cotterill, R. W. 2001. Ecological investigation of firm effects in horizontal mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 335–357.CrossRef

Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2018. A general theory of springboard MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 129–152.CrossRef

Luo, Y., & Bu, J. 2018. Contextualizing international strategy by emerging market firms: A composition-based approach. Journal of World Business, 53(3): 337–355.CrossRef

Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. 2012. Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 26–40.CrossRef

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103–123.CrossRef

March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.CrossRef

Meuer, J. 2014. Archetypes of inter-firm relations in the implementation of management innovation: A set-theoretic study in China’s biopharmaceutical industry. Organization Studies, 35(1): 121–145.CrossRef

Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. 2014. Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1681–1705.CrossRef

MOFCOM. 2012. Statistical Bulletin of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment. China Statistic Press,Beijing.

MOFCOM 2017. Statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Beijing:China Statistic Press.

Mudambi, R. 2011. Hierarchy, coordination, and innovation in the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4): 317–323.CrossRef

Mudambi, R., Pedersen, T., & Andersson, U. 2014. How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business, 49(1): 101–113.CrossRef

Najafi-Tavani, Z., Zaefarian, G., Naudé, P., & Giroud, A. 2015. Reverse knowledge transfer and subsidiary power. Industrial Marketing Management, 48: 103–110.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. 1993. Technical innovation and national systems. In National innovation systems: A comparative analysis: 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

OECD. 2011. Isic rev. 3 technology intensity definition classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities, 7 July, 2011

Peng, M. W. 2012. The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2(2): 97–107.CrossRef

Peng, M. W., Lebedev, S., Vlas, C. O., Wang, J. C., & Shay, J. S. 2018. The growth of the firm in (and out of) emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4): 1–29.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York:Harper and Row Publishers.

Popli, M., Ladkani, R. M., & Gaur, A. S. 2017. Business group affiliation and post-acquisition performance: An extended resource-based view. Journal of Business Research, 81: 21–30.CrossRef

Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Chaudhuri, S. 2009. Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un) necessary. Organization Science, 20(2): 313–328.CrossRef

Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. 2003. A bird in the hand or two in the bush?: Integration trade-offs in technology-grafting acquisitions. European Management Journal, 21(2): 179–184.CrossRef

Puranam, P., & Srikanth, K. 2007. What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8): 805–825.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL.

Ragin, C. C. 2006. How to lure analytic social science out of the doldrums: Some lessons from comparative research. International Sociology, 21(5): 633–646.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Wiley Online Library.

Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P.C. 2008. Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond: 190–212. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Ramamurti, R. 2012. What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1): 41–47.CrossRef

Ravasi, D., Tripsas, M., & Langley, A. 2017. Call for papers: Special issue of strategic organization: “Exploring the strategy-identity nexus”. Strategic Organization, 15(1): 113–116.CrossRef

Report, C. C. G. 2018. Report on Chinese enterprises globalization. Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press (China).

Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M., & Mullane, J. V. 1994. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Academy of Management Review, 19(3): 565–584.CrossRef

Richards, M., & Yang, Y. 2007. Determinants of foreign ownership in international R&D joint ventures: Transaction costs and national culture. Journal of International Management, 13(2): 110–130.CrossRef

Rugman, A. M. 2010. The theory and regulation of emerging market multinational enterprises. In Foreign direct investments from emerging markets: 75–87. Springer. Basingstoke, UK

Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. 2000. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46(5): 612–625.CrossRef

Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. 1996. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 63–76.CrossRef

Saxton, T., & Dollinger, M. 2004. Target reputation and appropriability: Picking and deploying resources in acquisitions. Journal of Management, 30(1): 123–147.CrossRef

Schilling, M. A. 2000. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2): 312–334.CrossRef

Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. 2010. Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 246–266.CrossRef

Sears, J., & Hoetker, G. 2014. Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 48–67.CrossRef

Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Yeheskel, O. 2008. From “distance” to “friction”: Substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 905–923.CrossRef

Sorkun, M. F., & Furlan, A. 2017. Product and organizational modularity: A contingent view of the mirroring hypothesis. European Management Review, 14(2): 205–224.CrossRef

Spanos, Y. E., & Voudouris, I. 2009. Antecedents and trajectories of AMT adoption: The case of Greek manufacturing SMEs. Research Policy, 38(1): 144–155.CrossRef

Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. 2011. Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8): 849–875.CrossRef

Tee, R. 2019. Benefiting from modularity within and across firm boundaries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(5): 1011.

Tee, R., Davies, A., & Whyte, J. 2019. Modular designs and integrating practices: Managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation. Research Policy, 48(1): 1011–1028.

Thite, M., Wilkinson, A., & Shah, D. 2012. Internationalization and HRM strategies across subsidiaries in multinational corporations from emerging economies—A conceptual framework. Journal of World Business, 47(2): 251–258.CrossRef

Tiwana, A. 2008a. Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11): 1241–1252.CrossRef

Tiwana, A. 2008b. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7): 769–780.CrossRef

UNCTAD 2017. World investment report 2017: Investment and the digital economy. New York, Geneva:United Nations.

Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7): 637–653.CrossRef

Von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. 2002. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4): 569–588.CrossRef

Vora, D., & Kostova, T. 2007. A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(3): 327–350.CrossRef

Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., & Maksimov, V. 2014. Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45: 111–130.CrossRef

Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 579–594.CrossRef

Xie, Z., & Li, J. 2017. Selective imitation of compatriot firms: Entry mode decisions of emerging market multinationals in cross-border acquisitions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1): 47–68.CrossRef

Yan, Z. J., Zhu, J. C., Fan, D., & Kalfadellis, P. 2018. An institutional work view toward the internationalization of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 53(5): 682–694.CrossRef

Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 59–82.CrossRef

Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

Zhang, H., Young, M. N., Tan, J., & Sun, W. 2018. How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies. Journal of World Business, 53(5): 752–767.CrossRef

Zheng, N., Wei, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yang, J. 2016. In search of strategic assets through cross-border merger and acquisitions: Evidence from Chinese multinational enterprises in developed economies. International Business Review, 25(1): 177–186.CrossRef

Titel: Mirror or no mirror? Architectural design of cross-border integration of Chinese multinational enterprises
verfasst von: Jiang Wei
Yang Yang
Sali Li
Publikationsdatum: 17.12.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09699-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Is it possible to escape? Local protectionism and outward foreign direct investment by Chinese privately-owned enterprises

Corporate social performance aspiration and its effects

The triggering effect of office design on employee creative performance: an exploratory investigation based on Duffy’s conceptualization

The co-evolution of institutions and entrepreneurship

A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors

The dark sides of engaging in creative processes: Coworker envy, workplace ostracism, and incivility

Premium Partner